Biomedical subjects

N Suchowerska

Publications and source records attributed to N Suchowerska.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

High dose-rate brachytherapy source localization: positional resolution using a diamond detector.

A potential real-time source position verification process for high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment is described. This process is intended to provide immediate confirmation that a treatment is proceeding according to plan, so that corrective action can be taken if necessary. We show that three dosimeters are in principle sufficient and demonstrate the feasibility of the process using a diamond detector and an Ir-192 source. An error analysis including all identified sources of error shows that this detector is capable of locating the distance to the source to within 2 mm for distances up to 12 cm. This positional accuracy is less than the diameter of typical HDR catheters indicating that a diamond detector can be used to accurately determine the distance to the source. The uncertainty in the distance is found to increase with distance.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Directional dependence in film dosimetry: radiographic and radiochromic film.

The trend towards conformal, intensity modulated radiotherapy treatments has established the need for a true integrating dosimeter. In traditional radiotherapy, radiographic film dosimetry is commonly used. The accuracy and reproducibility of film optical density as an indicator of dose is influenced by several variables, including the chemical processing conditions. As a result radiochromic film, with all the advantages of radiographic film but without the need for chemical processing, has increased in popularity, although the low-dose sensitivity of radiochromic film does remain a disadvantage for some experiments. Several studies have investigated the reproducibility of radiochromic film results, but none have specifically addressed the well-known directional dependence seen with traditional radiographic film. In this study, the directional dependence of radiographic (Kodak X-omat V) and radiochromic (Gafchromic) films were measured. It was found that both films over responded when exposed parallel to the central axis of the beam as opposed to perpendicular exposure. An attempt is made to explain the reason for the responses of both films in terms of spectral effects and the air gap between the phantom segments. Although radiographic film exposed parallel rather than perpendicular to the central axis of the beam exhibits a measured difference in film response at depth, this over response does not occur when the extent of the film is restricted to a small region at the centre of the phantom (in this case an air gap is not introduced across the phantom). This suggests that it is the air gap rather than the orientation of the film that is the cause of the over response. Furthermore, when film occupies a slice through the entire phantom an over response occurs for both radiographic and radiochromic film, indicating that spectral effects are not the cause.

Film Dosimetry↗

PubMed1999

Perturbation of radiotherapy beams by radiographic film: measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.

Radiographic film is an established practical tool used in the measurement of the dose distribution for radiotherapy purposes. The accuracy and reproducibility of film optical density as an indicator of dose has been associated with several factors including photon energy, processing conditions and film plane orientation. Few studies have investigated the factors causing variability in film dosimetry, due to the difficulty of separating the individual contributions. The effect that a sheet of radiographic film in a water phantom has on its response to a 6 MV photon and a cobalt-60 teletherapy beam, when orientated perpendicular and parallel to the beam central axis, is reported. Monte Carlo generated spectra were used to calculate collision kerma (Kcoll) for water and film elements. Measured and calculated results indicate a potential over-response at 25 cm depth of the order of 14 +/- 2.4% and 18 +/- 6.0% respectively for 6 MV photons and 15 +/- 3.4% and 32 +/- 4.5% respectively for a cobalt beam. For film exposed parallel as compared to perpendicular to the central axis of the beam, the calculated results suggest an explanation in terms of the predominantly forward directed secondary electrons for the measured difference in film response at depth. It is proposed that the difference in response of the parallel as compared to perpendicular exposed film be due to the predominantly 'upstream' photon interactions giving rise to energy deposition in film. The simulations indicate that the variation with depth of relative energy imparted in film and water elements correlates with the observed variation in film response with depth.

Energy Transfer↗

PubMed1997

The validity of using radiographic film for radiotherapy dosimetry.

Radiographic film is routinely used to obtain dosimetric information about therapy treatment beams. One source of inaccuracy is the variability of the chemical processing of the radiographic film. Several processors, film types and two sources (light and x-rays) were used to investigate the reproducibility of film processing for valid film dosimetry. Particular attention is paid to films commonly used in radiation therapy. The results suggest that for this series of film, given the same exposure, the variability in processing may result in an error of +/- 3.3% in optical density, which would lead to an error of +/- 4.4% in indicated dose. This level of inaccuracy is typical for both point and relative dose estimates. These results indicate that film should not be used as a point or relative dosimeter, unless the combination of film type, exposure, processing and reading have been specifically validated.

Equipment Design↗