PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N R Ploch

Publications and source records attributed to N R Ploch.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

How to use prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most effective analyte for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring prostatic carcinoma. METHODS: This article reviews what PSA is and how it can be used to detect clinically significant carcinomas as well as its application in managing patients after radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS: PSA screening results in increased detection of localized disease. In individual patients a serum PSA level is not a good indicator of pathologic stage; however, a serum PSA level of greater than 10 ng/mL is associated with a higher incidence of extracapsular disease. Asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed untreated prostate cancer and a serum PSA level less than 10 ng/mL do not need to undergo staging radionuclide bone scan. Elevated serum PSA is generally the first indicator of "persistent disease" after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. In androgen deprivation the PSA nadir is an important indicator of response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: PSA is the most accurate tumor marker in oncology. This analyte can be successfully used to diagnose, stage, and monitor prostatic carcinoma.

Adult↗

Prostate cancer tumor location as predicted by digital rectal examination transferred to ultrasound and ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy.

The advent of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and the Biopty instrument (Bard Urologic) has revolutionized prostate biopsy (PNB). Theoretically the systematic multiple biopsy approach offers the advantage of less sampling error with respect to presence of carcinoma, grade of carcinoma and sites of tumor within the gland. These parameters may be important in selecting the therapeutic approach and, if radical prostatectomy is contemplated, in modifying the operation as indicated based on tumor location. In the present investigation, we received specimens obtained from 100 men with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma who had previously undergone ultrasound-guided systematic random biopsy (TRUSPNB) along with TRUS and digital rectal exam (DRE). Among the 372 sectors with carcinoma identified in the 100 radical prostatectomy specimens, significant underrepresentation by TRUSPNB was noted (39% false negative). When an abnormality on either DRE, TRUS or TRUSPNB was observed, the sensitivity was 65%. The specificity was 89% when all three tests were abnormal. It would appear that preoperative assessment of tumor location is inadequate with the current modalities available. There may, however, be subsets of patients which would benefit by tumor location utilizing DRE, TRUS and TRUSPNB.

Biopsy, Needle↗