PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Tuefferd

Publications and source records attributed to N Tuefferd.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Long-term usefulness of an information programme on practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis].

INTRODUCTION: In France, numerous concordant studies show that there are some discrepancies between guidelines on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the current practice. In a previous study, conducted in April-June 2001, we found that the rate of appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was approximately 40%. An information programme was implemented and the purpose of this paper was to present the short- and long-term usefulness of this campaign. METHODS: A total of 13 pairs of surgeons/anaesthetists participated in data collection during the three periods of the study. Prescriptions were observed in order to answer to five questions. Five variables describing practices concerning antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery were compared to national recommendations (updated in 1999): did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was this carried out? Was the antibiotic used appropriate? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct? RESULTS: The overall compliance with recommendations was significantly improved during the third period (P = 0.0002). This improvement was particularly marked for antimicrobial prophylaxis duration. CONCLUSION: It seems that sequential surveillance of antimicrobial prophylaxis, including numerous surgical teams, could considerably improve the practices, if it was associated to informations that allowed physicians to appropriate the procedures.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2002

[Evaluation of practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Franche-Comté before and after implementation of an information program].

OBJECTIVES: To assess the practices of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Franche-Comté region of France before and after the implementation of information program. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter transversal study type before/after. The information program included a feedback on the observed results during the period before and a meeting with opinion leaders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected by 28 pairs of surgeons/anaesthetists. Prescriptions were analysed to answer five questions about antibiotic prophylaxis practices in surgery: did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was this carried out? Was the appropriate antibiotic used? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct? Our data were compared to national recommendations (updated in 1999). RESULTS: The overall frequency of conformity was about 40% both before and after the implementation of an information/awareness campaign. Only the conformity of the total duration of the prophylaxis was significantly higher after the action, but only for interventions that lasted less than two hours. [RR = 2.09 (1.32-3.31), p = 0.001]. This improvement in the total duration of regulation seemed to be related to the more frequent use of written protocols in the surgical units. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that information campaign have little effect within the framework of the good use of antibiotics. We agree with the experts who claim that only an overall strategy including organization, education and restriction will really improve the frequency of conformity of the practices of surgical prophylaxis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

[Antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery. Prescription compliance in Franche-Comté with the national reference system].

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in the Franche-Comté region of France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 surgical teams (72 pairs surgeons/anaesthesists) participated in data collection. Five variables describing practices concerning antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery were compared to national recommendations: did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was it carried out? Was the antibiotic used appropriately? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct? RESULTS: Among the 687 operations for which data were collected, 513 (74.7%) that corresponded to class 1 or 2 Altemeier operations for which the Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation (SFAR) had drawn up recommendations were analysed in order to answer these questions. The overall frequency of conformity with the regulations was 40% for these 513 operations. Of the 156 patients who did not receive the recommended antibiotic, 133 (85.5%) received an antibiotic with an activity range wider than that of the recommended antibiotic. The duration of prophylaxis was longer than recommended in 80 (87.9%) out of the 91 patients for whom the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis did not respect the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective surveillance showed that less than 50% of patients received an antibiotic prophylaxis that was conformed to the regulations. To ensure the efficiency of prophylaxis and to prevent deleterious effects, such as the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the recommendations must be regularly respected. Frequent audits of practices should be carried out by the teams responsible for fighting nosocomial infections.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Postoperative analgesia for circumcision in children].

Circumcision in children is followed by severe pain. This study analysed retrospectively anesthetic techniques of 110 children from 17 months to 14 years old who had undergone ambulatory of 24 h stay circumcision. There were two groups of patients: one being operated on under locoregional techniques combined with general anesthesia (53.6%), the other one under general anesthesia alone (46.4%). Post operative analgesia was provided by the regional anesthesia (with or without additional analgesics via rectal route) for the former group whereas analgesic drugs were administered only rectally for the latter one. In this second group, pain relief assessment was insufficiently recorded and was considered poor. In the first group, dorsal nerves block of the penis (DNBP) was performed on 47 children (79.8% of the locoregional techniques), caudal block on 10 patients and ring block on 2 patients. Regional techniques offered a satisfactory, safe and reliably effective post circumcision analgesia. DNBP should be used systematically in order to shorten duration of day circumcision stay.

Administration, Rectal↗
PubMed1990

[Intramuscular methohexital. A simple and reliable means of sedation for cerebral computed tomography in children].

Intramuscular methohexital sedation was retained as an easy and reliable method to sedate children for a C.T. scan. In this retrospective study of 50 cases of children aged from 2 months to 7 years all the children were administrated an oral premedication (diazepam: 1 drop/kg and atropine: 0.02 mg.kg-1) one hour before the scanner examination. Once in the operating room, they were administrated 10 mg.kg-1 methohexital saline 2.5% solution, intramuscularly deep in the buttock. E.C.G. was the main monitoring. Spontaneous breathing was evidenced by means of a simple device. At the end of the scan, the child was taken care for in the recovery room. The methohexital dose provided adequate sedation in most cases. Once the injection was given, a motionless state was reached in 4.20 minutes. The insertion of an intravenous catheter induced movements in 96% cases, which did not interfere with the successful intravenous puncture. In 33% cases, 1 to 2 mg.kg-1 ketamine was necessary because of a failed attempt at obtaining the required state, or of an awakening due to iodized injection. Among those cases, half the children were overweight for their ages. In this situation an adjusting dose should be considered. On average, a child under the influence of the drug slept for 35 minutes and the required time for a C.T. scan is 23.3 minutes. Time in the recovery room is on average 20 minutes. There was no episode of cardiovascular or respiration failure, or local reaction at the injection site. There was also no episode of seizure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia↗