PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Suga

Publications and source records attributed to N Suga.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Philosophy and stimulus design for neuroethology of complex-sound processing.

In research on the neural mechanisms for the processing of biologically important sounds such as species-specific sounds and sounds produced by prey and predators, it is necessary to study responses of central auditory neurons to biologically important sounds, information-bearing elements (IBEs) in them, and tone bursts. The tone bursts or constant-frequency (CF) components can be an IBE in many species of animals. Information-bearing parameters characterizing these sounds must be systematically varied, and tuning of neurons to individual parameters must be studied. The measurement of a tuning curve must be performed not only for excitatory responses, but also for inhibitory and facilitative responses, if any. The selectivity of a neuron to a particular type of sound must be tested for whether it is level-tolerant. Responses to complex sounds can probably be explained on the basis of those to IBEs and tone bursts, so that the use of the tone bursts, even though they are not IBEs, is as essential as that of the biologically important sounds.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Inactivation of the DSCF area of the auditory cortex with muscimol disrupts frequency discrimination in the mustached bat.

1. The Jamaican mustached bat uses a biosonar signal (pulse) with eight major components: four harmonics each consisting of a long constant frequency (CF1-4) component followed by a short frequency-modulated (FM1-4) component. While flying, the bat adjusts the frequency of its pulse so as to maintain the CF2 of the Doppler-shifted echo at a frequency to which its cochlea is very sharply tuned. This Doppler shift (DS) compensation likely is mediated or influenced by the Doppler-shifted CF (DSCF) processing area of the primary auditory cortex, which only represents frequencies in the range of echo CF2s (60.6 to 62.3 kHz when the "resting" frequency of the CF2 is 61.0 kHz). 2. We trained four bats to discriminate between different trains of paired tone bursts that mimicked a bat's pulse CF2 and the accompanying echo CF2. The frequency of these CF2s ranged between 61.0 and 64.0 kHz. A discriminated shock avoidance procedure response was employed using a leg flexion. For one stimulus, the S+, the pulse and echo CF2s were the same frequency (delta f = 0, i.e., no Doppler shift). A leg flexion during the S+ turned off both the S+ and the scheduled shock. For a second stimulus, the S-, the echo CF2 was 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 2.0 kHz higher than the pulse CF2. A delta f of 0.05 kHz was a frequency difference of 0.08%. No shock followed the S-, and leg flexions had no consequences. Correct responses consisted of a leg flexion during the S+ and no flexion during the S-; these responses were added together to compute the percentage of correct responses. When a bat correctly responded at better than 75% for all the delta f s, muscimol, a potent agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, was bilaterally applied to inactivate the DSCF area. Performance on each delta f discrimination was then measured. 3. Initial attempts to condition the bats to flex their legs to the CF tones mimicking part of the natural pulses and echoes failed. When broad-band noise bursts were substituted, however, the conditioned response was rapidly established. The noise band-width was gradually reduced and then replaced with the CF tones. Discrimination training with the tone burst trains then commenced. Throughout this procedure, the bats maintained their responding to the stimuli. The bats typically required approximately 20-30 sessions to perform consistently (> or = 75% correct responses) a discrimination involving a 2 kHz delta f.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

Cortical computational maps control auditory perception.

Mustached bats orient and find insects by emitting ultrasonic pulses and analyzing the returning echoes. Neurons in the Doppler-shifted constant-frequency (DSCF) and frequency-modulated (FM-FM) areas of the auditory cortex form maps of echo frequency (target velocity) and echo delay (target range), respectively. Bats were trained to discriminate changes in echo frequency or delay, and then these areas were selectively inactivated with muscimol. Inactivation of the DSCF area disrupted frequency but not delay discriminations; inactivation of the FM-FM area disrupted delay but not frequency discriminations. Thus, focal inactivation of specific cortical maps produces specific disruptions in the perception of biosonar signals.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat: encoding of relative velocity information.

1. Orientation sounds (pulses) emitted by the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) consist of up to four harmonics (H1-4); each harmonic contains a constant frequency (CF) component and a terminal frequency modulated (FM) component, so that there are eight components in total (CF1-4 and FM1-4). By referring the echo from a target to the emitted pulse, the mustached bat derives velocity information from Doppler shift and distance information from echo delay. In this study, the responses of single neurons in the medial geniculate body (MGB) to synthetic biosonar signals were investigated. Stimuli consisted of CF, FM, and CF-FM sounds. Paired CF-FM sounds were used to mimic any two harmonics of pulse-echo pairs. The dorsal and medial divisions of the MGB were found to contain combination-sensitive neurons. These neurons responded poorly to individual sounds regardless of frequency and amplitude and were facilitated by paired sounds presented at particular frequencies, amplitudes and inter-component intervals (simulated echo delay). Combination-sensitive neurons were tuned to the frequencies that characterize particular components of natural biosonar signals and were classified according to the components of pulse-echo pairs that best matched the spectral selectivity of the neuron. Two classes of combination-sensitive neurons were found, CF/CF and FM-FM. This paper focuses on CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons, which extract velocity information from paired CF components, and on CF2 and CF3 neurons, which, although not combination-sensitive, are tuned to the frequencies of the CF2 and CF3 components of biosonar signals. 2. CF2 and CF3 neurons were sharply tuned in frequency. The best frequencies of the most sharply tuned CF2 neurons were all approximately equal to 61.17 kHz (SD = 370 Hz), which closely matches the frequency at which P. parnellii stabilizes the CF2 component of an echo when compensating for Doppler shift. Thus CF2 neurons are specialized for a fine analysis of Doppler-compensated echoes. 3. Tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons remained narrow regardless of stimulus level. When compared at high stimulus levels (30 and 50 dB above minimum threshold), bandwidths of tuning curves of CF2 and CF3 neurons were much smaller than those of peripheral auditory neurons turned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies but were about the same as those of cortical neurons tuned to CF2 or CF3 frequencies. Thus the sharpening of neural tuning curves by the bat's central auditory system occurs within or before the MGB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

Combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat: encoding of target range information.

1. Delay-tuned combination-sensitive neurons (FM-FM neurons) have been discovered in the dorsal and medial divisions of the medial geniculate body (MGB) of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii). In this paper we present evidence for a thalamic origin for FM-FM neurons. Our examination of the response properties of FM-FM neurons indicates that the neural mechanism of delay-tuning depends on coincidence detection and involves an interaction between neural inhibition and excitation. 2. The biosonar pulse (P) and its echo (E) produced and heard by the mustached bat consist of four harmonics; each harmonic contains a constant frequency (CF) component and a frequency modulated (FM) component. Thus the pulse-echo pair contains eight CF components (PCF1-4, ECF1-4) and eight FM components (PFM1-4, EFM1-4). The stimuli used in this study consisted of CF, FM, and CF-FM sounds: paired CF-FM sounds were used to simulate any two harmonics of pulse-echo pairs. The responses of FM-FM neurons in the MGB were recorded extracellularly. We found that FM-FM neurons respond poorly or not at all to single sounds, respond strongly to paired sounds, and are tuned to the frequency and amplitude of each sound of the pair and to the time interval separating them (simulated echo delay). 3. All FM-FM neurons are facilitated by paired FM sounds and most are facilitated by paired CF sounds. Best facilitative frequencies measured with paired CF sounds fall outside the frequency ranges of the CF components of biosonar signals, whereas best facilitative frequencies measured with paired FM sounds fall within the frequency ranges of the FM components of biosonar signals. Thus FM-FM neurons are expected to respond selectively to combinations of FM components in biosonar signals. The FM components of pulse-echo pairs essential to facilitate FM-FM neurons are the FM component of the fundamental of the pulse (PFM1) in combination with the FM component of the second, third, or fourth harmonic of an echo (EFM2, EFM3, EFM4; collectively, EFMn). 4. The frequency combinations to which FM-FM neurons are tuned reflect small deviations from the harmonic relationship such as occurs in combinations of FM components from pulses and Doppler-shifted echoes. Compared with CF/CF neurons, however, FM-FM neurons are broadly tuned to stimulus frequency. Thus FM-FM neurons are Doppler-shift tolerant and relatively unspecialized for processing velocity information in the frequency domain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

Are the initial frequency-modulated components of the mustached bat's biosonar pulses important for ranging?

1. FM-FM neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, are specialized to process target range. They respond when the terminal frequency-modulated component (TFM) of a biosonar pulse is paired with the TFM of the echo at a particular echo delay. Recently, it has been suggested that the initial FM components (IFMs) of biosonar signals may also be important for target ranging. To examine the possible role of IFMs in target ranging, we characterized the properties of IFMs and TFMs in biosonar pulses emitted by bats swung on a pendulum. We then studied responses of FM-FM neurons to synthesized biosonar signals containing IFMs and TFMs. 2. The mustached bat's biosonar signal consists of four harmonics, of which the second (H2) is the most intense. Each harmonic has an IFM in addition to a constant-frequency component (CF) and a TFM. Therefore each pulse potentially consists of 12 components, IFM1-4, CF1-4, and TFM1-4. The IFM sweeps up while the TFM sweeps down. 3. The IFM2 and TFM2 depths (i.e., bandwidths) were measured in 217 pulses from four animals. The mean IFM2 depth was much smaller than the mean TFM2 depth, 2.87 +/- 1.52 (SD) kHz compared with 16.27 +/- 1.08 kHz, respectively. The amplitude of the IFM2 continuously increased throughout its duration and was always less than the CF2 amplitude, whereas the TFM2 was relatively constant in amplitude over approximately three-quarters of its duration and was often the most intense part of the pulse. The maximum amplitude of the IFM2 was, on average, 11 dB smaller than that of the TFM2. Because range resolution increases with depth and the maximum detectable range increases with signal amplitude, the IFMs are poorly suited for ranging compared with the TFMs. 4. FM-FM neurons (n = 77) did not respond or responded very poorly to IFMs with depths and intensities similar to those emitted on the pendulum. The mean IFM2 depth at which a just-noticeable response appeared was 4.48 +/- 1.98 kHz. Only 14% of the pulses emitted on the pendulum had IFM2 depths that exceeded the mean IFM2 depth threshold of FM-FM neurons. 5. Most FM-FM neurons responded to IFMs that had depths comparable with those of TFMs. However, when all parameters were adjusted to optimize the response to TFMs and then readjusted to maximize the response to IFMs, 52% of 27 neurons tested responded significantly better to the optimal TFMs than to the optimal IFMs (P less than 0.05, t test).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1990

Delay-tuned neurons in auditory cortex of mustached bat are not suited for processing directional information.

1. The mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, emits bisonar pulses each consisting of eight components: CF1-4 and FM1-4. In the auditory cortex of the bat there are arrays of FM-FM neurons that are tuned to particular delays of echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) from pulse FM1. They are specialized for the processing of target-range information. The FM signal is suited for ranging and also for target localization. Therefore we studied the directional sensitivity of FM-FM neurons with pulse FM1 and echo FMn. One of the FM1-FMn pair was moved around the bat's head while the other was fixed in front of the bat. 2. FM-FM neurons are sharply tuned in echo delay and are broadly tuned in echo amplitude. That is, they are tuned to a target that has a particular cross-sectional area and that is located at a particular distance from the bat. Their best amplitudes for echoes range between 8 and 73 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The best amplitude is approximately 30 dB higher than minimum threshold in the majority of neurons. 3. The higher the best amplitude is relative to minimum threshold, the larger the receptive field is at the best amplitude. The receptive field of FM-FM neurons at 30 dB above minimum threshold is always so large that it covers the entire contralateral auditory field or the entire contralateral field and the medial half of the ipsilateral auditory field. The large size of the receptive field and the uniform distribution of response magnitudes within the receptive field indicate that FM-FM neurons are not suited for sound localization. Directional information is probably processed in parallel by a separate population of neurons other than FM-FM neurons. 4. The receptive field of FM-FM neurons at 10 dB above minimum threshold is much smaller than that at 30 dB above minimum threshold, but it is still large. The mean azimuthal and elevational widths for echo FMn are greater than 70 degrees in all directions. There is no sign that FM-FM neurons are more directional than peripheral neurons. Furthermore, there is neither an azimuthal nor an elevational axis within the FM-FM area. 5. Mean best azimuths of FM-FM neurons are different for each echo FM harmonic: lateral 35 degrees for FM2 and lateral 19 degrees for FM3 and FM4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1990

Biosonar behavior of mustached bats swung on a pendulum prior to cortical ablation.

1. The biosonar signal (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, has four harmonics (H1-4), each consisting of a long constant-frequency component (CF1-4) followed by a short frequency-modulated component (FM1-4). As the bat approaches a target, it systematically modifies its pulses to optimize the extraction of information from the echoes. These behavioral responses include 1) Doppler-shift (DS) compensation in which the bat adjusts the frequency of its pulses to correct for the DS in the echoes. This maintains the echo CF2 at a frequency to which the bat's cochlea is very sharply tuned, slightly above the CF2 frequency of the bat's pulses when it is at rest (Frest, approximately 61 kHz); 2) echo intensity compensation, in which the bat lowers its pulse intensity as it approaches a large target, thus maintaining the echo intensity within a suitable range for auditory processing; and 3) and 4) duration and rate adjustments, in which the bat first increases its pulse duration to facilitate target identification, then shortens its pulse duration while increasing its pulse rate to facilitate target analysis. 2. We examined these responses, especially DS compensation, by swinging bats on a pendulum toward a large target over a distance of 3.6 m. Eight bats were given 15-30 swings per day for 6-25 days. 1) On 97% of all swings the bats showed strong DS compensation as the pendulum approached the target. They did not show DS compensation on the backswing. 2) On 40-50% of all swings, the bats clearly displayed the other responses. The bats typically increased their pulse intensity a small amount early in the pendulum swing, then decreased pulse intensity by as much as 18 dB as the target was more closely approached. They increased their pulse intensity during the backswing. 3) Pulse duration increased from approximately 20 to 23 ms early in the forward swing, decreased to approximately 18 ms as the target was more closely approached, and then increased to 20 ms by the end of the backswing. 4) The instantaneous repetition rate increased from approximately 17 pulses/s at the start of the forward swing to approximately 28 pulses/s near the target, then decreased to approximately 10 pulses/s by the end of the backswing. Pulses usually occurred in trains of 1-2 pulses, with longer trains occasionally occurring near the target. 3. The maximum DS on the pendulum was 1.34 kHz, and the maximum DS compensation was 146 +/- 98 (SD) Hz less than this value.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Neural mechanisms of ranging are different in two species of bats.

The primary cue for ranging by echolocation is the delay between an emitted pulse and its echo. The abilities of several species of bats to discriminate target ranges have been accounted for by a theory which assumes that bats perform cross-correlation analysis of the FM components of pulse and echo. In this study, the neural mechanisms performing the cross-correlation are shown to differ in two species. The mustached bat emits CF-FM pulses with four harmonics (CF1-4 and FM1-4) while the little brown bat emits FM pulses with only one harmonic (FM1). In the auditory cortex of both species, there is a cluster or clusters of delay-tuned neurons. Delay-tuned neurons in the mustached bat utilize delay lines created by neurons which respond to the FM1 component of the pulse and extract range information from the combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4). In contrast, delay-tuned neurons in the little brown bat utilize delay lines evoked by the pulse FM1, which is stronger than the echo FM1, and extract range information from the combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FM1. Inhibition is involved in creating the delay lines in both species.

Acoustics↗
PubMed1989

Distribution of combination-sensitive neurons in the ventral fringe area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

1. The orientation sound (pulse) of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, consists of long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) and short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The auditory cortex of this bat contains several combination-sensitive areas: FM-FM, DF, VA, VF, and CF/CF. The FM-FM area consists of neurons tuned to a combination of the pulse FM1 and the echo FMn (n = 2, 3, or 4) and has an echo-delay (target-range) axis. Our preliminary anatomical studies with tritiated amino acids suggest that the FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) area, which in turn projects to the ventral fringe (VF) area. The aim of our study was to characterize the response properties of VF neurons and to explore the functional organization of the VF area. Acoustic stimuli delivered to the bats were CF tones, FM sounds, and their combinations mimicking the pulse emitted by the mustached bat and the echo. 2. Like the FM-FM and DF areas, the VF area is composed of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. These neurons show little or no response to a pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tone or single FM sound. They do, however, show a strong facilitative response to a pulse-echo pair with a particular echo delay. The essential components in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and the FMn of the echo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1989

Principles of auditory information-processing derived from neuroethology.

For auditory imaging, a bat emits orientation sounds (pulses) and listens to echoes. The parameters characterizing a pulse-echo pair each convey particular types of biosonar information. For example, a Doppler shift (a difference in frequency between an emitted pulse and its echo) carries velocity information. For a 61-kHz sound, a 1.0-kHz Doppler shift corresponds to 2.8 ms-1 velocity. The delay of the echo from the pulse conveys distance (range) information. A 1.0-ms echo delay corresponds to a target distance of 17 cm. The auditory system of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnelli, from Central America solves the computational problems in analyzing these parameters by creating maps in the cerebral cortex. The pulse of the mustached bat is complex. It consists of four harmonics, each of which contains a long constant-frequency (CF) component and a short frequency-modulated (FM) component. Therefore, there are eight components in the emitted pulse (CF1-4 and FM1-4). The CF signal is particularly suited for target velocity measurement, whereas the FM signal is suited for target distance measurement. Since the eight components differ from each other in frequency, they are analyzed in parallel at different regions of the basilar membrane in the inner ear. Then, they are separately coded by primary auditory neurons and are sent up to the auditory cortex through several auditory nuclei. During the ascent of the signals through these auditory nuclei, neurons responding to the FM components process range information, while other neurons responding to the CF components process velocity information. A comparison of the data obtained from the mustached bat with those obtained from other species illustrates both the specialized neural mechanisms specific to the bat's auditory system, and the general neural mechanisms which are probably shared with many different types of animals.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1988

Delay-tuned combination-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the vocalizing mustached bat.

1. FM-FM neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat are sensitive to a pair of frequency-modulated (FM) sounds that simulates an FM component of the orientation sound and an FM component of the echo. These neurons are tuned to particular delays between the two FM components, suggesting an encoding of target range information. The response properties of these FM-FM neurons, however, have previously been studied only with synthesized orientation sounds and echoes delivered from a loud-speaker as substitutes for the bat's own orientation sounds and corresponding echoes. In this study, the combination sensitivity and delay tuning of FM-FM neurons were examined while the bat was actively vocalizing. 2. When the bat produced orientation sounds in an anechoic environment, or synthesized single FM echoes were delivered to a silent bat, the FM-FM neurons showed weak or no response. In contrast, when synthesized FM echoes were delivered with a particular delay from the FM component of the vocalized orientation sounds, the FM-FM neurons exhibited strong facilitative responses. 3. In both the vocalizing bats and the silent bats with substituted synthesized orientation sounds, all FM-FM neurons tested responded preferentially to the same echo harmonic (FM2, FM3, or FM4). 4. In vocalizing bats, FM-FM neurons showed maximum response to an echo FM component delivered with a particular delay (best delay) from an FM component in the orientation sound. Best delays measured with vocalized orientation sounds were nearly the same as those measured with synthesized orientation sounds. 5. The equivalent effect of a vocalized orientation sound and a synthesized FM1 component on the activity of FM-FM neurons indicates that, during echolocation, the FM1 component in the vocalized orientation sound stimulates the auditory system and conditions the FM-FM neurons to be sensitive to echoes with particular delays from the vocalized orientation sounds. 6. The amount of vocal self-stimulation to the inner ear by the bat's own vocalized sounds was measured by recording cochlear microphonic potentials (CMs). Spectral analysis of CM indicated that the amount of vocal self-stimulation by each harmonic of an orientation sound was equivalent to a sound of 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for the first harmonic (H1), 91 dB SPL for H2, 83 dB SPL for H3, and 70 dB SPL for H4, when the amplitude of the vocalized sound was 117 dB SPL at 5 cm in front of the bat's mouth.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Combination-sensitive neurons in the ventroanterior area of the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

1. Because the ventroanterior (VA) area is one of the target areas of the FM-FM area in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii, response properties of combination-sensitive neurons in this area were studied with constant-frequency (CF) tones, frequency-modulated (FM) sounds, and sounds similar to the bat's biosonar signal (pulse), which consisted of long CF components (CF1-4) and short FM components (FM1-4). CF1-4 and FM1-4 are the components in the four harmonics (H1-4) of the pulse. 2. Combination-sensitive neurons are clustered in a small area immediately anteroventral to the Doppler-shifted CF processing (DSCF) area and posteroventral to the anterior division of the primary auditory cortex. Because this cluster in the VA area is small, it was difficult to record a sufficient number of combination-sensitive neurons to explore the functional organization of the cluster, but it was found that the response properties of these VA neurons were unique. 3. Combination-sensitive neurons in the VA area are tuned to particular combinations of signal elements similar to the first and second harmonics of the pulse and/or echo. Unlike neurons in the FM-FM, dorsal fringe (DF), and CF/CF areas, no neurons in the VA area are tuned to the signal elements in the first and third or fourth harmonics. 4. The great majority of combination-sensitive neurons in the VA area can not be easily classified into either FM-FM or CF/CF neurons, because they show facilitative responses to combinations of CF1/CF2, FM1-FM2, and FM1-CF2. Therefore, they are called H1-H2 neurons. In the FM-FM and CF/CF areas, all the neurons could be easily classified as FM-FM or CF/CF. This uniqueness of H1-H2 neurons is related to the fact that their best frequencies for facilitation are predominantly between 61.0 and 62.0 kHz, i.e., within the frequency range of stabilized Doppler-shifted echo CF2. 5. In addition to 27 H1-H2 neurons, 7 FM1-FM2 neurons were also recorded in the VA area. The best delays of these H1-H2 and FM1-FM2 neurons measured with FM1-FM2 pairs are between 1 and 10 ms. Unlike neurons in the FM-FM and DF areas, their delay-tuning curves are very broad, even if their best delays are short, and extend beyond zero delay to several millisecond "negative" delays of the FM2 from the FM1, i.e., several millisecond delays of the FM1 from the FM2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1987

The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation.

1. In the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, the "resting" frequency of the constant-frequency component of the second harmonic (CF2) of the orientation sound (biosonar signal) is different among individuals within a range from 59.69 to 63.33 kHz. The standard deviation of CF2 resting frequency is 0.091 kHz on the average for individual bats. The male's CF2 resting frequency (61.250 +/- 0.534 kHz, n = 58) is 1.040 kHz lower than the female's (62.290 +/- 0.539 kHz, n = 58) on the average. Females' resting frequencies measured in December are not different from those measured in April when almost all of them are pregnant. Therefore, the orientation sound is sexually dimorphic. 2. In the DSCF (Doppler-shifted CF processing) area of the auditory cortex, tonotopic representation differs among individual bats. The higher the CF2 resting frequency of the bat's own sound, the higher the frequencies represented in the DSCF area of that bat. There is a unique match between the tonotopic representation and the CF2 resting frequency. This match indicates that the auditory cortex is "personalized" for echolocation and that the CF2 resting frequency is like a signature of the orientation sound. 3. If a bat's resting frequency is normalized to 61.00 kHz, the DSCF area overrepresents 60.6-62.3 kHz. The central region of this overrepresented band is 61.1-61.2 kHz. This focal band matches the "reference" frequency to which the CF2 frequency of a Doppler-shifted echo is stabilized by Doppler-shift compensation. 4. Since DSCF neurons are extraordinarily sharply tuned in frequency, the personalization of the auditory cortex or system is not only suited for the detection of wing beats of insects, but also for the reduction of the masking effect on echolocation of consepecific's biosonar signals. 5. Because the orientation sound is sexually dimorphic and the auditory cortex is personalized, the tonotopic representation of the auditory cortex is also sexually dimorphic.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1986

Response properties of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

For echolocation, the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii rubiginosus, emits orientation sounds (pulses) and listens to echoes. Each pulse is made up of 8 components, of which 4 are constant frequencies (Cf 1.4) and 4 are frequency-modulated (FM 1-4). Target-range information, conveyed by the time delay of the echo FM from the pulse FM, is processed in this species by specialized neurons in a part of the auditory cortex known as the FM-FM area. These cortical neurons are responsive to pulse-echo pairs at specific echo delays. The essential components in the sound pair include the pulse FM1 followed by an echo FMn (n = 2, 3 or 4). Downward sweeping FM1-FMn sounds that are similar to those the animal naturally hears during echolocation are the most effective in evoking facilitative responses. Most FM-FM neurons, however, still exhibit facilitative responses to stimulus pairs consisting of upward sweeping FM sounds and/or pure tones at frequencies found in FM sweeps. The magnitude of facilitation is altered by changes in echo rather than pulse amplitude. Neurons characterized by shorter best delays (or echoes from closer targets) do not require larger best echo amplitudes for facilitation.

Animals↗