Interobserver reliability in evaluating postural stability between clinicians and posturography.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability in assessing postural stability and to compare with results obtained by computerized posturography. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Balance clinic, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 81 patients attending with a primary complaint of imbalance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater reliability between two clinicians and the modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) as assessed by the Neurocom VSR Balance Master platform. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability scores were high (0.53-0.81) for all conditions of the mCTSIB except for the easiest, i.e. firm surface eyes open, where concordance levels were poor to fair. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was good agreement between observers and the computerized mCTSIB.