PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Plesh

Publications and source records attributed to O Plesh.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Comparison of automatic and voluntary chewing patterns and performance.

Chewing, like respiration, is ordinarily performed as an automatic motor act, yet both can be voluntarily controlled. No in-depth analyses of voluntary chewing exist. Therefore, we have analyzed on a cycle-by-cycle basis voluntarily controlled chewing, and compared it with automatic chewing. We assessed the performance during voluntarily controlled chewing by obtaining constant error and variable error scores. Nine healthy adults with full dentition were subjects (Ss). Their three-dimensional jaw movements and movement times were derived from Kinesiograph recordings obtained while chewing a standard piece of gum on the right side of the mouth. Burst durations and onset latencies of masseter activity were obtained from surface-recorded EMGs. Frequency during automatic chewing was obtained from data recorded while the subject viewed a film. Next, the subject chewed in time with a metronome set at this "automatic" rate. Intrasubject variability among 30 consecutive chewing cycles during voluntary was less than during automatic chewing. In every S gape and ipsilateral jaw excursions and the variability of burst durations of masseter activity were less during voluntary than during automatic chewing, showing that both the spatial and temporal aspects of the two types of chewing differ significantly. Ss varied in ability to follow the metronome. A S's constant error might be small, yet his variable error might be large, as if feed-back-based corrections influenced cycle-to-cycle variability. Fast chewers had smaller constant and variable error scores than did slow chewers, suggesting a speed-accuracy relationship. In summary, both temporal and spatial aspects of voluntary chewing were modified compared with those of automatic chewing. During voluntarily controlled chewing, cycle-to-cycle variability was less compared with automatic chewing due to reductions in variability of occlusal phase and the masseter's burst durations, and total jaw excursions were less because gapes and ipsilateral deviations during closing were reduced.

Adult↗

The effect of prior jaw motion on the plot of electromyographic amplitude versus jaw position.

Fabrication of interocclusal splint at a thickness determined by the vertical dimension at which the jaw muscle EMG amplitude is minimum has been recommended. However, the effect of prior jaw motion and the effect of the recording site on the EMG amplitudes and on the vertical dimension of minimum EMG activity have not been documented. IEMG amplitudes at various static jaw positions achieved during opening and during closing were analyzed in nine subjects. Surface IEMGs were recorded over the left anterior temporal muscle, left masseter and left suprahyoids muscles, and by nonspecific EMG recording as described by Rugh and Drago. The jaw position was recorded in 5 mm increments by a kinesiograph. After 30 seconds of relaxation, 10 successive IEMG reading at 4-second integration times were obtained at each recording site. These 10 recordings at each requested jaw position were averaged and analyzed. The IEMG activity changed with different jaw position. As the jaw opened from centric occlusion, the IEMG from jaw closing muscles decreased to a minimum and then increased with further opening. Moreover, the IEMG for a particular jaw position differed depending on the history of the jaw movement, that is, whether the position was achieved after an opening step or after a closing step. Two factors, the amount of jaw opening and the history of jaw movement to reach that position, seemed to influence the IEMG differently in each of the recorded muscles.

Adult↗

Mandibular movements and jaw muscles' activity while voluntarily chewing at different rates.

As a way of learning about the motor control of chewing, we studied how well a subject could voluntarily chew in time with a metronome and defined the changes in the spatial and temporal aspects of the chewing pattern with changes in chewing rate. Timing and extent of mandibular movements were assessed in nine adults from Kinesiograph recordings; timing and level of activity in digastric and both masseter muscles were determined from surface EMGs. Each subject chewed gum in time with a metronome set randomly at 46, 100, 160 beats per minute or at a frequency close to his automatic chewing rate. Cycle-by-cycle analysis showed that subjects varied in their ability to keep pace with the metronome. When chewing at high frequencies, six subjects reduced gape, three did not. Contralateral deflection in opening, when present, was significantly reduced when chewing at high frequencies and this decrease was independent of vertical gape. Durations of opening, closing, and occlusal phases decreased in proportion to the decrease in total cycle duration. Burst duration of diagastric activity decreased about 29% compared with a 77% decrease in cycle duration over all chewing rates. At low frequencies onset of digastric activity occurred after onset of opening. At high frequencies digastric onset preceded opening. Burst durations of both masseter muscles decreased in concert with the decrease in cycle duration. Termination of activity in both masseters was synchronous and always occurred 100 +/- 20 ms prior to the next opening. Therefore, we conclude that (i) individuals vary in ability and strategy for controlling chewing rate voluntarily and (ii) with increases in chewing rates the shortening of burst duration for the digastrics is significantly less than for the masseters.

Adult↗

Effect of gum hardness on chewing pattern.

Chewing rhythms are set by a putative central pattern generator whose output is influenced by sensory feedback. In this study we assessed how an altered feedback imposed by changing the hardness of a gum bolus modifies the timing of chewing, the maximal gape, and the activity in the masseter muscle on the chewing side. Ten adult subjects with no orofacial dysfunction chewed a standard piece of soft or hard gum for at least 3 min in random order. Vertical jaw movements were recorded with a kinesiograph and activity of the masseter muscle was recorded and integrated from surface EMG electrodes. The subjects sat in a dental chair and viewed a video lecture to distract their attention from chewing; they were instructed to chew on the right molars. Cycle-by-cycle analysis showed that 9 of the 10 subjects chewed the hard gum more slowly than the soft with no significant change in gape. The increases in cycle duration were due to changes in the duration of the opening and occlusal phases. The duration of closing was not significantly changed even though the duration and level of masseter activity were both significantly increased. We conclude that gum hardness by altering proprioceptive feedback modifies the output of the masticatory central pattern generator in such a way that the temporal aspects of chewing and the output of the masseteric motor pool are affected.

Adult↗

Measurement of silent period durations by hand and by commercial device.

Silent period durations obtained from the masseter muscle in response to taps to the chin during a clench were measured by the commercially available MDM device and by hand measurement from polygraph tracings. Of the 160 pairs of silent periods, 15 were measurable by polygraph but not by MDM, 20 were not measurable by polygraph but were measured by MDM, and 125 were measured by both. Of the 125 silent periods, the MDM gave a shorter reading in 112. Within-subject correlation coefficients between the two measurement methods ranged from -0.038 to + 0.95; the average (0.75) was significantly different from zero. The among-subject correlation coefficient was + 0.26 and was not significant. These data raise questions about the reliability and validity of silent period durations measured by the MDM device.

Electromyography↗

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded amalgam and full crowns.

The use of dentin bonding prior to placement of core build-up restorations has been shown to reduce microleakage and reinforce remaining tooth structure. However, information is lacking about the influence a core build-up has on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the influence of three types of core build-ups on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth.

Analysis of Variance↗

Bruxing patterns in children compared to intercuspal clenching and chewing as assessed with dental models, electromyography, and incisor jaw tracing: preliminary study.

The purpose of the present study was to compare bruxing patterns in children with chewing and maximum intercuspal clenching as defined in a clinical and laboratory environment. Six non-bruxing controls and six children who actively bruxed according to parent reports were evaluated. Both control and experimental subjects were assessed by an initial questionnaire, intraoral examination, extraoral examination, dental study models, incisor mandibular tracking, and bilateral surface electromyographic recordings (e.g., EMG). Bruxing was defined as grinding, clenching, or both in combination. The clinical examination consisted of an intraoral examination of the dentition, number of occlusal contacts, and wear facets. Dental study models were used to substantiate the intraoral findings for occlusal contact and wear facets. The mandibular incisors position was tracked during opening, closing, laterotrusion, protrusion, and chewing and compared to the bruxing movements in the experimental subjects. Bilateral surface EMG signals from the temporalis and masseter muscles were recorded in three maximum intercuspal clenches, ten chewing cycles on sugarless gum, and during simulated bruxing. The dental contacts were equal in number bilaterally in both control and bruxing subjects. Both groups demonstrated wear facets, but the bruxing subjects had more facets. The wear facets indicated lateral excursions but not clenching. Only the incisor jaw tracking and bilateral EMG differentiated the bruxing patterns. In those subjects (n = 4) who clenched during bruxing, the EMG pattern was not similar to that of intercuspal clenching and demonstrated its own unique muscle recruitment for the temporalis and masseter muscles. In the subjects who exhibited lateral excursions for bruxing (n = 2), the pattern of muscle recruitment of the two-closing muscles in terms of amplitude was similar for both the bruxing and chewing gum. Our findings support a concept that bruxing may depend upon factors that modify coactivation of muscle recruitment and do not depend upon occlusal contacts.

Analysis of Variance↗