PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N W Johannessen

Publications and source records attributed to N W Johannessen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry and late postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

In a randomized, blinded clinical study, we have used objective and subjective measures to determine if perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry--by virtue of its potential to lessen hypoxaemia--would decrease late postoperative cognitive dysfunction. We investigated 736 adult patients undergoing elective procedures (other than cardiac, neurosurgical or for cancer) under regional or general anaesthesia, allocated randomly to undergo (group I) or not to undergo (group II) pulse oximetry monitoring in the operating theatre and recovery room. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Wechsler memory scale (WMS) and continuous reaction time (RT) test the day before surgery, and on the 7th day after operation or at discharge if that occurred before postoperative day 7. A questionnaire sent 6 weeks after surgery elicited patients' subjective perceptions regarding cognitive abilities. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the total WMS score, the score for each WMS subtests or RT test. The questionnaire revealed that 7% in group I and 11% in group II believed cognitive abilities had decreased (ns). For the 40 patients whose WMS scores were 10 points less after than before operation, a follow-up study was undertaken 3 months after surgery. At that time, the median WMS score had returned to the preoperative value. We conclude that, for these 736 patients, subjective and objective measures did not indicate less postoperative cognitive impairment after perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: I. Design, demography, pulse oximetry failure rate, and overall complication rate.

BACKGROUND: Although pulse oximetry is currently in widespread use, there are few data documenting improvement in patient outcome as a result of the use of oximetry. The authors describe the study design, patient demographic findings, data validation, pulse oximetry failure rate, and overall postoperative complication rates in the first large prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial on perioperative pulse oximetry monitoring. METHODS: In five Danish hospitals, by random assignment, monitoring did or did not include pulse oximetry for patients 18 yr of age and older, whether scheduled for elective or emergency operations, or for regional or general anesthesia, except during cardiac and neurosurgical procedures. Operational definitions were established for perioperative events and postoperative complications. The data were collected preoperatively, during anesthesia, in the postanesthesia care unit, and until the day of discharge from the hospital or the seventh postoperative day. RESULTS: Of 20,802 patients, 10,312 were assigned to the oximetry group and 10,490, to the control group. In general, the demographic data, patient factors, and anesthetic agents used were distributed evenly. A slight intergroup difference was found in the distribution of age, duration of surgery, some types of surgery, and some types of anesthesia. The total failure rate of the oximetry was 2.5%, but it increased to 7.2% in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 4 (P < 0.00001). In 14.9% of the patients, one or more events occurred in the operating room and 13.5% in the postanesthesia care unit. The overall postoperative complication rate was 9.7%. The total rates of cardiovascular and respiratory complications were 2.78% and 3.50%, respectively. Within the first seven postoperative days, 0.47% of the patients died. Anesthesia was not thought to have been solely responsible for any death, but in 7 patients (1 per 3,365), it was a possible contributory factor. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the finding of a few significant inter-group differences, the randomization was well balanced with a high validity of data. The overall postoperative complication rate was similar to that in other recent morbidity and mortality studies.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: The authors describe the effect of pulse oximetry monitoring on the frequency of unanticipated perioperative events, changes in patient care, and the rate of postoperative complications in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: The study included 20,802 surgical patients in Denmark randomly assigned to be monitored or not with pulse oximetry in the operating room (OR) and postanesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: During anesthesia and in the PACU, significantly more patients in the oximetry group had at least one respiratory event than did the control patients. This was the result of a 19-fold increase in the incidence of diagnosed hypoxemia in the oximetry group than in the control group in both the OR and PACU (P < 0.00001). In the OR, cardiovascular events were observed in a similar number of patients in both groups, except myocardial ischemia (as defined by angina or ST-segment depression), which was detected in 12 patients in the oximetry group and in 26 patients in the control group (P < 0.03). Several changes in PACU care were observed in association with the use of pulse oximetry. These included higher flow rate of supplemental oxygen (P < 0.00001), increased use of supplemental oxygen at discharge (P < 0.00001), and increased use of naloxone (P < 0.02). The rate of changes in patient care as a consequence of the oximetry monitoring increased as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status worsened (P < 0.00001). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 10% of the patients in the oximetry group and in 9.4% in the control group (difference not significant). The two groups did not differ significantly in cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, or infectious complications. The duration of hospital stay was a median of 5 days in both groups (difference not significant). An equal number of inhospital deaths were registered in the two groups. Questionnaires, completed by the anesthesiologists at the five participating departments, revealed that 18% of the anesthesiologists had experienced a situation in which a pulse oximeter helped to avoid a serious event or complication and that 80% of the anesthesiologists felt more secure when they used a pulse oximeter. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that pulse oximetry can improve the anesthesiologist's ability to detect hypoxemia and related events in the OR and PACU and that the use of the oximeter was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of myocardial ischemia. Although monitoring with pulse oximetry prompted a number of changes in patient care, a reduction in the overall rate of postoperative complications was not observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Hypoxaemia is reduced by pulse oximetry monitoring in the operating theatre and in the recovery room.

To determine the impact of pulse oximeter monitoring on the incidence, severity and duration of hypoxaemia in the operating theatre (OT) and in the recovery room (RR), we investigated 200 patients in a randomized study. The extent of hypoxaemia in the OT was compared with that in the RR. Adult inpatients were allocated randomly to two groups: group I, pulse oximeter data and alarms "available"; group II, these data "unavailable" to the anaesthesia team and RR staff. Hypoxaemia was graded into four values of oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO2). The incidence of hypoxaemia was reduced significantly in group I in both OT and RR. In the OT, five patients in group II suffered SpO2 less than 76% compared with none in group I (P less than 0.02). In group II in the RR, seven patients suffered SpO2 less than 81%; three of these had SpO2 less than 76%. No patients in group I exhibited such small values of saturation. The smallest recorded SpO2 in the OT and the RR was significantly greater in group I. The cumulative duration of hypoxaemia was significantly less in group I in the RR, but not in the OT. The incidence and severity of hypoxaemia in the OT and in the RR were comparable, whereas the cumulative duration of hypoxaemia was significantly greater in the RR than in the OT. The occurrence of hypoxaemia in an individual patient in the OT significantly increased this patient's risk of suffering hypoxaemia in the RR. We conclude that the extent of hypoxaemia, especially in the RR, may be reduced significantly by pulse oximeter monitoring, but even with the information provided, some patients still develop hypoxaemia.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Hypoxaemia during anaesthesia--an observer study.

We have investigated 296 inpatients in a single-blind observer study to determine the incidence, degree and duration of hypoxaemia during anaesthesia. The clinical recognition of hypoxaemia, period of time until recognition and risk factors were studied. Oxygen saturation (Spo2) was monitored continuously with a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda, model 3700). One or more episodes of mild hypoxaemia (Spo2 86-90%) were recorded in 53% of patients. Severe hypoxaemia with Spo2 values less than 81% were recorded in 20% of patients. The mild hypoxaemic episodes lasted up to 34.6 min (mean 2.3 min) and 70% were not detected by the anaesthetist. In the remaining 30% of episodes, the anaesthetist diagnosed the complication with a mean time delay of 70 s. After intervention a mean time delay of 57 s was recorded until Spo2 exceeded 90%. Utilizing a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, we found that risk factors associated with a greater incidence of hypoxaemia were patient age (P less than 0.005) and anaesthetic technique (P less than 0.00001). We conclude that hypoxaemic episodes in our operating rooms are common during anaesthesia and suggest preoxygenation in all patients in addition to administration of supplementary oxygen during arousal from anaesthesia and during transfer to the recovery room.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Episodic nocturnal hypoxia and nasal packs.

Nasal obstruction influences respiration during sleep and nasal packs may cause obstructive sleep apnoea. In order to investigate this, the perioperative oxygen saturation was monitored for 3 nights with continuous pulse oximetry in 12 patients, who had bilateral nasal packs after septoplasty. A significant increase in the number of nocturnal episodes of hypoxia and a significant prolongation of the mean duration of the individual hypoxic periods were demonstrated during the first and the second post-operative nights. The clinical significance of these results is as yet unknown, but the use of partial nasal packing in septoplasty is advocated. Further investigations of nocturnal oxygen desaturation and design of nasal packs, securing the post-operative nasal airway, are needed.

Adolescent↗