PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Nicolas Girard

Publications and source records attributed to Nicolas Girard.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessing time to symptomatic progression, a patient-relevant efficacy endpoint, in the MARIPOSA study in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the phase 3 randomized MARIPOSA study, amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus osimertinib in participants with previously untreated, epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) was introduced to assess clinical worsening and complement endpoints that investigate radiographic disease progression and patient-reported outcomes. TTSP provides an easily interpretable measure of disease-specific symptom worsening to further support patient experience. METHODS: In MARIPOSA, TTSP was quantitatively assessed as a secondary efficacy endpoint and defined as the time from randomization until participants experience disease-specific symptom worsening requiring a clinical intervention or treatment change, or death. To evaluate the impact of amivantamab and lazertinib on TTSP considering its established OS benefit against osimertinib, an exploratory analysis censoring death events was performed. RESULTS: At the final protocol-specified OS analysis (median follow up: 37.8 months), median TTSP was 43.6 months with amivantamab and lazertinib versus 29.3 months with osimertinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83; p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.0001). Amivantamab and lazertinib reduced deaths following a TTSP event compared to osimertinib. A strong correlation between TTSP and PFS or OS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab and lazertinib significantly delayed TTSP versus osimertinib. TTSP offers a clinician-validated measurement of disease-specific symptom worsening, capturing symptoms perceived by patients that prompt clinical action. TTSP is highly correlated with PFS and OS, providing complementary insights alongside traditional endpoints. TTSP enhances understanding of treatment benefit and supports informed clinical decision-making by integrating patient experience.

Humans

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (HARMONi): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Ivonescimab has shown clinical efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease progressed after third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: HARMONi is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 114 cancer centres and hospitals across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (upper limit: 75 years in Asia) with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV non-squamous EGFR-mutated NSCLC, disease progression after treatment with a third-generation EGFR-TKI, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive voice response system or interactive web response system to receive ivonescimab (20 mg/kg) or placebo plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min) intravenously every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by brain metastases status at enrolment and geographical region. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by blinded independent radiology review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06396065), has completed enrolment, and is ongoing for treatment and follow-up. FINDINGS: From Jan 25, 2022, to Oct 1, 2024, 660 individuals were screened for eligibility; of these, 438 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ivonescimab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy (219 per group). Of enrolled patients, 257 (59%) were female and 181 (41%) were male; 306 (70%) reported race as Asian, and 105 (24%) as White. At a median follow-up of 22&#xb7;3 months (95% CI 21&#xb7;5-23&#xb7;0), 275 progression or death events had occurred in 345 patients (129 events among 172 patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 146 events among 173 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median progression-free survival was 6&#xb7;8 months (95% CI 5&#xb7;7-7&#xb7;1) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 4&#xb7;4 months (4&#xb7;1-5&#xb7;5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0&#xb7;52; 95% CI 0&#xb7;41-0&#xb7;66; p<0&#xb7;0001). At a median follow-up of 29&#xb7;7 months (95% CI 27&#xb7;7-31&#xb7;0), 262 deaths occurred in 438 patients (122 in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 140 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median overall survival was 16&#xb7;8 months (14&#xb7;3-19&#xb7;0) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 14&#xb7;0 months (12&#xb7;8-15&#xb7;7) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0&#xb7;79; 0&#xb7;62-1&#xb7;01). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus the placebo plus chemotherapy group were decreased neutrophil count (42 [19%] of 218 vs 36 [17%] of 218), decreased white blood cell count (28 [13%] vs 24 [11%]), decreased platelet count (27 [12%] vs 14 [6%]), and anaemia (22 [10%] vs 27 [12%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (28%) patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 33 (15%) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four patients (disease progression, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and hepatic failure, each in one patient; gastrointestinal haemorrhage and pulmonary embolism in one patient) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and five patients (pneumonitis, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, cognitive disorder, and embolic stroke, each in one patient) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI therapy. The clinical benefit and lack of new safety signals of ivonescimab with chemotherapy support the potential for the combination as a new treatment option in this patient population. FUNDING: Summit Therapeutics.

Humans

Molecular analysis of lung adenocarcinomas from the SAFIR02-Lung cohort reveals new metastasis-associated copy-number alterations including frequent mutant-specific KRAS-allelic imbalance and identifies CDKN2A homozygous deletions as an independent biomarker of poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Identifying molecular alterations specific to advanced lung adenocarcinomas could provide insights into tumour progression and dissemination mechanisms. METHOD: We analysed tumour samples, either from locoregional lesions or distant metastases, from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma from the SAFIR02-Lung trial by targeted sequencing of 45 cancer genes and comparative genomic hybridisation array and compared them to early tumours samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. RESULTS: Differences in copy-number alterations frequencies suggest the involvement in tumour progression of LAMB3, TNN/KIAA0040/TNR, KRAS, DAB2, MYC, EPHA3 and VIPR2, and in metastatic dissemination of AREG, ZNF503, PAX8, MMP13, JAM3, and MTURN. Conversely, no meaningful difference was found in pathogenic single-nucleotide variant frequencies, reinforcing the notion that they are early events in tumorigenesis. CDKN2A homozygous deletion was linked to poor clinical outcome in patients with early tumours (overall survival hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI: 1.43-3.28, corrected p-value&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01). Furthermore, we found that KRAS mutant allele specific imbalance, i.e. focal amplification of the mutant allele, is more prevalent in locoregional or distant samples of metastatic patients than in early lesions (8.4%, 13% and 2.8% respectively). This observation was replicated in three public cohorts. Tumours with KRAS mutant allele specific imbalance show specific patterns of co-occurrence and mutual exclusion with alterations in key cancer genes like CDKN2A, TP53, STK11 and NKX2-1, often in a tumour type dependent manner. CONCLUSION: Advanced LUAD tumours exhibit higher copy-number alteration burden, with distinct alterations associated with tumour progression and metastasis. CDKN2A homozygous deletions predict poor prognosis in early disease, while KRAS mutant allele-specific imbalance is enriched in advanced tumours.

Humans

Intracranial and systemic progression on amivantamab in platinum-treated epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved as monotherapy and as combination therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring various EGFR mutations in first-line and refractory settings. Sites of progressive disease on amivantamab monotherapy are not well understood and could be instructive for treatment management. METHODS: CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) enrolled participants with NSCLC, including those with treated brain metastases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was required at screening but performed per local practice after enrollment (conducted postbaseline every 6 [&#xb1;1] weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1). Sites of target, non-target, and new lesion progression were reported. This analysis includes 114 participants with EGFR exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) NSCLC after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy who received amivantamab monotherapy on or before June 4, 2020. RESULTS: As of March 30, 2021, the median follow-up was 12.5&#xa0;months (range, 0.2-30.5). Among 114 participants, the objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 43&#xa0;%; median duration of response was 10.8&#xa0;months, and median progression-free survival was 6.7&#xa0;months. RECIST-defined progressive disease occurred in 72/114 participants (63&#xa0;%); 25/72 (35&#xa0;%) continued amivantamab after progression (4.2 median additional months; range, 1.0-12.5). The most common first sites of progression were the lungs/pleura (29&#xa0;%), followed by bone (21&#xa0;%), brain (15&#xa0;%), and lymph node (12&#xa0;%). Thirteen participants (11&#xa0;%) had intracranial-only first progression. Six of these 13 participants underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) while continuing amivantamab. The median duration of amivantamab treatment post-progression in these 6 participants was 4.0&#xa0;months (range, 2.3-6.0). SRS was well tolerated, with 2 adverse events reported (nausea and fatigue, n&#xa0;=&#xa0;1 each). CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab monotherapy in post-platinum Ex20ins NSCLC demonstrated meaningful antitumor activity in participants, and intracranial-only progression was infrequent. Treatment of brain progression with SRS while continuing amivantamab appears feasible and tolerable.

Adult