Biomedical subjects

O Lochschmidt

Publications and source records attributed to O Lochschmidt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1989

Physical movement sensitive pacing: comparison of two "activity"-triggered pacing systems.

The Activitrax (A) and the Sensolog (S) pulse generator units were compared during bench tests and in patients both under ergometric conditions and during daily activities to determine the susceptibility of both systems to external noise. During the bench tests both pacemakers were mounted on a swingboard and subjected to controlled vibrational force. The patients were divided into two groups of 10 patients each, one group with A and the other with S units; the discriminating power of workload changes was examined under treadmill exercise. In six patients of each group the rate behavior of S and A during daily activities was recorded by Holter monitoring. During bench tests, S and A displayed a frequency-selective mode of operation between 2-70 Hz with the greatest sensitivity between 10-50 Hz. In patients, S showed a significantly higher discriminating power to changes in workload during treadmill exercise. According to y = 0.27x + 85.8 (r = 0.92) the relationship between the power and the pacing rate of S was linear, whereas with y = 0.04x + 89.8 (r = 0.2) the pacing rate of A was almost independent of the given power. The susceptibility to external noise occurring while riding in an auto, streetcar or train with rate increases between 7 ppm and 12 ppm did not significantly differ in both systems. Lying prone on the pacemakers produced brief (less than 1 min) rate increases of 38 ppm (S) and 18 ppm (A), respectively.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

PubMed1988

[Body movement as pacemaker induction value: comparison of 2 activity-triggered pacemakers].

This article compares the rate behavior of the activity-triggered pacemakers, the Activitrax (A) and the Sensolog (S), during bench tests as well as in patients under defined ergometric conditions and during every day life with special reference to the susceptibility of both systems to external noise. In the bench tests both pacemakers were mounted on a swingbord and subjected to controlled vibrational force. In the first experiment the frequency, in the second experiment the energy was varied. In two groups, one with S, one with A implanted, each consisting of 10 patients, the discriminating power of workload changes was examined under defined treadmill exercise. Furthermore in 5 patients of each group the rate behavior of S and A under daily life conditions and during common environmental noise was registered using Holter-ECG. In the bench tests S and A displayed a frequency-selective mode of operation between 2 Hz and 70 Hz with the highest sensitivity (resonance frequency) at 10 Hz. In patients, S showed a significantly higher discriminating power to changes of workload under treadmill exercise. According to y = 0.27x + 85.8 (r = 0.92) the relationship between the pacing rate of S and the power was linear whereas with y = 0.04x + 89.8 (r = 0.2) the pacing rate of A was almost independent of the given power. The susceptibility to external noise occurring during riding a car, streetcar or train with rate increases between 7 ppm and 12 ppm did not significantly differ in both systems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

PubMed1986

Rate control with an external SO2 closed loop system.

In 20 volunteers (mean age 35.5 y) and 12 pacemaker patients (mean age 68.7 y), central venous oxygen saturation (SO2) was monitored continuously by means of an optical sensor integrated in an external transvenous pacing lead placed in the right ventricular cavity. From the SO2 signal recorded at rest and during various modalities of exercise, an algorithm for controlling pacing rate of an external pacing system was developed. An open loop system was used in the volunteers, allowing the comparison of the computed pacing rate with the individual intrinsic heart rate. There was an excellent correlation between the two frequencies as far as the dynamic characteristics and the steady state relationship were concerned. In five pacemaker patients who were stimulated via the external lead, a closed loop control of pacing rate was used. In one patient with a DDD pacemaker implanted for third degree AV-block, the rate response of the SO2 driven pacemaker was well in accordance with the rate attained with the implanted atrial triggered system. With both pacing modes, exercise capacity as determined on a symptom limited treadmill test was identical. In four patients (3 AV block III, 1 bradyarrhythmia) an improvement in exercise tolerance up to 65 percent could be demonstrated with the rate responsive pacing mode. In all patients, it could be shown that an autoregulating pacemaker system with SO2 is an open possibility.

Adult↗