Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bone Density Conservation Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
Nelson B Watts
Publications and source records attributed to Nelson B Watts.
Application of the 1994 WHO classification to populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.
In 2003, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) developed Official Positions regarding the applicability of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone mineral density to populations other than postmenopausal women. However, these prior Official Positions do not fully address bone mineral density reporting in females prior to menopause, men, and non-whites. During the 2005 ISCD Position Development Conference, members of the ISCD Expert Panel in conjunction with the ISCD Scientific Advisory Committee re-addressed these topics and, based upon stringent reviews of best available data, developed ISCD Official Positions that provide greater specificity and clarification with respect to the following: (1) the utility of the term 'osteopenia'; (2) utilization of T- and Z-scores for bone mineral density reporting; (3) when to apply the WHO densitometric classification; and (4) which normative database(s) should be used for non-white individuals. Briefly, the term "osteopenia" is retained, but 'low bone mass' or 'low bone density' is preferred. Z-scores, not T-scores, are preferred in females prior to menopause and males under age 50. In these individuals, a Z-score of -2.0 or lower is defined as "below the expected range for age" and a Z-score above -2.0 is "within the expected range for age." T-scores are preferred and the WHO classification is applicable for postmenopausal women and men age 50 and older. These Official Positions, rationale and evidence are discussed in the following report.
Absorptiometry, Photon↗
Standards for performing DXA in individuals with secondary causes of osteoporosis.
This document addresses skeletal health assessment in individuals with secondary causes of osteoporosis. Recommendations are based on consensus of the Canadian Panel of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and invited international experts. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing in these populations is performed in conjunction with careful evaluation of the disease state contributing to bone loss and increased fragility fracture risk, as well as assessment of other contributing risk factors for fracture. The presence of secondary causes of bone loss may further increase the risk of fracture independently of BMD and may necessitate earlier pharmacologic intervention. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is indicated in the initial workup of secondary causes of osteoporosis. The BMD fracture risk relationship is not known for individuals with chronic renal failure (CRF). The BMD testing in this population may be normal in the presence of skeletal fragility, and quantitative bone histomorphometry is better at evaluating skeletal status than BMD in CRF. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a valuable tool in assessing skeletal health in individuals with secondary causes of osteoporosis.
Absorptiometry, Photon↗
Hyperbilirubinemia is not a major contributing factor to altered bone mineral density in patients with chronic liver disease.
Reduced bone density is commonly encountered in patients with chronic liver disease. Prior studies have shown that unconjugated bilirubin inhibits osteoblast activity and function in vitro and in animal models of bone mineralization. To determine whether hyperbilirubinemia promotes the development of hepatic osteodystrophy, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in a cohort of 86 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease referred for liver transplant evaluation. The mean age of the study population was 52 years (range, 22-73), in which 52% were female and 90% were white. Average bone density values were significantly lower than expected for age, race, and sex, with Z-scores for the femoral neck and spine of -0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.63 to -0.37; p=0.0003) and -0.69 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.52; p=0.0001), respectively. Sixty-one subjects (71%) exhibited reduced BMD (T-score of femoral neck or spine<or=-1 standard deviation [SD] below the young-adult mean), and 18 subjects (21%) met criteria for osteoporosis (T-score<-2.5 SD). Stepwise logistic regression analyses identified significant associations between BMD and serum creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, age, and gender. On the other hand, neither unconjugated, nor conjugated, nor total serum bilirubin levels were found to predict diminished BMD. The lack of association between serum unconjugated bilirubin levels and bone mineralization was validated in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats, in which BMD and serum osteocalcin levels were no different than in wild-type rodents. In conclusion, the finding that serum bilirubin levels do not correlate with reduced BMD in patients with end-stage liver disease, and that chronic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia does not lead to alterations in bone mineralization in Gunn rats, suggests that bilirubin is not a major contributing factor to hepatic osteodystrophy.
Adult↗
Comparison of serum calcium change following thyroid and nonthyroid neck surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Compare serum calcium changes following thyroid and nonthyroid/parathyroid neck surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled historic cohort study of 190 patients undergoing total thyroidectomy (TT, n = 97), completion thyroidectomy (CT, n = 27), and lateral neck dissection (ND, n = 66). RESULTS: Each group experienced significant corrected serum calcium drop pre-op to POD #1 (mean change (mg/dL) TT = 0.97, CT = 0.79, ND = 0.46; all P < 0.001) with significantly greater drop in TT and CT (P < 0.0001). TT and ND had significantly greater calcium drop from pre-op to PACU than CT (0.54, 0.43, 0.15; P = 0.04). TT and CT experienced significantly greater calcium drop from PACU to POD #1 than ND (0.45, 0.53, 0.05; P < 0.0001). No significant difference in hypocalcemia rate between TT and CT. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative calcium drop in nonthyroid neck surgery is likely hemodilutional, occurring intraoperatively, whereas in thyroid surgery it likely results from both hemodilution and parathyroid dysfunction with the latter manifesting after PACU. Postoperative calcium monitoring should be similar following total and completion thyroidectomy due to similar rates of hypocalcemia and mean calcium drops. EBM RATING: B-3b.
Analysis of Variance↗
Type 2 diabetes, thiazolidinediones: bad to the bone?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Effects of conjugated equine estrogen on risk of fractures and BMD in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: results from the women's health initiative randomized trial.
UNLABELLED: Further analyses from the Women's Health Initiative estrogen trial shows that CEE reduced fracture risk. The fracture reduction at the hip did not differ appreciably among risk strata. These data do not support overall benefit over risk, even in women at highest risk for fracture. INTRODUCTION: The Women's Health Initiative provided evidence that conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) can significantly reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Additional analysis of the effects of CEE on BMD and fracture are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women 50-79 years of age with hysterectomy were randomized to CEE 0.625 mg daily (n = 5310) or placebo (n = 5429) and followed for an average 7.1 years. Fracture incidence was assessed by semiannual questionnaire and verified by adjudication of radiology reports. BMD was measured in a subset of women (N = 938) at baseline and years 1, 3, and 6. A global index was used to examine whether the balance of risks and benefits differed by baseline fracture risk. RESULTS: CEE reduced the risk of hip (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94), clinical vertebral (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93), wrist/lower arm (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.72), and total fracture (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.80). This effect did not differ among strata according to age, oophorectomy status, past hormone use, race/ethnicity, fall frequency, physical activity, or fracture history. Total fracture reduction was less in women at the lowest predicted fracture risk in both absolute and relative terms (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08). CEE also provided modest but consistent positive effects on BMD. The HRs of the global index for CEE were relatively balanced across tertiles of summary fracture risk (lowest risk: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.05; mid risk: HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92-1.30; highest risk: HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.23; interaction, p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: CEE reduces the risk of fracture and increases BMD in hysterectomized postmenopausal women. Even among the women with the highest risk for fractures, when considering the effects of estrogen on other important health outcomes, a summary of the burden of monitored effects does not indicate a significant net benefit.
Aged↗
What is osteopenia, and what should be done about it?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Absorptiometry, Photon↗
Relationship between changes in BMD and nonvertebral fracture incidence associated with risedronate: reduction in risk of nonvertebral fracture is not related to change in BMD.
UNLABELLED: Whether greater treatment-related changes in BMD result in greater decreases in fracture risk is controversial. We analyzed the relationship between BMD change and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women from the risedronate fracture program. Change in BMD did not influence the magnitude of risedronate's effect on nonvertebral fractures; the incidence of nonvertebral fractures was equally low in treated patients whose BMD increased or decreased. INTRODUCTION: In untreated patients, low BMD correlates with increased fracture risk. Whether greater increases in BMD induced by anti-osteoporosis drugs are related to greater decreases in vertebral fracture risk is controversial, and little has been written about the relationship between change in BMD and nonvertebral fracture risk. We analyzed the relationship between BMD change and nonvertebral fracture incidence using individual patient data from postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving antiresorptive treatment with risedronate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This posthoc analysis combined data from three pivotal risedronate fracture endpoint trials. Women received risedronate 2.5 or 5 mg (n = 2,561) or placebo (n = 1,418) daily for up to 3 years. BMD and nonvertebral fractures confirmed by radiograph (hip, wrist, pelvis, humerus, clavicle, and leg) were assessed periodically over 3 years. RESULTS: The incidence of nonvertebral fractures in risedronate-treated patients was not different between patients whose spine BMD decreased (7.8%) and those whose spine BMD increased (6.4%; hazard ratio to subgroup of patients who lost BMD [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.50, 1.25) or between those whose femoral neck BMD decreased (7.6%) and those whose femoral neck BMD increased (7.5%; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68, 1.28). The changes in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD explained only 12% (95% CI, 2%, 21%; p = 0.014) and 7% (95% CI, 2%, 13%; p = 0.005), respectively, of risedronate's nonvertebral fracture efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated with risedronate, changes in BMD as measured by DXA do not predict the degree of reduction in nonvertebral fractures.
Aged↗
Safety and efficacy of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND: Oophorectomy reduces serum testosterone levels. We studied the efficacy and safety of transdermal testosterone in treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women. METHODS: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial was conducted in women (aged 24-70 years) who developed distressful low sexual desire after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy and who were receiving oral estrogen therapy. Women were randomized to receive placebo (n = 119) or testosterone patches in dosages of 150 microg/d (n = 107), 300 microg/d (n = 110), or 450 microg/d (n = 111) twice weekly for 24 weeks. Sexual desire and frequency of satisfying sexual activity were primary efficacy outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 447 women randomized, 318 (71%) completed the trial. Compared with placebo, women receiving the 300-microg/d testosterone patch had significantly greater increases from baseline in sexual desire (67% vs 48%; P = .05) and in frequency of satisfying sexual activity (79% vs 43%; P = .049). The 150-microg/d group showed no evidence of a treatment effect. The 450-microg/d group also was not statistically different from the 300-microg/d or placebo groups. Marginally significant linear dose-response trends were observed for total satisfying sexual activity and sexual desire at 24 weeks (P = .06 and .06, respectively). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups; no serious safety concerns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 300-microg/d testosterone patch increased sexual desire and frequency of satisfying sexual activity and was well tolerated in women who developed hypoactive sexual desire disorder after surgical menopause.
Administration, Cutaneous↗
Effect of osteoporosis treatments on risk of non-vertebral fractures: review and meta-analysis of intention-to-treat studies.
Most osteoporosis treatments have proven efficacy in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, whereas evidence is less straightforward for prevention of non-vertebral fractures. Conclusions as to the efficacy of a treatment should be based primarily on analyses of the intention to treat (ITT) population rather than on exploratory subgroup analyses; however, non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy has been largely derived by post-hoc subgroup analyses. This review and meta-analysis was performed to assess non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of several osteoporosis therapies, including a more stringent assessment of the ITT populations. Data on non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy, a defined endpoint of the ITT analyses and confirmed by radiographs, were obtained from randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trials of at least 3-year duration. Meta-analyses were performed for the two bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate. Relative risks (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and statistical significance for active treatment compared with placebo were calculated. Eleven clinical trials met the criteria for review, three of which showed statistically significant ( P < or =0.05) non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in the ITT population: two trials with risedronate and one trial with strontium. A meta-analysis showed significant reductions in the relative risk of non-vertebral fracture for both alendronate (RR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P =0.012) and risedronate (RR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.71-0.92, P =0.001). Risedronate and strontium ranelate were the only treatments to show non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in this robust assessment of anti-fracture efficacy of osteoporosis therapy using ITT populations in trials of 3 years or more in duration. Risedronate was the only agent shown to demonstrate efficacy in more than one trial. Meta-analysis showed that both alendronate and risedronate provide non-vertebral anti-fracture efficacy.
Aged↗
Prior oral contraception and postmenopausal fracture: a Women's Health Initiative observational cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To test for the possible association of past oral contraceptive (OC) use and incident fracture after menopause. DESIGN: A prospective cohort of 93,725 postmenopausal women. SETTING: Forty Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical centers across the United States. PATIENT(S): Ethnically diverse 93,725 volunteer postmenopausal women, 50 to 79 years old. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The main outcome was self-reported incident first fracture assessed prospectively by annual questionnaire. RESULT(S): The adjusted relative hazard (HR) for fracture among past OC users was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01-1.15). Among women without any postmenopausal hormone treatment, past OC use for < or =5 years led to an HR of 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.27) and for past OC use >5 years led to an HR of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.97-1.23) compared with never users. CONCLUSION(S): This study does not support the idea that past OC use protects against later fracture.
Aged↗
Incidence of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene or estrogen.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of raloxifene or estrogen, as compared with placebo, on the reporting of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women participating in an osteoporosis prevention trial. DESIGN: The current analysis is based on adverse event data that were collected as part of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of raloxifene for osteoporosis prevention in postmenopausal women. Women were 40 to 60 years of age at study entry and had a prior hysterectomy. A total of 619 women were randomized to placebo, raloxifene 60 or 150 mg/d, or conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg/d and followed for up to 3 years. Urinary incontinence was self-reported and rated by participants as "mild," "moderate," or "severe." RESULTS: The prevalence of urinary incontinence as reported by patients at baseline was similar across treatment groups (3% to 6%, P = 0.46). During 3 years of follow-up, new or worsening urinary incontinence was reported with the following frequency: placebo (1.3%), raloxifene 60 mg/d (0.7%), raloxifene 150 mg/d (0.6%), and conjugated equine estrogen (7.0%). The percentage of estrogen subjects reporting urinary incontinence was significantly greater than that for placebo and both doses of raloxifene (P < or = 0.02). CONCLUSION: During 3 years of follow-up, conjugated equine estrogen was associated with an increased incidence of reports of urinary incontinence in women with a prior hysterectomy and this was significantly greater than both placebo and raloxifene.
Adult↗
Review of treatment modalities for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
This review summarizes and updates data presented at recent annual Southern Medical Association conferences on postmenopausal osteoporosis. As part of any osteoporosis treatment program, it is important to maintain adequate calcium and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels either through diet or supplementation. Among the available pharmacologic therapies, the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate have demonstrated the most robust fracture risk reductions-approximately 40 to 50% reduction in vertebral fracture risk, 30 to 40% in nonvertebral fracture risk, and 40 to 60% in hip fracture risk. Ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing vertebral fracture risk. Salmon calcitonin nasal spray and raloxifene demonstrated significant reductions in vertebral fracture risk in pivotal studies. Teriparatide significantly reduced vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. Drugs on the horizon include strontium ranelate, which has been shown to reduce vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk, and zoledronic acid, an injectable bisphosphonate that increased bone density with once-yearly administration.
Alendronate↗
Ibandronate produces significant, similar antifracture efficacy in North American and European women: new clinical findings from BONE.
OBJECTIVES: BONE (oral iBandronate Osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe) determined whether less frequent dosing of ibandronate (dose-free interval > 2 months) provided similar antifracture efficacy to daily dosing. As osteoporosis medications must be effective across different populations, an additional objective of BONE was to investigate and report the effect of oral ibandronate in North American and European women, as described here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BONE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fractureprevention study in 2946 postmenopausal women (age 55 years-80 years; > or = 5 years since menopause) with osteoporosis (low lumbar spine bone mineral density and one to four prevalent vertebral fractures [T4-L4]). Participants received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) plus either placebo, oral daily ibandronate (2.5 mg) or oral intermittent ibandronate (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 months). The efficacy and tolerability of ibandronate were assessed independently in both North American and European populations. RESULTS: Consistent, significant efficacy was observed in the North American (new vertebral fracture risk reduction: 60% and 54% with daily and intermittent ibandronate, respectively) and European patient populations (50% and 48%, respectively). Both ibandronate regimens also significantly reduced the incidence of new, worsening, and acute clinical, vertebral fractures. Daily and intermittent ibandronate significantly increased bone density at the spine in both North American (5.4% and 4.4% vs. baseline with daily and intermittent ibandronate, respectively) and European (7.1% and 6.3% vs. baseline, respectively) populations. Significant increases were also observed for total hip bone density (2.6% and 3.7% vs. baseline for daily, and 2.5% and 3.1% for intermittent; North American and European populations, respectively). Comparable, significant decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover (reductions in urinary excretion of C-telopeptide levels of 53.5% and 67.1% vs. baseline for daily, and 50.0% and 53.8% for intermittent; North American and European populations, respectively) were also observed in both populations (p < 0.004 for all cited measurements in each ibandronate group vs. placebo). Oral ibandronate was well tolerated in both North American and European patients, with a safety profile similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ibandronate, administered daily or intermittently, effectively reduced vertebral fracture risk in North American and European women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. These results demonstrate the efficacy of ibandronate administered with extended dose-free intervals, regardless of patients' geographical origin. Research investigating other less frequent ibandronate regimens, such as once-monthly oral administration, is underway.
Administration, Oral↗
Guide to bone health and disease in cystic fibrosis.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common genetic disease within the Caucasian population and leads to premature respiratory failure. Approximately 60,000 individuals are currently living with CF in North America and Europe, 40% of whom are adults. The life span of these patients has increased from approximately 2 to 32 yr of age over the last three decades. Bone disease has emerged as a common complication in long-term survivors of CF. Some studies have observed that 50-75% of adults have low bone density and increased rates of fractures. Prevention and treatment of CF-related bone disease must address the myriad risk factors (decreased absorption of fat-soluble vitamins due to pancreatic insufficiency, altered sex hormone production, chronic lung infection with increased levels of bone-active cytokines, physical inactivity, and glucocorticoid therapy) for poor bone health. This review is a condensed and updated summary of the Guide to Bone Health and Disease in Cystic Fibrosis: A Consensus Conference, a statement that evolved from a meeting convened by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation in May 2002 to address the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of bone disease in CF. The goal of this conference was to develop practice guidelines for optimizing bone health in patients with CF.
Bone Diseases↗
Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.
UNLABELLED: Accurate radiographic diagnosis of vertebral fractures is important. This multicenter, multinational study assessed radiographic diagnoses of vertebral fracture in 2451 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Comparison between local and central readings yielded a false-negative rate of 34%. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fracture is a worldwide problem. INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures are the most common complication of osteoporosis. Although they are associated with significant morbidity, they frequently do not come to clinical attention. Accurate radiographic diagnosis is important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, multinational prospective study (the IMPACT trial), the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of vertebral fracture was evaluated in postmenopausal women 65-80 years of age newly diagnosed with osteoporosis (based on BMD measurement). Lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated for identification of vertebral fractures, first locally and subsequently at a central reading center, using a validated semiquantitative method. False-positive and false-negative rates were calculated based on adjudicated discrepancies between the initial interpretation at the local site and the subsequent central reading, considered the "reference standard." RESULTS: Of 2451 women with an evaluable radiograph both centrally and locally, 789 (32%) had at least one vertebral fracture. Adjudicated discrepancies (n = 350 patients) between local and central readings because of undetected vertebral fracture (68%) or equivocal terminology in the local radiology report (32%) yielded a false-negative rate of 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures was observed in all geographic regions (false-negative rates: North America, 45.2%; Latin America, 46.5%; Europe/South Africa/Australia, 29.5%). The false-positive rate was 5% globally. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fracture is a worldwide problem attributable in part to a lack of radiographic detection, use of ambiguous terminology in the radiology report, or both. Efforts to improve accuracy and reduce variability in terminology and interpretation may increase the effectiveness of spinal radiography for detecting vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis.
Aged↗
Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current "gold standard" for diagnosing osteoporosis and for monitoring patients. Errors in demographic information, improper patient positioning, incorrect scan analysis, and mistakes in interpretation can all lead to a wrong clinical decision or action. This paper reviews the fundamentals of positioning, scan analysis, and interpretation for central DXA and highlights some of the common pitfalls that may lead to erroneous results.
Absorptiometry, Photon↗