PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Neil Tuttle

Publications and source records attributed to Neil Tuttle.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Change in impairments in the first two treatments predicts outcome in impairments, but not in activity limitations, in subacute neck pain: an observational study.

QUESTION: Does change in impairments within and between the first two manual therapy treatments predict change in activity limitations by the end of treatment in patients with subacute neck symptoms? DESIGN: Longitudinal, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: 29 people with neck pain for more than two weeks who subsequently received >or= three treatments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Impairments measured were active neck ROM in six directions (total ROM), most limited direction of ROM (limited ROM), pain intensity, and pain location. Activity limitations were measured using the Neck Disability Index and the Patient Specific Functional Scale. Patients' perceptions of change were measured using the Global Perceived Effect Scale. Impairments and patients' perceptions were measured before and after the first two treatments and before the final treatment whereas activity limitations were measured only before the first and last treatments. RESULTS: All measures improved by the end of treatment.Between-treatment change in limited ROM predicted change in limited ROM (rs2 = 0.53 and 0.57) and total ROM (rs2 = 0.26) by the end of treatment. Within- and between-treatment change in pain location predicted change in pain location (rs2 = 0.24, 0.27,0.28, and 0.57) by the end of treatment. No significant relationships were found between change in any impairments in the first two treatments and change in activity limitations by the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Change in impairments predicts change in the same impairment by the end of treatment, but not in other impairments or activity limitations. It is recommended that there assessments used to guide and refine treatment be individualised and related to the specific goals for that patient.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Do changes within a manual therapy treatment session predict between-session changes for patients with cervical spine pain?

Physiotherapists often use within-session changes to provide a guide for refining treatment application. This study tested the validity of within-session changes as predictors of between-session changes for patients with neck pain receiving manual therapy treatment. A total of 70 pairs of treatments from 29 patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain receiving manual therapy were assessed to determine the relationship between within-session and between-session changes in range of motion (ROM), pain intensity, and centralisation. Measurements were taken of ROM of the more limited direction on each axis of flexion, extension, lateral-flexion and rotation, and pain (intensity and location) before and after treatment. The same measurements were repeated before the following treatment. Regression analysis demonstrated that within-session change accounted for 26% to 48% of the variability in between-session change for ROM and six per cent for pain intensity. The proportion of the within-session change for ROM maintained between sessions ranged from 42% to 63% (95% CI 25% to 88%). The odds ratios for within-session improved/not improved categorisation to predict between-session category for ROM ranged from 2.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 4.3) to 21.3 (95% CI 10.1 to 96.1), for pain intensity 4.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 14.4) and for pain centralisation 9.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 38.7) indicating greater likelihood of between-session improvement after within-session improvement. The between-session results for most patients (71% to 83%) could be classified correctly by their within-session category. The results support the use of within-session changes in ROM, centralisation, and possibly pain intensity as predictors of between-session changes for musculoskeletal disorders of the cervical spine.

Adult↗