PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Norman Starr

Publications and source records attributed to Norman Starr.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Recent metformin ingestion does not increase in-hospital morbidity or mortality after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative treatment of type 2 diabetes with metformin, an oral hypoglycemic drug, is thought to increase the risk of life-threatening postoperative lactic acidosis. In contrast, metformin improves serum glucose control and has beneficial cardiovascular effects, which may decrease the risk of adverse outcomes. In this investigation we sought to determine the influence of metformin treatment on mortality and morbidity compared with treatment with other oral hypoglycemic drugs in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective investigation, 1284 diabetic patients, with recent oral hypoglycemic ingestion (presumed to be 8-24 h preoperatively), underwent cardiac surgery from 1994-2004. Propensity scores were calculated from a logistic model which included baseline characteristics and perioperative variables. Four-hundred-forty-three (85%) of the metformin-treated patients were matched on nearest propensity score using greedy matching techniques with 443 nonmetformin-treated patients. Postoperative outcomes were compared between matched metformin- and nonmetformin-treated patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality, cardiac, renal, and neurologic morbidities were similar between groups. Metformin-treated patients had less postoperative prolonged tracheal intubation [OR (95% CI), 0.3 (0.1, 0.7), P = 0.003], infection [0.2 (0.1, 0.7), P = 0.007] and overall morbidities [0.4 (0.2, 0.8), P = 0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that recent metformin ingestion is not associated with increased risk of adverse outcome in cardiac surgical patients. Alternatively, metformin treatment may have beneficial effects.

Administration, Oral↗

Practice pattern variability for myocardial revascularization: impact on resource use across 24 centers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of hospital length of stay (LOS) after elective uncomplicated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the EPI-1 database, 1991-1993. SETTING: Multicenter; 24 academic, private, federal, and health maintenance institutions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective CABG surgery (n = 2,417). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using a systematic sampling scheme at each site, each patient was evaluated to identify markers of chronic disease, perioperative test data, treatments, adverse outcomes, and LOS. Institutional differences in the care of patients free of complications were assessed using a multivariate model. LOS was the outcome variable selected to estimate cost. A total of 861 patients (37%) were free of any complication. The mean site LOS ranged from 5.4 to 9.0 days, with half of the 24 centers reporting a hospital LOS routinely >7.1 days. The predominant factor associated with a complication-free LOS was site per se, accounting for 32% of the variability in hospital LOS that could not be explained by any site characteristic (eg, size, geographic location, academic affiliation). Multivariable analysis identified 3 demographic predictors--age >75 years (increasing LOS by 1.3 days), admission from the emergency department (increasing LOS by 0.7 days), and uninsured or Medicaid-insured (increasing LOS by 0.4 days); 2 historical predictors--New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure (increasing LOS by 0.5 days) and history of arrhythmia (increasing LOS by 0.7 days); and 2 practice patterns--transfusion of blood products (increasing LOS by 0.3 days) and delayed extubation (increasing LOS by 0.5 days). Previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurologic disease, and other historical factors were not associated with LOS in patients without a complication. CONCLUSION: A substantial variability in LOS after complication-free coronary artery bypass graft surgery was determined predominantly by site per se, even after adjustment for disease severity, site type or location, and surgical and anesthetic practices. The variability in LOS was likely due to practice style influences and represents an opportunity to decrease waste in the provision of a common and expensive procedure.

Blood Transfusion↗