PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Natasha Rekhtman

Publications and source records attributed to Natasha Rekhtman.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

IASLC Update on Classification of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Since the publication of the 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors, our knowledge of pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has expanded significantly, particularly through the elucidation of molecular pathways and proposals to refine histopathologic classification. This expanded knowledge across all aspects of pulmonary NENs holds promise for more precise stratification of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the potential development of novel, subtype-specific therapeutic strategies for all NENs. Based on our comprehensive review of the current pulmonary NEN landscape, our multidisciplinary expert panel has deliberated on the modification and updating of the 2021 classification, resulting in the proposal of a new pulmonary carcinoid/NET classification presented in this position paper, which incorporates the following three major points: (1) The proposed framework continues the shift from the traditional carcinoid terminology toward broader adoption of the "NET" nomenclature as found in other organ systems while retaining the term "carcinoid" as the primary diagnostic term to ensure clear communication with thoracic clinical providers. (2) Ki-67 has been incorporated as a diagnostic criterion, aligning with practices in other NET classifications. (3) There is formal recognition of the concept of "carcinoid/NET G3," a rare subset of lung carcinoids characterized by increased proliferative activity but with molecular features more aligned with pulmonary NETs than with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. This position paper on the current knowledge of pulmonary NENs, including the proposed carcinoid/NET classification, will aid in accurate tumor categorization and guide treatment strategies.

Carcinoid tumor

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were&#xa0;followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Biomarkers, Tumor