PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Cass

Publications and source records attributed to O Cass.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

The minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: introduction to structured reporting.

The wider use of computers for the management of endoscopic data and the use of electronic endoscopes for the production of high quality endoscopic images has made the standardization of terminology and images formats necessary in digestive endoscopy reports. The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have combined their efforts to propose a Minimal Standard Terminology for Computerized Databases in Endoscopy. This terminology is based on the following principles: no term describing findings less frequent than 1%, of the daily practice, and no term based on subjective impressions. The Minimal Standard Terminology has been developed according to the natural process of constructing an endoscopic report in natural language and deals with the following: reasons for performing the examination, endoscopic findings, endoscopic diagnosis, additional therapeutic and diagnosis procedures (biopsies, etc.). It is subdivided according to the main organs examined with an endoscopy. Until now, the Minimal Standard Terminology was tested in many centers and was shown to accurately cover 95% of routine examinations for the upper gastrointestinal tract, colonoscopy and cholangio-pancreatography. It is currently being tested in an a prospective way in several centers in Europe (with a grant from the European Commission DGXIII-C4) and in the USA (with grant from the AHDHF).

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗

Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: potential causes noted during controlled study of differing contrast media. Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Possible sources of post-ERCP pancreatitis were evaluated during a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing different contrast media. METHODS: A total of 1979 patients were randomized and subdivided into groups during the study. Patients were grouped for comparison depending on the type of procedure performed during ERCP. Diagnostic patients studied with pancreatograms (Group I) were compared with other groups, specifically, those not studied with pancreatograms (Group IV). All patients had subjective and objective estimates of the difficulty in cannulation of both ducts. The incidence of postprocedural pancreatitis was compared between and within each group. RESULTS: In Group I there was a progressively higher incidence of pancreatitis with increased numbers of pancreatic duct injections. Patients with the highest (19.5%) frequency of pancreatitis received 10 or more injections into the pancreatic duct. Group I cases with difficult common bile duct cannulations had a higher frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.5%), as compared with the entire group (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher incidence of pancreatitis associated with increased manipulation around the papillary orifice, especially with multiple pancreatic duct injections. There was also a slightly higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with difficult common bile duct cannulation. Endoscopists are encouraged to evaluate and develop safer cannulation techniques that minimize the number of injections into the pancreatic duct and enhance selective cannulation.

Catheterization↗

A comparison of nonionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective, multicenter study. Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is one of the most common complications associated with ERCP. Multiple factors have been implicated for this potentially serious complication. Numerous suggestions for minimizing risks at ERCP have been offered, one of which is to use nonionic, low osmolarity contrast agents for pancreatic injection. Results of previous studies comparing different contrast media have been inconclusive. METHODS: To evaluate the role contrast material plays in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Group performed a prospective double-blind controlled study. A total of 1,979 consecutive ERCP patients were enrolled, and 1,659 patients with pancreatic duct injections were divided into subgroups according to the complexity of the ERCP. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was compared between similar groups. Patients were randomized to receive injections of nonionic, low osmolarity contrast or standard ionic contrast media. RESULTS: The overall incidence of post-procedural pancreatitis was 10.2%. Those with diagnostic ERCP had the lowest incidence at 5.6%. Therapeutic procedures (12.3%) and sphincter of Oddi manometry (15.2%) had higher rates. Those injected with standard (ionic) contrast had an incidence of 10.4% and after injection with lower osmolar (nonionic) contrast, there was a 10% post-procedural pancreatitis rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more complex procedures develop pancreatitis more frequently. The use of low osmolar (nonionic) contrast media does not decrease the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Fluoroscopy is not necessary for Maloney dilation of chronic esophageal strictures.

The use of fluoroscopic guidance for Maloney dilation is controversial. In order to determine if fluoroscopic analysis would enhance the success of dilation and increase recognition of adverse events, we prospectively studied 125 Maloney dilations in 80 patients (mean age, 69.3 years) with mild esophageal strictures. Most strictures (89%) resulted from acid-peptic disease. Operators included two staff physicians (5 and 25 years of experience) and one trainee (1 year of experience). Dilations were performed with the patient seated upright and the operator noting the presence and amount of resistance (dilator size, 36F to 60F; median, 50F). The fluoroscopic monitor was not visible to the operator, and the results were recorded by an observer who did not communicate with the operator. Operator assessment of Maloney dilation was correct in 122 of 125 procedures. Two failures were interpreted as no passage by the operator when passage had occurred as confirmed by fluoroscopy. One failure was interpreted as passage when no passage had occurred as indicated by fluoroscopy. Adverse events included 1 episode of tracheal intubation and failure to recognize the dilator tip curling in the esophagus as observed by fluoroscopy in 6 of 125 (4.8%) procedures. Operator assessment of resistance was more often associated with curling of the dilator on the greater curve of the stomach than with an esophageal stricture. Greater operator experience tended to correlate with increased success and correct interpretation of dilation. Maloney dilations performed with patients at 30 degrees rather than upright at 90 degrees were associated with a marked increase in unsuccessful dilator passage and curling of dilator tip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Bioavailability and disposition of metoclopramide after single- and multiple-dose administration in diabetic patients with gastroparesis.

The disposition of metoclopramide after acute and chronic administration was determined in four diabetic patients with gastroparesis who had a creatinine clearance of 70.8 +/- 10.7 mL/min (mean +/- SD). Single, 10-mg oral and intravenous doses were administered on days 1 and 2, respectively, followed by 10 mg orally every six hours for three weeks. A second, 10-mg intravenous bolus dose was administered on the last morning of chronic therapy. Metoclopramide concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The elimination half-life, steady-state volume of distribution, and total body clearance after the initial intravenous dose were 3.9 +/- 1.2 hr, 2.7 +/- 0.3 L/kg, and 0.57 +/- 0.14 L/hr/kg, respectively. The initial bioavailability was 67.7 +/- 12.6%. After three weeks of chronic therapy, no significant differences in total body clearance (0.72 +/- 0.42 L/hr/kg) or bioavailability (77.5 +/- 16.8%) were observed. Thus the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of metoclopramide were not altered during chronic therapy in these diabetic patients.

Adult↗

Hyperthyroidism appearing as hyperemesis gravidarum.

Vomiting is a poorly recognized manifestation of hyperthyroidism. During pregnancy, this appearance can be indistinguishable from hyperemesis gravidarum. Two patients with intractable hyperemesis gravidarum were found to have hyperthyroidism. Their symptoms resolved when thyroid functions returned to normal. Given the ease of laboratory confirmation, excellent therapy, and the seriousness of delay in diagnosis, thyrotoxicosis should be considered in patients with unusual or severe hyperemesis gravidarum.

Adult↗