PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O A Zhukova

Publications and source records attributed to O A Zhukova.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Experimental infection of domestic cats by cowpox virus.

Infection of young domestic cats by cowpox virus isolated from sick rodents (family Muridae) revealed their high susceptibility to the virus; a severe disease with 100% lethality developed after oral inoculation as well as upon skin scarification. The disease in dermally infected animals was accompanied by eruptions on the site of inoculation. High concentration of the virus was detected in lungs of animals infected by either of inoculation routes. The data testify the possible participation of domestic cats as intermediate hosts in the circulation of cowpox virus.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

[The development and use of an immunoenzyme test system for detecting and the species identification of the monkey pox virus].

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) system for the species-specific diagnosis of monkeypox, based on the use of monoclonal antibodies (McAb) to monkeypox virus, has been developed. Immunoglobulins, isolated from McAb-containing cultural and immune ascitic fluids, have been conjugated with horse-radish peroxidase and used as detector antibodies. For immunosorption, rabbit polyclonal antibodies to the vaccine virus have been used. The specificity and sensitivity of the EIA system thus obtained have been tested on animals and humans having monkeypox and confirmed by traditional diagnostic methods (the isolation of the virus on chick embryo chorioallantoic membranes and in cell culture).

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Smallpox diagnosed 400 years later: results of skin lesions examination of 16th century Italian mummy.

Results are presented on virological examination conducted on WHO request of a Naples infant mummy with smallpox-like lesions. Electron microscopy of lesions confirmed the findings of Italian researchers: well-preserved virus-like structures, whose size and morphology were identical to those of orthopoxviruses have been revealed. It was shown that the virus in mummy skin had lost its viability. Viral antigenic activity could not be detected in EIA or RPHA, nor was determined its DNA in the test of DNA molecular hybridization.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1989

Monkey pox in humans: current results.

The presented studies were performed at the WHO Collaboration Center for Smallpox in Moscow in the framework of the WHO monkey pox project. The authors recommend improved methods for rapid detection of orthopoxvirus antigen, namely passive haemagglutination (PHA) using dried stable red blood cells and ELISA in order to provide more rapid and efficient laboratory diagnosis under field conditions. Independent serologic diagnosis of monkey pox by ELISA-adsorption (ELISA-A) was proved of value for epidemiological studies and for detection of inapparent infections. The application range of the latter technique and its limitations were also determined.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1988

[Laboratory-confirmed case of human infection with ratpox (cowpox)].

The present work describes a case of human disease resulting from the bite of a white rat and caused by a biological variant of cowpox virus. The isolates obtained from the sick man and the white rats which had been the source of this infection proved to be identical and did not differ from the biological variants of cowpox virus, isolated earlier from white rats and carnivorous animals of the family Felidae. Thus, the possibility of ratpox (cowpox) transmission from sick rodents to man was established.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The biotype and genetic characteristics of an isolate of the cowpox virus causing infection in a child].

A virus, identified as cowpox virus by its biological properties and the results of the analysis of its DNA, was isolated from a sick 4-year-old child with a clinical picture of pox, though having had no contacts with known natural carriers of the causative agent of this infection. At the same time the isolated virus was found to differ from the reference strain, as well as from other isolates of vaccinia virus by some biological markers (and in particular by the structure of cytoplasmic inclusions of type A) and by the restriction profile of DNA. The Hind III maps indicating the location of restriction sites made it possible to localize the genome differences established in this study. The specific feature of this case was the previous close contact of the child with a mole which was probably the source of infection.

Animals↗