Biomedical subjects

Nicole Wenderoth

Publications and source records attributed to Nicole Wenderoth.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill.

Bimanual coordination, a prototype of a complex motor skill, has recently become the subject of intensive investigation. Whereas past research focused mainly on the identification of the elementary coordination constraints that limit performance, the focus is now shifting towards overcoming these coordination constraints by means of task symbolization or perceptual transformation rules that promote the integration of the task components into a meaningful "gestalt". The study of these cognitive penetrations into action will narrow the brain-mind gap and will facilitate the development of a cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual movement control.

Attention↗

PubMed2003

Directional interference during bimanual coordination: is interlimb coupling mediated by afferent or efferent processes.

The role of afferent information in bimanual directional interference was studied by means of a modulation of the response-produced information in one of both limbs. In Experiment 1, visual information was either present, withdrawn, or shown with a directional transformation on a LCD screen. In Experiment 2, the technique of muscle tendon vibration was used to bias the kinesthetic afferent information associated with movement. The findings revealed strong evidence for directional interference between both limbs. Nevertheless, no evidence could be advanced that the observed interference from the right onto the left limb movement was modulated by manipulation of the afferent sources of information. It is concluded that directional interference primarily emerges at the efferent level of movement planning and organization.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback.

It is commonly agreed that a functional dissociation with respect to the internal vs external control of movements exists for several brain regions. This has, however, only been tested in relation to the timing and preparation of motor responses, but not to ongoing movement control. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the present study addressed the neuroanatomical substrate of the internal-external control hypothesis by comparing regional brain activation for cyclical bimanual movements performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Subjects performed a bimanual movement pattern, either with the help of on-line visual feedback of the movements (externally guided coordination) or with the eyes closed on the basis of an internal representation of the movement pattern (internally generated coordination). Visual control and baseline rest conditions were also added. Results showed a clear functional dissociation within the network involved in movement coordination. The hMT/V5+, the superior parietal cortex, the premotor cortex, the thalamus, and cerebellar lobule VI showed higher activation levels when movements were guided by visual feedback. Conversely, the basal ganglia, the supplementary motor area, cingulate motor cortex, the inferior parietal, frontal operculum, and cerebellar lobule IV-V/dentate nucleus showed higher involvement when movements were internally generated. Consequently, the present findings suggest the existence of distinct cortico-cortical and subcortico-cortical neural pathways for externally (augmented feedback) and internally guided cyclical bimanual movements. This provides a neurophysiological account for the beneficial effect of providing augmented visual feedback to optimize movements in normal and motor disordered patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Bimanual training reduces spatial interference.

The authors investigated whether training can reduce bimanual directional interference by using a star-line drawing paradigm. Participants (N = 30) were required to perform rhythmical arm movements with identical temporal but differing directional demands. Moreover, the effectiveness of part-task training in which each movement was practiced in isolation was compared with that of whole-task training in which only combined movements were performed. Findings revealed that bimanual training substantially reduced spatial interference, but unimanual training did not. The authors therefore concluded that the spatial coupling of the limbs is not implemented in a rigid way; instead, the underlying neural correlate can undergo plastic changes induced by training. Moreover, the practical implication that emerged from the present study is that athletic, musical, or ergonomic skills that require a high degree of interlimb coordination are best served by whole-task practice.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Directional invariance during loading-related modulations of muscle activity: evidence for motor equivalence.

In the present study, we investigated the influence of external force manipulations on movements in different directions, while keeping the amplitude invariant. Subjects ( n=10) performed a series of cyclical anteroposterior, mediolateral, and oblique line-drawing movements (star drawing task) with their dominant limb in the horizontal plane. To dissociate kinematics from the underlying patterns of muscle activation, spring loading was applied to the forearm of the moving limb. Whereas spring loading of the arm resulted in considerable changes in the overall amount of muscle activation in the elbow and shoulder muscles, invariance was largely maintained at the kinematic level. Subjects produced the required movement directions and amplitudes of the star drawing largely successfully, irrespective of the force bias induced by the spring. These observations demonstrate motor equivalence and strengthen the notion that the spatial representation of drawing movements is encoded in the higher brain regions in a rather abstract form that is dissociated from the concrete muscle activation patterns underlying a particular movement direction. To achieve this goal, the central nervous system shifted between two or more muscle grouping strategies to overcome modulations in the interaction among posture-dependent (joint stiffness), dynamic (inertial), and elastic (spring) torque components in the joints. Spring loading induced general changes in the overall amount of EMG activity, which was largely muscle but not direction specific, presumably to represent the posture-dependent biasing force of the spring. Loading was mainly shown to increase muscle coactivation in the elbow joint. This indicates that the subjects tended to increase stiffness in the elbow to compensate for changes in the spring bias forces in order to minimize trajectory errors. Changes in muscle grouping of the shoulder antagonists were mainly a consequence of movement direction but were also affected partly by loading, presumably reflecting the influence of dynamic force components. Taken together, the results confirmed the hypothesis that changes of movement direction and direction of force in the end-effector generated specific sets of muscle grouping to overcome the dynamic requirements in the joints while keeping the kinematics largely unchanged. This suggests that directional tuning in muscle activity and changes in muscle grouping reflects the formation of appropriate internal models in the CNS that give rise to motor equivalence.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing attractors.

The present study investigates whether the acquisition of a rhythmical bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing intrinsic coordination tendencies. Participants were required to learn 1 of 5 new coordination patterns, whose relative phase phi was either 36, 60, or 90 degrees away from the 0 degree and 180 degree attractors, respectively. They performed 35 trials, each consisting of 2 conditions: In the augmented feedback condition, continuous visual guidance was provided, while in the normal feedback condition participants were required to rely on normal vision of their arms. We found that all to-be-learned patterns were performed with higher accuracy in the visually guided condition, whereas interference with pre-existing coordination tendencies was more pronounced in the normal vision condition. Comparing the learning progress of the 5 groups, we found for patterns close to anti-phase, a smaller improvement and significantly larger phase errors than for patterns close to in-phase. This indicates that the acquisition of a new phase relationship is influenced by existing attractors and that the 180 degree attractor interfered more strongly with the to-be-learned pattern than the 0 degree attractor.

Adult↗