Biomedical subjects

N Suppipat

Publications and source records attributed to N Suppipat.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1978

Gingival fluid flow after gingivectomy related to mechanical or chemical plaque control.

The effects of mechanical tooth cleaning and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on healing after gingivectomy were compared in 8 patients by means of a "split mouth" technique. The experiment began after periodontal pack removal on day 7. Gingival fluid was sampled immediately before and on days 14, 21, 28, 35 after gingivectomy. The results showed that mechanical and chemical plaque control were equally effective in promoting healing after gingivectomy as evaluated by gingival fluid measurements.

Adult↗

PubMed1977

Influence of "time of day", pocket depth and scaling on gingival fluid flow.

Gingival fluid was sampled from the orifices of the gingival crevices in five male subjects with clinically healthy gingiva. The sampling was performed at 0915 h, 1215 h and 1515 h of the same day. Variation in "time of day" did not seem to influence the rate of gingival fluid flow. A total of 144 pockets (2-11 mm) in 19 patients were sampled for gingival fluid at the orifices. The adjacent gingiva was evaluated accordingly to the Gingival Index (GI). Gingival fluid flow was much more influenced by the degree of gingival inflammation than by pocket depth. Scaling with curettes was performed in five patients. Gingival fluid was sampled at the orifices immediately before scaling and on days 1, 14 and 28 after scaling. The flow rate decreased to a minimum on day 14 after scaling for all pocket depths and remained at almost the same level until day 28. Pockets less than 5 mm deep were more frequently without measurable amounts of fluid than pockets deeper than 5 mm on days 14 and 28.

Adult↗

PubMed1977

Evaluation of an electronic device for gingival fluid quantitation.

A number of factors which might affect the readings of the HAR-600 GCFM were studied: 1. The readings were higher when the filter paper strips were placed between the fron halves of the upper and lower counterparts than when they were placed between the rear halves. No differences in readings were observed when the strips were placed in the middle, the left, or the right areas of the counterparts. 2. The higher the fluid viscosity the lower the reading. Salt water (0.9% NaCl) gave a lower reading than deionized water. 3. Increased room temperature or relative humidity led to higher readings, especially when the fluid volume exceeded 0.2 microliter. 4. More reading time was required for high viscosity fluid, low temperature, and high relative humidity. The HAR-600 GCFM readings and the lengths of ninhydrin-stained areas were compared. Both methods were able to reflect the amounts of serum absorbed.

Animals↗

PubMed1974