PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N R Moudgal

Publications and source records attributed to N R Moudgal.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Studies on luteolysis: effect of antiserum to luteinizing hormone on sterols and steroid levels in pregnant hamsters.

The effect of luteinizing hormone antiserum (LH A/S) on sterol and steroid levels in luteal and non-luteal ovarian compartments, and on serum steroid levels of pregnant hamsters, was studied. Injection (ip) of 0.1 ml of LH A/S on day 7 caused termination of pregnancy and morphological regression of the corpus luteum (CL) within 18-20 h of treatment, whereas LH-free non-immune serum had no effect. Within 3 h of administration of LH A/S the luteal progesterone levels fell from a control value of 36.0 +/- 2.4 to 15.6 +/- 3.4 ng/mg, and estrogen from a control value of 20.8 +/- 3.4 to 12.2 +/- 1.5 pg/mg. By 12 h progesterone had dropped to 7.3 +/- 0.3 ng/mg whereas estrogen was undetectable by radioimmunoassay. Serum progesterone fell in 3 h from 5.53 +/- 0.39 to 3.15 +/- 0.26 ng/ml whereas estrogen fell from 172 +/- 26 to 123 +/- 9 pg/ml. The progesterone content of non-luteal ovarian tissue dropped in 3 h from 1.06 +/- 0.01 to 0.47 +/- 0.06 ng/mg and estrogen from 115.0 +/- 1.5 to 11.0 +/- 0.65 pg/mg. Both progesterone and estrogen were undetectable at 24 h. In the CL, free cholesterol concentration did not change significantly after A/S treatment, while esterified cholesterol increased from 2.82 +/- 0.14 to 4.14 +/- 0.25 mug/mg within 6 h and 5.52 +/- 0.17 mug/mg by 12 h. The results suggest that LH plays a critical role in the maintenance of CL of early pregnancy in the hamster and that deprivation of LH, even for periods as short as 3 h, significantly influences steroid production. The accumulation of cholesterol esters following LH-deprivation suggests that loss of cholesteryl esterase activity could be one of the events leading to luteolysis.

Animals↗

Induction and inhibition of implantation in lactating rats.

The interrelationship between prolactin and LH in the maintenance of pregnancy during lactation was studied. The reduction of suckled young from eight to two or less, as late as on the morning of Day 4 of pregnancy, resulted in normal implantation. Reintroduction of eight young on Day 4 to lactating pregnant rats deprived of their litters on Day 1 resulted in an inhibition of implantation, but reintroduction on Days 5 or 6 did not inhibit implantation. If oestrogen, HCG or PMSG was given on Day 4 of pregnancy, implantation was induced at the normal time in rats suckling large litters. When LH antiserum was given on the morning of Day 4 or Day 8 to pregnant rats suckling two young each, it blocked implantation and postimplantation survival of blasto-cysts, respectively. When the number of suckling young was increased from two to eight on Day 6, however, LH antiserum blocked pregnancy only to the extent of 70%. Prolactin administered during the preimplantation phase inhibited implantation in pregnant rats suckling a minimum number of young, but had no effect when given during the postimplantation phase. Progesterone failed to block implantation. Prolactin had no inhibitory effect on implantation in the absence of the suckling stimulus or in non-lactating pregnant rats. The inhibition of implantation by prolactin in rats suckling two young could be effectively reversed by the administration of oestrogen, PMSG or HCG on Day 4 of pregnancy.

Animals↗