Biomedical subjects

Nicolas Cermakian

Publications and source records attributed to Nicolas Cermakian.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Cryptochromes impair phosphorylation of transcriptional activators in the clock: a general mechanism for circadian repression.

CLOCK and BMAL1 [brain and muscle ARNT (arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator)-like protein 1] are central components of the molecular clock in mammals and belong to the bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix)/PAS [PER (Period)/ARNT/SIM (single-minded)] family. Features of their dimerization have never been investigated. Here, we demonstrate that PAS domain function requires regions extending over the short PAS core repeats. Strikingly, while deleting PAS core repeats does not overtly affect dimerization, it abolishes the transcriptional activity of the heterodimer. Interestingly, these deletions also abolish co-dependent phosphorylation of CLOCK and BMAL1, suggesting a link between the phosphorylation status of the heterodimer and its transactivation potential. We demonstrate that NPAS2 (neuronal PAS domain protein 2) and BMAL2 also undergo similar posttranslational modifications, thereby establishing the mechanism proposed for CLOCK-BMAL1 as a common feature of transcriptional activators in the circadian clock. The discovery of two novel splice variants of BMAL2 confirms the crucial role of the PAS domain and further strengthens the view that co-dependent phosphorylation is of functional significance. In agreement with this, we demonstrate that CRY1-2 (cryptochromes 1-2) affect transactivation and phosphorylation of transcriptional activators of the clock. Furthermore, CRY proteins stabilize the unphosphorylated forms of BMAL1(BMAL2) thereby shifting the phosphorylated/unphosphorylated ratio towards a predominantly unphosphorylated (transcriptionally inactive) form. In contrast, PER proteins, which are weak repressors, are without effect. From these results, we propose a general mechanism for the inhibition of CLOCK(NPAS2)-BMAL1(BMAL2) circadian transcriptional activation by CRY1-2.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2006

The circadian regulation of Presenilin-2 gene expression.

Circadian rhythms are generated by a molecular clock composed of clock genes and their protein products. Other genes are regulated in a rhythmic way by this molecular clockwork, but are not themselves constituents of the clock. This study shows that one of these clock-controlled genes encodes the signalling protein Presenilin-2. Indeed, evidence is presented that the promoter of the mouse Presenilin-2 gene is bound and activated by CLOCK and BMAL1, transcription factors of the mammalian circadian clock. Quantification of Presenilin-2 RNA shows that its expression is non-rhythmic in many peripheral tissues (heart, muscle, kidney, spleen, and thymus). Note, though, that careful analysis of the liver data shows that Presenilin-2 RNA exists in distinct isoforms in this tissue, and that rhythmicity is restricted to only a subset of these RNA isoforms. These data indicate a unique mode of regulation of Presenilin-2 transcripts, the circadian control of which appears to happen at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2005

[How many pieces to build a circadian clock?].

Biological rhythms represent a fundamental property of various living organisms. In particular, circadian rhythms, i.e. rhythms with a period close to 24 hours, help organisms to adapt to environmental daily rhythms. Although various factors can entrain or reset rhythms, they persist even in the absence of external timing cue, showing that their generation is endogenous. Indeed, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is considered to be the main circadian clock in mammals. Isolated SCN neurons have been shown to display circadian rhythms, and in each cell, a set of genes, called "clock genes", are devoted to the generation and regulation of rhythms. Recently, it has become obvious that the clock located in the SCN is not homogenous, but is rather composed of multiple functional components somewhat reminiscent of its neurochemical organization. The significance and implications of these findings are still poorly understood but pave the way for future exciting studies. Here, current knowledge concerning these distinct neuronal populations and the ways through which synchronization could be achieved, as well as the potential role of neuropeptides in both photic and non-photic resetting of the clock, are summarized. Finally, we discuss the role of the SCN within the circadian system, which also includes oscillators located in various tissues and cell types.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Differential control of Bmal1 circadian transcription by REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptors.

Circadian rhythms result from feedback loops involving clock genes and their protein products. In mammals, 2 orphan nuclear receptors, REV-ERBalpha and RORalpha, play important roles in the transcription of the clock gene Bmal1. The authors now considerably extend these findings with the demonstration that all members of the REV-ERB (alpha and beta) and ROR (alpha, beta, and gamma) families repress and activate Bmal1 transcription, respectively. The authors further show that transcription of Bmal1 is the result of competition between REV-ERBs and RORs at their specific response elements (RORE). Moreover, they demonstrate that Reverb genes are similarly expressed in the thymus, skeletal muscle, and kidney, whereas Ror genes present distinct expression patterns. Thus, the results indicate that all members of the REV-ERB and ROR families are crucial components of the molecular circadian clock. Furthermore, their strikingly different patterns of expression in nervous and peripheral tissues provide important insights into functional differences between circadian clocks within the organism.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2004

Circadian regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis proteins in mouse bone marrow and tumor.

Proapoptotic drugs such as docetaxel displayed least toxicity and highest antitumor efficacy following dosing during the circadian rest phase in mice, suggesting that cell cycle and apoptotic processes could be regulated by the circadian clock. In study 1, mouse bone marrow and/or tumor were obtained every 4 h for 24 h in C3H/HeN mice with or without MA13/C mammary adenocarcinoma in order to determine the circadian patterns in cell-cycle phase distribution and BCL-2 anti-apoptotic protein expression. In study 2, mouse bone marrow from B6D2F1 mice was sampled every 3 h for 24 h in order to confirm the BCL-2 rhythm and to study its relation with 24 h changes in the expression of proapoptotic BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) protein and clock genes mPer2, mBmal1, mClock, and mTim mRNAs. The rhythms in G1-, S- or G2/M-phase cells were shifted in tumor compared with bone marrow. In the tumor, the mean proportion of G2/M-phase cells increased by 75% from late rest to late activity span (P from cosinor = 0.001). No 24 h rhythm was found for BCL-2 in tumors. In contrast to this, in the bone marrow, mean BCL-2 expression varied 2.8-fold in B6D2F1 mice (P=0.025) and 3- or 4.5-fold in tumor-bearing and nontumor-bearing C3H/HeN mice, with a peak during the early rest span (P=0.024 and P<0.001, respectively). BAX varied fivefold during the 24 h span with a major peak occurring near mid-activity (P=0.007). The mean mRNAs of mPer2, mClock, and mBmal1 varied twofold to threefold over the 24 h, with high values during the activity span (P<0.05). In the tumor, the circadian organization in cell-cycle phase distribution was shifted and BCL2 rhythm was ablated. Conversely, a molecular circadian clock likely regulated BCL-2 and BAX expression in the bone marrow, increasing cellular protection against apoptosis during the rest span.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2003

A molecular perspective of human circadian rhythm disorders.

A large number of physiological variables display 24-h or circadian rhythms. Genes dedicated to the generation and regulation of physiological circadian rhythms have now been identified in several species, including humans. These clock genes are involved in transcriptional regulatory feedback loops. The mutation of these genes in animals leads to abnormal rhythms or even to arrhythmicity in constant conditions. In this view, and given the similarities between the circadian system of humans and rodents, it is expected that mutations of clock genes in humans may give rise to health problems, in particular sleep and mood disorders. Here we first review the present knowledge of molecular mechanisms underlying circadian rhythmicity, and we then revisit human circadian rhythm syndromes in light of the molecular data.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

No circadian rhythms in testis: Period1 expression is clock independent and developmentally regulated in the mouse.

Spermatogenesis is a process whereby haploid spermatozoa differentiate through meiosis from precursor stem cells. We examined the expression of circadian clock genes in the testis, to assess clock control over the timing of different developmental events. Clock genes are known to oscillate with circadian rhythmicity in the central clock structure, the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, but also in peripheral tissues. Here we show that Per1 gene expression in the testis is constant over a 24-h period and that the Per1 transcript is expressed at a level higher than the peak values of the Per1 oscillations observed for other tissues. Bmal1, another clock gene whose expression oscillates in other tissues, also shows constant expression levels in the testis. In addition, the levels and phosphorylation state of the PER1 protein are not oscillating at all times of day. Strikingly, Per1 is restricted primarily to step 7 to 10 spermatids and thus appears to be developmentally regulated. The expression of the Clock transcript is also developmentally regulated, but it is found principally in spermatogonia and spermatocytes up until the time of the first meiotic division. Per1 expression is not altered in testes from Clock mutant mice, suggesting that CLOCK does not activate Per1 in male germ cells, in contrast to what it does in other mouse tissues. Taken together, our observations suggest that the testis, in contrast to all other peripheral tissues, lacks a functioning circadian clock.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2003

On the communication pathways between the central pacemaker and peripheral oscillators.

Circadian rhythms are regulated by clocks located in specific structures of the CNS, such as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in mammals, and by peripheral oscillators present in various other tissues. The expression of essential clock genes oscillates both in the SCN and in peripheral pacemakers. Peripheral tissues in the fly and in the fish are directly photoreceptive. In particular, we have established the Z3 embryonic zebrafish cell line that recapitulates the dynamic light-dependent regulation of the vertebrate clock in vitro. In mammals the synchronization to daily light cycles involves neural connections from a subset of light-sensitive receptor-containing retinal ganglion cells. Humoral and/or hormonal signals originating from the SCN are thought to provide timing cues to peripheral clocks. However, alternative routes exist, as some peripheral clocks in mammals can be specifically entrained in a SCN-independent manner by restricted feeding regimes. Thus, not all peripheral tissues are equal in circadian rhythmicity. Testis, for example, displays no intrinsic circadian rhythmicity and the molecular mechanisms of clock gene activation in male germ cells appear to differ from other tissues. The study of the connecting routes that link the SCN to peripheral tissues is likely to reveal signalling pathways of fundamental physiological significance.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Phenotypic rescue of a peripheral clock genetic defect via SCN hierarchical dominance.

The mammalian circadian system contains both central and peripheral oscillators. To understand the communication pathways between them, we have studied the rhythmic behavior of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) surgically implanted in mice of different genotypes. MEFs from Per1(-/-) mice have a much shorter period in culture than do tissues in the intact animal. When implanted back into mice, however, the Per1(-/-) MEF take on the rhythmic characteristics of the host. A functioning clock is required for oscillations in the target tissues, as arrhythmic clock(c/c) MEFs remain arrhythmic in implants. These results demonstrate that SCN hierarchical dominance can compensate for severe intrinsic genetic defects in peripheral clocks, but cannot induce rhythmicity in clock-defective tissues.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activity.

Circadian rhythmicity in mammals is under the control of a molecular pacemaker constituted of clock gene products organized in transcriptional autoregulatory loops. Phase resetting of the clock in response to light involves dynamic changes in the expression of several clock genes. The molecular pathways used by light to influence pacemaker-driven oscillation of clock genes remain poorly understood. We explored the functional integration of both light- and clock-responsive transcriptional regulation at the promoter level of the Period (Per) genes. Three Per genes exist in the mouse. Whereas mPer1 and mPer2 are light-inducible in clock neurons of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus, mPer3 is not. We have studied the promoter structure of the three mPer genes and compared their regulation. All three mPer promoters contain E-boxes and respond to the CLOCK/brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT)-like protein 1 (BMAL1) heterodimer. On the other hand, only mPer1 and mPer2 promoters contain bona fide cAMP-responsive elements (CREs) that bind CRE-binding protein (CREB) from suprachiasmatic nucleus protein extracts. The mPer1 promoter is responsive to synergistic activation of the cAMP and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, a physiological response that requires integrity of the CRE. In contrast, activation of mPer promoters by CLOCK/BMAL1 occurs regardless of an intact CRE. Altogether, these results constitute strong evidence that CREB acts as a pivotal endpoint of signaling pathways for the regulation of mPer genes. Our results reveal that signaling-dependent activation of mPer genes is distinct from the CLOCK/BMAL1-driven transcription required within the clock feedback loop.

ARNTL Transcription Factors↗

PubMed2002

Light induction of a vertebrate clock gene involves signaling through blue-light receptors and MAP kinases.

The signaling pathways that couple light photoreception to entrainment of the circadian clock have yet to be deciphered. Two prominent groups of candidates for the circadian photoreceptors are opsins (e.g., melanopsin) and blue-light photoreceptors (e.g., cryptochromes). We have previously showed that the zebrafish is an ideal model organism in which to study circadian regulation and light response in peripheral tissues. Here, we used the light-responsive zebrafish cell line Z3 to dissect the response of the clock gene zPer2 to light. We show that the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway is essential for this response, although other signaling pathways may also play a role. Moreover, action spectrum analyses of zPer2 transcriptional response to monochromatic light demonstrate the involvement of a blue-light photoreceptor. The Cry1b and Cry3 cryptochromes constitute attractive candidates as photoreceptors in this setting. Our results establish a link between blue-light photoreceptors, probably cryptochromes, and the MAPK pathway to elicit light-induced transcriptional activation of clock genes.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed2002

Environmental stimulus perception and control of circadian clocks.

Circadian rhythms are regulated by clocks located in specific structures of the central nervous system, such as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in mammals, and by peripheral oscillators present in various other tissues. Recent discoveries have elucidated the control of central and peripheral clocks by environmental signals. The major synchroniser in animals is light. In mammals, a subset of retinal ganglion cells receive light signals that are transmitted to the SCN via the retinohypothalamic tract. Photoreception is probably elicited by a novel opsin, melanopsin, although cryptochromes may also play a role. These signals feed directly to the SCN master clock, which then provides timing cues to peripheral clocks. In contrast to mammals, peripheral tissues in the fly and in the fish are directly photoreceptive. However, alternative routes exist. Some peripheral clocks in mammals can be specifically entrained in an SCN-independent manner by restricting food during the light period.

Animals↗