Biomedical subjects

Nils R Gjerdet

Publications and source records attributed to Nils R Gjerdet.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Host response to titanium dental implant placement evaluated in a human oral model.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have questioned if metal sensitivity may arise from exposure to titanium. The objective of this study was to histologically evaluate non-perforated mucosa covering submerged maxillary titanium implants with regard to induced tissue reactions. METHODS: Thirteen patients, 21 to 69 years of age, without previous implants were included. After initial examination, the bone crest areas destined for dental implant placement were exposed, and threaded external hex dental implants were inserted. Prior to wound closure, a full mucosal tissue slice was biopsied from the edge of the mucoperiosteal flap (baseline). The patients were monitored monthly for 6 months. At the abutment connection, biopsies were taken by a 6-mm punch, altogether yielding 26 specimens. Tissue reactions were analyzed by coded histometric analysis at four defined areas at increasing distance from the oral epithelium, including ratios of inflammatory cells (IC)/epithelial cells, IC/fibroblasts, and number of dense particles. RESULTS: The stained sections portrayed gingival tissue with intact oral epithelium and connective tissue with variable accumulation of IC. Experimental biopsies demonstrated mineralized areas and dense particles of different sizes. Analysis of variance revealed a higher IC/fibroblast ratio for level 3 at baseline compared to level 3 at 6 months (P<0.01). Furthermore, a significant decrease in IC/fibroblast ratio was observed between levels 2 and 3 and 2 and 4 at 6 months (P<0.001). The connective tissue level facing the cover screw contained the highest number of dense particles (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue sensitivity reactions to titanium implants were not disclosed. All 6-month biopsies contained dense particles that were most likely metals.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

An overview of the current status of national reporting systems for adverse reactions to dental materials.

OBJECTIVES: Since all dental materials pose a potential risk to patients and members of the dental team, the post-market monitoring of adverse reactions caused by dental materials should be considered essential. This article reviews the current status of post-market monitoring of adverse reactions to dental materials and highlights some of the issues that arise in trying to establish an evidence base on the characteristics of adverse reactions to dental materials. METHODS: Norway, Sweden and more recently the UK have sought to monitor adverse reactions to dental materials systematically and proactively in an effort to add to the evidence base on the safety of dental materials. Their experiences in undertaking post-market surveillance have been combined in preparing this article. RESULTS: To date the Norwegian, Swedish and the UK projects has received 1268 reports over 11 years, 848 reports over 5.5 years and 1117 reports over 3 years, respectively, relating to adverse reactions seen or experienced by dental personnel and patients. Presently, there are no harmonized criteria for what can be classified as an adverse reaction related to dental materials. Under reporting is a recognised problem and lack of awareness and lack of clarity as to what constitutes an adverse reaction may be contributory factors. A pro-active reporting system takes a considerable time to become established, but can generate a lot of potentially useful information. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to raise the awareness among dental professionals of the potential for adverse reactions due to dental materials and to develop an internationally accepted system of data gathering that can produce the evidence that reflect the extent, severity and incidence of adverse reactions to dental materials.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Blood mercury following DMPS administration to subjects with and without dental amalgam.

The use of DMPS as a diagnostic tool in patients with symptoms allegedly caused by mercury from dental amalgam fillings is disputed. We have previously shown that the mercury concentrations in urine cannot be used in such a way. In the present study, we wished to evaluate the effect on blood mercury levels (B-Hg) following intravenously injected DMPS in four groups of subjects: 19 controls without amalgam experience; 21 healthy controls with amalgam fillings; 20 patients with self-reported symptoms from existing dental amalgams; and 20 patients who had removed amalgam fillings. A single dose of DMPS (2 mg/kg) was injected. Blood samples were collected prior to the injection and after 15, 30, 120 min, and after 24 h, and mercury was analyzed by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. All groups showed an initial drop of 24 to 30% in the blood levels, approaching baseline values (2.5-5.5 microg/l) after 2 h. The subjects with no amalgam experience had the lowest mercury values. There was no significant difference between the three groups with such experience. There were no significant differences between the two groups with amalgam fillings present. Patients with symptoms allegedly caused by amalgam were not different from the control groups. There were indications that part of the urinary mercury excreted during the first 30 min originated from blood.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Slippage between screwdriver and bone screw.

Cortical 3.5-mm stainless steel screws with hexagonal heads and corresponding screwdrivers from two manufacturers were investigated. Measurement of dimensions and torsional testing were done to study slippage between the screw and the driver bit. There were only small differences in dimensions between the manufacturers. Ultimate torque values obtained were at the level of 2.7 N-m where reaming of the screw socket took place. Additional rotation resulted in approximately (1/2) of the maximum torque. Subsequent torque testing in the opposite direction, corresponding to removal of the screw, revealed that the torque values were equally low in that direction. Additional insertion and removal of bone screws with hexagonal sockets are hampered after only one episode of slippage. It is justified to consider new shapes of drive bits and corresponding screw head sockets, such as a fluted multiedge configuration.

Bone Screws↗