Biomedical subjects

N Trapaidze

Publications and source records attributed to N Trapaidze.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Oligomerization of opioid receptors with beta 2-adrenergic receptors: a role in trafficking and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have recently joined the list of cell surface receptors that dimerize. Dimerization has been shown to alter the ligand-binding, signaling, and trafficking properties of these receptors. Recent studies have shown that GPCRs heterodimerize with closely related members, resulting in the modulation of their function. In this study, we have attempted to determine whether members of GPCR superfamilies that couple to different families of G-proteins can associate and form oligomers. We chose the beta2 adrenergic receptor that couples to stimulatory G-proteins and delta & kappa opioid receptors that couple to inhibitory G-proteins. beta2 and delta receptors undergo robust agonist-mediated endocytosis, whereas kappa receptors do not. We find that when coexpressed, beta2 receptors can form heteromeric complexes with both delta and kappa receptors. This heterooligomerization does not significantly alter the ligand binding or coupling properties of the receptors. However, it affects the trafficking properties of the receptors. For example, we find that delta receptors, when coexpressed with beta2 receptors, undergo isoproterenol-mediated endocytosis. Conversely, beta2 receptors in these cells undergo etorphine-mediated endocytosis. However, beta2 receptors, when coexpressed with kappa receptors, undergo neither opioid- nor isoproterenol-mediated endocytosis. Moreover, these cells exhibit a substantial decrease in the isoproterenol-induced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Taken together, these results provide direct evidence of heteromerization of GPCRs that couple to different types of G-proteins, which results in the modulation of receptor trafficking and signal transduction.

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2001

G protein coupled receptor dimerization: implications in modulating receptor function.

Protein-protein interactions are involved in the regulation of a large number of biological processes. It is well established that a variety of cell surface receptors interact with each other to form dimers, and that this is essential for their activation. Although the existence of G protein coupled receptor dimers was predicted from early pharmacological and biochemical analysis, solid evidence supporting dimerization has come within the past few years following the cloning of G protein coupled receptor cDNAs. Using differential epitope tagging and selective immunoisolation of receptor complexes, dimerization of a number of G protein coupled receptors including members of the rhodopsin, secretin, and metabotropic glutamate receptor families have been reported. More recently fluorescence or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques have been used to examine dimerization of these receptors in live cells. These studies have found that whereas in some cases there is an agonist induced increase in the level of dimers, in others there is a decrease or no change in dimer levels. Several recent studies have also reported the ability of related members of G protein coupled receptors to heterodimerize. These heterodimers exhibit distinct physical and functional properties. Examination of possible sites of interactions between receptors has implicated a role for extracellular, transmembrane and/or C-terminal region in dimerization. The functional consequences of dimerization, explored mainly using mutant receptors, have demonstrated a role in modulating agonist affinity, efficacy, and/or trafficking properties. Thus dimerization appears to be a universal phenomenon that provides an additional mechanism for modulation of receptor function as well as cross-talk between G protein coupled receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Heterodimerization of mu and delta opioid receptors: A role in opiate synergy.

Opiate analgesics are widely used in the treatment of severe pain. Because of their importance in therapy, different strategies have been considered for making opiates more effective while curbing their liability to be abused. Although most opiates exert their analgesic effects primarily via mu opioid receptors, a number of studies have shown that delta receptor-selective drugs can enhance their potency. The molecular basis for these findings has not been elucidated previously. In the present study, we examined whether heterodimerization of mu and delta receptors could account for the cross-modulation previously observed between these two receptors. We find that co-expression of mu and delta receptors in heterologous cells followed by selective immunoprecipitation results in the isolation of mu-delta heterodimers. Treatment of these cells with extremely low doses of certain delta-selective ligands results in a significant increase in the binding of a mu receptor agonist. Similarly, treatment with mu-selective ligands results in a significant increase in the binding of a delta receptor agonist. This robust increase is also seen in SKNSH cells that endogenously express both mu and delta receptors. Furthermore, we find that a delta receptor antagonist enhances both the potency and efficacy of the mu receptor signaling; likewise a mu antagonist enhances the potency and efficacy of the delta receptor signaling. A combination of agonists (mu and delta receptor selective) also synergistically binds and potentiates signaling by activating the mu-delta heterodimer. Taken together, these studies show that heterodimers exhibit distinct ligand binding and signaling characteristics. These findings have important clinical ramifications and may provide new foundations for more effective therapies.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2000

Opioid receptor endocytosis and activation of MAP kinase pathway.

Opioid receptors, members of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) super family, bind to endogenous opioid peptides or opiate drugs and induce a wide variety of signal transduction processes by inhibiting adenylyl cyclase, modulating cation channels, and activating the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Similar to other GPCRs, agonist binding causes rapid internalization and down-regulation of opioid receptors. The interdependence between receptor endocytosis and activation of MAP kinase pathway are increasingly being examined. We have examined these using ligands that exhibit differential extent of endocytosis as well as mutants of mu and delta opioid receptors that are unable to internalize. We find that ligands, including morphine, that do not induce receptor internalization are able to stimulate MAP kinase phosphorylation not only in heterologous cells but also in neuronal cell lines that express endogenous mu and delta receptors. Moreover, mutant receptors that fail to undergo agonist-mediated internalization are able to efficiently phosphorylate MAP kinases. Taken together, these data are consistent with the notion that the activation of MAP kinase pathway is an internalization independent phenomenon in the case of opioid receptors and that GPCR internalization and activation of MAP kinase are governed by complex regulatory mechanisms.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

Recycling and resensitization of delta opioid receptors.

Exposure to opioids results in the activation of opioid receptors; this is followed by receptor endocytosis. Previously, we showed that delta opioid receptors undergo rapid agonist-mediated internalization and that mutations in the C-tail result in a substantial loss of agonist-mediated internalization. In this study, we investigated the fate of receptors following rapid internalization. We found that the majority of the wild type receptors recycled back to the surface after acute agonist treatment. The kinetics of internalization and recycling of the receptor were virtually identical to the kinetics of internalization and recycling of the radiolabeled agonist. In contrast, the kinetics of internalization and recycling of a C-tail mutant receptor were substantially altered, suggesting an involvement of the C-tail in the recycling process. It is possible that in addition to agonist-mediated internalization, opioid receptors undergo constitutive, agonist-independent internalization. We directly examined this possibility using an antibody-prebinding assay. The wild type delta opioid receptors exhibited agonist-independent internalization via the clathrin-coated pit pathway. We also examined the role of receptor internalization and recycling in the modulation of its function by quantitating the level of opioid-stimulated phosphorylation of MAP kinase (MAPK) under conditions of receptor internalization and recycling. We found that agonist treatment caused a rapid increase in the level of phosphorylated MAPK that was rapidly desensitized. The removal of the agonist, which results in receptor recycling, led to the resensitization of the receptor, as evidenced by the agonist's ability to reinduce MAPK phosphorylation. Mutant receptors that underwent rapid recycling exhibited enhanced resensitization, suggesting a role for receptor recycling in the resensitization process. Taken together, these results indicate that agonist-mediated internalization and recycling modulate opioid receptor function and that the receptor C-tail plays an important role in both processes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

Role for C-tail residues in delta opioid receptor downregulation.

The delta opioid receptor, a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily, was used as a model system to characterize opioid receptor downregulation. Metabolic labeling followed by immunoprecipitation resulted in the isolation of the epitope-tagged mouse delta opioid receptor as a approximately 60-kDa protein. Prolonged agonist treatment with 100 nM d-Ala2, d-Leu5-enkephalin (DADLE) caused significant (approximately 60%) reduction in the level of receptor. The delta opioid receptor contains a number of phosphorylatable residues in the C tail. Point mutations of the majority of Ser/Thr sequences did not affect the level of downregulation, whereas mutation of Thr353 to Ala did. In order to test if phosphorylation at this site is involved in receptor downregulation, we generated a Thr353Glu mutant that would mimic the phosphorylated Thr at this site. This mutant exhibited a significantly higher extent of downregulation than the Thr353Ala mutant. In order to critically evaluate the requirement of Thr353 in receptor downregulation, we examined the downregulation of wildtype rat delta receptor (which does not contain Ala353) and an Ala353Thr point-mutant rat delta receptor. The wild-type receptor exhibited poor agonist-mediated downregulation, whereas Ala353Thr mutant exhibited increased downregulation. These results and results from additional studies with rat/mouse chimeric receptors support a role for phosphorylation of sites within the C tail in efficient downregulation of delta opioid receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2000

Acute ethanol treatment modulates delta opioid receptors in N18TG2 cells.

BACKGROUND: The in vitro adaptive responses of delta opiate receptors (DOR) to chronic ethanol treatment have been well documented. The acute effects of ethanol on these receptors are not well characterized beyond its effect on ligand binding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of clinically relevant concentrations of ethanol (50-200 mm) on the saturation binding kinetics, receptor/ligand internalization, and agonist stimulation of G-protein coupling in N18TG2 cells expressing the Flag epitope-tagged mouse DOR. METHODS: Confocal microscopy was used to localize Flag epitope-tagged DOR in N18TG2 cells. Saturation binding assays at 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C were conducted in the absence or presence of ethanol on cells not pretreated or pretreated with ethanol for 30 min at 37 degrees C. Highly specific delta agonist, DPDPE ([D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin), was used in these studies. The effect of ethanol on agonist stimulation of G-protein coupling was examined using [35S]GTPgammaS (guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate) binding to membranes. Agonist-mediated receptor internalization was examined using flow cytometry of cells labeled with the antiserum directed against the Flag epitope, and the ligand internalization was examined using [3H]DPDPE. RESULTS: Ethanol decreased the binding of the agonist [3H]DPDPE, and not the antagonist [3H]diprenorphine, in a dose-dependent manner. These effects were temperature-dependent. Ethanol reversibly inhibited agonist stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. In non-pretreated cells, ethanol decreased the rate of receptor/ligand internalization, but this effect was not seen in ethanol pretreated cells. Taken together, these results suggest that pretreatment of N18TG2 cells with ethanol induces compensatory mechanisms that allow the receptor to function efficiently in its presence. CONCLUSION: Acute ethanol decreased the binding, agonist-mediated functional coupling and receptor/ligand internalization in N18TG2 cells expressing epitope-tagged DOR. In these cells, 30-min pretreatment with ethanol was sufficient to reverse these effects.

Anesthetics↗

PubMed1996

Sequestration of the delta opioid receptor. Role of the C terminus in agonist-mediated internalization.

The primary structure of the opioid receptors have revealed that many of the structural features that are conserved in other G protein-coupled receptors are also conserved in the opioid receptors. Upon exposure to agonists, some G protein-coupled receptors internalize rapidly, whereas other structurally homologous G protein-coupled receptors do not. It is not known whether opioid receptors are regulated by rapid endocytosis. In transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the epitope-tagged wild type delta opioid receptor, exposure to 100 nM [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin causes internalization of the receptor within 30 min as determined by confocal microscopy. The rate of internalization of the wild type receptor is rapid with a half-maximal reduction by about 10 min, as determined by the reduction in mean surface receptor fluorescence intensity measured using flow cytometry. In contrast, the cells expressing receptors lacking the C-terminal 15 or 37 amino acids exhibit a substantially slower rate of internalization. Furthermore, the cells expressing receptors with point mutations of any of the Ser/Thr between Ser344 and Ser363 in the C-terminal tail exhibit a significant reduction in the rate of receptor internalization. These results suggest that a portion of the C-terminal tail is involved in receptor internalization. Agents that block the formation of clathrin-coated pits considerably reduce the extent of agonist-mediated internalization of the wild type receptor. Taken together, these results suggest that the wild type opioid receptor undergoes rapid agonist-mediated internalization via a classic endocytic pathway and that a portion of the C-terminal tail plays an important role in this internalization process.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1996

Thr353, located within the COOH-terminal tail of the delta opiate receptor, is involved in receptor down-regulation.

Prolonged exposure to abused drugs such as opiates causes decreased response to the drug; this reduced sensitivity is thought to be due to the loss of receptors, or down-regulation. The molecular mechanism of the opiate receptor down-regulation is not known. In order to address this, we generated a number of mutants of the delta opiate receptor COOH-terminal tail. When expressed in the Chinese hamster ovary cells, both the wild type and the receptor with a deletion of 37 COOH-terminal residues bind diprenorphine with comparable affinities and show similar decreases in cAMP levels in response to D-Ala2, D-Leu5, enkephalin (DADLE). However, the truncated receptor does not show down-regulation from the cell surface upon prolonged exposure (2-48 h) to DADLE. In contrast, both the wild type receptor and the receptor with the deletion of only 15 COOH-terminal residues show substantial down-regulation upon long term DADLE treatment. These results suggest that the region located between 15 and 37 residues from the COOH terminus is involved in the receptor down-regulation. In order to identify residues that play a key role in down-regulation, point mutations of residues within this region were examined for their ability to modulate receptor down-regulation. The receptor with a mutation of Thr353 to Ala does not down-regulate, whereas the receptor with a mutation of Ser344 to Gly down-regulates with a time course similar to that of the wild type receptor. Taken together, these results suggest that the COOH-terminal tail is not essential for functional coupling but is necessary for down-regulation and that Thr353 is critical for the agonist-mediated down-regulation of the delta opiate receptor.

Alanine↗