PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

O Zetterström

Publications and source records attributed to O Zetterström.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Formoterol as needed with or without budesonide in patients with intermittent asthma and raised NO levels in exhaled air: A SOMA study.

Patients with mild intermittent asthma sometimes show signs of inflammation, and guidelines suggesting bronchodilator therapy alone as needed may be questioned. The current study compared as-needed use of a rapid-acting beta2-agonist with as-needed use of a beta2-agonist and corticosteroid combination as the only medication in asthma patients with intermittent symptoms. A total of 92 nonsmoking asthma patients (of 187 screened) using only an inhaled beta2-agonist as needed (28 males, 64 females; mean age 37 yrs; mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 101% predicted, mean reversibility 6.5% pred and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) > or =20 parts per billion (ppb)) were randomised to treatment with formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) 4.5 microg as needed (n = 47) or budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 microg as needed (n = 45) in a double-blind, parallel-group 24-week study. The primary variable of efficacy was change in FeNO. Baseline FeNO was 60 ppb and 59 ppb in the budesonide/formoterol and formoterol groups, respectively. Mean reductions in FeNO in the budesonide/formoterol and formoterol groups were 18.2 ppb and 2.8 ppb, respectively (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-23.5 ppb). The reduction in the budesonide/formoterol group occurred during the first 4 weeks of treatment and remained at this low level. Mean FEV1 increased by 1.8% pred normal value in the budesonide/formoterol group and decreased by 0.9% pred normal value in the formoterol group (95% CI -4.7- -0.7). In the budesonide/formoterol group, use of > or =4 inhalations x day(-1) of study medication was seen on 21 treatment days compared with 74 in the formoterol group. In conclusion, as-needed use of an inhaled corticosteroid together with a rapid-acting bronchodilator may be more beneficial than a beta2-agonist alone in patients with intermittent asthma and signs of airway inflammation. The long-term benefits are unknown.

Adolescent↗

Urinary inflammatory mediators and inhalation of hypertonic saline in children.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory mechanisms of hypertonic saline-induced bronchoconstriction are not well understood. METHODS: Seventeen asthmatics with (n=11) and without bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) (n=6) and 18 randomly selected nonatopic nonasthmatic controls without BHR were evaluated by urine samples collected before and 1 h after hypertonic saline provocation test. Histamine, 11beta-PGF2alpha, and LTE4 were analysed by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) by radioimmunoassay (RIA). RESULTS: The levels of leukotriene E4 (LTE4) increased significantly after the challenge tests, both in the asthmatics (median: 354 pg/mg pre-challenge vs. 628 pg/mg post-challenge; P=0.05) and in the controls (median: 294 pg/mg pre-challenge vs. 460 pg/mg post-challenge; P <0.01). The levels of histamine also increased significantly in the latter (median: 299 micromol/mg pre-challenge vs. 569 micromol/mg post-challenge; P=0.03). However, the levels of 11beta-PGF2alpha and EPX did not change significantly after the challenge tests either in the asthmatics or in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The inhalation of hypertonic saline increased urinary excretion of LTE4 both in the asthmatics and in the controls. The slight increase of leukotrienes was enough to induce airway obstruction in some of the asthmatics, because of the hyperresponsiveness in their airways.

Asthma↗

Seasonal differences of peak expiratory flow rate variability and mediators of allergic inflammation in non-atopic adolescents.

Variations in peak expiratory flow (PEF) and serum eosinophil mediators were studied in healthy adolescents. Twenty-five boys and 31 girls, 11-16 years of age (mean age 14.3 years), were selected and investigated during the birch pollen season of 1995; 45 were also investigated during the autumn of the same year. The PEF was measured twice daily and eosinophil mediators in serum and in urine were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) once during the birch pollen season and once in autumn. The type values of the daily PEF variation, expressed in amplitude percentage mean, were 6.4 and 3.9%, mean values were 7.35 and 6.74%, and the 95th percentiles were 18 and 14%, during the birch pollen season and autumn, respectively. The 95th percentiles were 41 and 38 microg/l for serum eosinophil cationic protein (s-ECP), 74 and 62 microg/l for serum eosinophil protein X (s-EPX), 987 and 569 microg/l for serum myeloperoxidase (s-MPO), and 165 and 104 microg/mmol for urinary eosinophil protein X/urinary creatinine (u-EPX/u-creatinine), during the birch pollen season and autumn, respectively. The levels of the eosinophil mediators decreased significantly from May (n = 56) to November (n = 45), for s-ECP from a median value of 14 microg/l to 7 microg/l (p= 0.001), for s-EPX from a median value of 28 microg/l to 20 microg/l (p= 0.001), and for the neutrophil mediator, s-MPO, from a median value of 440 g/l to 292 g/l (p< 0.001). The PEF variability decreased significantly (p= 0.037), from spring (n = 55; median 8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-10.19) to autumn (n = 44; median 6%, 95% CI 6.1-8.9). A significant correlation was found between the levels of s-ECP and s-EPX (rs = 0.7, p< 0.001), between s-ECP and s-MPO (rs = 0.6, p< 0.001), between s-EPX and s-MPO (rs = 0.4, p< 0.005), and between s-EPX and u-EPX/u-creatinine (rs = 0.6, p< 0.0001), in the birch pollen season (n = 56) and in the autumn (n = 45). There was a positive correlation found in PEF variability between the two seasons (n = 43; rs = 0.5, p= 0.0006). No other correlation was found between PEF variability and any other parameters. The difference in the levels of eosinophil mediators between seasons in non-atopic, healthy children is unexplained. Normal limits for mediators were higher and PEF variability was almost the same as has been reported in adults. When using normal values, seasonal influences should be considered.

Adolescent↗

Improved asthma control with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler, compared with budesonide alone.

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler was compared with budesonide alone, and with concurrent administration of budesonide and formoterol from separate inhalers, in patients with asthma, not controlled with inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone. In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy study, 362 adult asthmatics (forced expiratory volume in one second 73.8% of predicted, inhaled glucocorticosteroid dose 960 microg x day(-1)) received single inhaler budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations b.i.d., or corresponding treatment with budesonide, or budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers. There was a greater increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) with single-inhaler (35.7 L x min(-1)) and separate-inhaler (32.0 L x min(-1)) budesonide and formoterol, compared with budesonide alone (0.2 L x min(-1); p<0.001, both comparisons); the effect was apparent after 1 day (p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons). Similarly, evening PEF, use of rescue medication, total asthma symptom scores and percentage of symptom-free days improved more with both single inhaler and separate inhaler therapy than with budesonide alone, as did asthma control days (approximately 15% more, p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons, with a marked increase in the first week). All treatments were well tolerated and the adverse event profile was similar in all three treatment groups. It is concluded that single inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol is a clinically effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with asthma that is not fully controlled by inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Salbutamol via Easyhaler is at least as effective as salbutamol via Turbuhaler in the treatment of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and acceptability of salbutamol inhaled via Easyhaler and Turbuhaler multi-dose dry powder inhalers in the treatment of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Thirty-two adult patients with asthma and/or bronchial hyper-reactivity were included in the study, which was carried out according to a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over design. Histamine challenge test was performed on 2 study days separated by at least 7 days. The challenge test was continued until a > or = 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was achieved. The patients then inhaled a single 100 microg dose of salbutamol from Easyhaler, or from Turbuhaler. FEV1 was assessed by flow-volume spirometry before and after histamine challenge and 1.5, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 60 min after salbutamol inhalation. The primary efficacy variable was the maximum percentage change in FEV1 from the post-challenge value. The secondary efficacy variable was area under the curve (AUC) of FEV1. At the end of the study, acceptability of salbutamol Easyhaler was evaluated using a questionnaire and Easyhaler was also compared with the inhalation device the patient had used earlier. Twenty-six patients completed the study. Both salbutamol Easyhaler and salbutamol Turbuhaler produced a rapid and significant increase in FEV1, with maximum percentage changes being 43.9% (+/-15.3) and 40.5% (+/-21.9) from the post-challenge value, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two inhalation devices in terms of changes in FEV1 or AUC of FEV1. The use of Easyhaler and getting a new dose from Easyhaler was considered to be very easy by 65% and easy by 35% of the patients. None considered it difficult. Of 16 patients who had used Turbuhaler earlier, 19% considered Easyhaler much better, 44% better, and 38% the same as Turbuhaler, and none considered it worse. In conclusion, the results show that salbutamol Easyhaler was at least as effective as salbutamol Turbuhaler in the treatment of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. In addition, the patients considered Easyhaler very easy or easy to use. The majority of patients who reported Turbuhaler as their own inhaler considered Easyhaler better or much better than Turbuhaler.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Skin test evaluation of genetically engineered hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1: results obtained with a mix of two recombinant Bet v 1 fragments and recombinant Bet v 1 trimer in a Swedish population before the birch pollen season.

BACKGROUND: More than 95% of birch pollen-allergic subjects react with the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, and almost 60% of them are sensitized exclusively to this allergen. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the in vivo biologic activity of genetically engineered hypoallergenic derivatives of Bet v 1 (an equimolar mixture of 2 recombinant [r] Bet v 1 fragments and of rBet v 1 trimer) with that of rBet v 1 wild-type by skin prick and intradermal testing. METHODS: Birch pollen-allergic patients who had not received immunotherapy (n = 23), a group of allergic patients without birch pollen allergy (n = 12), and nonatopic persons (n = 8) from northern Europe (Sweden) underwent skin prick and intradermal testing with different concentrations of the recombinant allergens and commercial birch pollen extract before the birch pollen season. Immediate and late-phase reactions were recorded and allergen-specific IgE and IgG subclass responses were determined by CAP radioallergosorbent test and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Atopic persons without birch pollen allergy and nonatopic individuals did not have skin reactions to rBet v 1 wild-type and genetically engineered hypoallergenic derivatives. By intradermal testing, 8 of 23 and 13 of 23 birch pollen-allergic patients did not react with the highest concentration (1 microg/mL) of the rBet v 1 fragment mix and rBet v 1 trimer, respectively, compared with 1 with rBet v 1 wild type. Likewise, the highest concentration (100 microg/mL) of fragment mix or trimer failed to elicit a positive skin prick test in 18 of 23 and 15 of 23 patients in comparison with 0/23 with the monomer. No late reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: The recombinant hypoallergenic birch pollen allergens can probably be used for patient-tailored immunotherapy with a reduced risk to induce anaphylactic reactions.

Adolescent↗

Characterization of eosinophils and detection of eotaxin in skin chamber fluid after challenge with relevant allergen in patients with mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: A selective recruitment of eosinophils to sites of allergic inflammation is suggested to be controlled by regulation of cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine whether allergen challenge in skin chambers, applied on patients with allergic rhinitis and mild asthma, results in a selective influx of activated eosinophils and detectable levels of cytokines/chemokines related to eosinophil recruitment, such as interleukin (IL)-5 and eotaxin. METHODS: A skin blister was induced on the volar aspect of each forearm; one contained PBS-heparin buffer (control) and the other was challenged with relevant allergen. Peripheral blood was drawn before the allergen was applied to the skin chamber, and the expression of CD9, CD11b and EG2-epitope on intracellular eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was analysed in eosinophils. Chamber fluid was collected 8 h after allergen application and analysed for differential cell counts, expression of eosinophil activity markers, the presence of ECP, eotaxin, and IL-5. RESULTS: The number of recruited leucocytes was equal in the allergen-challenged chambers and in controls. However, the number of eosinophils was significantly increased in the allergen-challenged chambers, and elevated levels of released ECP were measured. Moreover, the eosinophils recruited were activated, as shown by increased expression of EG2 and CD11b, and decreased expression of CD9, in comparison with blood eosinophils. In the skin chamber fluids, higher levels of eotaxin were detected in the allergen-challenged chambers than in controls, but there were no detectable levels of IL-5. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a selective recruitment of eosinophils, and higher levels of released ECP and eotaxin, in skin chambers stimulated with allergen, as compared with control chambers. Allergen challenge in skin chambers is a useful tool for studies of eosinophil recruitment, their state of activation, and their involvement in the allergic inflammatory response.

Adult↗

Skin-prick test for severe marginal periodontitis.

The present study tested the hypothesis that treatment-resistant periodontitis patients present with a more intense inflammatory response to marginal bacterial plaque as a sign of an inflammatory overreaction. Patients with severe marginal periodontitis (Gingival Index > 20%) who had not responded to treatment showed almost no positive response to lipid A in a skin-prick test, which was significantly different from the results from patients with severe marginal periodontitis who had responded to treatment and from healthy control individuals without marginal periodontitis. This finding can be interpreted as an impaired inflammatory reactivity to periodontitis pathogens in treatment-resistant patients, rejecting the hypothesis.

Adult↗

Capsaicin desensitization of the nasal mucosa reduces symptoms upon allergen challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Patients with birch pollen allergic rhinitis were treated locally, out of season, in the nasal cavity with capsaicin (30 microM) or saline. The capsaicin treatment resulted in a statistically significant reduction of symptoms upon allergen challenge, which lasted for 2 months. Saline had no effect on the symptom score upon allergen challenge. Neither capsaicin nor saline treatment had any effect on allergen challenge-induced nasal mucosal swelling monitored by acoustic rhinometry. Allergen challenge-induced eosinophil migration to the nasal mucosa was affected by neither capsaicin nor the saline treatment. The finding that capsaicin treatment reduces allergic symptoms indicates that selective, non-peptide neurokinin receptor antagonists may be an alternative in the future in the treatment of nasal allergy. However, owing to the pain involved in local capsaicin treatment this treatment is unlikely to be of clinical use.

Administration, Intranasal↗

No signs of activity markers in peripheral blood despite increased bronchial reactivity after repeated low-dose allergen exposure.

The allergen inhalation test can be used as an experimental model to study pathophysiological events in allergic asthma. Repeated low-dose inhalations of allergen induce increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and resemble natural allergen exposure. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether eosinophil recruitment and activation in peripheral blood, differences in expression of lymphocyte surface antigens and increased bronchial responsiveness to histamine occur during and after repeated low-dose bronchial allergen challenge. Fourteen atopic asthmatic patients were challenged in a randomized double-blind manner for 7 days with either allergen in very low doses or placebo. We measured the concentration of eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and the expression of the EG2-epitope on intracellular ECP in eosinophils and the expression of lymphocyte surface antigen markers in peripheral blood. The challenge period started and ended with a histamine provocation. The repeated low-dose allergen exposure resulted in a significant increase in BHR. No changes were seen in the placebo group. Concerning the inflammatory parameters in peripheral blood, no significant changes were seen during or after the week of low-dose allergen inhalations. Our results show that very low, repeated doses of allergen induce increased airway reactivity despite lack of evident clinical symptoms or signs of activation of inflammatory cells in peripheral blood.

Adult↗

Benefits from adding the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor zileuton to conventional therapy in aspirin-intolerant asthmatics.

From bronchoprovocation studies and investigations of the acute effects of drugs that inhibit leukotrienes (LT), the hypothesis has emerged that leukotrienes are important mediators of airway obstruction and other symptoms in aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA). However, it has yet not been shown if subjects with AIA respond favorably to clinical treatment with leukotriene inhibitors. Therefore, in a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study, we examined the effects of 6 wk of treatment with the leukotriene-pathway inhibitor zileuton (600 mg, four times daily) in 40 patients with well-characterized AIA. The treatment was added to existing therapy, which included medium to high doses of inhaled (average daily dose 1,030 microg of beclomethasone or budesonide) or oral glucocorticosteroids (4 to 25 mg/d) for all but one of the patients. On top of this treated baseline, there were no significant effects of adding placebo, indicating that their asthma was kept relatively stable. However, there was an acute and chronic improvement in pulmonary function after treatment with zileuton, expressed both as increased FEV1 from baseline compared with placebo, and higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values on zileuton treatment compared with placebo. The improvements occurred despite lower use of rescue bronchodilator with zileuton. Zileuton also diminished nasal dysfunction, which is one of the cardinal signs of AIA. There was a remarkable return of smell, less rhinorrhea, and a trend for less stuffiness and higher nasal inspiratory flow during treatment with zileuton. Zileuton caused a small but distinct reduction of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine and inhibited aspirin-induced bronchoconstriction. Zileuton inhibited urinary excretion of LTE4 but did not change airway reactivity to inhaled LTD4, supporting that zileuton specifically inhibited leukotriene biosynthesis. The findings indicate that leukotrienes are important mediators of persistent airway obstruction and chronic nasal dysfunction in AIA. The study also suggests that addition of a leukotriene pathway inhibitor such as zileuton may bring about greater control of asthma than what is achieved by treatment with medium to high doses of glucocorticosteroids alone.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of periodontal defects.

The aim of the present clinical trial was to test tolerability during 2 treatments with EMDOGAIN in a large number of patients. An open, controlled study design in 10 Swedish specialist clinics was chosen, with a test group of 107 patients treated with EMDOGAIN in connection with periodontal surgery at 2 surgical test sites per patient. The procedures were performed 2 to 6 weeks apart on one-rooted teeth with at least 4 mm deep intraosseous lesions. A control group of 33 patients underwent flap surgery without EMDOGAIN at 1 comparable site. In total, 214 test and 33 control surgeries were performed. Serum samples were obtained from test patients for analysis of total and specific antibody levels. 10 of the patients had samples taken before and after the first surgery, 56 other samples were taken after one treatment with EMDOGAIN, and 63 after 2 treatments. None of the samples, not even from allergy-prone patients after 2 treatments, indicated deviations from established baseline ranges. This indicates that the immunogenic potential of EMDOGAIN is extremely low when applied in conjunction with periodontal surgery. Comparison between the test and control groups demonstrated the same type and frequency of postsurgical experiences, i.e., reactions caused by the surgical procedure itself. Clinical probing and radiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and 8 months postsurgery. About half of the patients (44 test and 21 control) were also evaluated after 3 years. There was a significant difference between the test and control results at 8 months postsurgery, and this difference had increased further at the 3 year follow-up. The 2.5-3 mm increase in attachment and bone level after treatment with EMDOGAIN was of the same magnitude as seen in the studies with split-mouth design aiming for test of effectiveness of EMDOGAIN.

Adult↗

Inhibition of allergen-induced airway obstruction and leukotriene generation in atopic asthmatic subjects by the leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor BAYx 1005.

BACKGROUND: Leukotriene receptor antagonists significantly blunt allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Inhibitors of leukotriene synthesis should theoretically provide similar protection, but conflicting results have been obtained when synthesis inhibitors have been tested in allergen challenge. BAYx 1005, a new inhibitor of leukotriene synthesis, was therefore evaluated in an allergen bronchoprovocation study. METHODS: Ten men with mild allergic asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine were recruited. On two different occasions each subject inhaled a single dose of allergen, previously determined to cause at least a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) four hours after ingestion of 750 mg BAYx 1005 or placebo in a double blind crossover design. Urinary excretion of leukotriene E4 was measured before and during the challenges. RESULTS: The mean (SE) maximal fall in FEV1 was 7.1 (1.7)% after BAYx 1005 and 21.0 (3.0)% after placebo (p < 0.001). The mean difference between treatments was 13.9 (95% CI 7.0 to 20.8) for the maximal fall in FEV1. All subjects were protected by BAYx 1005, the mean inhibition of the fall in FEV1 being 70.0 (7.0)%. The mean area under the curve (AUC) for urinary excretion of leukotriene E4 in the first two hours after the challenge was 1.7 (0.9) after placebo and 0.4 (0.6) after BAYx 1005 (difference = 1.3 (95% CI-0.1 to 2.7); p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that BAYx 1005 is a potent inhibitor of allergen-provoked leukotriene synthesis in asthmatic subjects and lend further support to the suggestion that leukotrienes are important mediators of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction.

Adult↗

Effect of 1 year daily treatment with 400 microg budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in newly diagnosed asthmatics.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with a low daily dose of 400 microg inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in newly diagnosed asthmatics could influence the course of asthma. Seventy five adult patients, mostly with mild asthma, diagnosed during the previous year and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, participated in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group multicentre study. They were treated with budesonide 200 microg b.i.d. or placebo, delivered via Turbuhaler for 12 months and followed-up for another 6 months without inhaled steroid treatment. Airway function, symptom scores, reactivity to histamine and inflammatory indices in blood were assessed. The mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 28 L x min(-1) after budesonide treatment compared with no increase in the placebo group (p=0.011). The provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20) (geometric mean) increased in the budesonide group by approximately two doubling dose steps, but not in the placebo group (p=0.0003). The difference between groups with regard to improvement in asthma symptom scores and inflammatory indices did not reach statistical significance. During the 6 month follow-up, the PEF values of the patients who had previously been treated with budesonide decreased by 18 L x min(-1) while the PD20 decreased by approximately one doubling dose step. In conclusion, early treatment with a low dose of budesonide improves airway function and decreases bronchial responsiveness, but the improvements are short-lasting without continued treatment.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Anti-IgE-induced accumulation of leukocytes, mediators, and albumin in skin chamber fluid from healthy and atopic subjects.

The aim of this study was to examine potential differences between healthy and atopic subjects with regard to IgE-mediated cutaneous inflammation. For this purpose, we analyzed histamine, tryptase, leukotriene B4, albumin, eosinophils, and total leukocytes in skin chamber fluid after challenge with anti-human IgE. We also measured gross skin reactivity (wheal, flare, and late-phase reactions), circulating IgE, and eosinophils, as well as the state of eosinophil activation. It was found that despite having more circulating IgE, the skin responsiveness of the atopic subjects did not differ significantly from that of the nonatopic subjects with respect to mediator release, albumin extravasation, or total recruitment of leukocytes. Moreover, the sizes of anti-IgE-induced wheal, flare, and late-phase reactions were very similar in the two groups. On the other hand, significant recruitment of eosinophils during the IgE-mediated reaction was more or less restricted to the atopic group. Yet the recruited eosinophils, of which the majority was in an early state of activation before degranulation, did not seem to contribute significantly to the IgE-mediated delayed skin edema. Furthermore, the eosinophil count in anti-IgE chambers of the atopic subjects did not correlate with any of the other parameters monitored. Thus because the anti-IgE-induced recruitment of eosinophils appeared to be unrelated to factors such as the number of peripheral blood eosinophils, the degree of mast cell activation, the intensity of inflammatory skin changes, and the level of circulating IgE, it is apparent that the mechanisms for and pathophysiologic role of IgE-mediated dermal eosinophil accumulation in atopic subjects require further investigation.

Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic↗

Allergen-induced inflammation in the nose: a comparison of acute and repeated low-dose allergen exposure.

To investigate allergic rhinitis induced by two experimental provocation models, we compared local inflammation with markers of eosinophil activity in peripheral blood. Patients with strictly seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected and investigated outside the pollen season. An acute challenge with increasing doses of allergen every 15 min until symptoms occurred was performed in nine patients. Nasal lavage and blood samples were taken before and 4 and 24 h after challenge. After a 6-week washout period, 10 patients were submitted to 7 days of repeated low allergen exposures. One small dose (approximately equal to 1/100 of the acute dose) was given each day. Blood and lavage samples were taken prior to and after the period. As control four patients were challenged with diluent only. The acute challenge resulted in sneezing and nasal discharge and blockage and was accompanied by a rise in histamine and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in lavage fluid after 4 h and continuing after 24 h, when there also was a rise in the number of eosinophils and ECP in peripheral blood. The repeated low-dose exposures caused very few symptoms but produced increased ECP in the lavage fluid and a trend toward increased histamine concentration. There were no changes in ECP, intracellular EG2 binding, or number of eosinophils in the blood. No changes were seen in the control group. Our findings show that changes in eosinophil mediator release in nasal lavage can be seen after very low, but repeated, allergen exposures despite no, or minimal, clinical symptoms.

Adult↗

Eosinophil activity markers in peripheral blood have high predictive value for bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with suspected mild asthma.

The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of eosinophils and markers of their activity for bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in a population of patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. The activation of eosinophils was estimated by measuring eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in serum. In addition, flow cytometry was used to measure the expression of the EG2-epitope on intracellular ECP in eosinophils from peripheral blood. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with clinical history of asthma were studied. Of the 28 patients, 18 had a positive bronchial challenge test measured as PD20 < or = 1600 micrograms histamine. A significantly higher concentration of eosinophils and a trend to higher ECP in the peripheral blood was found in the hyperreactive group than in the nonreactive group. However, the intracellular expression of ECP did not correlate with the PD20 value, and no significant difference between the groups was found. With one eosinophil activity marker, either serum ECP or EG2, BHR could be predicted in 70% of the patients. If we combined any two of the activity markers (serum ECP, EG2, or the percentage of eosinophils), the predictive value increased to 100%. We conclude that the blood eosinophil concentration, as well as, to some extent, serum ECP, has a high specificity for BHR in patients with recently developed clinical symptoms of asthma. Despite normal bronchial reactivity, some patients had signs of activated eosinophils, i.e., high serum ECP and increased EG2 expression. Thus, these markers may reflect early stages in the development of BHR. Our results also indicate that a combined evaluation of percentage of eosinophils and of eosinophil activity markers is of clinical value to predict BHR.

Adolescent↗

Sustained eosinophil cationic protein release into tears after a single high-dose conjunctival allergen challenge.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of eosinophils is a hallmark sign of the allergic late-phase response (LPR). Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), a readily measurable product released from activated eosinophils, has so far not been evaluated in the ocular LPR. OBJECTIVE: Two sets of trials were performed in order to investigate changes of local and systemic eosinophil activity and their possible link with symptoms and hyperreactivity in the allergic LPR in the eye. METHODS: In the first experiment, ECP was analysed in tears and serum and the clinical reaction was evaluated during a 72-h time-course after a single, high-dose allergen challenge out of season in one eye of 15 pollen-sensitized volunteers. In a second experiment, the hypothesis of an increased clinical response to an allergen challenge in an eye that had been provoked with allergen 48 h previously was tested in nine sensitized individuals. RESULTS: In the first experiment, symptoms at 10 min and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h significantly exceeded base line scores of the challenged eyes. Tear ECP was significantly elevated in challenged eyes compared to contralateral eyes at 6, 8 and 24 h. In addition, symptoms and ECP release correlated significantly at the 24-h evaluation. Serum ECP remained unchanged throughout the study period. In the second experiment, conjunctival hyperreactivity 48 h after an allergen challenge was not confirmed. CONCLUSION: ECP secretion occurs in the experimental ocular LPR and is in part associated with the magnitude of the clinical reaction, which suggests a truly pathogenic role of the activated eosinophil in pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Administration, Topical↗