PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nancy L Havill

Publications and source records attributed to Nancy L Havill.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Lack of association between the increased incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease and the increasing use of alcohol-based hand rubs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between the increasing use of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) and the increased incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). SETTING: A 500-bed university-affiliated community teaching hospital. METHODS: Use of ABHRs during the period 2000-2003 was expressed as the number of liters of ABHR used per 1000 patient-days. The proportion of hand hygiene episodes performed by using an ABHR was determined by periodic observational surveys. CDAD was defined as a physician-ordered stool assay positive for C. difficile toxin A or A/B. The incidence of CDAD was expressed as the number of unique patients who had 1 or more positive CDAD test results per 1,000 patient-days. RESULTS: During 2000-2003, the use of ABHR increased 10-fold, from 3 to greater than 30 L/1,000 patient-days (P<.001). The proportion of hand hygiene episodes performed using an ABHR increased from 10% to 85% (P<.001). The incidence of CDAD in 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 was 1.74, 2.33, 1.14, and 1.18 cases/1,000 patient-days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite a significant and progressive increase in the use of ABHRs in our facility during a 3-year period, there was no evidence that the incidence of CDAD increased. These findings suggest that factors other than the increased use of ABHRs are responsible for the increasing incidence of CDAD noted since 2000 in other facilities.

Alcohols↗

Nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea associated with enterotoxin-producing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to present new evidence that enterotoxin-producing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus may cause nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study that utilized standard methods to exclude other bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens as causes of nosocomial diarrhea in patients with heavy growth of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in their stool. Staphylococcal enterotoxin assays were performed on S. aureus strains recovered from patients' stools and on stool specimens from affected patients. Retrospective cohort studies compared the severity of diarrhea in patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus-associated diarrhea with that of patients whose stool did not contain the organism and with patients colonized or infected with enterotoxin-negative methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains. RESULTS: During an 18-month period, 11 patients had nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea associated with enterotoxin-producing strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Other common bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens were excluded. S. aureus strains from the 11 patients produced staphylococcal enterotoxin A, A and B, or D. Eighty-nine percent of patients had the same enterotoxin(s) in stool specimens as produced by the strain recovered from their stool. Case patients had a greater number of days of diarrhea than patients without methicillin-resistant S. aureus in their stool (p < 0.001), or randomly selected patients colonized or infected with enterotoxin-negative methicillin-resistant S. aureus (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence that enterotoxin-producing strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus may cause nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Greater recognition of this disease should result in more rapid and appropriate treatment of affected patients.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Clinical progression of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis associated with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin.

Daptomycin, a novel cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, exhibits rapid bactericidal activity in vitro against most clinically relevant gram-positive organisms, including drug-resistant pathogens. Herein we describe a patient in whom methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin was responsible for bacteremia and progressive vertebral osteomyelitis during daptomycin therapy.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Frequency and possible infection control implications of gastrointestinal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of health care-associated infections. Multiple factors, including transmission from unrecognized reservoirs of MRSA, are responsible for failure to control the spread of MRSA. We conducted prospective surveillance to determine the frequency of gastrointestinal colonization with MRSA among patients and its possible impact on nosocomial transmission of MRSA. Stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin A/B assays were routinely inoculated on colistin-naladixic acid agar plates, and S. aureus was identified by using standard methods. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by growth on oxacillin-salt screening agar. For patients whose stool yielded MRSA, information regarding any previous cultures positive for MRSA or other organisms that would require contact precautions was obtained from the laboratory's computer system. During a 1-year period, 151 (9.8%) of 1,543 patients who had one or more stool specimens screened had MRSA in their stool. Ninety-three (62%) of the 151 patients had no previous history of MRSA colonization or infection. Of these 93, 75 were inpatients. Sixty (80%) of the 75 inpatients with no previous history of MRSA were not under "contact precautions." The 60 patients would have spent an estimated total of 267 days without being placed under contact precautions if their positive stool cultures had not resulted in their being isolated. Placing patients under contact precautions based on their positive stool cultures prevented an estimated 35 episodes of MRSA transmission. We conclude that gastrointestinal colonization with MRSA may serve as an unrecognized reservoir from which transmission of MRSA may occur in health care facilities.

Adult↗

Do infection control measures work for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence regarding the effectiveness of control measures in reducing transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals. DESIGN: Literature review and surveillance cultures of hospitalized patients at high risk for MRSA colonization or infection. SETTING: A 500-bed, university-affiliated, community teaching hospital. RESULTS: The percentage of nosocomial S. aureus infections caused by MRSA increased significantly between 1982 and 2002, despite the use of various isolation and barrier precaution policies. The apparent ineffectiveness of control measures may be due to several factors including the failure to identify patients colonized with MRSA. For example, cultures of stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin assays at one hospital found that 12% of patients had MRSA in their stool, and 41% of patients with unrecognized colonization were cared for without using barrier precautions. Other factors include the use of barrier precaution strategies that do not account for multiple reservoirs of MRSA, poor adherence of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recommended barrier precautions and handwashing, failure to identify and treat HCWs responsible for transmitting MRSA, and importation of MRSA by patients admitted from other facilities. Control programs that include active surveillance cultures (ASCs) of high-risk patients and use of barrier precautions have reduced MRSA prevalence rates and have been cost-effective. Using a staged approach to implementing ASCs can minimize logistic problems. CONCLUSION: MRSA control programs are effective if they include ASCs of high-risk patients, use of barrier precautions when caring for colonized or infected patients, hand hygiene, and treating HCWs implicated in MRSA transmission.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗