Biomedical subjects

O Anker-Hansen

Publications and source records attributed to O Anker-Hansen.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

On demand therapy with omeprazole for the long-term management of patients with heartburn without oesophagitis--a placebo-controlled randomized trial.

AIM: To observe the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients without oesophagitis following effective symptom relief, and to determine the place of acid pump inhibitor therapy in the long-term management of these patients. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy of on-demand therapy with omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized multicentre trial. It involved 424 patients with troublesome heartburn without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis in whom heartburn had been resolved with short-term treatment. Patients were told to take study medication on demand once daily on recurrence of symptoms until symptoms resolved over a 6-month period. They also had access to antacids. The primary efficacy variable was time to discontinuation of treatment, due to unwillingness to continue. RESULTS: According to life-table analysis, after 6 months the remission rates were 83% (95% CI: 77-89%) with omeprazole 20 mg, 69% (61-77%) with omeprazole 10 mg, and 56% (46-64%) with placebo (P < 0.01 for all intergroup differences). The mean (s.d.) number of study medications used per day in these groups was 0.43 (0.27), 0.41 (0.27) and 0.47 (0.27), respectively. The use of antacids was highest in the placebo group and lowest in the omeprazole 20 mg group. Treatment failure was associated with more than a doubling of antacid use, and a deterioration in patient quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of patients with heartburn who do not have oesophagitis need acid inhibitory therapy in addition to antacid medication to maintain a normal quality of life. On-demand therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, is an effective treatment strategy in these patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Quality of life in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis: effects of treatment with omeprazole.

OBJECTIVE: Because improvement in quality of life (QoL) is an important therapeutic goal in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis, the aim of the present study was to compare the impact of omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg daily with that of placebo on QoL in patients with heartburn as the predominant symptom. METHODS: QoL was measured at baseline and after 4 wk using two validated questionnaires, the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. RESULTS: The two questionnaires were completed by 163 patients in the omeprazole 20 mg group, 163 in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and 82 in the placebo group. The reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale showed a significant improvement in terms of reflux symptoms on omeprazole 20 mg versus omeprazole 10 mg and placebo, and on omeprazole 10 mg compared with placebo. The total score of the PGWB index improved significantly more on both doses of omeprazole than on placebo. The mean scores rose from 96.8 to 103.9 on omeprazole 20 mg, from 98.4 to 106.0 on omeprazole 10 mg, and from 98.0 to 100.6 on placebo. All dimensions of the PGWB index improved on treatment with omeprazole, but the improvements were most pronounced in the dimensions depicting anxiety, depressed mood, and self-control. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that treatment with omeprazole 20 mg and omeprazole 10 mg restores QoL to a level comparable with that observed in a healthy population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Heartburn without oesophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the value of effective antisecretory therapy in the relief of heartburn in patients without oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with heartburn, without endoscopic signs of oesophagitis, were randomized to double-blind treatment with omeprazole, 20 or 10 mg once daily, or placebo, for 4 weeks (n = 509). Pre-treatment oesophageal acid exposure was assessed using 24-h intra-oesophageal pH monitoring. Heartburn was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: At 4 weeks the proportion of patients with complete absence of heartburn was 46% (95% confidence interval, 39-53%) with 20 mg omeprazole, 31% (25-38%) with 10 mg omeprazole, and 13% (7-20%) with placebo. Satisfaction with therapy was reported by 66%, 57%, and 31% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, 20 and 10 mg once daily, provides rapid relief of heartburn in patients without endoscopic oesophagitis.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed1996

Prevention of peptic ulcer and dyspeptic symptoms with omeprazole in patients receiving continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. A Nordic multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to cause gastroduodenal lesions and dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Patients with a history of dyspepsia or uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease and with a need for continuous NSAID treatment were randomized to receive either 20 mg omeprazole once daily or placebo. Gastroduodenal ulcers, erosions, and dyspeptic symptoms were evaluated after 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: During a 3-month study period 4.7% (4 of 85) of omeprazole-treated patients developed peptic ulcer, compared with 16.7% (15 of 90) of patients treated with placebo. This prophylactic effect of omeprazole was sustained independently of previous peptic ulcer history or Helicobacter pylori status. Development of dyspeptic symptoms requiring active treatment, either alone or in combination with ulcer(s) or erosions, occurred in 15.3% (15 of 85) of patients treated with omeprazole and 35.6% of those who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, provides effective prophylactic therapy in patients at risk of developing NSAID-associated peptic ulcers or dyspeptic symptoms.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Lansoprazole versus omeprazole in active duodenal ulcer. A double-blind, randomized, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Lansoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole that inhibits the H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase in the parietal cell and, like the first developed proton pump inhibitor omeprazole, gives a strong inhibition of gastric acid output. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized comparative study patients with active duodenal ulcers were treated with either 30 mg lansoprazole or 20 mg omeprazole in the morning. All demographic data in the two treatment groups were comparable. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients entered the study. There was no difference in healing rates between the groups either after 2 weeks (86.2% for lansoprazole and 82.1% for omeprazole) or after 4 weeks (97.1% and 96.2%). No patient ceased treatment owing to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Both lansoprazole and omeprazole generate very high healing rates and good symptom relief in active duodenal ulcer. Side effects are few and mild.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed1987

Swedish multicenter study on prepyloric and gastric ulcer.

A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the effects of sucralfate and cimetidine for the short-term treatment of gastric and prepyloric ulcers. Ulcer healing was evaluated endoscopically at 4-week intervals up to 8 weeks in the PPU study and up to 12 weeks in the GU study. A total of 142 PPU and 134 GU patients completed the study. The overall healing rates after 8 weeks in the PPU study were 83% for the sucralfate group and 90% for the cimetidine group (NS), while the cumulative healing rates after 12 weeks in the GU study were 98% for the sucralfate group and 94% for the cimetidine group (NS). The confidence interval means that the 95% confidence limit ranges from 11% in favour of sucralfate to 2% in favour of cimetidine in the GU study and corresponding figures of 4% 19% in the PPU study. There were significantly more patients in the cimetidine group taking antacid tablets after 3 weeks in the GU study. Symptomatic relief did not differ significantly. Reported side effects and symptoms, pooled together with our duodenal ulcer study, were mostly non-specific and in some part related to the ulcer disease. In conclusion, sucralfate and cimetidine are both excellent healing agents for the short-term treatment of PPU and GU. Both give rapid and good symptomatic relief with no side effects of any importance.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1986

Short term treatment of gastric ulcer: a comparison of sucralfate and cimetidine.

A double blind randomised study was undertaken to compare sucralfate and cimetidine in short term treatment of gastric ulcer. The study included 149 patients with endoscopically confirmed gastric ulcerations. Patients with prepyloric ulcers 2 cm or less from the pyloric ring were not accepted for participation in the trial. Ulcer healing was assessed endoscopically at four week intervals. A total of 134 patients completed the study. The cumulative healing rates after 12 weeks were 98% for sucralfate and 94% for cimetidine treated patients. After four and eight weeks, the healing rates were 61% and 94% for sucralfate and 69% and 94% for the cimetidine-treated group respectively. No statistically significant differences in healing rates were seen. The 95% confidence interval was calculated for the difference between the ulcer healing rates of sucralfate and cimetidine. This interval was found to range between +11% and -2% after 12 weeks of treatment - that is, the healing efficacy of sucralfate was calculated to be at most 11% better or 2% worse than that of cimetidine. No significant differences in symptom relief, side effects or antacid intake were found.

Aluminum↗