PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Neal S Kleiman

Publications and source records attributed to Neal S Kleiman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removal.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to analyze the impact of arterial access site, sheath size, timing of sheath removal, and use of access site closure devices on high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: In the SYNERGY trial, 9,978 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. METHODS: This analysis includes 9,404 patients for whom sheath access information was obtained for the first PCI procedure or diagnostic catheterization. Comparisons of baseline, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were carried out according to access site and sheath size. RESULTS: Overall, 9,404 (94%) patients underwent angiography at a median of 21 hr (25th and 75th percentiles: 5, 42) and 4,687 (50%) underwent PCI at a median of 23 hr (6,49) of enrollment. The access site was femoral for 94.9% of cases, radial for 4.4%, and brachial for 0.7%. Radial access was associated with fewer transfusions than femoral access (0.9% vs. 4.8%, P=0.007). For femoral access, the rates of noncoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related TIMI major bleeding by sheath size was 1.5% for 4 or 5 French (Fr), 1.6% for 6 Fr, 3.3% for 7 Fr, and 3.8% for >or=8 Fr (P<0.0001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, femoral access site, larger sheath size, and delayed sheath removal were independent predictors of need for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller sheaths, radial access, and timely sheath removal may mitigate the bleeding risk associated with potent antithrombotic/platelet therapy and early catheterization.

Aged↗
PubMed2007

Prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: recommendations for the high risk patient undergoing cardiovascular procedures.

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third leading cause of hospital acquired renal failure and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease is the primary predisposing factor for CIN. As estimated glomerular filtration rate<60 ml/1.73 m2 represents significant renal dysfunction and defines patients at high risk. Modifiable risk factors for CIN include hydration status, the type and amount of contrast, use of concomitant nephrotoxic agents and recent contrast administration. The cornerstone of CIN prevention, in both the high and low risk patients, is adequate parenteral volume repletion. In the patient at increased risk for CIN it is often appropriate to withhold potentially nephrotoxic medications, and consider the use of n-acetylcysteine. In patients at increased risk for CIN the use of low or iso-osomolar contrast agents should be utilized and strategies employed to minimize contrast volume. In these patients serum creatinine should be obtained forty-eight hours post procedure and it is often appropriate to continue withholding medications such as metformin or non steroidal anti-inflammatories until renal function returns to normal.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed2007

Platelet reactivity in patients with subacute stent thrombosis compared with non-stent-related acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Recent case control studies suggest that patients with subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) have increased platelet reactivity. However, SAT often presents as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which is also associated with augmented platelet activation. We therefore compared platelet reactivity in patients with SAT and patients with AMI unrelated to stenting. METHODS: We identified 20 patients with SAT, 20 patients with ST-elevation AMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 20 patients who underwent stenting without SAT occurrence (stable control group). Platelet function was measured > or = 3 days after PCI in the SAT (repeat procedure) and AMI groups and > or = 3 months after stenting in the stable group. All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by aggregation in response to 5 and 20 micromol/L of adenosine diphosphate and 1.5 mmol/L arachidonic acid, and by flow cytometric determination of P-selectin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activation. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar among the groups. Platelet testing was performed 4.9 +/- 1.7, 3.1 +/- 0.3, and 108 +/- 22 days after PCI in the SAT, AMI, and stable groups, respectively. The SAT group had higher platelet aggregation and activation markers than the stable group. However, platelet aggregation and activation was very similar in the SAT and AMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SAT have increased platelet reactivity, compared with patients who do not develop SAT following stenting. However, the augmented platelet reactivity does not appear to differ from patients with AMI unrelated to stenting. This study highlights the need for large prospective studies to determine whether platelet hyperreactivity increases the risk of SAT.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

First-in-human experience of an antidote-controlled anticoagulant using RNA aptamer technology: a phase 1a pharmacodynamic evaluation of a drug-antidote pair for the controlled regulation of factor IXa activity.

BACKGROUND: Selectivity, titratability, rapidity of onset, and active reversibility are desirable pharmacological properties of anticoagulant therapy administered for acute indications and collectively represent an attractive platform to maximize patient safety. A novel anticoagulation system (REG1, Regado Biosciences), developed using a protein-binding oligonucleotide to factor IXa (drug, RB006) and its complementary oligonucleotide antidote (RB007), was evaluated in healthy volunteers. The primary objective was to determine the safety profile and to characterize the pharmacodynamic responses in this first-in-human study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Regado 1a was a subject-blinded, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study that randomized 85 healthy volunteers to receive a bolus of drug or placebo followed 3 hours later by a bolus of antidote or placebo. Pharmacodynamic samples were collected serially. Subject characteristics were the following: median age, 32 years (interquartile range, 23 to 39 years); female gender, 35%; and median weight, 79 kg (interquartile range, 70 to 87 kg). No significant differences were found in median hemoglobin, platelet, creatinine, or liver function studies. There were no significant bleeding signals associated with RB006, and overall, both drug and antidote were well tolerated. One serious adverse event, an episode of transient encephalopathy, occurred in a subject receiving the low intermediate dose of RB006. The subject's symptoms resolved rapidly, and no further sequelae occurred. A predictable dose-pharmacodynamic response, reflected in activated partial thromboplastin time measurements, was seen after administration of the bolus of drug, with a clear correlation between the peak posttreatment activated partial thromboplastin time and post hoc weight-adjusted dose of drug (correlation coefficient, 0.725; P<0.001). In subjects treated with drug, antidote administration reversed the pharmacological activity of the drug, with a rapid (mean time, 1 to 5 minutes across all dose levels) and sustained return of activated partial thromboplastin time to within the normal range. The activated clotting time followed a similar anticoagulant response and reversal pattern. As anticipated, prothrombin time remained unchanged compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These observations represent a first-in-human experience of an RNA aptamer and its complementary oligonucleotide antidote used as an anticoagulant system. The findings contribute to an emerging platform of selective, actively reversible anticoagulant drugs for use among patients with thrombotic disorders of the venous and arterial circulations.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Effect of ranitidine on the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy human subjects.

Aspirin is often taken with H2-receptor antagonists. In vitro data suggest that certain antagonists, such as ranitidine, have inhibitory effects on platelet function. There are no reports on the combined effect of aspirin and H2-receptor antagonists on platelet function in humans. Therefore, this study's aim was to evaluate the effects of aspirin, ranitidine, and their combination on platelet function in humans. Ten healthy men aged 34.7 +/- 2 years received aspirin 325 mg/day for 4 days followed by a 9-day washout period, 3 days of ranitidine treatment (150 mg twice daily), and 4 days of dual-drug treatment. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and on the last days of aspirin monotherapy, the washout period, ranitidine monotherapy, and dual-drug treatment. Platelet aggregation was measured in response to 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid, 5 and 10 mumol/L adenosine diphosphate, and 1 micro g/ml collagen. The Platelet Function Analyzer 100 test was performed, and blood salicylate levels were measured in 6 subjects. Aspirin caused a marked reduction in platelet aggregation and prolongation of Platelet Function Analyzer 100 closure time. Ranitidine caused a modest decrease in platelet aggregation. Unexpectedly, the combination of aspirin and ranitidine caused less inhibition of platelet aggregation and prolongation of Platelet Function Analyzer 100 time than aspirin alone (p = 0.02 to 0.07 compared with aspirin alone). Blood salicylate levels were lower when subjects took aspirin with ranitidine than when they took aspirin alone (1 +/- 0.8 vs 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.005). In conclusion, ranitidine appears to attenuate the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy volunteers. The most likely mechanism for these findings is a change in the absorption conditions of aspirin in the presence of ranitidine.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Angiographic adverse events, creatine kinase-MB elevation, and ischemic end points complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (a REPLACE-2 substudy).

Several angiographic adverse events during coronary balloon angioplasty have been associated with increased creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) enzymes and adverse clinical outcomes. The significance of angiographic adverse events in the stent era has not been widely studied. We analyzed 10 types of angiographic adverse events that were reported in the 6,010-patient Second Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial to determine their relation to CK-MB elevation and clinical ischemic end points after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Angiographic adverse events occurred in 9.1% of REPLACE-2 patients. Most (8 of 10) types of angiographic adverse events were associated with an increased risk of increased CK-MB (p <0.001 for each), and 47% of all patients with an angiographic adverse event developed increased CK-MB. Logistic regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 6 months was the occurrence of an angiographic adverse event during PCI (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.4, p <0.001). Side branch closure, abrupt closure, any decreased flow during the procedure, angiographic distal embolization, and perforation or tamponade were individual predictors of the occurrence of the combined clinical ischemic end point at 6-month follow-up (p <0.005 for each). In conclusion, most angiographic adverse events during PCI are associated with increased CK-MB and are powerful predictors of adverse clinical events within 6 months.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Genetic polymorphisms of the platelet receptors P2Y(12), P2Y(1) and GP IIIa and response to aspirin and clopidogrel.

INTRODUCTION: There is wide variability in the responses of individual patients to aspirin and clopidogrel. Polymorphisms of several platelet receptors have been related to increased platelet aggregation. We therefore aimed to evaluate whether these polymorphisms are related to altered response to aspirin or clopidogrel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n=120) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received aspirin for > or =1 week but not clopidogrel were included. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20-24h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin insensitivity was defined as 5 microM ADP-induced aggregation > or =70% and 0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or =20%. Clopidogrel insensitivity was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or =10% in response to 5 and 20 microM ADP. PlA polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa, T744C polymorphism of the P2Y(12) gene and the 1622A>G polymorphism of the P2Y(1) gene were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: There were no differences in polymorphism frequencies between drug-insensitive vs. drug-sensitive patients. There were also no significant differences in response to aspirin (assessed by arachidonic acid-induced aggregation) or to clopidogrel (assessed by ADP-induced aggregation or activation markers) when patients were grouped according to genotype. The only trend observed was lower reduction in PAC-1 binding following clopidogrel in PlA(2) carriers (P=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an association between polymorphisms in the platelet receptors GP IIIa, P2Y(12) or P2Y(1) and response to aspirin or clopidogrel in cardiac patients. These findings suggest that the variability in response to anti-platelet drugs is multi-factorial and is not caused only by single gene mutations.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a magnetic-assisted navigation system during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of tortuous and severely angulated coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: The magnetic navigation system consists of two 0.8-T permanent magnets which generate a magnetic field over the heart. Altering the magnetic vector deflects a coronary guidewire with a magnetic tip. METHODS: Patients were selected for magnetic-assisted intervention (MAI) for potentially difficult to cross lesions. The time required for placement of the guidewire, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and amount of contrast for the procedure were recorded. There were a total of 59 patients undergoing PCI of 68 lesions. RESULTS: Patients were grouped based on whether MAI was attempted as a first option ("primary attempt"; n = 46) or following failure to pass a conventional guidewire ("secondary attempt"; n = 13). The target lesion was successfully crossed in 49 of 55 lesions (89%) and 9 of 13 lesions (69%) in patients undergoing primary and secondary attempts, respectively. The procedural success rates were 84% and 62%, respectively. Most lesions were located in the circumflex artery territory (39% and 62% of lesions, respectively). The median (25th and 75th percentiles) time for crossing the lesion was longer in the secondary attempt group (14.8 [5, 15.5] vs. 28.9 [8, 38] min). Median fluoroscopy time and median contrast used were also higher among the secondary attempt group. CONCLUSIONS: This first report of MAI suggests that it may become a useful adjunct for wire placement in difficult coronary interventions.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2006

Therapeutic strategies for cardiogenic shock, 2006.

Cardiogenic shock, a devastating consequence of acute myocardial infarction, is associated with extremely high mortality. Treatment strategies should focus on prompt reperfusion and hemodynamic support. The primary approach for therapy is emergent angiography and revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery, with the assistance of intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation. Several adjunctive pharmacologic agents, particularly inotropic drugs and vasopressors, are also helpful for hemodynamic support. However, these agents have not been shown to provide a survival benefit, and their use is primarily based on clinical experience. Since our last publication, several important advances have been made in the understanding and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Recent evidence suggests that a systemic inflammatory response, including the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase, complement activation, and an inflammatory cytokine cascade, play a role in the development of cardiogenic shock. Newer therapeutic strategies, including C5 inhibitors and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, are being combined with traditional strategies, such as inotropic agents, vasopressors, and circulatory assist, to treat cardiogenic shock.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in a randomized investigation of bivalirudin versus heparin plus planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention: predictors and outcome in the Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The REPLACE-2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) blockade as compared with heparin plus planned GPIIb/IIIa blockade among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. Provisional drug was used in 374 (6%) of the 6010 patients. We sought to analyze the predictors for provisional drug use and to assess the outcomes in this cohort. METHODS: Outcome among the 5.2% of patients in the heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa blockade group and the 7.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group who received provisional placebo or GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, respectively, was compared against patients without provisional drug use and between randomized arms. Multivariate models identified predictors of provisional drug use and outcome at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: Myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and bleeding events occurred more frequently among patients who required provisional drug than those who did not, but there were no differences in 1-year mortality. Ischemic and hemorrhagic end points occurred at similar rates among patients receiving provisional drug in either the heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa group compared with the bivalirudin group. Independent predictors of provisional drug use were randomization to bivalirudin, recent infarction, multilesion intervention, impaired pretreatment coronary flow, and lesion complexity. Provisional drug use, but not randomization to bivalirudin, independently predicted 30-day and 6-month ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: Provisional administration of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor is associated with more frequent ischemic and bleeding events, reflecting the procedural complications that led to the use of provisional drug. The proportion of bivalirudin-treated patients who will require provisional GPIIb/IIIa blockade, however, is not large enough to have a significant deleterious impact on the overall incidence of ischemic end points or to invalidate the strategy of bivalirudin plus provisional GPIIb/IIIa blockade.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes who are treated with bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial.

BACKGROUND: The REPLACE-2 trial demonstrated that bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibition is not inferior to heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibition in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The extent to which this applies to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine if bivalirudin has similar efficacy in ACS patients as compared with "stable" patients in the REPLACE-2 trial. METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of ACS patients compared with stable patients and the outcomes of ACS patients according to whether or not they had received bivalirudin, including the economic costs. The trial enrolled 1351 ACS patients (myocardial infarction within 7 days or unstable angina within 48 hours, but not on ongoing GPIIb/IIIa or heparin therapy) and 4554 stable patients. RESULTS: Patients with ACS had a similar rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days compared to stable patients (7.2% vs 6.7%, P = .51) and death at 1 year (1.6% vs 2.2%, P = .169), but a higher rate of urgent coronary artery bypass graft at 30 days (1.0% vs 0.3%, P = .002). Patients with ACS treated with bivalirudin had a similar rate of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization compared with ACS patients treated with heparin and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (8.7% vs 8.0%, P = .616) and death at 1 year (1.5% vs 1.8%, P = .701), but a higher rate of revascularization at 6 months (12% vs 8.4%, P = .04). Patients with ACS treated with bivalirudin had less major bleeding than ACS patients treated with heparin and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, although this was not statistically significant (2.7% vs 4.5%, P = .07). Mean 30-day costs for patients with ACS were dollar 12415 for those treated with bivalirudin and dollar 12806 for those treated with heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (P = .022). CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin with provisional GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor use in low-risk ACS patients (not receiving preprocedural GPIIb/IIIa blockade) appears to provide similar protection against death and myocardial infarction as the combination of heparin and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, although we observed a higher rate of revascularization at 6 months.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) initiative.

BACKGROUND: Unlike ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the degree of stenosis and physiology of ischemia varies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI who lack significant epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) in routine clinical practice remain poorly characterized. We sought to determine the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI and insignificant CAD. METHODS: We analyzed 38301 patients with NSTEMI in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative who underwent cardiac catheterization to determine the prevalence and factors associated with insignificant CAD (all coronary stenoses <50%) and inhospital outcomes for patients with and without CAD. A multivariable model was used to determine the factors associated with insignificant CAD. RESULTS: A total of 3306 (8.6%) of 38301 patients had insignificant CAD. The strongest multivariable predictors of insignificant CAD were female sex (odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.6-3.1), younger age (odds ratio per 10-year decrease 1.5, 95% CI 1.5-1.6), and lack of current/recent smoking (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.7-2.0). Inhospital rates of death were 0.65% for patients with insignificant CAD compared with 2.36% for patients with CAD (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Insignificant CAD is present in 9% of patients with NSTEMI and is associated with a low incidence of adverse outcomes. The strongest predictors of insignificant CAD are female sex and younger age. These findings underscore the need for research to understand the pathophysiology of myocardial infarction in this population.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin reduces ischemic events more effectively than unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients treated conservatively for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The SYNERGY trial compared these agents in high-risk patients undergoing early invasive treatment. Enoxaparin was noninferior to UFH for the 30-day primary end point of death/myocardial infarction (MI), but modestly increased bleeding. METHODS AND RESULTS: This article compares the outcomes of the 4687 SYNERGY patients (47%) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, who were randomized to receive enoxaparin or UFH. Antithrombotic therapy was administered prerandomization in 78%. Crossover (usually in the catheterization laboratory) to the alternative antithrombotic occurred in 14.6% of enoxaparin patients and 2.9% of UFH-treated patients (P < .0001). Stenting was performed in 86.3%. Abrupt vessel closure occurred in 1.3% of enoxaparin patients and 1.7% of UFH-treated patients (P = .318). The rates of death/MI were similar at 30 days (13.1% with enoxaparin vs 14.2% with UFH, P = .289). GUSTO severe bleeding occurred with similar frequency in both groups (1.5% vs 1.6%, P = .688). TIMI major bleeding was more common with enoxaparin (3.7% vs 2.5% with UFH, P = .028). Transfusions were more frequent with enoxaparin than with UFH (6.8% vs 5.4%, P = .047). TIMI major bleeding increased with crossover from enoxaparin to UFH (from 3.7% to 7.8%) and from UFH to enoxaparin (from 2.5% to 8.6%). Statistical adjustment to model reasons for crossover did not affect the overall safety and efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome, enoxaparin avoids the need for monitoring and achieves similar effectiveness to UFH but is associated with more bleeding.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Initial impact of drug-eluting stent use on the spectrum of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The availability of drug-eluting stents was expected to expand the application of percutaneous coronary intervention to a wider group of patients and lesion types. We sought to determine whether drug-eluting stents' availability has changed the practices of operators performing percutaneous coronary intervention with regard to patient selection and procedural factors. METHODS: We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at the Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, during three periods: June 2002-March 2003, June 2003-March 2004 and June 2004-March 2005. Sirolimus-eluting stents were available during the latter two periods. Paclitaxel eluting stents became available during the third period. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization were referred for percutaneous coronary intervention during the latter two periods (26.8%, 30.4%, 30.4%, respectively, P<0.0001). Patients undergoing stent placement during the latter two periods were more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia or to have undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention. The average implanted stent length was greater during the latter periods (14.5+/-4.6, 16.4+/-5.2, 16.8+/-5.5 mm, respectively, P<0.0001) and the average stent diameter was smaller (3.23+/-1.22, 3.13+/-1.16, 3.02+/-0.6 mm, respectively, P<0.0001). The frequency of percutaneous coronary intervention involving long lesions (>20 mm) and Left Anterior Descending (LAD) lesions was higher in the latter two periods and the frequency of multivessel stenting was higher in the last period. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of patients and coronary lesions that have undergone stenting has changed, particularly in the third period when both drug-eluting stent types were available. We observed a gradual shift toward higher-risk clinical and lesion characteristics following the introduction of drug-eluting stents.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Anti-thrombotic effect of bivalirudin compared with eptifibatide and unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients: an ex vivo human study.

Patients with diabetes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk for thrombotic complications following the procedure. We sought to compare the anti-thrombotic effect of bivalirudin to that of eptifibatide plus unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI. Thirty diabetic patients were randomized to receive during PCI either bivalirudin (bivalirudin group, n=15) or eptifibatide plus heparin (eptifibatide group, n=15) at standard dosing regimens. The drugs were continued for 20 minutes (bivalirudin) or 18 hours (eptifibatide) after PCI. Blood thrombogenicity was assessed using the Badimon ex vivo perfusion chamber. Each patient underwent two perfusion studies - at baseline (on aspirin and clopidogrel) and 15-20 minutes following PCI. Perfusion studies were performed at rheologic conditions of low and high shear rates (LSR, HSR). Porcine aortic tunica media served as the thrombogenic substrate. Aortic specimens were stained for total platelet-thrombus and fibrin deposition. Thrombus area was measured using computerized planimetry. There were no differences in clinical characteristics or baseline thrombus area between the two groups. Total platelet-thrombus area was reduced significantly in both groups, but the degree of reduction was lower in the bivalirudin group compared with the eptifibatide group (HSR: 69.5% vs. 89.3% reduction, respectively, P=0.04; LSR: 50.6% vs. 73.2%, P=0.03). Fibrin deposition was reduced in both groups by 47-49%. In conclusion, both bivalirudin and the combination of eptifibatide plus heparin, given to diabetic patients during PCI, achieved marked reductions in total thrombus formation and fibrin deposition. However, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition by eptifibatide caused a more pronounced reduction in thrombus formation.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Potential role of activated platelets in homing of human endothelial progenitor cells to subendothelial matrix.

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) mobilize from the bone marrow in response to tissue injury and participate in vascular repair. However, there is limited data about the homing mechanisms of EPCs to vascular injury sites. Recently animal experiments indicated that platelets play a role in recruitment of EPCs to injury sites. However, data on the possible interaction between platelets and EPCs within the human system are limited. We, therefore, examined in-vitro human platelet-EPC interaction under static and flow conditions. Human EPCs were isolated from donated buffy coats by magnetic microbeads and flow cytometry cell sorting using CD133 and VEGFR-2, respectively, as markers. Platelets were tested in the form of washed platelets, platelet rich plasma or whole blood. EPCs formed heterotypic aggregates with resting platelets under static conditions, an interaction that was greatly enhanced when platelets were activated by collagen, ADP or thrombin-activation peptide. The platelet-EPC interaction was inhibited by antibodies to P-selectin or P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1), but not by antibodies to glycoproteins Ib-IX-V or IIb/IIIa. When perfused over activated platelets under shear stress of 2.5 dyn/cm(2), EPCs tethered to platelayers and either adhered immediately or rolled a short distance before adhering. In addition, platelets promoted the colonization of adherent EPCs in culture conditions. Consistent with recent animal studies, these findings demonstrate that human EPCs interact in vitro with activated platelets under static and flow conditions, mediated through P-selectin-PSGL-1 interaction. This interaction may be a central mechanism for homing of EPCs to vascular injury sites.

AC133 Antigen↗
PubMed2005

Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients (n = 150) treated with aspirin but not clopidogrel had blood samples drawn at baseline and 24 h after clopidogrel loading. Depending on the definition used, 9% to 15% were resistant to aspirin and 24% to clopidogrel. About half of the aspirin-resistant patients were also resistant to clopidogrel. As a group, aspirin-resistant patients had lower response to clopidogrel (assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers) than aspirin-sensitive patients. Both aspirin- and clopidogrel-resistant patients had higher incidence of creatine kinase-MB elevation than the respective sensitive patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Wide variability has been reported in response to aspirin and clopidogrel. There are limited data on the simultaneous responses to both drugs. METHODS: Elective PCI patients (n = 150) who received aspirin for > or = 1 week but not clopidogrel were included. All patients received bivalirudin during PCI. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20 to 24 h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin resistance was defined by > or = 2 of 3 criteria: rapid platelet function analyzer-ASA score > or = 550, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation > or = 70%, and 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or = 20%. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or = 10% in response to 5 and 20 micromol/l ADP. RESULTS: Nineteen (12.7%) patients were resistant to aspirin and 36 (24%) to clopidogrel. Nine (47.4%) of the aspirin-resistant patients were also clopidogrel resistant. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be women and have diabetes than were aspirin-sensitive patients. They also had lower response to clopidogrel, assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers (flow cytometry-determined PAC-1 binding and P-selectin expression). Elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band after stenting occurred more frequently in aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients (38.9% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.04) and in clopidogrel-resistant versus clopidogrel-sensitive patients (32.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-resistant patients as a group have reduced response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, we have identified a unique group of dual drug-resistant patients who may be at increased risk for thrombotic complications after PCI.

Aged↗