PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Norman Wolmark

Publications and source records attributed to Norman Wolmark.

49 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Effects of tamoxifen on benign breast disease in women at high risk for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In 1998 the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) demonstrated that tamoxifen treatment reduced the incidence of both invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women at high risk for the disease. We examined the effect of tamoxifen treatment on the incidence of benign breast disease and the number of breast biopsies in the same group of women. METHODS: We examined the medical records of 13 203 women with follow-up who participated in the NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Included in this analysis were women who had undergone a breast biopsy and who had histologic diagnoses of adenosis, cyst, duct ectasia, fibrocystic disease, fibroadenoma, fibrosis, hyperplasia, or metaplasia. The relative risk (RR) for each histologic diagnosis was estimated for women who received tamoxifen and for women who received placebo. We also tallied the number of biopsies that women in the placebo and tamoxifen groups underwent. RESULTS: Overall, tamoxifen treatment reduced the risk of benign breast disease by 28% (RR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65 to 0.79). Tamoxifen therapy resulted in statistically significant reductions in the risk of adenosis (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.73), cyst (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.75), duct ectasia (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.97), fibrocystic disease (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.77), hyperplasia (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.71), and metaplasia (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.62). Tamoxifen therapy also reduced the risk for fibroadenoma (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.04) and fibrosis (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.03). Compared with the placebo group, the tamoxifen group had 29% (95% CI = 23% to 34%) fewer biopsies (1048 versus 1469) and 19% fewer women who underwent a biopsy (811 versus 1019). This resulted in a 29% reduction in the risk of biopsy in women treated with tamoxifen (RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.77). This risk reduction occurred predominantly in women younger than 50 years. CONCLUSION: Women in this study who received tamoxifen, especially younger women (i.e., <50 years), had a reduced incidence of clinically detected benign breast disease and underwent fewer breast biopsies.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prognosis after rectal cancer in blacks and whites participating in adjuvant therapy randomized trials.

PURPOSE: National health statistics indicate that blacks have lower survival rates from colorectal cancer than do whites. This disparity has been attributed to differences in stage at diagnosis and other disease features, extent and quality of treatment, and socioeconomic factors. We evaluated outcomes for blacks and whites with rectal cancer who participated in randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). The randomized trial setting enhances uniformity in disease stage and treatment plan among all participants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included black (N = 104) or white (N = 1,070) patients from two serially conducted NSABP randomized trials for operable rectal cancer. Recurrence-free survival and survival were compared using statistical modeling to account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between the groups. RESULTS: Blacks and whites had largely similar disease features at diagnosis. After adjustment for patient and tumor prognostic covariates, the black/white recurrence hazard ratio (HR) was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.66). The mortality HR was somewhat larger at 1.45 (95% CI = 1.09 to 1.93). Outcomes were improved for both groups in the more recent trial, which employed systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in all treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Recurrence-free survival was modestly less favorable for blacks, whereas overall survival was more disparate. Outcomes between groups were more comparable than those noted in national health statistics surveys and other studies. Adequate treatment access and the identification of new prognostic factors that can identify patients at high risk of recurrence are needed to ensure optimal outcomes for rectal cancer patients of all racial/ethnic backgrounds.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Prognostic value of thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes' B and C colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project collaborative study.

PURPOSE: To define the value of thymidylate synthase (TS), Ki-67, and p53 as prognostic markers in patients with stage II and III colon carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic value of TS, Ki-67, and p53 in 706 patients with Dukes' B (291 patients) or Dukes' C (415 patients) colon carcinoma who were treated with either surgery alone (275 patients) or surgery plus fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin chemotherapy (431 patients) in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocols C01-C04. All three markers were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques. RESULTS: Using 5 years of follow-up data, our retrospective analysis demonstrated an association between TS intensity (relapse-free survival [RFS]: risk ratio [RR] = 1.46, P =.01; overall survival [OS]: RR = 1.54, P =.002), Ki-67 (RFS: RR = 0.76, P =.05; OS: RR = 0.62, P =.001), and p53 (RFS: RR = 1.49, P =.01; OS: RR = 1.21, P =.18) for RFS and OS. High TS intensity levels and positive p53 staining were associated with a worse outcome. Tumors containing a high percentage of Ki-67-positive cells enjoyed an improved outcome compared with those patients whose tumors contained relatively few positive cells. An interaction with treatment was not identified for any of the markers. CONCLUSION: This retrospective investigation demonstrated that TS, Ki-67, and p53 staining each had significant prognostic value for patients with Dukes' B and C colon carcinoma. However, none of the markers could be used to clearly discern groups of individuals who would be predicted to derive greater or lesser benefit from the use of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Lack of influence of cytokeratin-positive mini micrometastases in "Negative Node" patients with colorectal cancer: findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel projects protocols R-01 and C-01.

PURPOSE: Results of the few extant reports concerning the clinical significance of so-called "occult micrometastases" of lymph nodes of patients with Dukes A and B colorectal cancer have been variable. We examined the presumably negative nodes of a larger cohort of such patients who were enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project clinical trials R-01 and C-01 for the influence of what we preferably designate as nodal mini micrometastases on parameters of survival. METHODS: Mini micrometastases were detected by immunohistochemical staining of the original lymph node sections with anticytokeratin A1/A3 in a total of 241 Dukes A and B patients with rectal and 158 with colonic cancers. Their frequency, as well as that of nuclear and histologic grades, and an estimation of their relationship to relative risks were correlated with overall and recurrence-free survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Nodal mini micrometastases were detected in 73 of 399 (18.3 percent) patients of this cohort. They failed to exhibit any significant relationship to overall or recurrence-free survival. No association between the assessments of tumor differentiation and mini micrometastases was found. Nuclear and histologic grades also failed to further discriminate overall or recurrence-free survival in patients with A or B stages of colonic or rectal cancers in this cohort. CONCLUSION: The immunohistochemical demonstration of nodal mini micrometastases failed to discriminate high- and low-risk groups of patients with colorectal cancer who were designated as being node-negative after routine pathologic examination.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗
PubMed2002

Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In 1976, we initiated a randomized trial to determine whether lumpectomy with or without radiation therapy was as effective as total mastectomy for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 1851 women for whom follow-up data were available and nodal status was known underwent randomly assigned treatment consisting of total mastectomy, lumpectomy alone, or lumpectomy and breast irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of the outcome were obtained. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of recurrent tumor in the ipsilateral breast was 14.3 percent in the women who underwent lumpectomy and breast irradiation, as compared with 39.2 percent in the women who underwent lumpectomy without irradiation (P<0.001). No significant differences were observed among the three groups of women with respect to disease-free survival, distant-disease-free survival, or overall survival. The hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent lumpectomy alone, as compared with those who underwent total mastectomy, was 1.05 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.23; P=0.51). The hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation, as compared with those who underwent total mastectomy, was 0.97 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.14; P=0.74). Among the lumpectomy-treated women whose surgical specimens had tumor-free margins, the hazard ratio for death among the women who underwent postoperative breast irradiation, as compared with those who did not, was 0.91 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.06; P=0.23). Radiation therapy was associated with a marginally significant decrease in deaths due to breast cancer. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in deaths from other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation continues to be appropriate therapy for women with breast cancer, provided that the margins of resected specimens are free of tumor and an acceptable cosmetic result can be obtained.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less.

PURPOSE: This trial was prompted by uncertainty about the need for breast irradiation after lumpectomy in node-negative women with invasive breast cancers of </= 1 cm, by speculation that tamoxifen (TAM) might be as or more effective than radiation therapy (XRT) in reducing the rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in such women, and by the thesis that both modalities might be more effective than either alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After lumpectomy, 1,009 women were randomly assigned to TAM (n = 336), XRT and placebo (n = 336), or XRT and TAM (n = 337). Rates of IBTR, distant recurrence, and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) were among the end points for analysis. Cumulative incidence of IBTR and of CBC was computed accounting for competing risks. Results with two-sided P values of.05 or less were statistically significant. RESULTS: XRT and placebo resulted in a 49% lower hazard rate of IBTR than did TAM alone; XRT and TAM resulted in a 63% lower rate than did XRT and placebo. When compared with TAM alone, XRT plus TAM resulted in an 81% reduction in hazard rate of IBTR. Cumulative incidence of IBTR through 8 years was 16.5% with TAM, 9.3% with XRT and placebo, and 2.8% with XRT and TAM. XRT reduced IBTR below the level achieved with TAM alone, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status. Distant treatment failures were infrequent and not significantly different among the groups (P =.28). When TAM-treated women were compared with those who received XRT and placebo, there was a significant reduction in CBC (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.95; P =.039). Survival in the three groups was 93%, 94%, and 93%, respectively (P =.93). CONCLUSION: In women with tumors </= 1 cm, IBTR occurs with enough frequency after lumpectomy to justify considering XRT, regardless of tumor ER status, and TAM plus XRT when tumors are ER positive.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation.

BACKGROUND: In women with breast cancer, the role of radical mastectomy, as compared with less extensive surgery, has been a matter of debate. We report 25-year findings of a randomized trial initiated in 1971 to determine whether less extensive surgery with or without radiation therapy was as effective as the Halsted radical mastectomy. METHODS: A total of 1079 women with clinically negative axillary nodes underwent radical mastectomy, total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation, or total mastectomy plus axillary dissection only if their nodes became positive. A total of 586 women with clinically positive axillary nodes either underwent radical mastectomy or underwent total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of outcome were obtained. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed among the three groups of women with negative nodes or between the two groups of women with positive nodes with respect to disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, distant-disease-free survival, or overall survival. Among women with negative nodes, the hazard ratio for death among those who were treated with total mastectomy and radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.28; P=0.38), and the hazard ratio for death among those who had total mastectomy without radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.03 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.23; P=0.72). Among women with positive nodes, the hazard ratio for death among those who underwent total mastectomy and radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.06 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.27; P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The findings validate earlier results showing no advantage from radical mastectomy. Although differences of a few percentage points cannot be excluded, the findings fail to show a significant survival advantage from removing occult positive nodes at the time of initial surgery or from radiation therapy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18.

BACKGROUND: Examination was performed on pathologic material from patients enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) protocol B-18, in which the clinical effects of preoperative (preop) and postoperative (postop) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) were compared. METHODS: Of the total number of 1523 patients, 1234 patients (81%) were in the pathologically evaluable cohort. Six hundred twenty-six patients had been randomized prospectively to receive AC postop and 608 had been randomized to receive AC preop. Preentry diagnosis was made by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and/or Tru-cut biopsy (TC). AC-induced and other pathologic changes were identified, and their relation to pathologic response and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was determined. Frequencies of the number of lymph node metastases, their size, stromal reaction, and extracapsular extension (ECE) were compared in the two treatment groups, as was their correlation with OS and DFS. Survival estimates were based on 9 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Approximately 13% of primary breast carcinoma cases exhibited both a clinical complete response (cCR) and a pathologic complete response (absence of invasive tumor [pCR]) to preop AC. An additional 7% of patients exhibited a pCR in the absence of a cCR. A pCR occurred in 38% of those patients determined to have achieved a cCR. Poor nuclear grade of the tumor cells in the pre-entry FNA and/or TC specimens significantly predicted a pCR. Patients with the latter exhibited a better OS and DFS compared with those with a pathologic partial response (presence of sparse invasive tumor [pPR]) or no pathologic response (pNR). Epithelial alterations considered to be induced in tumors by preop AC were comprised of types 1 and 2 giant cells with meganuclei, apocrine metaplasia, and cytoplasmic vacuolation. They had a high degree of specificity (range, 86-99%) but a low sensitivity (range, 7-38%). All were predictive of a pPR and were found to be related adversely to OS and DFS. A fibrous stromal reaction noted in tumors or their putative sites in the preop group was found to have only modest degrees of specificity (63%) and sensitivity (74%). Moderate/marked sclerosis of basement membranes of the ductal and ductular elements of the terminal ductolobular unit (TDLU) was significantly more frequent in nontumor-bearing areas of breasts from patients in the preop treatment group compared with those in the postop treatment group (67% vs. 48%; P < 0.0001). The degrees of change in the TDLU in patients in the postop treatment group were found to be unrelated to age. Lymphatic tumor extension in the primary tumor, as well as a positive lymph node status, were less frequent in the preop treatment group compared with the postop treatment group. The OS and DFS were nearly identical in both treatment groups, being 69% and 55% and 70% and 53% in the preop and postop treatment groups, respectively, at 9 years. A fibrous stromal response to lymph node metastases was found to be significant for DFS but not OS. ECE was similar in both groups (55% vs. 48%; P = 0.12). Only 1% of ECE was found to be related to axillary failure in both treatment arms combined. There was no significant difference with regard to the parameters of survival for patients in the postop treatment group whose lymph nodes contained micrometastases (< 2.0 mm) or mini micrometastases (< 1.0 mm) (the latter detected immunohistochemically with anticytokeratin), and a true-negative lymph node status (not immunohistochemically converted to positive). Conversely, there was no apparent difference with regard to OS in preop treated patients with lymph node micrometastases, mini micrometastases, and macrometastases (P = 0.19). Those with mini micrometastases had a significantly worse OS compared with those with a true-negative lymph node status (P = 0.0007). DFS remained worse for patients in that treatment group with micrometastases and mini micrometastases compared with those with negative lymph nodes, although it was better than that for patients with macrometastases (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Poor nuclear grade of tumor cells in the preentry FNA or TC specimens in the preop group was predictive of a pCR. AC-induced meganuclear giant cells and apocrine changes and nuclear and histologic grades of the primary tumors also were found to be prognostically significant in patients in the preop treatment group, and the latter two variables were found to be significant for those patients in the postop treatment group. No evidence was found to support the need for axillary lymph node radiation for ECE of lymph node metastases. Extended pathologic or immunohistochemical procedures also appear to be unnecessary for the detection of lymph node mini micrometastases, at least when traditional postop chemotherapy is used. The adverse relation between such small metastases and OS and DFS after preop AC appears to be related to the timing of the chemotherapy administration rather than any pathobiologic reasons.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience.

Trastuzumab (Herceptin) provides clinical benefits for patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancers that have overexpressed the HER2 protein or have amplified the HER2 gene. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-31 is designed to test the advantage of adding Herceptin to the adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (Taxol) in the treatment of stage II breast cancer with HER2 overexpression or gene amplification. Eligibility is based on HER2 assay results submitted by the accruing institutions. We conducted a central review of the first 104 cases entered in this trial on the basis of immunohistochemistry (IHC) results. We found that 18% of the community-based assays, which were used to establish the eligibility of patients to participate in the B-31 study, could not be confirmed by HercepTest IHC or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) by a central testing facility. This report provides a snapshot of the quality of HER2 assays performed in laboratories nationwide.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2002

Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while results of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) are encouraging, conditions that may affect sentinel node (SN) detection and false negative rates with respect to clinical and pathological tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy require investigation. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with clinical stage I, II and IIIA invasive breast cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel/segmental resection, SNB, and axillary node dissection (AND). RESULTS: SNs were found in 31 of 34 patients (91.2%). SNs were found in 20 of 21 patients (95.2%) with complete clinical tumor response, it was positive in 40% and no false negatives occurred. SNs were found in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) with partial or no clinical tumor response; in four patients (33%) the SN was positive and no false negative nodes were found. Seven patients had complete pathological tumor response. SNs were found in six of these patients (85.7%). The SN was positive in 1 of 6 patients (16.7%) with no false negative. In 25 of 27 patients (92%) with partial or no pathological tumor response, the SN was identified. Eleven of these patients (44%) had positive nodes with no false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: SN identification rate and accuracy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma were extremely good however there is potential for inaccuracy after less than complete pathological tumor response. Further evaluation of SNB in larger clinical trial is warranted prior to accepting this approach as a standard care.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

The study of tamoxifen and raloxifene: preliminary enrollment data from a randomized breast cancer risk reduction trial.

Tamoxifen reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 49% among women at increased risk for breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial P-1, and raloxifene reduced breast cancer incidence by more than 70% in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation osteoporosis trial. These findings led the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to design and launch the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene. Risk-eligible women are = 35 years of age and postmenopausal; they have either lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or a 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer of at least 1.67% as determined by the Gail model. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either tamoxifen 20 mg or raloxifene 60 mg daily. The trial opened for accrual on July 1, 1999. After 32 months of recruitment at 194 clinical centers in North America, risk assessments have been performed in 107,855 women (83.8% white, 9.4% black, 3.8% Hispanic, 3.1% other race/ethnic groups). Of the eligible patients, 12,637 have been randomized (20.9% of risk-eligible women); the median age is 58 years (mean, 58 years), and the median 5-year risk of breast cancer is 3.3% (mean, 4.0%). LCIS was reported in 8.4% of women prior to randomization. Gail model risk was = 3.0% in 5 years for 59.3% of white women, 45.0% of black women, and 44.5% of Hispanic women. The trial will recruit a total of 22,000 postmenopausal women and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of either agent or their equivalence in reducing the incidence of primary breast

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 and B-20 trials showed that tamoxifen benefited women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative axillary nodes, and that chemotherapy plus tamoxifen was more effective than tamoxifen alone. We present long-term findings from those trials and relate them to age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations. We also discuss the extent of progress made in the treatment of such patients. METHODS: B-14 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=1453) or tamoxifen (n=1439); B-20 patients to tamoxifen (n=788) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen (CMFT, n=789). Primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and overall survival estimated according to patients' age, menopausal status, and tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration. Smoothed recurrence rates were used to measure patterns of recurrence as a continuous function of age. FINDINGS: Compared with placebo, tamoxifen benefited women in B-14 through 15 years, irrespective of age, menopausal status, or tumour oestrogen-receptor concentration (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence-free survival 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.80, 0.71-0.91, p=0.0008). In B-20, the benefit from CMFT over 12 years was greater than that from tamoxifen alone (HR for recurrence-free survival 0.52, 0.39-0.68, p<0.0001; HR for overall survival 0.78, 0.60-1.01, p=0.063). When CMFT was compared with placebo, there were reductions in treatment failure of about 65% in all age-groups. INTERPRETATION: Much benefit has been achieved in treatment of women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and negative nodes. When planning systemic therapy for such patients of all ages, it should be understood that some have tumours with variable concentrations of oestrogen-receptors, a surrogate for other biomarkers associated with tumour growth and response to treatment. Older women tend to have higher tumour oestrogen-receptor concentrations and are more likely to benefit from tamoxifen than from chemotherapy; in younger women, the converse is true. Consequently, the notion that use of tamoxifen or chemotherapy should be based only on age is too restrictive.

Aged↗