PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Pagani

Publications and source records attributed to O Pagani.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Control of delayed nausea and vomiting with granisetron plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting after cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 69 mg/m2) were compared in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 654 patients (of whom 619 were evaluable) received prophylactic granisetron plus dexamethasone before chemotherapy on day 0; on day 1 complete responders and non-responders were randomized separately to receive dexamethasone, 8 mg b.d. p.o., with either granisetron, 1 mg b.d. p.o., or matching placebo for six days. RESULTS: Over days 1-6 the complete response rates were 54.5% (dexamethasone group) and 52.1% (dexamethasone plus granisetron group). Response rates were higher over days 4-6 (71.8% and 70.7%, respectively) than over days 1-3 (60.4% and 57.9%, respectively). Significantly more patients who responded to antiemetic treatment during day 0 were responders over days 1-6 (63% vs. 17%; P < 0.001). No other treatment-related differences were found. Adverse events tended to be minor, with constipation and headache the most common. Overall, there were no significant differences in the safety profiles of the two regimens, but constipation and abdominal pain were significantly more common in the dexamethasone plus granisetron group. CONCLUSIONS: Granisetron plus dexamethasone did not appear to confer additional benefit over use of dexamethasone alone in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting following cisplatin chemotherapy. Control of acute nausea and vomiting, however, appeared to be an important factor influencing delayed nausea and vomiting.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The impact of adding low-dose leucovorin to monthly 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: results of a phase III trial. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

PURPOSE: A wide variety of fluorouracil (FU)-plus-leucovorin (LV) dose schedules are in clinical use for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Only the monthly low-dose LV-plus-FU regimen, as used by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, has demonstrated a lasting survival benefit as opposed to FU alone (J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1407-1417). The Swiss Cancer Group adopted this regimen for a confirmatory phase III trial but used the same dose-intensity of fluorouracil in both treatment arms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable or metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive monthly FU 400 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day as intravenous push daily for five days, or FU alone. RESULTS: Three hundred nine of the 310 patients randomized were eligible and included in the analysis. The objective response rate for patients with measurable disease was 9% with FU alone and 22% with FU-plus-LV (P = 0.0001). The median progression-free survival was 3.9 versus 6.2 months (P = 0.003) and the overall survival 10 versus 12.4 months (P = 0.02). The major prognostic factors for survival were performance status, weight loss, and disease symptoms. WHO > 2 toxicity, consisting of stomatitis (P = 0.001), diarrhea (P = 0.001), and nausea (P = 0.001), was more pronounced for FU-plus-LV, without fatal events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest published randomized trial to compare FU-plus-LV to FU alone in advanced colorectal cancer. It confirms the survival benefit obtained from biomodulating monthly FU with low-dose LV. The toxic effects of FU-plus-LV were acceptable to most patients, and they responded well to FU dose reductions. In the absence of an ideal dose-intense FU monotherapy regimen, monthly FU with low-dose LV provides a simple and economical means by which to achieve adequate FU efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the oral platinum analogue JM216 given daily for 14 days.

BACKGROUND: The oral bis (acetate) ammine dichloro cyclohexylamine platinum (IV) analogue (BMS-182751) was brought into clinical development because it was shown to be cytotoxic against some human tumour cell lines and to have an antitumor activity in murine tumours at least comparable to that of parenteral cisplatin and carboplatin. In early clinical studies in which the optimal schedule of treatment was daily for five consecutive days, dose-dependent nausea and vomiting occurred in about two-thirds of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate if the use of lower daily doses for longer periods of time could result in a better tolerability, JM216 was given once daily for 14 consecutive days every four to five weeks to adult patients with solid tumors. Oral antiemetics were given prophylactically only at the highest doses. The pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum were studied on days 1 and 14 of the first cycle by Inductively Coupled-Mass-Spectrometry (ICP-MS). RESULTS: Forty-six patients were treated at doses ranging from 10 mg/m2/d to 50 mg/m2/d and 39 were evaluable for hematologic toxicity over 74 cycles. MTDs were reached at 45 mg/m2/d and 50 mg/m2/d x 14 repeated every five weeks in patients with extensive, or limited/no prior treatment, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia which was delayed and variable among patients. Other non-hematological toxicities were severe vomiting (22% of cycles), diarrhea (28% of cycles) and drug-associated fever (32% of patients), controlled with paracetamol. Subjective improvement with disappearance of tumour-related pain was observed in one patient with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and in one previously untreated patient with malignant mesothelioma. Cmax and AUC values of both total and ultrafiltrable platinum on days 1 and 14 were highly variable among patients. Only Cmax on day 1 was linearly related to the dose. Total and ultrafiltrable platinum were still detectable two weeks after the last dose. No relationship could be established between AUC values and toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Daily doses of JM216 of 40 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 for 14 consecutive days every five weeks with oral antiemetic prophylaxis are selected for phase II evaluation of single agent in patients with extensive or limited/no prior treatment, respectively. The administration of JM216 on a day x 14 schedule produced nausea and vomiting comparable to that observed with the day x 5 regimen but of longer duration. The variability of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, even though limited at the doses proposed for phase II evaluation of JM216 as single agent, recommend a careful monitoring of the patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Ventricular arrhythmia and torsade de pointe: dose limiting toxicities of the MDR-modulator S9788 in a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: S9788 is a triazineaminopiperidine derivative capable of reversing multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro. In preclinical models S9788 was several fold more potent MDR inhibitor than verapamil or cyclosporine. At P-glycoprotein (Pgp) blocking concentrations, S9788 appeared to have only very little toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a two step phase I trial we treated 39 patients with refractory cancer with S9788 and bolus doxorubicin. The steps differed mainly in the S9788 infusion duration; in the first part 23 patients received the MDR-reversing drug S9788 over 30 minutes, in the second step of the study 16 patients were administered S9788 over 150 minutes. The doses of S9788 were escalated in cohorts of three patients up to a dose level (DL) of 96 mg/m2 on the 30 minutes infusion, and to 144 mg/m2 on the 150 minutes infusion. The pharmacokinetics of S9788 were determined. RESULTS: With the 30-minute infusion schedule symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia were found to be dose limiting. In all patients at the highest DL transient cardiac repolarization prolongation with a long QT-interval on ECG was demonstrated. With the 150-minute administration schedule, S9788 could be escalated up to 144 mg/m2 without subjective toxicity. However, transient QT prolongation was present in all patients. A third degree AV-block and a QT increase of about 40% occurred at the highest DL. Asymptomatic torsade de pointe (DL 96 mg/m2) was demonstrated on Holter recording in one patient. Theses repolarization disturbances with QT increase were considered dose limiting toxicity and the trial was closed. No arrhythmia related death was noted. Pharmacokinetics were similar with both infusion schedules with a mean alpha half life of 11.3 and 13.2 minutes, for the 30-minute and 150-minute infusion, and a terminal half life of 13.5 and 15 hours, respectively. QTc prolongation duration appeared to be dose-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: With the tested infusion schedules, cardiac toxicity, in particular AV-blocks and QT prolongation, leading to ventricular arrhythmia and torsade de pointe, are the dose limiting toxicities of S9788. Our experience together with the observation of asymptomatic torsade de pointe in two other phase 1 trials of S9788 infused over six hours precluded the further clinical development of S9788.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Taxoids in combination with epirubicin: the search for improved outcomes in breast cancer.

The combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and either doxorubicin or epirubicin has significant activity against metastatic breast cancer. However, the optimal schedule in terms of activity and toxicity is still under investigation. The use of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) in combination with anthracyclines is also active and could represent a safe and favorable alternative. In a phase I trial, 28 patients with metastatic or locally advanced disease received combination chemotherapy using doses of up to 85 mg/m2 docetaxel and 120 mg/m2 epirubicin, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support at the higher dose levels. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Severe fluid retention and symptomatic cardiotoxicity were not seen. Responses occurred at doses of 75 mg/m2 docetaxel plus 90 mg/m2 epirubicin and above. However, the proportion of responders did not increase with increasing dose, and the 75 mg/m2 docetaxel/90 mg/m2 epirubicin combination has been selected for further phase II study.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The toxicity profile of prolonged infusions of paclitaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer has already been defined. The objective of this dose-finding study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of shorter (three-hour) infusions of paclitaxel in combination with i.v. bolus cyclophosphamide in patients who had previously received a maximum of one chemotherapy for advanced breast carcinoma. The MTD of the same regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support was then established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty women with metastatic breast cancer received a total of 352 fully evaluable courses of therapy. The starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 given every three weeks. At least three patients were treated at each dose level and if there were dose-limiting toxic effects during the first cycles three additional patients were entered. G-CSF support (5 micrograms/kg s.c.) was added to the second cycle if specific dose-limiting toxicities had occurred during the first cycle. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which more than two of six patients presented dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle. RESULT: Febrile neutropenia (n = 4) and severe thrombocytopenia (n = 1) defined the MTDs of paclitaxel as 200 mg/ m2 and of cyclophosphamide as 2,000 mg/m2 with or without G-CSF in patients with and, respectively, without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Non-hematologic toxicity was moderate. Recommended doses were 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 1,750 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide with or without G-CSF in patients with and, respectively, without prior chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 25% and 50%, respectively, in patients with and without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Complete remissions (9%) were reported only in patients without prior chemotherapy; antitumour activity in women with anthracycline-resistant disease, with an 8% response rate (95% CI: 1%-26%), was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 1,750 mg/m2 can be safely administered every three weeks to women with advanced breast cancer. The moderate antitumour activity observed with the schedule tested argues against its use as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Menstrual cycle and timing of breast surgery in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

PURPOSE: It has been postulated that breast cancer surgery performed during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle is associated with poorer outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested this hypothesis by evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) for 1033 premenopausal patients who received definitive surgery either during the follicular phase (n = 358) or the luteal phase (n = 675). All patients were enrolled in a randomized trial conducted between July 1986 and April 1993. All had node positive breast cancer and randomization was stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status. All patients received at least three cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). The median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: Patients who underwent definitive surgery for breast cancer in the follicular phase had a slightly worse disease-free survival than those operated on during the luteal phase (five-year DFS percentage: 53% versus 58%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.38; P = 0.20). The effect was significantly greater for the subpopulation of 300 patients with ER-negative primaries (P = 0.02 interaction effect; five-year DFS percentages 42% vs. 59%; hazard ratio 1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.25; P = 0.008). The effect of timing of surgery diminished for analyses based on lesser surgical procedures, e.g., excisional biopsies. In particular, no effect of timing was observed for fine needle aspiration procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures which are more extensive than a fine needle aspiration biopsy might be associated with worse prognosis if conducted during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. This phenomenon was seen predominantly for high risk breast cancer with low levels or no estrogen receptors in the primary tumor.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in women with advanced breast cancer.

The primary aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given by 3-hour infusion and cyclophosphamide given by intravenous bolus every 3 weeks in patients with breast cancer. Patients had received a maximum of one prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was also determined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The 80 women who took part in this study received 347 fully evaluable courses of therapy. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2; G-CSF support (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) was added at the subsequent cycle if specific dose-limiting toxicities had occurred during the previous cycle. Febrile neutropenia and severe thrombocytopenia defined the maximum tolerated doses as paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 2,000 mg/m2, with or without G-CSF support, in patients with or without a prior chemotherapy. Recommended doses were paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,750 mg/m2 in these two groups of patients. The overall response rate was 25% among patients who had received prior therapy for metastatic disease and 50% in patients who had not been previously treated. Complete remissions were reported in 9% of patients, but only among those who were previously untreated.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

The last 3 months of life of cancer patients: medical aspects and role of home-care services in southern Switzerland.

The clinical data on terminal cancer patients who have died since the establishment of a program of collaboration between community services and the cancer center of Canton of Ticino, southern Switzerland, were retrospectively analyzed to describe the characteristics of patients seen and the effect on them of a home-care program coordinated by the cancer center. The home-care program is based on five geographically grouped community-based domiciliary services, with the addition of one nurse responsible for coordination and one physician from the oncology center. Selection criteria for participation in the home-care program are defined. The main outcome measures were: number of hospitalizations and median hospital stay during the last 3 months of life; reasons for and median length of last hospitalization; place of death of patients who had home care and those who did not. In the group of 993 patients analyzed, the median contact time with the cancer center was 9.5 months (10th percentile: 1 month, 90th percentile: 71 months); the most frequent neoplasm was lung cancer (22%) with the briefest contact time (7.5 months; 10th percentile: 1 month; 90th percentile: 21 months); 13.5% of patients were never hospitalized; half of the patients had a total hospital stay of 24 days or longer and 23% died at home. The sociodemographic and medical characteristics of home-care users were similar to those of the home-care non-users and to those of the overall group. In the group of home-care users (32% of the total) 22% were never hospitalized, half of the patients had a total hospital stay of 17 days or longer, and 43.5% of them died at home. These values were significantly different (P > 0.001) from those reported in the group of home-care non-users. Palliative care, provided at home through community-based domiciliary services, is associated with less frequent and shorter hospitalizations in the last 3 months of life. Medical oncology and palliative treatments should be mutually complementary to improve patients care. Cancer centers should be involved in the planning and coordination of supportive-care domiciliary services.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral NK611, a new podophyllotoxin derivative.

NK611 is a novel water-soluble podophyllotoxin derivative that has comparable antitumour activity but higher potency and better bioavailability in animals as compared with etoposide. The primary objectives of this study were to determine, after both oral and intravenous administration in the same patient, the bioavailability and the pharmacokinetic profile of NK611. Secondary objectives involved evaluation of the toxicity and the antitumor activity. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral or intravenous (30-min infusion) doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/m2 on day 1, when pharmacokinetic studies were performed. A daily oral dose of 20 mg/m2 was then given from day 4 through day 7 for respective total doses of 85, 90, and 100 mg/m2. NK611 and its metabolites were determined in plasma and urine by two different high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods with UV detection. A total of 21 adult patients entered the study and received the complete first cycle and at least the 1st day of cycle 2; 17 of them received at least 2 complete cycles of treatment. After intravenous administration, the plasma decay curve of NK611 followed a two-exponential model, and after oral administration it declined monoexponentially in most cases. At all dose levels, bioavailability values were around 100%. At concentrations between 10 and 20 mg/m2 after both routes of administration, the pharmacokinetics were nonlinear; the terminal half-life, plasma clearance, and volume of distribution were significantly different; and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was not correlated to the dose. The urinary excretion of NK611 corresponded to 10-15% of the dose after administration by both routes, whereas that of N-demethyl NK611 and its picroform was highly variable. The features of neutropenia were comparable with those noted for etoposide involving a high degree of interpatient variability and recovery within 1 month after treatment. A daily dose of 20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks is the recommended regimen for phase II studies in patients who have never been treated or have undergone previous chemotherapy only once.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Phase I study of the antipurine antifolate lometrexol (DDATHF) with folinic acid rescue.

Lometrexol (5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolic acid) is a new antifolate that is highly selective in inhibiting the key enzyme of purine synthesis glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. The most promising preclinical features of lometrexol in animal models were its significant activity against a broad panel of solid tumors, the schedule dependency of its antitumor activity, and the availability of a rescue regimen with folinic or folic acid. In the present study, lometrexol was first given daily for 3 consecutive days, repeated every 4 weeks (part I). The occurrence of delayed myelotoxicity prompted the development of a rescue regimen with lometrexol given in a single dose on day 1, followed by oral folinic acid, 15 mg four times a day, from day 3 to day 5 (part II). Longer time intervals between administration of lometrexol and start of rescue were then evaluated (part III), and in the last part of the study (part IV), the maximum tolerated dose of single intermittent doses of lometrexol with folinic acid given from day 7 to day 9 was established. Sixty adult patients entered the study. In part I, the highest daily dose that could be safely given was 4 mg/m2, for a total dose of 12 mg/m2. Cumulative early stomatitis and delayed thrombocytopenia were dose limiting. The use of oral folinic acid made it possible to escalate the dose up to 60 mg/m2, and the maximum tolerated dose was reached at this dose when folinic was given from day 7 to day 9, with anemia being the dose-limiting toxicity. A shorter time interval between lometrexol and folinic acid administrations (from day 5 to day 7) is recommended for Phase II evaluations to optimize the antitumor effect. Anemia was normochromic and macrocytic, possibly due to a deficiency of folic acid. One partial response of 8 months' duration was reported in a patient with epithelial cancer of the ovary, relapsing after cisplatin and alkylating agents. The use of folic acid as rescue, proposed on the basis of experimental data and pharmacological considerations, has also allowed the repeated administration of lometrexol at doses higher than in the previous studies. The advantages of rescue with folinic acid over supplementation with folic acid, however, are difficult to define.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Informed consent for phase I studies: evaluation of quantity and quality of information provided to patients.

BACKGROUND: The process by which patients are informed and their consent is obtained in phase I trials has thus far been only marginally studied. Since 1986 we have followed an oral procedure, consisting of three consecutive conversations in which the investigator responsible for phase I studies, the research nurse and the patients' relatives and/or friends also participate, followed by the patients signing of a written consent form. It is required that six items of information considered essential by our staff be conveyed to patients by the responsible investigator. Meerwein's model, which defines three main dimensions of the informing process (the information itself, the emotional and interactive aspects), has been studied to ascertain whether it can be applied to evaluate the quality of the information proffered. METHODS: Thirty-two conversations were taped, transcribed and evaluated by one psychiatrist and one psychologist. A quantitative analysis of information was performed by calculating the number of patients to whom the essential items of information had been conveyed. The qualitative analysis was performed by rating on a five-point scoring system, from 1 (very bad) to 5 (excellent), the three dimensions of the informing process for each patient and by calculating for each dimension the mean score of the constituent items. RESULTS: Complete information about the characteristics of the phase I drug and the modalities of the treatment and follow up was given to almost 80% of the patients. All but one of the items of the information dimension scored 3.5 or higher, with the one related to the assessment by the doctor of the patient's understanding at the end of the consultation scoring less than 3 in 53% of the patients. All items of the emotional dimension scored higher than 3.5. Greater difficulty was encountered by the physician with the interactive dimension, the lowest mean scores being reported on the items related to the doctor's awareness of the indirectly expressed anxieties of the patients. In 71% of the consultations the three dimensions of information scored more than 3 and balanced one another, indicating a successful consultation by the Meerwein model. CONCLUSIONS: The informed consent procedure applied was satisfactory from a quantitative point of view, and the main items of information were acceptable to the patients. Meerweins's model proved to be applicable and useful for identifying pitfalls in communication. Greater attention should be paid to the indirect messages and implied criticisms of the patients to improve their participation in decision making. Physicians should become more skillful in providing adequate information and improve their methods of communication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral etoposide phosphate.

PURPOSE: To determine the bioavailability (F) and the pharmacokinetic profile of both etoposide and its prodrug, etoposide phosphate, after oral and intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate, and to determine the maximum-tolerable dose (MTD) of oral etoposide phosphate administered daily for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. In addition, we sought to develop and validate two limited-sampling models (LSMs) to predict the etoposide area under the curve (AUC) 24 hours after administration of oral and intravenous etoposide phosphate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the F part of the study, patients were assessed for pharmacokinetic studies after one oral and one intravenous administration of the same dose of etoposide phosphate. Etoposide phosphate and etoposide plasma concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To develop LSMs after oral and intravenous administration, patients were randomized between the training and validation data sets. In the phase I part of the study, which followed the F part, the dose of etoposide phosphate was escalated from 50 mg/m2/d for etoposide equivalents for 5 days to 220 mg/m2/d for 5 days. RESULTS: Forty adult patients with solid tumors or lymphoma entered the study and 35 were assessable for toxicity. The MTDs were defined as 175 mg/m2 and 220 mg/m2 in previously treated and untreated patients, respectively. Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with high interpatient variability. Within 15 minutes after intravenous administration, etoposide phosphate was no longer detectable in plasma, and it was never detectable after oral administration. Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide following etoposide phosphate were comparable to those reported for etoposide. The relative F (mean +/- SD) of etoposide after oral etoposide phosphate was 76 +/- 27%, with a range of 37% to 144%. CONCLUSION: The clinical and pharmacokinetic results of this study confirm the prodrug hypothesis of etoposide phosphate. Although firm conclusions cannot be drawn, the F of oral etoposide phosphate seems to be comparable to or only slightly better than that of oral etoposide.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (administered as a 3-hour infusion) and cyclophosphamide have been given to patients with advanced breast cancer every 3 weeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the two drugs in combination without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The maximum tolerated dose of the same regimen with G-CSF support will then be determined in a subsequent group of patients. Patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease were eligible for this study. The need for G-CSF support was established by an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for more than 7 days, an ANC count less than 0.1 x 10(9)/L for more than 3 days, febrile neutropenia requiring intravenous antibiotics, World Health Organization grade 3 or greater mucositis for more than 7 days, or the failure of the ANC to recover by day 28. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose level at which more than two of six patients treated needed G-CSF support during the second treatment cycle. To date, 20 patients have been entered at the following dose levels: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 1), paclitaxel 155 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (level 3), and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 4). Only one patient at level 2 needed G-CSF support because of an ANC below 0.1 x 10(9)/L for more than 3 days after the first cycle. Neither febrile neutropenia nor treatment delay for more than 1 week was reported. Antitumor activity has been observed from level 3. The evaluation of the toxicity of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 175 mg/m2 without G-CSF support is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Clinical pharmacology of chronic oral etoposide in patients with small cell and non-small cell lung cancer.

We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etoposide given chronically by the p.o. route to patients with small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Single daily p.o. doses of 100 mg etoposide were given for 21 consecutive days every 4 weeks to 39 previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer and 10 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Bioavailability was studied after one i.v. and one p.o. dose of 100 mg etoposide given 48 h before and on day 1 of treatment, respectively. Etoposide plasma levels were measured using the HPLC method. Inter- and intrapatient variability of the area under the curve of the concentration versus time (AUC) during the first cycle were evaluated using a limited sampling model; the variability of etoposide plasma concentrations (Ecs) during the first cycle was assessed by weekly blood samples taken 24 h after dosing. The overall bioavailability of etoposide (mean +/- SD) was 67% +/- 22% and was not affected by fasting. A much higher inter- than intrapatient variability of both the AUC and 24-h Ec determined on days 8, 15, and 22 was found. Neutropenia was dose limiting and of varying degrees (mean +/- SD of absolute neutrophil count nadir at the first cycle: 1.5 +/- 1.2 x 10(3)/microliter). Neutropenia WHO grade >/=3 occurred in 38% of the patients after the first cycle. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed a significant relationship between the mean 24-h Ec and neutropenia, expressed as log- of absolute neutrophil count nadir or as a relative decrease of neutrophils. A correlation between a critical value of mean 24-h Ec (0.34 microgram/ml) and a high probability of achieving a greater than 80% decrease in absolute neutrophil count was found. Two pharmacodynamic models (one previously described and one developed in this study) were used to evaluate the possibility of predicting neutropenia on the basis of individual etoposide pharmacokinetics and baseline absolute neutrophil count. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown a high interpatient variability and a relatively low intrapatient variability of AUC and 24-h Ec. The application of the pharmacodynamic models and mean 24-h Ec cutoff values has proven statistically valid to predict the occurrence of severe neutropenia. However, it remains to be demonstrated in a prospective manner whether the application of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic knowledge can improve the overall therapeutic outcome of chronic p.o. treatment with etoposide.

Administration, Oral↗