PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Norton William Milgram

Publications and source records attributed to Norton William Milgram.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning and memory as a function of age in Down syndrome: a study using animal-based tasks.

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) are at a high risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) after the age 40; however, low levels of intellectual functioning, coupled with impaired language ability, confound the detection of AD. Comparative neuropsychological tests developed in animal models of aging and cognition do not require intact language function and can be useful for detecting changes in cognition. Experimental paradigms used to detect age-dependent cognitive deficits in animal models were applied in the present study to measure cognitive function in a group of 20 adults with DS ranging in age from 22 to 58 years. Object discrimination, reversal learning, and spatial and object memory were administered using a modified Wisconsin General Testing Apparatus and reinforcement (penny rewards). When considering age as the only clinical variable to parallel the animal studies, age was significantly correlated with performance on object memory and marginally related to performance on reversal learning and spatial memory. However, when evaluating multiple clinical variables including age, a measure of intellectual ability (FSIQ), scores on the Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Mental Retardation (DMR), and gender using regression analysis, scores on the DMR were the best predictors of errors of reversal learning, whereas FSIQ was the best predictor of performance on object memory. These results suggest that while age may be related to performance on learning and memory tasks, other clinical variables may be stronger predictors of performance in adults with DS. These changes may reflect prefrontal and medial temporal lobe dysfunction that is associated with the development of AD pathology in DS.

Adult↗

Age-associated cognitive deficits in humans and dogs: a comparative neuropsychological approach.

We compared performance of younger and older human participants to that of younger and older dogs on tasks that evaluate object discrimination, egocentric spatial ability, object recognition, spatial memory, and cognitive flexibility. Our goal was to determine whether (i) tasks sensitive to advanced age in dogs are also age-sensitive in humans; (ii) the pattern of task difficulty observed in dogs mirrors that observed in humans; (iii) dogs and humans use similar strategies to solve equivalent tasks. Dogs performed more poorly than humans on reversal tasks that evaluate cognitive flexibility. We suggest that dogs, most notably older dogs, use different strategies than healthy humans when solving these tasks. Humans appear to test a priori hypotheses to solve the task at hand. As a consequence, expectations about the complexity of the task being tested can impair human performance. By contrast, dogs appear to rely more heavily on either simpler hypotheses, or associative trial and error learning, which probably accounts for their difficulty in learning non-matching tasks. Dogs also show perseverative responding, which hinders the acquisition of reversal tasks.

Adult↗