Biomedical subjects

Nicolas Grimault

Publications and source records attributed to Nicolas Grimault.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Learning in discrimination of frequency or modulation rate: generalization to fundamental frequency discrimination.

Fifteen initially inexperienced subjects were trained for 4 weeks (12 2-h sessions) in frequency discrimination with pure tones around 88, 250, or 1605 Hz, or amplitude modulation rate discrimination of noise bands, using modulation rates around 88 or 250 Hz. Before, in the middle of, and after this training period, pure-tone frequency discrimination thresholds (DLFs), harmonic complex tone fundamental frequency discrimination thresholds (DLF0s), and amplitude modulation rate discrimination thresholds (DLFMs) were measured in several conditions including the trained one. Training in pure-tone frequency discrimination resulted in significantly larger improvements in DLF0s when the test complexes contained resolved harmonics than when they were composed of unresolved harmonics. This result supports the hypothesis that the discrimination of the F0 of resolved harmonics shares common underlying mechanisms with the frequency discrimination of pure tones. Training in rate discrimination did not result in larger DLF0 improvements for unresolved than for resolved harmonics.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

In this study, auditory stream segregation based on differences in the rate of envelope fluctuations--in the absence of spectral and temporal fine structure cues--was tested. The temporal sequences to segregate were composed of fully amplitude-modulated (AM) bursts of broadband noises A and B. All sequences were built by the reiteration of a ABA triplet where A modulation rate was fixed at 100 Hz and B modulation rate was variable. The first experiment was devoted to measuring the threshold difference in AM rate leading subjects to perceive the sequence as two streams as opposed to just one. The results of this first experiment revealed that subjects generally perceived the sequences as a single perceptual stream when the difference in AM rate between the A and B noises was smaller than 0.75 oct, and as two streams when the difference was larger than about 1.00 oct. These streaming thresholds were found to be substantially larger than, and not related to, the subjects' modulation-rate discrimination thresholds. The results of a second experiment demonstrated that AM-rate-based streaming was adversely affected by decreases in AM depth, but that segregation remained possible as long as the AM of either the A or B noises was above the subject's AM-detection threshold. The results of a third experiment indicated that AM-rate-based streaming effects were still observed when the modulations applied to the A and B noises were set individually, either at a constant level in dB above AM-detection threshold, or at levels at which they were of the same perceived strength. This finding suggests that AM-rate-based streaming is not necessarily mediated by perceived differences in AM depth. Altogether, the results of this study indicate that sequential sounds can be segregated on the sole basis of differences in the rate of their temporal fluctuations in the absence of other temporal or spectral cues.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Spectral integration in bands of modulated or unmodulated noise.

Spectral integration was measured for pure-tone signals masked by unmodulated or modulated noise bands centered at the signal frequencies. The bands were typically 100 Hz wide, and when modulated, they were sinusoidally amplitude modulated at a rate of 8 Hz and a depth of 100%. In experiment 1, thresholds were first measured for each individual pure tone of a triplet in the presence of its respective masker band, and then for those three tones added together at their respective threshold levels, masked by their respective masker bands. Four sets of triplets were used: 250, 1000, 4000 Hz; 354, 1000, 2828 Hz; 500, 1000, 2000 Hz; and 800, 1000, 1200 Hz. When the masker bands were unmodulated, the amount of spectral integration was about 2.4 dB for all triplets, consistent with the integration expected based on the multiband energy detector model. When the bands were modulated, the amount of integration depended upon the spacing between masker bands; for the two widest spacings, the integration was between about 0 and 3 dB, whereas for the two closest spacings, the integration was approximately 5 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 addressed the cause of this greater spectral integration in the presence of the modulated masker bands with closer spacing. The second experiment demonstrated that sensitivity (d') was proportional to signal power regardless of whether the background noise was modulated or not, and thus the greater integration in dB in the presence of the modulated noise bands could not be accounted for by shallower psychometric functions in those conditions. Instead, the third experiment showed that the greater integration was likely due to the fact that the masker bands were comodulated. In other words, it was probably due to cues related to comodulation masking release when all three bands (and signals) were present.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm.

The neural mechanisms underlying the perception of pitch, a sensory attribute of paramount importance in hearing, have been a matter of debate for over a century. A question currently at the heart of the debate is whether the pitch of all harmonic complex tones can be determined by the auditory system's using a single mechanism, or whether two different neural mechanisms are involved, depending on the stimulus conditions. When the harmonics are widely spaced, as is the case at high fundamental frequencies (FOs), and/or when the frequencies of the harmonics are low, the frequency components of the sound fall in different peripheral auditory channels and are then "resolved" by the peripheral auditory system. In contrast, at low F0s, or when the harmonics are high in frequency, several harmonics interact within the passbands of the same auditory filters, being thus "unresolved" by the peripheral auditory system. The idea that more than one mechanism mediates the encoding of pitch depending on the resolvability status of the harmonics was investigated here by testing for transfer of learning in F0 discrimination between different stimulus conditions involving either resolved or unresolved harmonics after specific training in one of these conditions. The results, which show some resolvability-specificity of F0-discrimination learning, support the hypothesis that two different underlying mechanisms mediate the encoding of the F0 of resolved and unresolved harmonics.

Adult↗