PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N Vogelzang

Publications and source records attributed to N Vogelzang.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Clinical staging of prostate cancer: reproducibility and clarification of issues.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for prostate cancer adopted in 1992 is based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) designations. It has been widely accepted for use in local and advanced disease. The purpose of this study was to assess reproducibility of staging among observers and to help clarify staging issues. Twelve prostate cancer cases were sent to 20 physicians with special expertise in prostate cancer including eight urologists, eight radiation oncologists, and four medical oncologists. Physicians were asked to assign a stage based on the 1992 AJCC clinical staging. The most frequently reported stage assigned to each case was taken to be the consensus. Agreement was the percentage of physicians who reported that particular stage. Seventy-five percent of the physicians responded. The overall agreement for assignment of T stage was 63.9%. Differences were found by specialty for inclusion of available information in designating a T stage. The overall agreement for N stage was 73.8%. The most common designation was Nx regardless of availability of a computed tomography scan. The overall agreement for M stage was 76.6%. Without a bone scan the most common designation was Mx regardless of Gleason grade or prostate-specific antigen (PSA). A frequent comment was that PSA was more indicative of disease extent than current clinical staging. The reproducibility of the 1992 clinical AJCC staging is poor even among experts in the field. This problem arises primarily from disagreement regarding which studies are included in assigning a stage. Some of these difficulties are addressed in the 1997 revision. However, the clinical staging does not address the true biological significance of disease in many instances.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

A phase II study of docetaxel (Taxotere), estramustine, and low-dose hydrocortisone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: preliminary results of cancer and leukemia group B Trial 9780.

Combinations of estramustine with other antimitotic agents, such as docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA), are synergistic in vitro and show significant clinical activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). We have studied intravenous docetaxel 70 mg/m2, oral estramustine, and low-dose daily hydrocortisone in men with HRPC who demonstrated progression after initial hormone therapy. Of the 47 men who were enrolled, 40 are evaluable for response and/or toxicity. One patient (3%) has had a complete response and eight (20%) have had a partial response, yielding a total objective response rate of 23%. Of 39 patients with elevated pretreatment prostate-specific antigen levels who have had at least one posttreatment prostate-specific antigen measurement, 27 (69%) have had > or =50% decreases and 21 (54%) have had > or =75% decreases in prostate-specific antigen levels. Toxicity is modest but manageable. This therapy is efficacious and well tolerated in HRPC and should be compared in phase III trials with other drugs active in HRPC, such as mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To review the outcome of therapy with maximal androgen blockade and compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a 2 x 2 factorial design. A total of 813 patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily), plus 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). RESULTS: At the time of analysis (median follow-up, 49 weeks), bicalutamide plus LHRH-A was associated with a statistically significant improvement in time-to-treatment failure, the primary endpoint, when compared with flutamide plus LHRH-A. The results with longer follow-up (median, 95 weeks) support previous findings of an improved time-to-treatment failure with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A; however, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. A treatment failure endpoint was reached by 68% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group, compared with 72% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The upper one-sided 95% confidence limit for survival was 1.00, meeting the definition for equivalence (< 1.25). With longer follow-up, overall mortality was 34%, with equivalent survival between groups: 32% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group died, compared with 35% in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.11; P = 0.29). The upper one-sided 95% confidence limit for survival was 1.07, meeting the definition for equivalence (< 1.25). Diarrhea occurred in 24% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group compared with 10% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A is effective and well tolerated. Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Interleukin-2 associated linear IgA bullous dermatosis.

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) in adults is characterized by subepidermal bullae associated with a linear deposition of IgA at the basement membrane zone. Its cause is unclear, although it appears to have an immune-mediated basis. The development of LABD in a cancer patient undergoing immunotherapy has been described in the French literature. We describe a similar case of LABD arising in a patient while undergoing interleukin-2 immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

A controlled trial of Casodex (bicalutamide) vs. flutamide, each in combination with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group.

Between January 1992 and September 1993, 813 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer were enrolled in a multicentre, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy) trial and randomised to antiandrogen therapy with Casodex (bicalutamide, 50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and to luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue therapy with Zoladex (goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide (7.5 mg every 28 days). Time to treatment failure was the primary efficacy endpoint. At a median follow-up time of 49 weeks, there was a significant (p = 0.005) difference between groups in time to treatment failure in favour of Casodex plus LHRH analogue. Overall, 168 (42%) of 404 patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group and 218 (53%) of 409 patients in the flutamide plus LHRH analogue group reached a treatment failure endpoint. Although a cause-specific treatment-failure analysis was not performed, the difference between groups in treatment failure attributed to adverse events (mainly diarrhoea) was evident primarily in the first 7 months of therapy. The difference between groups in treatment failure for objective progression was most evident after 1 year of therapy. With further follow-up (median time of 95 weeks), the result for time to treatment failure, although no longer statistically significant, were consistent with the previous finding of an improvement in time to treatment failure associated with Casodex plus LHRH analogue therapy. With a median of 95 weeks of follow-up, 34% of deaths had occurred. The survival analysis was not dissimilar between the 2 groups. At 49 weeks median follow up, the incidence of diarrhoea was significantly (p < 0.001) lower among patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group. Diarrhoea led to withdrawal from therapy for 2 patients in the Casodex plus LHRH analogue group, compared with 25 patients in the flutamide plus LHRH analogue group. In conclusion, Casodex plus LHRH analogue is well tolerated and effective with an improvement in time to treatment failure over flutamide plus LHRH analogue. Survival was not dissimilar between the 2 treatment groups.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Urinary nuclear matrix protein as a marker for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate an immunoassay for urinary nuclear matrix protein, NMP22, as an indicator for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of subjects participated in this trial of NMP22: 1-175 with transitional cell carcinoma, 2-117 with benign urinary tract conditions and 3-375 healthy volunteers. Each subject provided a single (3 voids) urine sample for analysis at the time of study entry. Each sample was assayed for the level of NMP22. RESULTS: In normal healthy volunteers and in subjects with benign conditions median NMP22 levels were 2.9 and 3.3 units per ml., respectively. Median urinary NMP22 levels in patients with transitional cell carcinoma were significantly greater than in comparison subjects. Patients with active transitional cell carcinoma had significantly greater median urinary NMP22 levels than those with no evidence of disease (6.04 versus 4.11 units per ml., p = 0.027, 1-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). We noted no effect of tumor grade, extent of disease or exposure to intravesical therapy on urinary NMP22 levels. CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 is a promising urinary tumor marker for monitoring transitional cell carcinoma. Nuclear matrix proteins are a new class of tumor markers that represent the basis for the development of assays with increased efficacy for the detection and treatment of cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a 2 x 2 factorial design. Eight hundred thirteen patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) and flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) and leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). RESULTS: With a median duration of follow-up of 49 weeks, time to treatment failure, the primary endpoint, was significantly (P = 0.005) better for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group than for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. Patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group were 34% more likely to fail treatment over the given time period, as indicated by the hazard ratio of 0.749 (95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.92) for bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A. Results for secondary endpoints (survival, quality of life, and subjective response) were similar between groups. Diarrhea occurred in 24% of patients in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group, compared with 10% of patients in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A is well tolerated and provides superior efficacy to flutamide plus LHRH-A with respect to time to treatment failure. Assessment of the effects of these regimens on longer term survival requires additional time for follow-up.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Phase II study of echinomycin in patients with advanced breast cancer: a report of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 8641.

Twenty-five women with advanced histologically documented stage IV recurrent or inoperable breast cancer were enrolled on a phase II study of echinomycin administered at a dose of 1.2 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes weekly for 4 weeks followed by a two week rest period. Seventy-six percent of patients had visceral dominant disease at study entry and all patients had previously received chemotherapy. One of 21 eligible patients had a partial response lasting 147 days. The median survival for this group of patients was 5.9 months and the median time to treatment failure was 1.7 months. Nausea and vomiting was the primary toxic effect and was severe or life-threatening in 43% of patients. Transient elevation of liver enzymes occurred in 30% of patients. Bone marrow suppression was not significant. Echinomycin as employed in this study did not demonstrate significant antitumor activity in previously treated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1990

True hermaphrodite with bilateral ovotestes, bilateral gonadoblastomas and dysgerminomas, 46,XX/46,XY karyotype, and a successful pregnancy.

The first case (to the authors' knowledge) is reported of a true hermaphrodite with bilateral ovotestes, bilateral gonadoblastomas and dysgerminomas, a 46, XX/46,XY karyotype, and a successful pregnancy. The true hermaphroditism was diagnosed during infancy. The patient was subsequently found to have a gonadoblastoma and a microscopic dysgerminoma in the gonad diagnosed as an ovotestis and excised during infancy. The successful pregnancy occurred when the patient was 29 years old. A year later a large gonadal tumor affecting the remaining gonad was excised. The gonad was found to be an ovotestis, and the tumor was a dysgerminoma arising from a gonadoblastoma. This case further emphasizes the malignant potential of the Y chromosome in patients with abnormal gonads.

Disorders of Sex Development↗
PubMed1988

Comparison of criteria for assigning germ cell tumor patients to "good risk" and "poor risk" studies.

To evaluate the potential effect of patient selection on chemotherapy trials for patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT), four sets of eligibility criteria for poor risk trials were compared in 118 patients. A significant difference was found in the number of patients designated poor risk by the various criteria (P less than .005). Disagreement in the risk assignment by the various selection criteria was seen in 44% of patients. Initial complete response (CR) rates in patients designated poor risk by the various criteria ranged from 38% to 62%. Initial CR rates as high as 94% were seen in patients considered to be poor risk by one set of criteria, but good risk by another. Substantial differences in sensitivity, specificity, overall predictive value, and survival distributions were observed for the various selection criteria. Randomized trials will be necessary to reduce the influence of eligibility criteria on trial outcome and conclusions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Treatment of soft tissue sarcoma with fibroblast interferon (beta-interferon): an American Cancer Society/Illinois Cancer Council Study.

Twenty patients with soft tissue sarcoma were treated with iv human fibroblast interferon (beta-interferon). Each cycle of treatment involved 5 X 10(6) units over 10 minutes, then 5 X 10(6) units iv over 3 hours daily X 10 with cycles repeated every 20 days X 3. Maintenance therapy was given twice weekly if disease was stable or responsive after three therapy periods. One patient had a partial response to treatment and six patients experienced stable disease for variable periods of time. Toxicity (fever, fatigue, leukopenia, hepatic enzyme elevations) was moderate and tolerable; therapy (except in one case of profound granulocytopenia) was neither interrupted nor discontinued because of toxicity. We conclude that beta-interferon in the dose and schedule used has limited value for soft tissue sarcoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Role of etoposide-based chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsing germ cell tumors.

Forty-nine patients with metastatic germ cell tumors were treated with etoposide 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously each day for five days as "salvage" chemotherapy. Forty-seven patients had received standard induction regimens for metastatic germ cell tumors before receiving etoposide and cisplatin. Four patients were treated after surgical resection of a single site of relapse (Group I). Forty-five patients had measurable or evaluable disease at the time of treatment. In 17 patients with evaluable disease who had either achieved a prior complete remission or received no prior cisplatin (Group II), eight (47 percent) complete and four (24 percent) partial remission were observed. In 28 patients who had never achieved a prior complete remission (Group III), no complete and five (18 percent) partial responses were observed. Seven of 21 patients in Groups I and II and none of 28 patients in Group III remain alive and free of disease. Assuming prior treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, these data and a review of the published experience with similar salvage regimens for patients with relapsing or refractory germ cell tumors suggest that combination chemotherapy based on etoposide and cisplatin is effective primarily in those patients who achieved a prior complete remission. Such therapy is ineffective in the absence of a prior complete remission probably because the patients have tumors that are largely resistant to cisplatin. Observed responses are probably due to etoposide alone. Investigational therapies should be pursued in those patients whose disease is refractory to current induction regimens.

Agranulocytosis↗