PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

N W Watson

Publications and source records attributed to N W Watson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of metaphase and interphase FISH monitoring of minimal residual disease with MLL gene probe: case study of AML with t(9;11).

The place of FISH in the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is yet to be fully characterised. Routine bone marrow cytogenetics at diagnosis in a 22 year old patient with acute myeloid leukemia FAB type M5 detected a translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23). We report our investigations to assess residual levels of translocation using a FISH probe designed to detect a gene split by the translocation. We used MLL (Oncor), a probe which spans the MLL gene at 11q23, in both metaphase and interphase preparations. At diagnosis, metaphase FISH showed 3 distinct cell lines-normal with 2 signals, abnormal with 3 signals and abnormal with 2 signals, while interphase FISH showed only 2 cell lines, one with 2 signals (which could be normal or abnormal) and one with 3 signals (split MLL). Following treatment, with the patient in clinical remission, 7 further cytogenetic analyses and 2 further FISH analyses were compared. Our results suggest that monitoring of the t(9;11) by metaphase FISH is feasible and straightforward compared to cytogenetics but interphase FISH may be problematic.

Adult↗

A pharmacokinetic study of sublingual aerosolized morphine in healthy volunteers.

A pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetics of morphine after an intravenous dose with the pharmacokinetics after a sublingual dose administered from an aerosol. Plasma levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were measured in five normal volunteers after morphine administration by the intravenous route and from a novel sublingual pressurized aerosol formulation. The mean (+/- s.d.) bioavailability of the sublingual aerosol morphine was 19.7 +/- 6.7%. The morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine and the morphine-6-glucuronide/morphine ratios were 5.1 +/- 1.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.4, respectively, for the intravenous route and 28.3 +/- 11.3 and 5.2 +/- 1.4, respectively, for the sublingual route. The combined total areas under the plots of systemic concentration against time (AUC) for the metabolites after the two routes was not significantly different. When compared with published data for oral administration the results demonstrate that the sublingual aerosol morphine might provide an alternative to conventional methods of morphine delivery, and has similar pharmacokinetics to a sublingual morphine tablet. It has no particular pharmacokinetic advantages over oral morphine, except a potential for a faster onset of analgesia. Bioavailability, maximum plasma concentration, Cpmax, and the time at which the maximum plasma concentration is reached, Tmax, are equivalent to those for orally administered morphine.

Administration, Sublingual↗