[Comparative study of soft diet or clear liquids in the resumption of oral intake in the postoperative period].
BACKGROUND: The reinstitution of oral intake in patients who have undergone intraabdominal surgery has traditionally progressed in a stepwise fashion beginning with clear liquids, liquid diet and after an adequate tolerance regular diet. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the reinstitution of oral intake after major abdominal surgery with regular diet offers benefits into which it's not harmful for patients and reduce the in-hospital stay. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective, randomized, open study conducted between October 1996 to May 1997. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 and older submitted to elective or urgent surgery of the abdomen and pelvis were included with the exception of: bariatric surgery, esophageal resection, pyloroplasty, pancreato-duodenal resection, laparoscopic surgery and patients under ventilatory support or with enteral or parenteral nutrition. As soon as postoperative ileus disappeared patients were randomly assigned to receive regular diet (group 1) or clear liquids (group 2) as the first oral intake. Oral diet tolerance was evaluated as well as the caloric and protein intake, the in-hospital stay and the cost. RESULTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Group 1 was conformed by 63 patients, and group 2 for 69 patients. There was no difference between, sex, age, kind of surgery (elective or emergency) and the type of pathology. 96.6% of patients in group 1 tolerated regular diet and 96.9% of patients in group 2 tolerated clear liquids. Only two patients of each group required oral intake suspension. The in-hospital stay was 2.6 +/- 2.0 days in group 1 against 3.4 +/- 2.6 in group 2 (P = < 0.005), the cost of the in-hospital stay period after the beginning of oral intake was 2726 +/- 2107 pesos in group 1 against 3547 +/- 2690 in group 2 (P = < 0.005), the caloric and protein intake were 1307 +/- 523 Kcals with 55.9 +/- 23.2 grams of proteins in group 1 and 651 +/- 204 Kcals and 0 grams of proteins in group 2 (P = < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in adverse reactions with the use of regular diet as the first meal. The in-hospital stay and the cost were reduced significantly and the calories and grams of proteins are higher in group 1. These results suggest that the routine use of clear liquids as the initial postoperative diet may be unnecessary and nutritionally suboptimal when compared with regular diet.