PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nicole Murray

Publications and source records attributed to Nicole Murray.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Functional analysis and intervention to reduce self-injurious and agitated behavior when removing protective equipment for brief time periods.

The authors conducted studies that were designed to maintain low levels of hand-to-head self-injury when protective equipment was removed (i.e., rigid arm sleeves and a protective helmet) for brief time periods with an individual with profound intellectual disabilities. A series of assessments was first conducted of a topographically similar form of behavior to self-injury when the person was wearing protective equipment (i.e., hitting helmet with rigid arm sleeves). Results of these assessments indicated that head hitting (with equipment) was not sensitive to social consequences (Study 1) but that it was reduced substantially when the individual had access to items that produced vibration or vibration and sound (Study 2). A treatment protocol that included items that produced vibration and vibration with sound produced substantial reductions in attempts at self-injury and agitation when protective equipment was removed for brief time periods (Study 3).

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Powered partial adenoidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm our clinical impression that the powered microdebrider is superior to curettes for performing partial adenoidectomy (removal of the superior one half to three fourths of the adenoid pad). DESIGN: Observational study of 100 children undergoing partial adenoidectomy with the powered microdebrider compared with 40 children undergoing conventional partial adenoidectomy with curettes. SETTING: Private and public tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: All patients younger than 20 years undergoing partial adenoidectomy at the respective institutions during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: Partial adenoidectomy as indicated for chronic otitis media, airway obstruction, or chronic or recurrent tonsillitis with either the powered microdebrider or curettes. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Operative time (with specific quantification of the time required for tissue removal and hemostasis), blood loss, complications, and subjective ease of use. RESULTS: Operative time was 59% shorter for the microdebrider group (mean, 3 minutes 22 seconds; range, 1 minute 6 seconds to 12 minutes 45 seconds) than for the conventional group (mean, 8 minutes 8 seconds; range, 1 minute 2 seconds to 22 minutes 0 seconds) (P<.001). Blood loss was comparable for both groups (powered group: mean, 2.0 mL/kg; range, 0.4 to 9.4 mL/kg; conventional group: mean, 2.0 mL/kg; range, 0.3 to 6.7 mL/kg; P=.34). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in either group. Surgeon satisfaction with the microdebrider was high. CONCLUSIONS: The powered microdebrider for partial adenoidectomy is quicker and is not associated with blood loss or complications above that of conventional partial adenoidectomy. The degree of control afforded by the microdebrider technique is of utmost value in preventing complications such as velopharyngeal insufficiency, and this is now our procedure of choice.

Adenoidectomy↗

Power-assisted partial adenoidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe partial adenoidectomy using a powered microdebrider and review the experience with the procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study and review. METHODS: To perform a power-assisted partial adenoidectomy, the surgeon directs the window in the microdebrider blade tip toward the tissue, which is drawn in by suction; the rotating blade then shaves the tissue. Studies have compared this adenoidectomy technique with curette procedures. RESULTS: In a comparative prospective study, we found that operating time and time required for hemostasis were significantly shorter (P =.001) with power-assisted partial adenoidectomy than with curettage. There was no significant difference between the two procedures in blood loss or complication rate. These results were similar to those of previous studies. Overall, we have performed more than 1000 power-assisted partial adenoidectomies. No long-term complications have occurred, blood loss remains low, and surgeons are satisfied with the technique because of its speed, improved visibility during resection, and precision. CONCLUSION: We and other authors have found power-assisted partial adenoidectomy to provide a faster, more precise operation than curette techniques, with benefits for both patient and surgeon.

Adenoidectomy↗