PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N P Cottaris

Publications and source records attributed to N P Cottaris.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Some transformations of color information from lateral geniculate nucleus to striate cortex.

We have recorded the responses of single cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and striate cortex of the macaque monkey. The response characteristics of neurons at these successive visual processing levels were examined with isoluminant gratings, cone-isolating gratings, and luminance-varying gratings. The main findings were: (i) Whereas almost all parvo- and konio-cellular LGN cells are of just two opponent-cell types, either differencing the L and M cones (L(o) and M(o) cells), or the S vs. L + M cones (S(o) cells), relatively few striate cortex simple cells show chromatic responses along these two cardinal LGN axes. Rather, most are shifted away from these LGN chromatic axes as a result of combining the outputs (or the transformed outputs) of S(o) with those of L(o) and/or M(o) cells. (ii) LGN cells on average process color information linearly, exhibiting sinusoidal changes in firing rate to isoluminant stimuli that vary sinusoidally in cone contrast as a function of color angle. Some striate cortex simple cells also give linear responses, but most show an expansive response nonlinearity, resulting in narrower chromatic tuning on average at this level. (iii) There are many more +S(o) than -S(o) LGN cells, but at the striate cortex level -S(o) input to simple cells is as common as +S(o) input. (iv) Overall, the contribution of the S-opponent path is doubled at the level of the striate cortex, relative to that at the LGN.

Animals↗

Spatial and temporal receptive fields of geniculate and cortical cells and directional selectivity.

The spatio-temporal receptive fields (RFs) of cells in the macaque monkey lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and striate cortex (V1) have been examined and two distinct sub-populations of non-directional V1 cells have been found: those with a slow largely monophasic temporal RF, and those with a fast very biphasic temporal response. These two sub-populations are in temporal quadrature, the fast biphasic cells crossing over from one response phase to the reverse just as the slow monophasic cells reach their peak response. The two sub-populations also differ in the spatial phases of their RFs. A principal components analysis of the spatio-temporal RFs of directional V1 cells shows that their RFs could be constructed by a linear combination of two components, one of which has the temporal and spatial characteristics of a fast biphasic cell, and the other the temporal and spatial characteristics of a slow monophasic cell. Magnocellular LGN cells are fast and biphasic and lead the fast-biphasic V1 subpopulation by 7 ms; parvocellular LGN cells are slow and largely monophasic and lead the slow monophasic V1 sub-population by 12 ms. We suggest that directional V1 cells get inputs in the approximate temporal and spatial quadrature required for motion detection by combining signals from the two non-directional cortical sub-populations which have been identified, and that these sub-populations have their origins in magno and parvo LGN cells, respectively.

Animals↗

Inputs to directionally selective simple cells in macaque striate cortex.

It is clear that the initial analysis of visual motion takes place in the striate cortex, where directionally selective cells are found that respond to local motion in one direction but not in the opposite direction. Widely accepted motion models postulate as inputs to directional units two or more cells whose spatio-temporal receptive fields (RFs) are approximately 90 degrees out of phase (quadrature) in space and in time. Simple cells in macaque striate cortex differ in their spatial phases, but evidence is lacking for the varying time delays required for two inputs to be in temporal quadrature. We examined the space-time RF structure of cells in macaque striate cortex and found two subpopulations of (nondirectional) simple cells, some that show strongly biphasic temporal responses, and others that are weakly biphasic if at all. The temporal impulse responses of these two classes of cells are very close to 90 degrees apart, with the strongly biphasic cells having a shorter latency than the weakly biphasic cells. A principal component analysis of the spatio-temporal RFs of directionally selective simple cells shows that their RFs could be produced by a linear combination of two components; these two components correspond closely in their respective latencies and biphasic characters to those of strongly biphasic and weakly biphasic nondirectional simple cells, respectively. This finding suggests that the motion system might acquire the requisite temporal quadrature by combining inputs from these two classes of nondirectional cells (or from their respective lateral geniculate inputs, which appear to be from magno and parvo lateral geniculate cells, respectively).

Animals↗

Temporal dynamics of chromatic tuning in macaque primary visual cortex.

The ability to distinguish colour from intensity variations is a difficult computational problem for the visual system because each of the three cone photoreceptor types absorb all wavelengths of light, although their peak sensitivities are at relatively short (S cones), medium (M cones), or long (L cones) wavelengths. The first stage in colour processing is the comparison of the outputs of different cone types by spectrally opponent neurons in the retina and upstream in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Some neurons receive opponent inputs from L and M cones, whereas others receive input from S cones opposed by combined signals from L and M cones. Here we report how the outputs of the L/M- and S-opponent geniculate cell types are combined in time at the next stage of colour processing, in the macaque primary visual cortex (V1). Some V1 neurons respond to a single chromatic region, with either a short (68-95 ms) or a longer (96-135 ms) latency, whereas others respond to two chromatic regions with a difference in latency of 20-30 ms. Across all types, short latency responses are mostly evoked by L/M-opponent inputs whereas longer latency responses are evoked mostly by S-opponent inputs. Furthermore, neurons with late S-cone inputs exhibit dynamic changes in the sharpness of their chromatic tuning over time. We propose that the sparse, S-opponent signal in the lateral geniculate nucleus is amplified in area V1, possibly through recurrent excitatory networks. This results in a delayed, sluggish cortical S-cone signal which is then integrated with L/M-opponent signals to rotate the lateral geniculate nucleus chromatic axes.

Action Potentials↗