PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Neal J Meropol

Publications and source records attributed to Neal J Meropol.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Can molecular imaging predict response to preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer? A Fox Chase Cancer Center prospective experience.

This study was undertaken to correlate change in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) uptake with response to combined-modality neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Twenty patients (13 male; 7 female) underwent (18)FDG-PET scans before and 3 to 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiation before surgery. Staging by endoscopic ultrasound was T3/T4 (17/1); two patients were unable to undergo endorectal ultrasound. Fifteen patients had perirectal lymphadenopathy. Median radiation dose was 5,040 cGy (range, 4,500 to 5,500 cGy). All patients received continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (or capecitabine) with radiation. Median pre- and post-chemoradiation standard uptake values were 9.4 (range, 3.6 to 37.0) and 3.05 (range, 0.5 to 8.2), respectively. Median percent standard uptake value decrease observed in the postchemoradiation PET scans was 71% (range, 7% to 95%). Six patients (30%) had pathologic complete response. Only two of six patients with postchemoradiation standard uptake values <or=2.5 had a complete pathologic response. The time from the end of radiation to surgery was marginally significant for predicting pathologic complete response (P = .12). Neoadjuvant combined-modality therapy resulted in decreased metabolic activity on PET. Because response to preoperative treatment predicts clinical outcome, the utility of midtreatment PET scans to guide treatment decisions should be further explored in larger clinical studies.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Changing patterns of bone and brain metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic advances for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have been associated with prolonged survival. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that expanded treatment options and resultant improved survival for patients with metastatic CRC are associated with an increased incidence of metastases at uncommon sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic CRC evaluated from 1993 to 2002 at the Fox Chase Cancer Center were identified. Medical records were abstracted to obtain the following: date of diagnosis/metastasis, primary tumor site, therapeutic agents received, survival, and site(s) of metastases. RESULTS: The records of 1020 patients were reviewed. Incidence of bone and brain metastases were 10.4% (95% CI, 8.6%-12.4%) and 3% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.5%), respectively. Bone metastases were more common with increased numbers of active systemic agents received: 0 (3.7%), 1 (9.4%), 2 (10.9%), 3 (16.3%), and 4/5 (17.4%; P = 0.001; trend test). Patients receiving irinotecan or oxaliplatin were more likely to develop bone metastases (13.2% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.01 for irinotecan; 16.9% vs. 9%, P = 0.003 for oxaliplatin). Patients with primary rectal versus primary colon cancer were more likely to develop bone metastases (16% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.001). Patients with lung metastases were more likely to have bone metastases (16.1% vs. 6.4%; P < 0.0001) or brain metastases (6.2% vs. 1.2%; P < 0.0001) than those without. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the incidence of bone and brain metastases in patients with CRC is more common than previously reported and is associated with receipt of multiple systemic treatments. As survival improves for this patient population, clinicians should be aware of the potential for metastases at previously uncommon sites.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Loss of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase and elevated ornithine decarboxylase is common in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Loss of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) gene at 9p21 is observed frequently in a variety of human cancers. We have shown previously that MTAP can act as a tumor suppressor gene and that its tumor suppressor function is related to its effect on polyamine homeostasis. Ornithine decarboxylase is a key enzyme in the regulation of polyamine metabolism. The aim of this study is to analyze MTAP and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) expression in primary pancreatic tumor specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We measured MTAP and ODC activity in protein extracts derived from 30 surgically resected tumor samples and eight normal pancreas samples. In a subset of six samples, we also examined MTAP DNA using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. In addition, we examined the effect of the ODC inhibitor difluoromethylornithine on two pancreatic adenocarcinoma-derived cell lines. RESULT: MTAP activity was 2.8-fold reduced in adenocarcinomas and 6.3-fold reduced in neuroendocrine tumors compared with control pancreas. Conversely, ODC activity was 3.6-fold elevated in adenocarcinomas and 3.9-fold elevated in neuroendocrine tumors compared with control pancreas. Using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found in tumor samples that 43 to 75% of the nuclei had lost at least one copy of MTAP locus, indicating that loss of MTAP activity was at least partially because of deletion of the MTAP locus. We also show that inhibition of ODC by difluoromethylornithine caused decreased cell growth and increased apoptosis in two MTAP-deleted pancreatic adenocarcinoma-derived cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: MTAP activity is frequently lost, and ODC activity is frequently elevated in both pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. Inhibition of ODC activity caused decreased cell growth and increased apoptosis in pancreatic tumor-derived cell lines. These findings suggest that MTAP and polyamine metabolism could be potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Telomerase is frequently activated in tumors with microsatellite instability.

Telomeres are specialized structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes that are required for the complete replication and stability of naturally occurring chromosome ends. Telomere stabilization is critical for the unlimited cellular proliferation that is necessary for tumor formation. While most tumors achieve telomere stabilization through activation of telomerase, a subset of tumors utilize a recombination-based mechanism termed Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) to maintain chromosome termini. Tumors utilizing ALT for telomere preservation will likely be refractory to treatment with telomerase inhibitors. Furthermore, tumors carrying mutations that predispose a cell to utilize ALT may activate this pathway when challenged by telomerase inhibition. Mutation of the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway enhances telomerase independent survival in yeast, with the survivors using recombination-based pathways for telomere maintenance. One possibility is that mutation of the MMR pathways alleviates suppression of recombination, thereby abrogating the need for telomerase activation. If true, one might predict an increased frequency of tumors harboring MMR mutation to use ALT for telomere maintenance. Here we characterized tumors with and without MMR mutation for the presence of telomerase activity versus ALT. We found similarly frequent activation of telomerase in tumors with and without MMR mutation, suggesting that human tumors with MMR mutation may respond favorably to treatment with telomerase inhibitors.

Base Pair Mismatch↗
PubMed2004

Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of single-agent cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer whose tumors express the epidermal growth factor receptor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase II, open-label clinical trial. Patients were required to have EGFr expression demonstrated on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining before study participation. Patients were required to have received irinotecan, either alone or in a combination regimen, and to have demonstrated clinical failure on this regimen before study entry. Cetuximab was administered weekly by intravenous infusion. The first dose of 400 mg/m(2) was given during the course of 2 hours. Subsequent weekly treatments were given at a dose of 250 mg/m(2) during the course of 1 hour. RESULTS: Fifty-seven eligible patients were treated. All were assessable for toxicity and response. The most commonly encountered grade 3 to 4 adverse events, regardless of relationship to study drug, were an acne-like skin rash, predominantly on the face and upper torso (86% with any grade; 18% with grade 3), and a composite of asthenia, fatigue, malaise, or lethargy (56% with any grade, 9% with grade 3). Two patients (3.5%) experienced grade 3 allergic reactions requiring discontinuation of study treatment. A third patient experienced a grade 3 allergic reaction that resolved, and the patient continued on the study. Neither diarrhea nor neutropenia were dose limiting in any of the 57 patients treated. Five patients (9%; 95% CI, 3% to 19%) achieved a partial response. Twenty-one additional patients had stable disease or minor responses. The median survival in these previously treated patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer is 6.4 months. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab on this once-weekly schedule has modest activity and is well-tolerated as a single agent in patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer whose tumors express the epidermal growth factor receptor. Further studies of cetuximab will evaluate the use of cetuximab in conjunction with first-line and adjuvant treatments for this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: R115777 is a selective, nonpeptidomimetic inhibitor of farnesyltransferase (FTase), an enzyme responsible for the post-translational modification of several proteins, including Ras. Given the high frequency of K-Ras mutations in malignancies commonly treated with irinotecan, the broad preclinical antiproliferative activity of R115777 and its largely non-overlapping toxicity profile with irinotecan, this phase I study of the combination of R115777 and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer was undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled onto the study were 14 patients (eight male, six female; median age 63 years, range 48-72 years). Five patients had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0, eight patients PS 1, and one patient PS 2. The patients were treated with R115777 orally twice daily for 28 days and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 42-day cycle. Seven patients received R115777 100 mg twice daily and seven received R115777 200 mg twice daily. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was experienced by one of seven patients treated with R115777 100 mg (grade 3 fatigue), and two of seven patients treated with R115777 200 mg (grade 3 diarrhea, grade 4 neutropenia lasting >5 days). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was R115777 100 mg twice daily and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) weekly. Non-DLTs were primarily rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and neutropenia. R115777 demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics without interaction with irinotecan and achieved serum levels required for antitumor activity in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of R115777 exceeded those necessary for FTase inhibition in vitro without evidence of interaction with irinotecan. However, the MTD of R115777 in this study was lower than that obtained with an alternate schedule. Thus, further development of this schedule is not recommended.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with oxaliplatin and capecitabine: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The current study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the objective response rate, and a secondary endpoint was to measure the time to disease progression. METHODS: A 2-stage trial was planned with an accrual goal of 35 patients. The treatment included oxaliplatin given at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Initially, capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses was given on Days 1-14 of each cycle, but this was reduced to a dose of 1500 mg/m2/day because of toxicity. Patients were followed by computed tomography scans every two cycles to evaluate treatment response, and toxicity was monitored. RESULTS: The first 13 patients on the trial received the higher dose of capecitabine. Although 5 responses (38.5%) were noted, 5 patients were hospitalized with diarrhea and dehydration. This toxicity led to a decrease in the dose of capecitabine to 1500 mg/m2/day and an additional 35 patients were treated. At the lower dose, the partial response rate was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21.5-55.1%). The estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.4-8.2 months). At the lower dose, four patients were hospitalized with diarrhea/dehydration (with one death reported), one with febrile neutropenia, and one with ventricular fibrillation. Overall, Grade (according to version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) 3-4 diarrhea was reported to develop in 20% of those patients treated at the capecitabine dose of 1500 mg/m2/day compared with 62% of patients treated at the dose of 2000 mg/m2/day. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is an active and convenient regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and should be compared with other front-line regimens as therapy for disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a promise fulfilled?

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly expressed in colorectal cancers but not in most normal tissues, raising the possibility that this receptor could serve as a target for highly selective therapy. Based on preclinical studies demonstrating that antagonists of EGFR resulted in the inhibition of tumor growth, the development of clinical reagents has been aggressively pursued. Early clinical studies demonstrated antitumor activity of EGFR inhibitors in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with acceptable toxicity. This early success fueled rapid clinical development. In this article, we will review the current status of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer, in an effort to describe both how far we have come as well as where we need to go in optimizing this promising therapeutic approach.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

The base excision repair enzyme MED1 mediates DNA damage response to antitumor drugs and is associated with mismatch repair system integrity.

Cytotoxicity of methylating agents is caused mostly by methylation of the O6 position of guanine in DNA to form O6-methylguanine (O6-meG). O6-meG can direct misincorporation of thymine during replication, generating O6-meG:T mismatches. Recognition of these mispairs by the mismatch repair (MMR) system leads to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. MMR also modulates sensitivity to other antitumor drugs. The base excision repair (BER) enzyme MED1 (also known as MBD4) interacts with the MMR protein MLH1. MED1 was found to exhibit thymine glycosylase activity on O6-meG:T mismatches. To examine the biological significance of this activity, we generated mice with targeted inactivation of the Med1 gene and prepared mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) with different Med1 genotype. Unlike wild-type and heterozygous cultures, Med1-/- MEF failed to undergo G2-M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis upon treatment with the methylating agent N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). Similar results were obtained with platinum compounds' 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan. As is the case with MMR-defective cells, resistance of Med1-/- MEF to MNNG was due to a tolerance mechanism because DNA damage accumulated but did not elicit checkpoint activation. Interestingly, steady state amounts of several MMR proteins are reduced in Med1-/- MEF, in comparison with Med1+/+ and Med1+/- MEF. We conclude that MED1 has an additional role in DNA damage response to antitumor agents and is associated with integrity of the MMR system. MED1 defects (much like MMR defects) may impair cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by DNA damage.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients in Phase I clinical trials sometimes report high expectations regarding the benefit of treatment. The authors examined a range of patient characteristics to determine which factors were associated with greater expectations of benefit from Phase I trials. METHODS: Participants were adult patients with cancer who had been offered participation in Phase I studies and had decided to participate. Patients completed interviewer-administered surveys before initiation of treatment. Physicians assessed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status for each patient. Statistical analyses (Pearson product moment correlation and t tests) used multiple imputation to account for missing data. RESULTS: Overall, 593 patients who were offered participation in Phase I trials were contacted, and 328 patients agreed to participate in a study of decision making by cancer patients. Of these, 260 patients (79%) enrolled in a Phase I trial. Patients' expectations regarding the chance that their disease would be controlled with experimental therapy were unrelated to age, gender, living situation, education level, or functional status. Expectations were correlated positively with beliefs about the benefit of standard therapy and the maximum benefit patients may experience from experimental therapy. Greater expectations of benefit were associated with better health-related quality of life, stronger religious faith, optimism, relative health stock, monetary risk seeking, and poorer numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations expressed as beliefs in personal outcomes may be related more to quality of life and personality variables than to patients' knowledge or functional status. Whether such expectations are accurate reflections of knowledge has important implications for evaluating the informed consent process.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication.

PURPOSE: To describe and compare the perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians regarding phase I clinical trials. METHODS: Eligible patients had been offered phase I trial participation and had decided to participate but had not yet begun treatment. Each patient's physician also served as a study subject. Patients and physicians completed questionnaires with domains including perceptions of potential benefit and harm from treatment (experimental and standard), relative value of quality and length of life, and perceived content of patient-physician consultations. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients and 48 physicians completed surveys. Patients had high expectations regarding treatment outcomes (eg, median 60% benefit from experimental therapy), with those choosing to participate in a phase I trial being more optimistic than those declining phase I participation. Patients predicted a higher likelihood of both benefit and adverse reactions from treatment (experimental and standard) than their physicians (P <.0001 for all comparisons). Although 95% of patients reported that quality of life was at least as important as length of life, only 28% reported that changes in quality of life with treatment were discussed with their physicians. In contrast, 73% of physicians reported that this topic was discussed (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients offered phase I trial participation have expectations for treatment benefit that exceed those of their physicians. The discordant perceptions of patients and physicians may possibly be explained by patient optimism and confidence; however, the discrepancies in reports of consultation content, particularly given patients' stated values regarding quality of life, raise the possibility that communication in this context is suboptimal.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Randomized phase I trial of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemotherapy: potential role as mucosal protectant.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) when administered with fluorouracil (FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 81) received KGF by intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1 to 3, followed by FU 425 mg/m2/d IV bolus plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d IV on days 4 to 8. KGF dose levels were 1, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 microg/kg/d. A randomized, placebo-controlled design was employed (2:1 randomization of KGF to placebo). Oral mucositis was assessed by examination on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 28. In addition, patients provided daily assessments of oral symptoms using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Skin and oral events occurred in 13 of 18 patients (eight patients, grade 1; four patients, grade 2; and one patient, grade 3) treated with 60 and 80 microg/kg of KGF and three of 11 patients treated with 40 microg/kg (grade 1). These symptoms were dose limiting in three cases (ie, in two of 10 patients treated with 80 microg/kg and in one of eight patients treated with 60 microg/kg). The frequency of grade 2 to 4 mucositis was 43% in patients treated with KGF, compared with 67% in patients treated with placebo (P =.06). Patient self-assessments of oral pain and clinical assessments of mucositis showed good correlation (Kendall's tau = 0.75). CONCLUSION: KGF is generally well tolerated when administered IV at doses up to 40 microg/kg/d for 3 days before a 5-day course of FU plus leucovorin. A clinically meaningful biologic effect was also suggested in that patients treated with the epithelial growth factor KGF had a lower rate of grade 2 to 4 mucositis than did patients treated with placebo.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase II and pharmacodynamic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 as initial therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: R115777 is a selective nonpeptidomimetic inhibitor of farnesyltransferase (FTase), one of several enzymes responsible for posttranslational modification that is required for the function of p21(ras) and other proteins. Given that RAS mutations are nearly universal in pancreatic cancer and R115777 demonstrated preclinical activity against pancreatic cell lines and xenografts, this phase II study was undertaken to determine its clinical activity and effect on target proteins in patients with measurable metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease were treated with 300 mg of R115777 orally every 12 hours for 21 of 28 days. Inhibition of FTase activity in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells was measured using a lamin B C-terminus peptide as substrate. Western blot analysis was performed to monitor farnesylation status of the chaperone protein HDJ-2. RESULTS: No objective responses were seen. Median time to progression was 4.9 weeks, and median survival time was 19.7 weeks. The estimated 6-month survival rate was 25%, with no patients progression-free at 6 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities were liver enzyme elevation, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, rash, and anorexia. FTase activity (mean +/- SD) decreased by 49.8% +/- 9.8% 4 hours after treatment on day 1 and 36.1% +/- 24.8% before treatment on day 15. HDJ-2 farnesylation (mean +/- SD) decreased by 33.4% +/- 19.8% on day 15. CONCLUSION: Although treatment with R115777 resulted in partial inhibition of FTase activity in mononuclear cells, it did not exhibit single-agent antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Predictors of long-term outcomes in older breast cancer survivors: perceptions versus patterns of care.

PURPOSE: There are few data on sequelae of breast cancer treatments in older women. We evaluated posttreatment quality of life and satisfaction in a national population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted with a random cross-sectional sample of 1,812 Medicare beneficiaries 67 years of age and older who were 3, 4, and 5 years posttreatment for stage I and II breast cancer. Regression models were used to estimate the adjusted risk of decrements in physical and mental health functioning by treatment. In a subset of women (n = 732), additional data were used to examine arm problems, impact of cancer, and satisfaction, controlling for baseline health, perceptions of ageism and racism, demographic and clinical factors, region, and surgery year. RESULTS: Use of axillary dissection was the only surgical treatment that affected outcomes, increasing the risk of arm problems four-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 10.51), controlling for other factors. Having arm problems, in turn, exerted a consistently negative independent effect on all outcomes (P </=.001). Processes of care were also associated with quality of life and satisfaction. For example, women who perceived high levels of ageism or felt that they had no choice of treatment reported significantly more bodily pain, lower mental health scores, and less general satisfaction. These same factors, as well as high perceived racism, were significantly associated with diminished satisfaction with the medical care system. CONCLUSION: With the exception of axillary dissection, the processes of care, and not the therapy itself, are the most important determinants of long-term quality of life in older women.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of two doses of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) versus FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment groups: 36 to FU (500 mg/m(2))/LV (500 mg/m(2)) alone, 35 to FU/LV + low-dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and 33 to FU/LV + high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). FU/LV was given weekly for the first 6 weeks of each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Compared with the FU/LV control arm, treatment with bevacizumab (at both dose levels) plus FU/LV resulted in higher response rates (control arm, 17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 34%; low-dose arm, 40%, 95% CI, 24% to 58%; high-dose arm, 24%, 95% CI, 12% to 43%), longer median time to disease progression (control arm, 5.2 months, 95% CI, 3.5 to 5.6 months; low-dose arm, 9.0 months, 95% CI, 5.8 to 10.9 months; high-dose arm, 7.2 months, 95% CI, 3.8 to 9.2 months), and longer median survival (control arm, 13.8 months; 95% CI, 9.1 to 23.0 months; low-dose arm, 21.5 months, 95% CI, 17.3 to undetermined; high-dose arm, 16.1 months; 95% CI, 11.0 to 20.7 months). After cross-over, two of 22 patients had a partial response to bevacizumab alone. Thrombosis was the most significant adverse event and was fatal in one patient. Hypertension, proteinuria, and epistaxis were other potential safety concerns. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results of this randomized trial support further study of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: a test of a mediational model.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for research to identify factors influencing intentions to undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among family members at risk for CRC. This study tested a mediational model primarily guided by Ronis' elaboration of the Health Belief Model in predicting intention to have colorectal cancer screening among siblings of individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer prior to age 56 years. METHODS: Data were collected from 534 siblings of individuals diagnosed with CRC. A baseline survey was administered by telephone. Measures included perceived susceptibility, CRC severity, physician and family support for CRC screening, cancer-specific distress, the closeness of the relationship with the affected sibling, and future intention to have a colonoscopy. Participant age, gender, and number of prior colonoscopies, as well as the stage of the affected patient's cancer and time from the patient's diagnosis to the interview, were controlled for in the analyses. RESULTS: The proposed model was not a good fit to the data. A respecified model was fit to the data. In this model, physician support, family support, and sibling closeness were significantly associated with both perceived benefits and barriers. Perceived severity was associated with barriers. Benefits and barriers, as well as cancer-specific distress, were directly associated with colonoscopy intentions. Results were consistent with a mediational role for benefits and barriers in the associations of sibling closeness and with a mediational role for barriers in the association between perceived severity and colonoscopy intentions. Family and physician support impacted intentions both directly and indirectly through effects on benefits and barriers. Perceived risk was not associated with benefits, barriers, or colonoscopy intentions. CONCLUSION: Intervention efforts to increase colonoscopy intentions may benefit from targeting family influences, particularly the affected proband in the family, as well as physician influence, cancer-related distress, perceived CRC severity, and perceived benefits and barriers to colonoscopy.

Colonoscopy↗