A new childhood pathway for transmission of an increased likelihood of smoking?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Nicholas Anthonisen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently assessed using a single physiological measurement, the forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1). COPD, however, has complex effects on other aspects of respiratory function, and in many patients is associated with important systemic changes. We hypothesized that a multidimensional staging system for COPD could provide a more complete assessment of the disease's impact. We considered over 40 potential staging variables, evaluating them according to sensitivity to change, measured reproducibly, independence of the information they provide and prognostic value. We finally selected three: FEV1 (including arterial blood gas measurements when FEV1 falls below 35% predicted), Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and body mass index (BMI). Each measure correlates independently with prognosis in COPD, is supported by a significant body of literature and serves as a surrogate for other potentially important variables. We then used principal components analysis (PCA) to determine the degree of association between 30 of the potential variables measured in 813 stable COPD patients. Using PCA, six groups of measurements defined independent categories of patient information: pulmonary function (including FEV1), symptoms of cough and sputum, dyspnea, health status, bronchodilator reversibility and BMI. These include the three principal variables selected for the staging system. Although the staging boundaries were based on existing literature, they have proven useful in predicting survival. We conclude that a multidimensional grading system is useful to assess the impact of COPD.
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are a common occurrence and characterize the natural history of the disease. Over the past decade, new knowledge has substantially enhanced our understanding of the pathogenesis, outcome and natural history of AECOPD. The exacerbations not only greatly reduce the quality of life of these patients, but also result in hospitalization, respiratory failure, and death. The exacerbations are the major cost drivers in consumption of healthcare resources by COPD patients. Although bacterial infections are the most common etiologic agents, the role of viruses in COPD exacerbations is being increasingly recognized. The efficacy of antimicrobial therapy in acute exacerbations has established a causative role for bacterial infections. Recent molecular typing of sputum isolates further supports the role of bacteria in AECOPD. Isolation of a new strain of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, or Streptococcus pneumoniae was associated with a considerable risk of an exacerbation. Lower airway bacterial colonization in stable patients with COPD instigates airway inflammation, which leads to a protracted self-perpetuating vicious circle of progressive lung damage and disease progression. A significant proportion of patients treated for COPD exacerbation demonstrate incomplete recovery, and frequent exacerbations contribute to decline in lung function. The predictors of poor outcome include advanced age, significant impairment of lung function, poor performance status, comorbid conditions and history of previous frequent exacerbations requiring antibacterials or systemic corticosteroids. These high-risk patients, who are likely to harbor organisms resistant to commonly used antimicrobials, should be identified and treated with antimicrobials with a low potential for failure. An aggressive management approach in complicated exacerbations may reduce costs by reducing healthcare utilization and hospitalization.