PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nael Kilzieh

Publications and source records attributed to Nael Kilzieh.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

The distinct temperament profiles of bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies, controversies abound on whether the long-term traits of unipolar and bipolar patients could be differentiated by temperament and whether these traits, in turn, could be distinguished from subthreshold affective symptomatology. METHODS: 98 bipolar I (BP-I), 64 bipolar II (BP-II), and 251 unipolar major depressive disorder (UP-MDD) patients all when recovered from discrete affective episodes) and 617 relatives, spouses or acquaintances without lifetime RDC diagnoses (the comparison group, CG) were administered a battery of 17 self-rated personality scales chosen for theoretical relevance to mood disorders. Subsamples of each of the four groups also received the General Behavior Inventory (GBI). RESULTS: Of the 436 personality items, 103 that significantly distinguished the three patient groups were subjected to principal components analysis, yielding four factors which reflect the temperamental dimensions of "Mood Lability", "Energy-Assertiveness," "Sensitivity-Brooding," and "Social Anxiety." Most BP-I described themselves as near normal in emotional stability and extroversion; BP-II emerged as labile in mood, energetic and assertive, yet sensitive and brooding; MDD were socially timid, sensitive and brooding. Gender and age did not have marked influence on these overall profiles. Within the MDD group, those with baseline dysthymia were the most pathological (i.e., high in neuroticism, insecurity and introversion). Selected GBI items measuring hypomania and biphasic mood changes were endorsed significantly more often by BP-II. Finally, it is relevant to highlight a methodologic finding about the precision these derived temperament factors brought to the UP-BP differentiation. Unlike BP-I who were low on neuroticism, both BP-II and UP scored high on this measure: yet, in the case of BP-II high neuroticism was largely due to mood lability, in UP it reflected subdepressive traits. LIMITATION: We used self-rated personality measures, a possible limitation generic to the paper-and-pencil personality literature. It is therefore likely that BP-I may have over-rated their "sanguinity"; or should one consider such self-report as a reliable reflection of one's temperament? One can raise similar unanswerable questions about "depressiveness" and "mood lability." CONCLUSION: As contrasted to CG and published norms, the postmorbid self-described "usual" personality is 1) sanguine among many, but not all, BP-I; 2) labile or cyclothymic among BP-II; and 3) subanxious and subdepressive among UP. It is further noteworthy that with the exception of BP-II, the temperament scores of BP-I and MDD were within one SD from published norms. Rather than being pathological, these attributes are best conceived as subclinical temperamental variants of the normal, thereby supporting the notion of continuity between interepisodic and episodic phases of affective disorders. These findings overall are in line with Kraepelin's views and contrary to the DSM-IV formulation of axis-II constructs as being pathological and sharply demarcated from affective episodes.

Adult↗

Abstinence, anticipation, reduction, and treatment (AART): a stepwise approach to the management of atypical antipsychotic side effects.

Antipsychotic medications, specifically the atypical agents, serve as first-line treatment options for patients with psychotic disorders, including individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Atypical antipsychotics are also often prescribed off-label as either the primary treatment or as an adjunctive treatment for individuals with other disorders, including mood disorders without psychosis, behavioral disorders, and insomnia. Despite the generally superior side-effect profiles of atypical antipsychotics compared with typical antipsychotic agents, the atypicals have been associated with a number of serious side effects, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disorders, seizures, hyperprolactinemia, and movement disorders. This article offers a stepwise approach to the management of antipsychotic side effects: Abstinence, Anticipation, Reduction, and Treatment (AART). The steps in AART are hierarchical, but often overlap in the areas of risk prevention and minimization. The authors discuss issues relevant to each level of intervention and provide suggestions for integrating the AART approach into a comprehensive treatment plan. By incorporating this stepwise approach into their clinical decision-making process, prescribers may be able to optimize the risk:benefit ratio associated with the prescription of atypical antipsychotics.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Combination antipsychotic therapy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed, yet few clinical studies have examined this practice. Experts have generally recommended antipsychotic combinations, especially those combining an atypical and a conventional antipsychotic, as a measure of last resort. A survey of prescribers was conducted to examine why combination antipsychotic therapy is being used in outpatient clinical practice. METHODS: Antipsychotic prescribing practices in the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health System were reviewed for a six-month period during 1998-1999. Data on the use of atypical and conventional antipsychotics in combination were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1,794 patients received prescriptions for at least one antipsychotic medication during the study period, of which 715 (40 percent) received an atypical agent. Ninety-three patients (13 percent) who were treated with an atypical antipsychotic received a prescription for combination antipsychotic therapy for at least 30 days. In cases in which both a conventional and an atypical agent were prescribed, the primary reason given for adding a conventional antipsychotic medication was to treat persistent positive symptoms. The primary reason an atypical agent was added to a conventional agent was to switch medications to the atypical agent; however, a significant number of patients became "stuck" on the combination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support previous reports of the frequent use of combination antipsychotic therapy in clinical practice. Prospective controlled trials are needed to substantiate perceptions that combination antipsychotic therapy is clinically beneficial and to provide guidelines on when and for whom antipsychotic polypharmacy should be considered.

Adult↗

Socio-demographic correlates of psychiatric morbidity among low-income women in Aleppo, Syria.

Interest in mental morbidity as an important component of health is increasing worldwide. Women generally suffer more than men from common mental disorders, and discrimination against women adds to their mental sufferings. Studies looking into the socio-demographic correlates of women's mental morbidity are lacking in most Arab countries. In this study we wanted to determine the spread and socio-demographic correlates of mental distress among low-income women in Aleppo, Syria. A sample of 412 women was recruited from 8 randomly selected primary care centers in Aleppo. Response rate was 97.2%, mean age of participants 28 + 8.4 years, where married women constituted 87.9%. A special questionnaire was prepared for the study purpose, utilizing the SRQ-20 non-psychotic items and questions about background information considered relevant to the mental health of women in the studied population. Interviews were conducted in an anonymous one-to-one fashion. The prevalence of psychiatric distress in our sample was 55.6%. Predictors of women's mental health in the logistic regression analysis were; physical abuse, women's education, polygamy, residence, age and age of marriage. Among these predictors, women's illiteracy, polygamy and physical abuse were the strongest determinants of mental distress leading to the worse outcomes. Our data show that mental distress is common in the studied population and that it is strongly associated with few, possibly modifiable, factors.

Adolescent↗

Depression in Kraepelinian schizophrenia.

In order to improve our understanding of depression in chronic schizophrenia, depressive symptoms were assessed in institutionalized, so called Kraepelinian, patients with schizophrenia (N = 43). The patients had been ill and dependent on others for at least 5 years. Depressive symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) scale were less prevalent in this population compared to published data on non-Kraepelinian patients. Only 5% of our Kraepelinian patients had a HAM-D score >/= 16. There was also a low prevalence of core depressive symptoms (depressed mood, suicidal ideation, and guilt). The relationship of depression to other dimensions of schizophrenia was explored. Depression had a modest positive correlation (r = 0.44) with general psychopathology as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), but not with positive symptoms as measured by BPRS positive subscale or negative symptoms as measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Depression also showed a modest positive correlation (r =.48) using the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS) for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). These results indicate that in Kraepelinian schizophrenia, depression is not prevalent, even though patients are severely ill both in symptom and functioning domains. The results of our analysis support that Kraepelinian schizophrenia is a distinct subtype, and raise questions regarding the boundary between schizoaffective disorder and non-Kraepelinian schizophrenia. Finally, the low rate of depression observed revives the notion that preservation of core functional abilities is important for a depressive reaction to evolve in schizophrenia.

Adult↗