Biomedical subjects

Norimichi Shimamoto

Publications and source records attributed to Norimichi Shimamoto.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Static and dynamic analysis of five anterior instrumentation systems for thoracolumbar scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A nondestructive biomechanical investigation among five anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to analyze the static and dynamic biomechanical stability of five different systems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although a variety of anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis are available, very few attempts have been made at comparative biomechanical studies. METHODS: Thirty calf spines were underwent static biomechanical tests, including flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loading modes in the multisegmental spinal model. Five anterior instrumentation systems included: 1) Texas Scottish Rite Hospital system; 2) Bad Wildungen Metz; 3) anterior ISOLA; 4) Cotrel-Dubousset Hoph; and 5) Kaneda Anterior Scoliosis System. The initial and postfatigue stability after a cyclic loading test were analyzed by measuring the range of motion at instrumented segments compared to the intact within the same specimen (% to intact). RESULTS: Two-rod systems showed a significant decrease in range of motion compared to one-rod systems in flexion-extension (P < 0.001) and axial rotation (P < 0.05). In lateral bending, all systems demonstrated a significant decrease in range of motion of less than 40% to the intact (P < 0.001). After cyclical loading test, all systems increased in range of motion. In flexion-extension, one-rod systems depicted a significant increase in range of motion, compared to two-rod systems (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the initial stability analysis, two-rod systems are superior to one-rod systems. For one-rod systems, repeated physiologic loading may result in reduced stability in flexion-extension.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2002

Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model.

STUDY DESIGN: biomechanical testing of the strength and stability of lumbosacral fixation constructs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical properties of five different lumbosacral fixation constructs and determine the benefit of adding supplementary fixation to S1 screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Extension of long fusions to the sacrum remains a difficult clinical challenge. Only a limited number of biomechanical studies have evaluated the different fixation methods available, and none has included both nondestructive and load to failure testing of these fixation methods. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen calf spines were prepared and tested for each construct. The five constructs tested included the following: S1 screws alone, S1 screws and S2 proximally directed screws, S1 screws and S2 distally directed screws, S1 screws and intrasacral rods, and S1 screws and iliac screws. Nondestructive, multidirectional flexibility analyses included four loading methods followed by a destructive flexural load to failure. Lumbosacral peak range of motion (millimeters or degrees) and ultimate failure load (Nm) of the five reconstruction techniques were statistically compared using a one-way analysis of variance combined with a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. RESULTS: S1 screw strain tested in flexion-extension was significantly reduced by the addition of any second point of distal fixation. There was no significant difference between any of the different sacral fixation constructs (P > 0.05). In axial compression, only the addition of iliac screws significantly reduced S1 screw strain. In destructive testing under flexion loading, only iliac screws statistically increased the load at failure (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of adding a second fixation point distal to the S1 screws in reducing S1 screw strain. Iliac fixation is more effective than secondary sacral fixation points but may not be necessary in all clinical situations. Only iliac fixation effectively increased the load to failure under catastrophic loading conditions. Supplementary sacral fixation failed to significantly protect against catastrophic failure. These findings support the clinical observation that iliac fixation is least likely to fail in high-risk, long fusions. Whether testing range of motion, screw strain, or load to failure, no benefit could be demonstrated for intrasacral rod placement when compared with other supplementary sacral fixation techniques. Intrasacral rod placement was equal to a second sacral screw in reducing S1 screw strain during flexion-extension loading. It was not as effective as iliac fixation in reducing screw strain or preventing catastrophic failure. When choosing fixation methods in long fusions to the sacrum, this study supports the use of iliac fixation as the method least likely to loosen or pull out. A second point of sacral fixation also offers biomechanical advantages when compared with S1 fixation alone and may be an appropriate choice in less "high risk" fusions to the sacrum.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Artificial intervertebral disc replacement using bioactive three-dimensional fabric: design, development, and preliminary animal study.

STUDY DESIGN: A new artificial intervertebral disc was developed, and its intrinsic biomechanical properties, bioactivity, and the effectiveness as a total disc replacement were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. OBJECTIVES: To introduce a new artificial intervertebral disc and to evaluate the in vitro mechanical properties, fusion capacity to bone, and segmental biomechanics in the total intervertebral disc replacement using a sheep lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The loss of biologic fusion at the bone-implant interface and prosthetic failures have been reported in previous artificial discs. There have been no clinically applicable discs with detailed experimental testing of in vivo mechanics and interface fusion capacity. METHODS: The artificial intervertebral disc consists of a triaxial three-dimensional fabric (3-DF) woven with an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber, and spray-coated bioactive ceramics on the disc surface. The arrangement of weave properties was designed to produce mechanical behavior nearly equivalent to the natural intervertebral disc. Total intervertebral disc replacement at L2-L3 and L4-L5 was performed using 3-DF disc with or without internal fixation in a sheep lumbar spine model. The segmental biomechanics and interface histology were evaluated after surgery at 4 and 6 months. RESULTS: The tensile-compressive and torsional properties of prototype 3-DF were nearly equivalent to those of human lumbar disc. The lumbar segments replaced with 3-DF disc alone showed a significant decrease of flexion-extension range of motion to 28% of control values as well as partial bony fusion at 6 months. However, the use of temporary fixation provided a nearly physiologic mobility of the spinal segment after implant removal as well as excellent bone-disc fusion at 6 months. CONCLUSION: An artificial intervertebral disc using a three-dimensional fabric demonstrated excellent in vitro and in vivo performance in both biomechanics and interface histology. There is a potential for future clinical application.

Animals↗