Biomedical subjects

O de Cobelli

Publications and source records attributed to O de Cobelli.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Magnetic resonance imaging combined with artificial erection for local staging of penile cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with artificial erection for local staging of penile cancer. METHODS: We compared local clinical, MRI plus artificial erection, and pathologic staging in 9 cases of penile cancer. Erection was obtained by injecting 10 microg prostaglandin E1 into the corpora cavernosa. T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI with and without contrast was obtained using a phased array coil. Local treatment was based on tumor location and extent, as defined by the clinical and MRI findings. RESULTS: The histologic diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in 8 patients and sarcoma in 1. The MRI and pathologic staging coincided in 8 of 9 patients. MRI, clinical, and pathologic staging coincided in 5 patients: 4 had Stage T2 and 1 had Stage T1 disease. In 2 patients, the MRI and pathologic stage was T2, but the clinical stage differed. Another patient had Stage T2 clinically but T3 by MRI and pathologic staging. In the last patient, none of the stages coincided (clinical Stage T1, MRI Stage T0, and pathologic Stage Tis). The only complication during the procedure was that 1 patient developed priapism after prostaglandin injection, which was relieved by evacuation of the corpora cavernosa. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to use artificial erection with MRI to stage local penile cancer. The method appears promising for local staging of penile cancer, but additional studies are necessary to confirm its utility.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

[Radical prostatectomy: comparison of technics].

From 1989 until today 46 patients aged 44-75 years underwent a radical prostatectomy two of whom transperineal and another 44 patients underwent a retropubical prostatectomy (twenty of whom with the nerve sparing technique). Based on our experience, the clinical stages that benefit from a radical prostatectomy as are as followed: T1b, T1c, T2a, T2b; T2c, in patients who present a good A.S.A., a remaining life-span of ten years is expected. Our preference, regarding the best access was clearly the traditional retropubical which allowed us on a preliminary bases a bilateral iliaco-otturatorial lymphoadenectomy with extemporaneus histological exams. Based on our experience we do not see an indication for a radical surgical intervention in the following with: P.S.A. higher than 60 ng./ml in patients with a clinical stage C. Positive abdominal-pelvical computer tomography for macrometastical lymph nodes. Positive bone scintigraphy. Patients over the age of 75 years.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

[Complications and limitations of endoscopic therapy for urethral stenosis].

Endoscopic treatment of urethral stenosis is not an alternative to surgical therapy but is an ideal therapeutical partner. The limits of endoscopic resection lie in the lack of anatomopathologican and clinical knowledge regarding the long-term maintenance of stability of the urethral lumen that in every case the internal urethrotomy manages to create. In fact internal urethrotomy is capable of almost totally eliminating the urethral stenosis but with a higher incidence of relapse, even in the short-term. The complications of endoscopic therapy of urethral stenosis are the usual local complications and of mild seriousness. Among the most frequently noted are the swelling and/or peno-scrotal suffusion by incorrect routes, and post-operative urethraemorrhagia. More rarely, but with serious effects, are purulent urethritis or sepsis. In our case list major complications such as priapism, cavernositis or septic shock were not noted. In conclusion endoscopic therapy of urethral stenosis is a simple technique, repeatable with low morbidity and is the best technique in the congenital 'ring'.

Endoscopy↗