PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nathalie Paquet

Publications and source records attributed to Nathalie Paquet.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Blue blocker glasses impede the capacity of bright light to suppress melatonin production.

Blocking morning light exposure with dark goggles can contribute to the adjustment to night work but these glasses are incompatible with driving. Recently, it was discovered that the biological clock is most sensitive to short wavelengths (blue light). Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that cutting the blue portion of the light spectrum with orange lens glasses (blue blockers) would prevent the light-induced melatonin suppression, a test broadly used as an indirect assessment of the circadian clock sensitivity. Fourteen normal subjects were exposed at night to a 60 min bright light pulse (1300 lx behind filters) between 01:00 and 02:00 hr while wearing orange lens glasses (experimental condition) or grey lens glasses (control condition). The amount of salivary melatonin change observed during the light pulse was compared with a melatonin baseline obtained the night before. Although both glasses transmitted the same illuminance (1300 lx) but at an irradiance 25% higher for the orange lens (408 microW/cm2) compared with the grey lens (327 microW/cm2), a non-significant increase of 6% (95% CI, -20% to 9%) was observed with the orange lens whereas a significant (P < 0.05) reduction of 46% (95% CI, 35-57%) was observed with the grey lens. Blue blockers represent an elegant means to prevent the light-induced melatonin suppression. Further studies are needed to show that these glasses, which are suitable for driving, could facilitate adaptation to night work.

Adult↗

Improved real-time RT-PCR method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative calculation and double correction.

Quantification of mRNA expression levels using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) is increasingly used to validate results of DNA microarrays or GeneChips. It requires an improved method that is more robust and more suitable for high-throughput measurements. In this report, we compare a user non-influent, second derivative method with that of a user influent, fit point method that is widely used in the literature. We also describe the advantage of using a double correction: one correction using the expression levels of a housekeeping gene of an experiment as an internal standard and a second using reference expression levels of the same housekeeping gene in the tissue or cells. The first correction permits one to decrease errors due to sample preparation and handling, while the second correction permits one to avoid the variation of the results with the variability of housekeeping in each tissue, especially in experiments using various treatments. The data indicate that the real-time PCR method is highly efficient with an efficiency coefficient close to the theoretical value of two. The results also show that the second derivative method is more accurate than the fit point method in quantifying low gene expression levels. Using triplicate experiments, we show that measurement variations using our method are low with a mean of variation coefficients of <1%.

Algorithms↗