PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O E Dahl

Publications and source records attributed to O E Dahl.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Oral, direct Factor Xa inhibition with BAY 59-7939 for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement.

BACKGROUND: Joint replacement surgery is an appropriate model for dose-ranging studies investigating new anticoagulants. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, oral, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor--BAY 59-7939--relative to enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy, dose-ranging study, patients were randomized to oral BAY 59-7939 (2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg b.i.d.), starting 6-8 h after surgery, or s.c. enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, starting on the evening before surgery. Treatment was continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5-9 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of 706 patients treated, 548 were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of any deep vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality; rates were 15%, 14%, 12%, 18%, and 7% for BAY 59-7939 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg b.i.d., respectively, compared with 17% for enoxaparin. The primary efficacy analysis did not demonstrate any significant trend in dose-response relationship for BAY 59-7939. The primary safety endpoint was major, postoperative bleeding; there was a significant increase in the frequency of events with increasing doses of BAY 59-7939 (P = 0.045), but no significant differences between individual BAY 59-7939 doses and enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: When efficacy and safety were considered together, the oral, direct FXa inhibitor BAY 59-7939, at 2.5-10 mg b.i.d., compared favorably with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Frequency and timing of clinical venous thromboembolism after major joint surgery.

Over a 13-year period we studied all patients who underwent major hip and knee surgery and were diagnosed with objectively confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism, either deep venous thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism, within six months after surgery. Low-molecular-weight heparin had been given while the patients were in hospital. There were 5607 patients. The cumulative incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism was 2.7% (150 of 5607), of which 1.1% had developed pulmonary embolism, 1.5% had deep venous thrombosis and 0.6% had both. Patients presented with deep venous thrombosis at a median of 24 days and pulmonary embolism at 17 days after surgery for hip fracture. After total hip replacement, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurred at a median of 21 and 34 days respectively. After total knee replacement, the median time to the presentation of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was 20 and 12 days respectively. The cumulative risk of venous thromboembolism lasted for up to three months after hip surgery and for one month after total knee replacement. Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed after discharge from hospital in 70% of patients who developed this complication. Despite hospital-based thromboprophylaxis, most cases of clinical venous thromboembolism occur after discharge and at different times according to the operation performed.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor undergoing evaluation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following orthopedic surgery. METHODS: In a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study, 1973 patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were randomized to 6-10 days of oral dabigatran etexilate (50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily), starting 1-4 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) starting 12 h prior to surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of VTE (detected by bilateral venography or symptomatic events) during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1949 treated patients, 1464 (75%) patients were evaluable for the efficacy analysis. VTE occurred in 28.5%, 17.4%, 16.6%, 13.1% and 24% of patients assigned to dabigatran etexilate 50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily and enoxaparin, respectively. A significant dose-dependent decrease in VTE occurred with increasing doses of dabigatran etexilate (P < 0.0001). Compared with enoxaparin, VTE was significantly lower in patients receiving 150 mg twice daily [odds ratio (OR) 0.65, P = 0.04], 300 mg once daily (OR 0.61, P = 0.02) and 225 mg twice daily (OR 0.47, P = 0.0007). Compared with enoxaparin, major bleeding was significantly lower with 50 mg twice daily (0.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.047) but elevated with higher doses, nearly reaching statistical significance with the 300 mg once-daily dose (4.7%, P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of dabigatran etexilate, commenced early in the postoperative period, was effective and safe across a range of doses. Further optimization of the efficacy/safety balance will be addressed in future studies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Dose escalating safety study of a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, in patients undergoing total hip replacement: BISTRO I.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor undergoing evaluation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total hip replacement. Following oral administration, dabigatran etexilate is rapidly converted to its active form dabigatran (BIBR 953 ZW). OBJECTIVES: To determine the safe therapeutic range of dabigatran etexilate following total hip replacement. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalating study, 314 patients received oral doses of dabigatran etexilate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 mg twice daily or 150 and 300 mg once daily) administered 4-8 h after surgery, for 6-10 days. Dose escalation was based on clinical and pharmacokinetic data. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome included venographic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic DVT and pulmonary embolism, during the treatment period. RESULTS: No major bleeding event was observed in any group, but two patients at the highest dose (300 mg twice daily) suffered bleeding from multiple sites associated with reduced renal clearance and prolonged pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. A dose-response was demonstrated for minor bleeding events. Of the 289 treated patients, 225 patients had evaluable venograms. The overall incidence of DVT was 12.4% (28/225 patients). There was no consistent relationship between the dose and incidence of DVT, the highest incidence in any group being 20.8% (5/24 patients). The lowest dose (12.5 mg twice daily) showed a high rate of proximal DVT [12.5% (3/24)] and no increase in PD parameters. Peak and trough plasma concentrations, area under the dabigatran plasma concentration-time curve and PD parameters also increased in proportion with the dose. Higher dabigatran plasma concentrations were associated with lower DVT rates. Approximately 20% of the patients had low plasma concentrations after the first dose suggesting further optimization of the preliminary tablet formulation is required. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran etexilate demonstrates an acceptable safety profile, with a therapeutic window above 12.5 mg and below 300 mg twice daily. The low number of VTE events within each treatment group indicates a satisfactory antithrombotic potential, although the study was not powered for an efficacy analysis. Additional studies are ongoing to optimize oral absorption and the efficacy/safety balance.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Sustained prothrombotic profile after hip replacement surgery: the influence of prolonged prophylaxis with dalteparin.

In a randomized trial on the effect of dalteparin for 5 weeks after HRS we evaluated hemostatic variables in plasma sampled before and 1, 6 and 35 days postoperatively. In 218 patients we found that prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), d-dimer and fibrinogen were significantly higher on day 35 as compared with baseline values in the placebo group (P < 0.001 for all). The same pattern was found in the dalteparin group, but with significantly lower values for F1 + 2, TAT and d-dimer. In patients in the placebo group with venographically proven deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on day 35 (33%), significantly higher values were found for F1 + 2, TAT and d-dimer than in patients without DVT. Patients in the highest quartile of d-dimer (>2850 ng mL-1) had an odds ratio for the presence of DVT of 24.0 when compared with patients in the lowest quartile (<1625 ng mL-1). It is concluded that a substantial hypercoagulability is sustained until day 35 after HRS, significantly reduced with prolonged administration of dalteparin.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Investment in prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin improves clinical outcomes after hip replacement.

Clinical guidelines recommend the use of extended out-of-hospital thromboprophylaxis in patients who have had major arthroplasty. However, the cost-effectiveness of prolonging pharmacological thromboprophylaxis into the out-of-hospital phase following hip replacement surgery remains the subject of considerable debate. This debate centers on the clinical relevance of the 'surrogate' venographic endpoints that have been used in most clinical trials and used to generate some of the cost analyses of thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this study was to estimate, from the payer perspective, the direct medical costs of prolonging the duration of thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin from 1 week to 28-35 days in patients undergoing hip replacement, and to compare these to the costs associated with using 'standard' in-hospital thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin. To derive 'best' estimates for rates of clinically and economically relevant thromboembolism associated with hip replacement surgery (i.e. those that would in reality incur management costs), we used data on the prevalence of both symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). These estimates were used in conjunction with diagnostic-related groups (DRG) reimbursement rates and a dalteparin cost model, which assumed home-based self-administration for prolonged thromboprophylaxis, to calculate overall direct medical costs of prolonged vs. in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. The management costs of the strategies evaluated were, to the nearest 1000 Euros: 465 000 Euros for in-hospital prophylaxis with LMWH; 339 000 Euros for in-hospital prophylaxis with warfarin; and 368 000 Euros for prolonged prophylaxis with dalteparin. For every 1000 patients treated, prolonging thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin from 1 to 4-5 weeks will avoid 30 clinical DVTs and 18 PEs at a saving of 2000 Euros per clinical event. Compared with in-hospital warfarin, prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin will avoid 28 DVTs and four PEs at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 900 Euros per clinical event avoided. We consider that investment in prolonged thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin is justified for the improvement in clinical outcomes produced.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗
PubMed2003

The direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: the EXPRESS study.

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran and its subcutaneous (s.c.) form melagatran are novel direct thrombin inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. METHODS: In a double-blind study, 2835 consecutive patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were randomized to either melagatran/ximelagatran or enoxaparin. Melagatran 2 mg was started immediately before surgery; 3 mg was then administered postoperatively, followed by 24 mg of oral ximelagatran b.i.d. beginning the next day. Enoxaparin 40 mg, administered subcutaneously o.d., was started 12 h before surgery. Both treatments were continued for 8-11 days. The main efficacy outcome measures were major venous thromboembolism (VTE); [proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal and/or fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), death where PE could not be ruled out], and total VTE (proximal and distal DVT; PE; death from all causes). DVT was detected by mandatory bilateral ascending venography at the end of the treatment period or earlier if clinically suspected. The main safety outcome was bleeding. RESULTS: The rates of major and total VTE were significantly lower in the melagatran/ximelagatran group compared with the enoxaparin group (2.3% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.0000018; and 20.3% vs. 26.6%, P < 0.0004, respectively). Fatal bleeding, critical site bleeding and bleeding requiring reoperation did not differ between the two groups. 'Excessive bleeding as judged by the investigator' was more frequent with melagatran/ximelagatran than with enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement, preoperatively initiated s.c. melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran was significantly more effective in preventing VTE than preoperatively initiated s.c. enoxaparin.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Extended out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis in patients after elective hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based medicine guidelines based on venographic end points recommend in-hospital prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients having elective hip surgery. Emerging data suggest that out-of-hospital use may offer additional protection; however, uncertainty remains about the risk-benefit ratio. To provide clinicians with a practical pathway for translating clinical research into practice, we systematically reviewed trials comparing extended out-of-hospital LMWH prophylaxis versus placebo. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified by 1) searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library Database for reports published from January 1976 to May 2001; 2) reviewing references from retrieved articles; 3) scanning abstracts from conference proceedings; and 4) contacting pharmaceutical companies and investigators of the original reports. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials comparing extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis with LMWH versus placebo in patients having elective hip arthroplasty. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data independently. Reviewers evaluated study quality by using a validated four-item instrument. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six of seven original articles met the defined inclusion criteria. The included studies were double-blind trials that used proper randomization procedures. Compared with placebo, extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis decreased the frequency of all episodes of deep venous thrombosis (placebo rate, 150 of 666 patients [22.5%]; relative risk, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.54; P < 0.001]), proximal venous thrombosis (placebo rate, 76 of 678 patients [11.2%]; relative risk, 0.31 [CI, 0.20 to 0.47; P < 0.001]), and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (placebo rate, 36 of 862 patients [4.2%]; relative risk, 0.36 [CI, 0.20 to 0.67; P = 0.001]). Major bleeding was rare, occurring in only one patient in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Extended LMWH prophylaxis showed consistent effectiveness and safety in the trials (regardless of study variations in clinical practice and length of hospital stay) for venographic deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The aggregate findings support the need for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery.

Aftercare↗
PubMed2001

Timing of initial administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in patients following elective hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative and postoperative venous thrombosis are common in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Prophylactic regimens include subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin 12 hours or more before or after surgery and oral anticoagulants. Recent clinical trials suggest that low-molecular-weight heparin initiated in closer proximity to surgery is more effective than the present clinical practice. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin administered at different times in relation to surgery vs oral anticoagulant prophylaxis. METHODS: Reviewers (A.F.M. and S.M.M.) identified studies by searching MEDLINE, reviewing references from retrieved articles, scanning abstracts from conference proceedings, and contacting investigators and pharmaceutical companies. Randomized trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparin administered at different times relative to surgery with oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty, evaluated using contrast phlebography, were selected. Two reviewers (A.F.M. and S.M.M.) extracted data independently. RESULTS: The literature review identified 4 randomized trials meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The results indicate that low-molecular-weight heparin initiated in close proximity to surgery resulted in absolute risk reductions of 11% to 13% for deep vein thrombosis, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 43% to 55% compared with oral anticoagulants. Low-molecular-weight heparin initiated 12 hours before surgery or 12 to 24 hours postoperatively was not more effective than oral anticoagulants. Low-molecular-weight heparin initiated postoperatively in close proximity to surgery at half the usual dose was not associated with a clinically or statistically significant increase in major bleeding rates (P =.16). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of initiating low-molecular-weight heparin significantly influences antithrombotic effectiveness. The practice of delayed initiation of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis results in suboptimal antithrombotic effectiveness without a substantive safety advantage.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Late occurring clinical deep vein thrombosis in joint-operated patients.

In a prospective study of 4,840 patients, we determined the annual incidence of clinical deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in mobilized, discharged orthopedic-operated "high-risk" patients (hip replacement surgery, knee replacement surgery, nailed hip fracture) and assumed "low-risk" patients (diagnostic knee arthroscopy). In addition, the time from the operation to the time when the patients were readmitted with clinically suspected DVT and the distribution of radiologically-confirmed DVT were recorded. Thromboprophylaxis was routinely given for about 10 days to the high-risk groups during the hospital stay but not to patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. During 9 years, the annual incidence of DVT following major procedures was 2.1% (95% CI 1.6-2.6) vs. 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.1) after diagnostic knee arthroscopy. Symptoms appeared, on average, 27 (3-150) days after total hip replacement surgery, 36 (3-150) days after nailed hip fracture, 17 (6-30) days after total knee replacement and 1 (1-6) day after knee arthroscopy. In hip-operated patients, 50% of the DVTs were found in the proximal veins vs. 40% following knee arthroplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Continuing out-of-hospital prophylaxis following major orthopaedic surgery: what now?

Post-surgical deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is often underdiagnosed by clinical assessment alone. Subclinical DVT is a major source of pulmonary embolism, which is an important cause of death, particularly following total hip replacement surgery. Results from pathophysiological studies and recently conducted, prospective double-blind venographic studies in Europe and North America suggest that, in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery, thromboprophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin should be continued for at least 5 weeks post-operatively to minimize this serious complication.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1999

Combined administration of dextran 70 and dalteparin does not increase perioperative blood loss compared to dextran 70 alone in major orthopedic surgery.

A prospective open-labeled clinical study was carried out to compare the safety of dextran 70 and low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin; DD group) versus dextran 70 alone (D group) in patients subjected to elective hip replacement surgery. Dalteparin, 5,000 IU/day and dextran 70, 500 ml during surgery and on the first postoperative day were administered to 214 patients. Dextran 70 alone was infused in 44 patients, 500 ml during surgery and on the 1st, 3rd and 5th postoperative day. Mean total blood loss during the operation and until the 2nd postoperative day was 1,708 ml in the DD group and 1,712 ml in the D group (p = 0.79). During the 1st postoperative week, no group differences were found in the relative number of patients that received packed red blood cells (p = 0.95), the amount of transfused packed red blood cells (p = 1.0) and changes in hemoglobin concentrations (p = 0.69). The present results suggest that dextran 70 and dalteparin can be combined in recommended doses without significantly increasing perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Bone traumatization and insufficient plugging of surgical traumatized bone surfaces with bone cement favor bleeding. Further well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Mechanisms of hypercoagulability.

Following certain major operative procedures, large amounts of tissue factor may be released from damaged tissues to venous blood. Mechanical and chemical injury to the collecting veins exposes subendothelial procoagulant proteins. This initiates a marked local hypercoagulable process. Subsequently, venous bloodborne procoagulant debris induce a substantial thrombin generation as blood passes the lung capillaries. Thus, the lungs seem to have a central role in the mechanisms of hypercoagulability in high-risk patients. Hypercoagulable blood is squeezed out in the peripheral circulation and may favor thrombosis formation both in central and peripheral vessels. In addition, reduced venous blood flow for several days to weeks after the operation may put these patients at-risk for thromboembolic complications for a long time. Several predisposing genetic and acquired factors associated with thrombophilia have been proposed to contribute to this hypercoagulable process. However, few studies and conflicting results have been reported. The clinical penetrance of the described thrombophilic abnormalities and their contribution to the hypercoagulable process in "high-risk" patients are, at present, unclear. The post-traumatic hypercoagulability seems to be a systemic phenomenon, at least following major orthopedic surgery. Cardiorespiratory and vascular complications play a prominent role as a cause of death and morbidity during and after this kind of surgery.

Animals↗