Biomedical subjects

N Weinrich

Publications and source records attributed to N Weinrich.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

[Experiences in the treatment of midfacial fractures using a fixed-angle osteosynthetic system. Biomechanical results].

AIM: Fixed-angle osteosynthetic systems are characterized by mechanical "locking" of the osteosynthetic screw and plate. These systems have found increasing acceptance and use for osteosynthetic fixation and temporary reconstruction of the mandible. The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability and performance of fixed-angle systems in the treatment of midfacial fractures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A newly developed fixed-angle osteosynthetic plate system (smart lock) was compared to a conventional system using fresh human skulls. The iatrogenically produced zygomatic fractures of the human skulls were treated by osteosynthesis and biomechanically tested. Furthermore, in a dynamic test series, an artificial bone was subjected to an alternating force of 15 N of up to 1,000,000 cycles. The new screws and plates were subjected to further biomechanical tests. RESULTS: The tests using the fixed-angle implants revealed that an increase of stability of up to 40% can be expected after osteosynthetic fixation. Furthermore, the plates resisted 1,000,000 cycles of alternating forces, whereby the conventional systems failed after 170,000 cycles on the average. CONCLUSION: Fixed-angle systems, due to their construction, provide a high degree of stability even in thin bones of the midface. They appear to be promising for the treatment of midfacial fractures.

Bite Force↗

PubMed2004

Three-dimensional load measurements in an external fixator.

On the basis of a six-degree-of-freedom adjustable fracture reduction hexapod external fixator, a system which can be used for measuring axial and shear forces as well as torsion and bending moments in the fixator in vivo was developed. In a pilot study on 9 patients (7 fresh fractures and 2 osteotomies of the tibia), the load in the fixator during the healing process was measured after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and at fixator removal. The measured values enabled both the type of fracture to be determined as well as the monitoring of the healing process. In well-reduced type A3 fractures small axial (direction of the bone axis) forces were found in the fixator. A2, B2 and C3 fractures showed distinct axial forces, which decreased during the healing process, according to an increasing load transfer over the bone. Bending moments in the fixator showed good correspondence with the clinical healing process, except in the case of a C3 fracture. A combination of bending moment and axial force proved to be particularly suitable to assess fracture healing. In transverse fractures, the well-known resorption phenomenon of bone in the fracture gap at approximately 4 weeks was detected by the system. Compared with other external fixator load measurements in vivo, the hexapod offers the advantage of being able to measure all forces and moments in the fixator separately and with a relatively simple mechanical arrangement. In our opinion, it will be possible to control fracture healing using this system, thereby minimizing radiation exposure from radiographs. Furthermore, the measurement system is a step towards the development of external fixator systems that enable automatic adjustments of the callus mechanical situation ("automatic dynamization") and inform the patients about the optimal weight bearing of their extremity ("intelligent fixator").

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2002

[Theory and software of the hexapod external fixator].

Using hexapod kinematics (Stewart platform), an external fixator was developed that can be adjusted in all six spatial degrees of freedom by means of six linear adjusting elements. With such a system, any desired three-dimensional bone movements, for example, fracture reduction or deformity correction, can be effected exactly, without having temporarily to compromise any stability already achieved or to rearrange the construction during treatment. Since the introduction of the hexapod principle by Stewart in 1965, computerized control has been deemed necessary for its application. This paper describes the mathematical basis and the software developed for clinical use. Mathematical procedures are needed for the calculation of the inverse and forward kinematics of the hexapod, and for the description of three-dimensional movements.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗