PubMed2001
Transverse mandibular distraction osteogenesis involves moving the osteotomized segments of the mandible in either a varus or valgus direction. This maneuver allows for widening of the bigonial distance or for a lateral shift of an asymmetric mandibular midline. During this process, a significant amount of torque is placed on the mandibular condyles, because they act as the pivot point for the mandibular translation. Although standard linear distraction osteogenesis induces transient, reversible changes in the temporomandibular joint, it is not known what effect the varus and valgus stresses of transverse distraction have on the temporomandibular joint. We therefore designed a study to document the temporomandibular joint changes following various degrees of transverse distraction. Bilateral transverse mandibular distraction was performed on 10 adult, female mongrel dogs using an external, multiplanar mandibular distraction device. The distraction protocol was as follows: (1) complete osteotomy at the angle of the mandible, (2) 5-day latency period, (3) distraction rate of 1 mm/day, (4) rhythm of one turn per day, (5) linear activation 16 to 30 mm bilaterally, and (6) 8-week consolidation period. A variety of varus and valgus distraction vectors were applied to the mandible only after 10 mm of initial linear distraction had been achieved. Posteroanterior and lateral cephalograms were performed throughout the entire process. Pre-distraction and post-consolidation computed tomographic scans were also performed. Changes in mandibular conformation, axis of rotation, temporomandibular joint structure, and glenoid fossa changes were directly assessed by evaluating the postmortem craniofacial skeleton. The findings were compared with those of normal, age-matched mongrel dog skulls. Significant remodeling changes were observed in the temporomandibular joints of all animals involved in the study. The mandibular condyles demonstrated varying degrees of flattening and erosion at all contact points with the craniofacial skeleton. In some cases, the condyle became part of the distraction regenerate process and was hypertrophied in all dimensions. The condyles were frequently displaced out of the glenoid fossa, particularly on the side in the direction of varus distraction. When the latter occurred, a new fossa was created on the undersurface of the zygomatic arch. Varying degrees of mandibular rotation in the sagittal plane were also observed, which led to abnormal torquing of the condyles in the coronal plane, depending on whether the axis of rotation occurred primarily around the condyle or around the distraction regenerate zone.In conclusion, transverse mandibular distraction is an effective means of producing a varus or valgus shift in the gonion relative to the midsagittal plane. However, unlike linear or angular mandibular distraction, transverse distraction has a multitude of nontransient effects on the temporomandibular joint. Therefore it must be emphasized that in clinical practice, transverse distraction should be used cautiously. One must also be aware that such a maneuver in distraction can have negative effects on the temporomandibular joint.