Biomedical subjects

Oleg N Vassiliev

Publications and source records attributed to Oleg N Vassiliev.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Comparison between an event-by-event Monte Carlo code, NOREC, and ETRAN for electron scaled point kernels between 20 keV and 1 MeV.

An event-by-event Monte Carlo code called NOREC, a substantially improved version of the Oak Ridge electron transport code (OREC), was released in 2003, after a number of modifications to OREC. In spite of some earlier work, the characteristics of the code have not been clearly shown so far, especially for a wide range of electron energies. Therefore, NOREC was used in this study to generate one of the popular dosimetric quantities, the scaled point kernel, for a number of electron energies between 0.02 and 1.0 MeV. Calculated kernels were compared with the most well-known published kernels based on a condensed history Monte Carlo code, ETRAN, to show not only general agreement between the codes for the electron energy range considered but also possible differences between an event-by-event code and a condensed history code. There was general agreement between the kernels within about 5% up to 0.7 r/r (0) for 100 keV and 1 MeV electrons. Note that r/r (0) denotes the scaled distance, where r is the radial distance from the source to the dose point and r (0) is the continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA) range of a mono-energetic electron. For the same range of scaled distances, the discrepancies for 20 and 500 keV electrons were up to 6 and 12%, respectively. Especially, there was more pronounced disagreement for 500 keV electrons than for 20 keV electrons. The degree of disagreement for 500 keV electrons decreased when NOREC results were compared with published EGS4/PRESTA results, producing similar agreement to other electron energies.

Electrons↗

PubMed2006

Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric accuracy of commercial treatment planning systems used in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for thoracic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical IMRT plans for lung and esophageal cancers and mesothelioma were used to investigate the accuracy of dose calculations from two commercial treatment planning systems (Pinnacle and Corvus systems). Dose distributions were measured with ion chambers and thermoluminescent dosimeters for individual IMRT fields and composite treatment plans in water phantoms and anthropomorphic phantoms. A Monte Carlo-based system was established to compute three-dimensional dose distributions to compare with the treatment planning system calculations. RESULTS: Dose calculations from the Pinnacle system were acceptable within 5% of the local dose or a 5-mm distance-to-agreement for 80% of the points measured with ion chambers, 74% of the points measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters, and 96% of the points compared with the Monte Carlo calculations. For the Corvus system, 89% of the points agreed with the measured dose and 98% agreed with the Monte Carlo calculations. Underestimation of the dose from the treatment planning system was found in the low-dose regions (<50% of the prescribed dose), possibly caused by inadequate modeling of the multileaf collimators. CONCLUSION: The Pinnacle and Corvus dose calculations were acceptable for thoracic IMRT in high-dose regions. Beam modeling is likely the most critical factor for the accuracy of IMRT dose calculations.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Dosimetric properties of photon beams from a flattening filter free clinical accelerator.

Basic dosimetric properties of 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams from a Varian Clinac 21EX accelerator operating without the flattening filter have been measured. These include dose rate data, depth dose dependencies and lateral profiles in a water phantom, total scatter factors and transmission factors of a multileaf collimator. The data are reviewed and compared with measurements for the flattened beams. The unflattened beams have the following: a higher dose rate by factors of 2.3 (6 MV) and 5.5 (18 MV) on the central axis; lower out-of-field dose due to reduced head scatter and softer spectra; less variation of the total scatter factor with field size; and less variation of the shape of lateral dose profiles with depth. The findings suggest that with a flattening filter free accelerator better radiation treatments can be developed, with shorter delivery times and lower doses to normal tissues and organs.

Particle Accelerators↗

PubMed2006

MCNPX simulation of a multileaf collimator.

Our purpose in this work was to validate a very detailed Monte Carlo model, developed in MCNPX, of a Millennium 120 multileaf collimator integrated into a Varian Clinac 21EX treatment head. The Monte Carlo results were compared with measurements for both the 6-MV and 18-MV photon modes. The following comparisons were performed: depth-dose curves, lateral profiles, multileaf collimator leakage, the tongue-and-grove test, and the round leaf-end test. The good agreement between the Monte Carlo simulations and measurements showed that our model is accurate. Consequently, the benchmarks provided by our study can be used in future Monte Carlo studies.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2006

Development and commissioning of a multileaf collimator model in monte carlo dose calculations for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

A multileaf collimator (MLC) model, "MATMLC," was developed to simulate MLCs for Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This model describes MLCs using matrices of regions, each of which can be independently defined for its material and geometry, allowing flexibility in simulating MLCs from various manufacturers. The free parameters relevant to the dose calculations with this MLC model included MLC leaf density, interleaf air gap, and leaf geometry. To commission the MLC model and its free parameters for the Varian Millennium MLC-120 (Varian Oncology Systems, Palo Alto, CA), we used the following leaf patterns: (1) MLC-blocked fields to test the effects of leaf transmission and leakage; (2) picket-fence fields to test the effects of the interleaf air gap and tongue-groove design; and (3) abutting-gap fields to test the effects of rounded leaf ends. Transmission ratios and intensity maps for these leaf patterns were calculated with various sets of modeling parameters to determine their dosimetric effects, sensitivities, and their optimal combinations to give the closest agreement with measured results. Upon commissioning the MLC model, we computed dose distributions for clinical IMRT plans using the MC system and verified the results with those from ion chamber and thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements in water phantoms and anthropomorphic phantoms. This study showed that the MLC transmission ratios were strongly dependent on both leaf density and the interleaf air gap. The effect of interleaf air gap and tongue-groove geometry can be determined most effectively through fence-type MLC patterns. Using the commissioned MLC model, we found that the calculated dose from the MC system agreed with the measured data within clinically acceptable criteria from low- to high-dose regions, showing that the model is acceptable for clinical applications.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Monte Carlo study of photon fields from a flattening filter-free clinical accelerator.

In conventional clinical linear accelerators, the flattening filter scatters and absorbs a large fraction of primary photons. Increasing the beam-on time, which also increases the out-of-field exposure to patients, compensates for the reduction in photon fluence. In recent years, intensity modulated radiation therapy has been introduced, yielding better dose distributions than conventional three-dimensional conformal therapy. The drawback of this method is the further increase in beam-on time. An accelerator with the flattening filter removed, which would increase photon fluence greatly, could deliver considerably higher dose rates. The objective of the present study is to investigate the dosimetric properties of 6 and 18 MV photon beams from an accelerator without a flattening filter. The dosimetric data were generated using the Monte Carlo programs BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. The accelerator model was based on the Varian Clinac 2100 design. We compared depth doses, dose rates, lateral profiles, doses outside collimation, total and collimator scatter factors for an accelerator with and without a flatteneing filter. The study showed that removing the filter increased the dose rate on the central axis by a factor of 2.31 (6 MV) and 5.45 (18 MV) at a given target current. Because the flattening filter is a major source of head scatter photons, its removal from the beam line could reduce the out-of-field dose.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2006

Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator.

Several studies have shown that removal of the flattening filter from the treatment head of a clinical accelerator increases the dose rate and changes the lateral profile in radiation therapy with photons. However, the multileaf collimator (MLC) used to shape the field was not taken into consideration in these studies. We therefore investigated the effect of the MLC on flattened and unflattened beams. To do this, we performed measurements on a Varian Clinac 21EX and MCNPX Monte Carlo simulations to analyze the physical properties of the photon beam. We compared lateral profiles, depth dose curves, MLC leakages, and total scatter factors for two energies (6 and 18 MV) of MLC-shaped fields and jaw-shaped fields. Our study showed that flattening filter-free beams shaped by a MLC differ from the jaw-shaped beams. Similar differences were also observed for flattened beams. Although both collimating methods produced identical depth dose curves, the penumbra size and the MLC leakage were reduced in the softer, unflattened beam and the total scatter factors showed a smaller field size dependence.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2006

A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam.

Dose to the patient outside of the treatment field is important when evaluating the outcome of radiotherapy treatments. However, determining out-of-field doses for any particular treatment plan currently requires either time-consuming measurements or calculated estimations that may be highly uncertain. A Monte Carlo model may allow these doses to be determined quickly, accurately, and with a great degree of flexibility. MCNPX was used to create a Monte Carlo model of a Varian Clinac 2100 accelerator head operated at 6 MV. Simulations of the dose out-of-field were made and measurements were taken with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an acrylic phantom and with an ion chamber in a water tank to validate the Monte Carlo model. Although local differences between the out-of-field doses calculated by the model and those measured did exceed 50% at some points far from the treatment field, the average local difference was only 16%. This included a range of doses as low as 0.01% of the central axis dose, and at distances in excess of 50 cm from the central axis of the treatment field. The out-of-field dose was found to vary with field size and distance from the central axis, but was almost independent of the depth in the phantom except where the dose increased substantially at depths less than dmax. The relationship between dose and kerma was also investigated, and kerma was found to be a good estimate of dose (within 3% on average) except near the surface and in the field penumbra. Our Monte Carlo model was found to well represent typical Varian 2100 accelerators operated at 6 MV.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2005

Reference photon dosimetry data and reference phase space data for the 6 MV photon beam from varian clinac 2100 series linear accelerators.

The current study presents the reference photon dosimetry data (RPDD) and reference phase space data (RPSD) for the 6 MV photon beam from Varian 2100 series linear accelerators. The RPDD provide the basic photon dosimetry data, typically collected during the initial commissioning of a new linear accelerator, including output factors, depth dose data, and beam profile data in air and in water. The RPSD provide the full phase space information, such as position, direction, and energy for each particle generated inside the head of any particular linear accelerator in question. The dosimetric characteristics if the 6 MV photon beam from the majority of the aforementioned accelerators, which are unaltered from the manufacturer's original specifications, can be fully described with these two data sets within a clinically acceptable uncertainty (approximately +/-2 %). The current study also presents a detailed procedure to establish the RPDD and RPSD using measured data and Monte Carlo calculations. The RPDD were constructed by compiling our own measured data and the average data based on the analysis of more than 50 sets of measured data from the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) and 10 sets of clinical dosimetry data obtained from 10 different institutions participating in the RPC's quality assurance monitoring program. All the measured data from the RPC and the RPC-monitored institutions were found to be within a statistically tight range (i.e., 1sigma approximately 1% or less) for each dosimetric quantity. The manufacturer's standard data, except for in-air off-axis factors that are available only from the current study, were compared with the RPDD, showing that the manufacturer's standard data could also be used as the RPDD for the photon beam studied in this study. The RPSD were obtained from Monte Carlo calculations using the BEAMnrc/ DOSXYZnrc code system with 6.2 MeV (a spread of 3% full width at half maximum) and 1.0 mm full width at half maximum as the values of the energy and radial spread of a Gaussian electron pencil beam incident on the target, respectively. The RPSD were capable of generating Monte Carlo data that agreed with the RPDD within the acceptance criteria adopted in the current study (e.g., 1% or 1 mm for depth dose). A complete set of the RPDD and RPSD from the current study is available from the RPC website (http://rpc.mdanderson.org) or via mass storage media such as DVD or CD-ROM upon request.

Electrons↗

PubMed2005

Monte Carlo calculations of the absorbed dose and energy dependence of plastic scintillators.

Detector systems using plastic scintillators can provide instantaneous measurements with high spatial resolution in many applications including small field and high dose gradient field applications. Energy independence and water equivalence are important dosimetric properties that determine whether a detector will be useful in a clinical setting. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we calculated the energy dependence of plastic scintillators when exposed to photon beams in the radiotherapeutic range. These calculations were performed for a detector comprised of a BC-400 plastic scintillator surrounded by a polystyrene wall. Our results showed the plastic scintillation detector to be nearly energy independent over a range of energies from 0.5 to 20 MeV. The ratio of the dose absorbed by the scintillator to that absorbed by water was nearly a constant, approximately equal to 0.98 over the entire energy range of interest. These results confirm the water equivalence of the plastic scintillation detector and are in very good agreement with earlier results obtained using Burlin cavity theory.

Computer Simulation↗