Biomedical subjects

N Zilembo

Publications and source records attributed to N Zilembo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Randomized phase II three-arm trial with three platinum-based doublets in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. An Italian Trials in Medical Oncology study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not tolerate cisplatin-based regimens because of its nonhemathological toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the response rate safety of new platinum analogue regimens, randomizing 147 patients with nonoperable IIIB/IV NSCLC to (i) carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 mg min/ml) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (GEM) (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 for six cycles; (ii) same regimen for three cycles followed by docetaxel (Taxotere) (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 plus GEM (1250 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 for three cycles; (iii) oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) on day 1 plus GEM (1250 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 for six cycles. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat objective response rates were 25%, 25% and 30.6% in arms A, B and C, respectively. Median survival was 11.9, 9.2 and 11.3 months in arms A, B and C, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia/anemia occurred in 29%/12.5%, 10%/16.5% and 8%/6% of arms A, B and C, respectively; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 20.5%, 16.5% and 6%; grade 1/2 neurological toxicity in 43% of arm C. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin/GEM (arm C) had similar activity to carboplatin/GEM (arm A), but milder hematological toxicity and may be worth testing in a phase III study against carboplatin/GEM in patients not suitable for cisplatin. The sequential regimen gave no additional benefit.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Osteoprotegerin and osteopontin serum values in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients treated with anastrozole.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a potent antiresorptive molecule that binds NF-kappaB ligand, the final effector for osteoclastogenesis. OPG production is regulated by a number of cytokines and hormones. Osteopontin (OPN) is a secreted adhesive glycoprotein involved in tumour angiogenesis, and also a non-collagenous protein involved in bone turnover. OPN serum value is associated with tumour burden and survival in advanced breast cancer patients. The short-term effects of anastrozole on OPG and OPN serum values, and the usefulness of these analytes during follow-up were studied in 34 consecutive advanced breast cancer patients receiving anastrozole 1 mg/day. Blood samples were taken before treatment and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. OPG and OPN values were measured by ELISA. The results were analysed for all patients, and also separately for patients with (group A, 22 patients) and without (group B, 12 patients) bone metastasis. Whether the survival of all patients was related to their OPN serum values was also tested by placing patients into three groups (terciles) according to their baseline OPN values. No significant changes in OPG and OPN values were observed in the complete patient group. There was no difference in baseline OPG and OPN serum values between patients in groups A and B. In group A, a significant percentage increase in both OPG and OPN values from baseline was detected during treatment. No significant changes were reported for group B patients. Furthermore, in group A, a significant increase in both analytes was evident only for patients with progressive disease (PD). The Kaplan-Meier adjusted survival estimates for patients grouped according to tercile OPN values differed significantly (P = 0.001, log rank test). In conclusion, in the short term, anastrozole does not seem to affect OPG and OPN serum values in patients without bone disease. OPG and OPN appear to be useful predictors of the outcome of skeletal disease and elevated OPN values may be associated with short survival in advanced breast cancer patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of four gemcitabine plus carboplatin schedules as front-line treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To explore the activity and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) we tested four administration sequences on H460 NSCLC cells, and at the same time performed a randomized phase II trial using analogous schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GEM was given first in two in vitro sequences, and CBDCA first in the other two; interaction was quantified calculating a combination index. Eighty-eight chemotherapy-naïve, stage IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive either: GEM (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA (AUC 5 mg.min/ml) on day 1, 4 h before GEM (arm A); same as arm A except CBDCA given 4 h after GEM (arm B); GEM on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA on day 2 (arm C); GEM on days 2 and 9 and CBDCA on day 1 (arm D). Courses were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: In the preclinical study, CBDCA given before GEM produced a synergistic cytotoxic effect. Two complete and 29 partial responses occurred in 86 of 88 treated patients (intention-to-treat analysis 35%; 95% confidence interval 25.5% to 46.8%). One- and 2-year survivals were 44% and 11%, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11%; grade 3/4 neutropenia in 17%; and non-hematological toxicity was insignificant. Median survival was 11 months (range 7-18+), but better in patients receiving CBDCA first (arms A and D) (13 versus 9 months) than in patients receiving GEM first (arms B and C). The response was greater (50% versus 31%) in arm A than in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS: The CBDCA/GEM combination is safe and active against stage IV NSCLC. Our preclinical and clinical findings suggest that administration of CBDCA before GEM gives the better outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Short-term effects of anastrozole treatment on insulin-like growth factor system in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients.

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) play a fundamental role in cancer development by acting in both an endocrinal and paracrinal manner, and hormone breast cancer treatments affect the IGF system by modifying circulating growth factor levels. We evaluated total IGF-1, IGF-2, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3 in the blood of 34 postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients (median age 63 years, range 41-85) treated with anastrozole, a non-steroidal structure aromatase inhibitor (NSS-AI). The plasma samples were obtained at baseline, and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. The IGFs were quantitated by means of sensitive radioimmunoassays (RIAs). IGF-1 significantly increased during anastrozole treatment (baseline versus 12 weeks, P=0.031), IGF-2 showed a trend towards an increase, and IGFBP-1 constantly but not significantly decreased; IGFBP-3 did not seem to be affected at all. The anastrozole-induced changes in IGFs and IGFBP-1 appeared to be different in the patients receiving a clinical benefit from those observed in non-responders. We have previously shown that letrozole (a different type of NSS-AI) modifies blood IGF-1 levels, and the results of this study of the biological effects of anastrozole on the components of the IGF system confirm our previous observations.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

c-erbB 2 serum level as prognostic factor in hormonally treated advanced breast cancer patients.

To investigate whether c-erbB 2 serum levels may be predictive of clinical response, progression-free and overall survival in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer hormonally treated, 265 patients enrolled in previous clinical trials were evaluated. C-erbB 2 serum levels were assessed before the start of treatment and in a subgroup of patients also at the first response evaluation. In addition, serum CA 15.3 levels were determined. The role of c-erbB 2 was investigated by means of multiple regression models in which both c-erbB 2 and CA 15.3 values were modelled as continuous variables together with other known prognostic factors. The failure probability tended to be higher in the presence of high c-erbB 2 levels, but the trend was not statistically significant; in contrast, significant results were obtained for progression-free survival (PFS,P <0.001) and overall survival (OS, P=0.014). The within-patient c-erbB 2 variation significantly predicted PFS (P=0.006) and OS (P=0.040). It is worth noting that c-erbB 2 and CA 15.3 baseline levels were significantly correlated and that the prognostic effect of c-erbB 2 tended to disappear in the presence of high CA 15.3 levels for PFS and OS.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Biological activity of anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: effects on estrogens and bone metabolism.

BACKGROUND: To study the short-term biological effect of anastrozole on serum estrogens, androgens, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OH-PGR), gonadotrophins, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and bone metabolism markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer received anastrozole 1 mg/day. Blood samples were taken before commencement of treatment and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks during treatment to measure serum levels of estrogens (E(1), E(2) and E(1)-S), androgens [androstenedione (Delta(4)), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), testosterone (TST), free TST, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S)], 17OH-PGR, SHBG and gonadotrophins. As an indicator of bone resorption, we measured serum levels of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) and the cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), and for osteoblastic activity, intact osteocalcin (BGP) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP). RESULTS: After 2 weeks E(1 )and E(1)-S levels decreased on average by 56% (range 23.1-88.8%) and 75.8% (range 52.4-87.2%), respectively; E(2) decreased on average by 62% (range 31.4-89.6%). No significant changes were detected in levels of androgens or 17OH-PGR. There was a significant increase in gonadotrophins over time (P = 0.0001 for both luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone), and a significant decrease in SHBG (P = 0.0001). A progressive significant increase in bone metabolism serum markers was detected in all patients: BAP, P = 0.039; BGP, P = 0.016; ICTP, P = 0.0021; and NTx, P = 0.0013. In particular, patients with bone metastases had a statistically significant increase of bone resorption markers (ICTP, P = 0.0019; NTx, P = 0.025) and borderline for bone formation markers. In patients without bone disease, BAP, BGP and ICTP remained unchanged, whereas serum NTx significantly increased (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole is a selective aromatase inhibitor as it does not modify serum levels of androgens and 17OH-PGR. In our experience no relationship was found in the short-term period between serum estrogen suppression and bone metabolism.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin with or without the aromatase inhibitor formestane in premenopausal breast cancer: effects on bone metabolism markers.

BACKGROUND: the combination of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogue and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) induces greater oestrogen suppression than the analogue alone in premenopausal breast cancer. However, very few data on the biological effects of such a combination are currently available. AIM OF THE STUDY: the short-term effects of treatment with the LH-RH analogue triptorelin alone or in association with the AI formestane on bone metabolism were investigated in premenopausal breast cancer. Circulating levels of the bone formation markers carboxy-terminal and amino-terminal propeptides of type I procollagen (PICP and PINP) and the bone resorption marker cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) were assessed. In addition, serum levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: twenty-one patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly given triptorelin monthly alone (n=10, arm A) or in combination with formestane fortnightly (n=11, arm B). Blood samples were collected over a 3-month period. RESULTS: serum PICP and PINP levels increased significantly over time (P=0.0065 and 0.0197 in arm A and B, respectively); no change in ICTP levels was observed. A rise in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels was seen in each treatment group, but only the increase in IGF-I was significant (P=0.0138, always). The on-treatment levels of the bone turnover markers and IGF-system components were inversely correlated with serum oestrogens. Neither treatment modalities significantly affected serum IL-6 levels over time. No difference in the behaviour of any of the assessed biomarkers was observed between patients with or without skeletal metastases. CONCLUSION: it is worth noting that complete oestrogen depletion, at least in our case series, seems to increase only osteoblastic activity markers. The observed modifications appear to be related to oestrogen depletion per se rather than the degree of oestrogen suppression or the different therapeutic regimen administered.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Response and survival in patients with advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain poor. As single agents, the nucleoside analog gemcitabine, and the semisynthetic vinca alkaloid vinorelbine, have been shown to be effective in NSCLC and to have a low toxicity profile. METHODS: Fifty-four chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC Stage IIIB (any TN3M0 or T4 any NM0) or IV (any T any NM1) were enrolled in this single-institution Phase II study. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) were both administered on Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to 9 courses unless disease progression or severe toxicity required their discontinuation. RESULTS: Partial tumor regression was observed in 16 patients, for an overall response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval, 18.4-46.7%) on an intent-to-treat basis. The median time to progression was 5 months (range, 3-20). The median survival was 12 months (range, 5-42+); 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 49.1% and 17%, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was mild with only 11% of the patients developing Grade 3 neutropenia. None of the patients developed any Grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine is feasible on an outpatient basis. The good activity and tolerability of the regimen make it a suitable candidate for further trials, using platinum-based regimens as comparators and possibly selecting elderly and less fit patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Steroidal aromatase inhibitors in elderly patients.

The choice of treatment for elderly breast cancer patients needs particular care because the presence of physiological functional impairments can modify the drug bioavailability in an unpredictable manner. Hormonal treatment remains one of the choices and, although tamoxifen has proved to be effective in any setting, the use of selective aromatase inhibitors is arousing. Depending on their chemical structure, aromatase inhibitors are either steroidal (such as exemestane and formestane) or non-steroidal (such as letrozole, vorozole and anastrozole). Formestane has been studied in elderly patients with breast cancer and has been found to induce an overall response rate of 51% (95% CI, 35-67%). The drug suppresses estradiol (E2) levels, and changes in other hormones (FSH, LH and SHBG) are observed, but with poor clinical significance, thus confirming its selectivity and potency. Formestane has also been demonstrated to be as effective as tamoxifen. Exemestane and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors appear to be very promising drugs.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Tumor response and estrogen suppression in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for the hormonal treatment of breast cancer (BC) is based on depriving tumor cells of estrogenic stimulation. Aromatase inhibitors (Als) block the conversion of peripheral tissue androgens to estrogens with different levels of potency. In an attempt to investigate the relationship between tumor response and estrogen suppression, we reviewed the hormonal and clinical data of two previous studies with formestane (250 and 500 mg i.m. fortnightly) in advanced BC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred four BC patients were selected on the basis of the availability of records concerning their plasma estrone (El) and estradiol (E2) levels assessed at scheduled times. The degree of estrogen suppression and the best clinical response of each patient during the trials were considered. RESULTS: There was a positive and significant (P < 0.05) correlation between baseline and post-formestane E1 and E2 levels, with a decrease in the levels of both hormones irrespective of any antitumor response. In particular, the degree of plasma estrogen suppression was similar in the patients who experienced a complete remission and those with progressive disease (PD). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma estrogen suppression induced by aromatase inhibition is not the only mechanism accounting for its clinical activity. Many clinical trials have demonstrated that all AIs induce a similar antitumor response regardless of their potency, and further investigations are warranted in order to improve our understanding as to why the patients with PD also show a significant plasma estrogen suppression. It is possible that intratumoral aromatase activity may be a marker for selecting the BC patients most likely to respond to AI treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) versus megestrol acetate (MA) in postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 769 patients were randomized to EXE 25 mg/d (n = 366) or MA (n = 403) 40 mg four times daily. Tumor response, duration of tumor control, tumor-related signs and symptoms (TRSS), quality of life (QOL), survival, and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall objective response (OR) rates were higher in patients treated with EXE than in those treated with MA (15.0% v 12.4%); a similar trend was noted in patients with visceral metastases (13.5% v 10.5%). Median survival time was significantly longer with EXE (median not reached) than with MA (123.4 weeks; P =.039), as were the median duration of overall success (OR or stable disease > or = 24 weeks; 60.1 v 49.1 weeks; P =.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 v 16.6 weeks; P =.037), and time to treatment failure (16.3 v 15.7 weeks; P =.042). Compared with MA, there were similar or greater improvements in pain, TRSS, and QOL with EXE. Both drugs were well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 weight changes were more common with MA (17.1% v 7.6%; P =.001). CONCLUSION: EXE prolongs survival time, time to tumor progression, and time to treatment failure compared with MA and offers a well-tolerated treatment option for postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

Exemestane improves survival in metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized study.

We compared the efficacy and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) with megestrol acetate (MA) in women with metastatic breast cancer. This phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 769 postmenopausal women who had experienced tamoxifen failure. Treatment arms consisted of EXE 25 mg once daily (n=366) or MA 40 mg four times daily (160 mg daily; n=403). Peer-reviewed, intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that EXE induced a trend toward higher rates of complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) (15.0% vs. 12.4%) and of CR+PR+stable disease (SD)=24 weeks (37.4% vs. 34.6%), but differences were not statistically significant. Statistically significant differences favoring EXE were seen in median duration of CR+PR+SD=24 weeks (60.1 vs. 49.1 weeks; P=0.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 vs. 16.6 weeks; P=0.037), time to treatment failure (16.3 vs. 15.7 weeks; P=0.042), and overall survival (not reached vs. 123.4 weeks; P=0.039). Both treatments were well tolerated, but MA was associated with more grade 3 or 4 weight gain (8% vs. 17%, P=0.001); the pain score was sim-ilar in both groups. There was a trend toward superiority in treatment-related signs and symptoms (TRSS) with EXE. There was greater improvement in the pain score and TRSS in patients achieving an objective response with EXE vs. MA. Quality of life improved or was similar for EXE in most domains. Exemestane offers an important new treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

New clinical trials for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

In oncology there is an increasing interest in neuroendocrine tumors, whose incidence is generally considered low, although in a recent analysis of 5,468 cases there was an increase in the proportion of pulmonary and gastric carcinoids and a decrease in the appendiceal carcinoids. However carcinoid tumors are indolent and their diagnosis is often difficult to carry out, so the true incidence may be higher. Surgery remains the treatment of choice and it should always be considered in patients with neuroendocrine tumors although a complete cure is difficult to obtain. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is the medical treatment for highly proliferating neuroendocrine tumors, but it has showed a modest benefit. Somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide are the standard hormonal treatment for neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, two trials on lanreotide and octreotide have been published, and it is worth noting that in each trial a long-acting formulation has been used: for lanreotide a prolonged-release formulation (PR) which allows an injection of 30 mg every 2 weeks, and for octreotide a long-acting release formulation (LAR) which allows an injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg every 28 days. The results of each trial are very promising. However, there are methodological and clinical aspects which make it difficult to carry out new trials for studying neuroendocrine tumors. The increasing number of biological markers deserve further investigations before their wide use in clinical practice.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1999

Chromogranin A, neuron specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and hydroxyindole acetic acid evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Chromogranin A (CgA), neuron specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and urinary 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA) are the markers currently used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The authors examined the role of such biomarkers in a large series of patients with NETs. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients entered the study. Multiple blood and 24-hour urine specimens were assayed for biomarker quantitation. RESULTS: The accuracy of each marker was assessed in patients with (n = 106) and without (n = 21) disease. CgA proved to be the best marker (specificity of 85.7% and sensitivity of 67.9%). Patients with disease had significantly higher CgA and NSE levels compared with disease free patients (P = 0.00003 and P = 0.00240, respectively). NSE and 5-HIAA determination showed a very high specificity (100%) but a rather low sensitivity (32.9% and 35.1%, respectively). CEA was found to have little diagnostic value (sensitivity of 15.4%). CgA was the most sensitive marker for detecting patients with disseminated disease and 5-HIAA displayed the highest sensitivity in identifying syndromic patients. Tumor marker modifications were studied during follow-up. In particular, rises in CgA were associated with progressive disease in 83.3% of cases and stable CgA was associated with stable disease in 53.8% of cases. The relation between CgA modifications and liver lesions during follow-up also was studied; increases in CgA levels were associated with local progression in 100% of cases and stable marker levels were found in 68.7% of the patients with unchanged lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrate that CgA has the highest accuracy and is the most reliable biomarker reflecting the clinical evolution of NETs.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed1999

Double-blind, randomised, multicentre endocrine trial comparing two letrozole doses, in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Letrozole is an orally competitive aromatase inhibitor. This double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial was carried out to evaluate the endocrine effects of two doses of letrozole, 0.5 mg versus 2.5 mg orally daily, in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients progressing after tamoxifen. The pharmacokinetics of letrozole was also assessed. 46 patients entered the trial, 22 on letrozole 0.5 mg and 24 on 2.5 mg. A significant suppression of oestrone and oestradiol levels was achieved by both letrozole doses. Neither letrozole dose induced any changes in cortisol and aldosterone production at rest or after Synacthen stimulation. Androstenedione, testosterone, 17 alpha-OH progesterone, triiodothyronine (T3) thyroxine, (T4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) plasma levels did not show any significant changes. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) levels increased significantly over time. Plasma letrozole concentrations increased until reaching steady-state values after 1 month at the dose of 0.5 mg and after 2 months at 2.5 mg. In conclusion, both letrozole doses suppressed oestrogen levels without affecting adrenal activity.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole are new aromatase inhibitors with a nonsteroidal structure (NSS), and have been demonstrated to be highly effective and better tolerated than standard endocrine therapy with megestrol (megestrol acetate) and aminoglutethimide (AG). These agents are very potent and selective: all of them are capable of suppressing estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) to the limit of sensitivity methods, and plasma estrone sulfate (E1S) levels are also suppressed. However, the fact that this potency has not led to any greater clinical efficacy, and that there is no relationship between estrogen suppression and clinical response, suggests that aromatase inhibitors may have additional mechanisms of action. A number of international, multicentre clinical trials have compared anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole with megestrol 160 mg/day or AG 500 mg/day plus hydrocortisone in patients with advanced breast cancer. Letrozole proved to be significantly more effective than megestrol but anastrozole had a greater effect on survival than either agent. However, letrozole therapy led to longer survival than that observed in patients treated with AG. The activity of vorozole was similar to that of megestrol and AG. These results have raised a number of questions. The first is how should the clinical results be evaluated, given that 'disease stabilisation lasting > or =6 months' has been considered a response? The second is how should these drugs be used, and whether there is a rationale for using them in combination or sequentially in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer? Finally, is the possible effect of formestane and vorozole on intratumoral aromatase an alternative or concomitant mechanism of action? Anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole will be compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer in adjuvant and primary settings. However, we feel that concomitant biological and clinical studies should also be carried out in order to clarify the properties of these drugs and avoid possible risks for patients over time.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1998

Effects of short-term pre-operative tamoxifen on steroid receptor and Ki-67 expression in primary breast cancer: an immunocytochemical study.

The effects of the short-term pre-operative administration of tamoxifen (TAM, 20 mg once daily) on the tumor levels of steroid receptors and the nuclear proliferation Ki-67 antigen, were investigated in 32 elderly patients with hormone-sensitive, operable primary breast cancer by means of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). The FNAB smears before (pre-TAM) and after six weeks of treatment (post-TAM) were stained immunocytochemically in order to obtain an H-score for steroid receptors, and the percentage of cellular nuclei containing Ki-67. The mean oestrogen receptor (ER) score between the pre- and post-TAM specimens fell from 181.2 9.7 ( SEM) to 148.1 7.9 (Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank test, p=0. 01) and there was also a significant decrease in both the mean progesterone receptor (PgR) score (178.4 10.6 vs 148.5 10.6; p=0.01) and mean Ki-67 index (8.2% 1.2 vs 4.9% 0.9; p=0.0002). The reliability of FNAB as a sampling method was checked by comparing the results of the immunocytochemical assay (ICA) of the post-TAM biopsies with those of the immunohistochemical assay (IHA) of the corresponding excised tumors. There was a positive correlation between the ICA and IHA scores: ER (Spearman's correlation coefficient, rho=0.66, p<0.001), PgR (rho=0.84, p<0.001) and Ki-67 (rho=0.96, p<0.001). We conclude that the sequential use of FNAB is a reliable means of assessing the behaviour of within-tumor biomarkers during endocrine therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

The minimal effective exemestane dose for endocrine activity in advanced breast cancer.

Phase I studies have demonstrated that exemestane, an irreversible oral aromatase inhibitor, is able to suppress circulating oestrogen levels. In our previous experience, doses ranging from 2.5 to 25 mg induced a similar suppression of oestrogens. The aim of this study was to identify the minimum effective exemestane dose on the basis of endocrine activity. 20 evaluable postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients were randomly given exemestane 0.5, 1, 2.5 or 5 mg, in double-blind conditions. Oestrone (E1), oestradiol (E2), oestrone sulphate (E1S), gonadotrophins, sex-hormone binding globulin and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate serum levels were evaluated from the first day of treatment to the 7th, 14th, 28th and 56th day. Serum E1, E2 and E1S levels were suppressed by all doses starting from day 7; the degree of inhibition versus baseline was 25 up to 72% for E1, 30 up to 62% for E2 and 16 up to 52% for E1S, with higher doses achieving greater suppression; these changes were maintained over time. A significant increase in FSH and LH levels was observed for all doses. Treatment tolerability was satisfactory. The endocrine effects of exemestane appear to be dose related and 0.5 and 1 mg are ineffective for adequately suppressing circulating oestrogens.

Aged↗