Biomedical subjects

Naeem A Soomro

Publications and source records attributed to Naeem A Soomro.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

The effect of inadequate in situ perfusion in the non heart-beating donor.

In situ aortic perfusion in the nonheart-beating donors (NHBD) is an important procedure to reduce primary warm ischaemic injury prior to formal donor organ retrieval. It allows an interim period to obtain donor family consent and theatre preparation. This study describes our experience of inadequate aortic perfusions resulting from difficult aortic cannulations and associated adverse outcome despite reasonable viability tests. Since 1998, all NHBD in our institution are perfused in situ using a double balloon triple lumen (DBTL) catheter inserted through a femoral artery cut-down procedure. The DBTL catheter is positioned with distal occlusive balloon at the aortic bifurcation using the "pull-back" technique, the proximal occlusive balloon lies above the renal arteries. This provides selective aortic perfusion in particular the kidneys. Venous decompression using a femoral vein catheter enables a "two-way infusion system". Pre-transplant viability status of retrieved kidneys is determined by measuring pressure/resistance characteristics to the flow and biochemical markers for ischaemic injury. There were 90 NHBD renal transplants performed from 72 donors. Three renal transplants were carried out from three donors of ineffective in situ perfusion secondary to cannulation difficulties. Femoral cannulation was difficult as a result of extensive atherosclerosis of donor vessels. The comparison of allograft outcome from effective and ineffective in situ perfusion of donors showed high rate of primary nonfunction (PNF) from ineffective perfusion (chi-squared, P < 0.0001). The cases demonstrated poor outcome from ineffective perfusion related to the cannulation difficulties. Therefore a strict policy should be taken in cases where aortic cannulation and perfusion is inadequate, despite pretransplant assessment. In these circumstances, the primary warm ischaemia time should be extended to include this period of ineffective perfusion.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience.

UNLABELLED: A comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy is presented by authors from the UK. They found that the laparoscopic approach could safely be offered to patients treated in experienced units and after adequate training fo the surgeon, with no increase in complications or decrease in efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare our early experience of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) with a contemporary cohort of conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Transperitoneal left-sided LDN was offered to carefully selected potential live kidney donors on the basis of vascular anatomy. The first 20 donors who underwent LDN were compared with a control group of 20 patients who had ODN. Donors and recipients were compared for demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications and allograft function. RESULTS: There was no peri-operative mortality in either group. No laparoscopic procedure required open conversion. The operating time was comparable (165 vs 153 min); LDN was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (200 vs 350 mL; Mann-Whitney U, P = 0.01) and hospital stay (3 vs 5 days; P < 0.001). The graft warm ischaemic time was significantly longer for LDN (5 vs 2 min; P < 0.001) but this did not appear to affect either the delayed graft function rate (5% vs 10%, not significant) or serum creatinine level at discharge (125 vs 126 micromol/L). CONCLUSIONS: UK centres with experience of advanced laparoscopy and ODN can safely offer LDN to potential live donors.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one donors underwent multislice spiral CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA. In addition to axial images, multiplanar reconstruction and maximum intensity projections were used to display the renal vascular anatomy. Twenty-four donors had a left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), whereas seven had right open donor nephrectomy (ODN); LDN was only considered if the renal vascular anatomy was favourable on the left. CTA and MRA images were analysed by two radiologists independently. The radiological and surgical findings were correlated after the surgery. RESULTS: CTA showed 33 arteries and 32 veins (100% sensitivity) whereas MRA showed 32 arteries and 31 veins (97% sensitivity). CTA detected all five accessory renal arteries whereas MRA only detected one. CTA also identified all three accessory renal veins whereas MRA identified two. CTA had a sensitivity of 97% and 47% for left lumbar and left gonadal veins, whereas MRA had a sensitivity of 74% and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multislice spiral CTA with three-dimensional reconstruction was more accurate than MRA for both renal arterial and venous anatomy.

Donor Selection↗

PubMed2004

Graft function after kidney transplantation from non-heartbeating donors according to maastricht category.

PURPOSE: Donor shortages have led to some groups using alternative sources such as non-heartbeating donors (NHBDs). Kidneys from NHBDs suffer from warm ischemia at cardiac arrest which is reflected by acute tubular necrosis of the allograft, resulting in a period of delayed graft function. NHBDs are categorized by the circumstances surrounding the agonal events of death which reflect differences in the likelihood of ischemic injury to the kidney. In this study we determined the impact of ischemic injury on the renal function of kidneys procured from different categories of NHBDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2003, 144 kidneys were procured from 72 NHBDs resulting in 93 transplants characterized into Maastricht categories II, III and IV NHBD renal transplants. Renal function after transplant was evaluated from the last dialysis until discharge from hospital, and then at 3 monthly intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Primary warm ischemic time is more prolonged in the uncontrolled donor (category II) than controlled donor (category III greater than IV). Delayed graft function occurs more frequently (Maastricht category II 83.8%, III 67.4% and IV 0%, ANOVA p <0.05) and the return to normal function is more prolonged in uncontrolled donors. This is illustrated by the greater incidence of acute tubular necrosis (Maastricht category II 81.1%, III 65.2% and IV 50.0%, ANOVA p = nonsignificant) in the kidney allograft. There was no difference in year 1 allograft survival (Maastricht category II 83.9%, III 92.5% and IV 100%, ANOVA p = nonsignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Early graft function is poorest in kidneys derived from Maastricht category II donors and best in category IV with III in-between. However, after 3 months the function of kidneys from all donors is the same.

Adult↗