PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Grootheer

Publications and source records attributed to O Grootheer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Brain potentials reveal the timing of face identity and expression judgments.

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from multiple scalp locations from young human subjects while they performed two different face processing tasks. The first task entailed the presentation of pairs of faces in which the second face was either a different view of the first face or a different view of a different face. The subjects had to decide whether or not the two faces depicted the same person. In the second task, pairs of faces (frontal views) were presented with the task of judging whether the expression of the second face matched that of the face. Incongruous faces in the view (identity) matching task gave rise to a negativity peaking at about 350 ms with a frontocentral maximum. This effect was similar to the N400 obtained in linguistic tasks. ERP effects in the expression matching task were much later and had a different distribution. This pattern of results corresponds well with neuropsychological and neuroimaging data suggesting specialized neuronal populations subserving identity and expression analysis but adds a temporal dimension to previous investigations.

Adult↗

Event-related brain potentials to unfamiliar faces in explicit and implicit memory tasks.

The purpose of this study was to investigate electrophysiological correlates related to the recognition of repeated faces in the intact human by means of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). A group of young healthy adults performed a continuous face recognition task, in which 240 unfamiliar faces were flashed upon a computer screen with 80 of the faces being repetitions. The subjects had to classify faces as previously seen and previously unseen faces. The concomitantly recorded ERPs from 19 scalp sites revealed a more positive going waveform for the correctly classified repeated faces beginning at about 280 ms (old/new effect). The same subjects performed a similar task with visually presented concrete nouns as stimuli. The old/new effect in this task showed a similar distribution, amplitude and onset latency. It is thus concluded that the old/new effect is not specific to the materials to be memorized. In contrast, the old/new effect in an implicit face repetition experiment (with the detection of famous persons being the task) showed a different distribution. It is argued that the differential distribution might reflect the different requirements of the two tasks (explicit vs. implicit task). Recent interpretations of the old/new effects are discussed.

Adult↗