PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Oliver Sartor

Publications and source records attributed to Oliver Sartor.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Safety and efficacy of repeat administration of samarium Sm-153 lexidronam to patients with metastatic bone pain.

BACKGROUND: Samarium Sm 153 lexidronam (Sm-153) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for painful bone metastases. The purpose of the analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of repeated doses of Sm-153 in patients with metastatic bone pain. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 202 patients administered 1.0 mCi/kg of Sm-153. Particular emphasis was placed on analysis of data from 55 patients receiving > or = 2 doses. Pain scores, adverse events, and hematologic parameters were assessed after each dose. RESULTS: Mild, transient suppression of platelets and white blood cell counts was the most common adverse event after treatment. Nadirs were approximately half of baseline at 4 weeks after dosing with recovery by Week 8 in 90% of patients. Temporary grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11%, 12%, and 17% of patients after the first, second, and third drug administration, respectively. Grade 3 leukopenia occurred in less than 7% of patients independent of the number of administrations. Significant decreases in pain scores (P < .001) were observed at Week 4 after each of the first 3 doses and maintained at Week 8 after the first 2 doses (P < .003) but not the third. Decreases in pain scores were observed in 70%, 63%, and 80% of patients, respectively, at Week 4 after the first 3 administrations. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated dosing of 1.0 mCi/kg of Sm-153 was both safe and effective and is a reasonable treatment option in patients whose bone pain responds and then recurs after an initial dose provided that adequate hematologic function is present at the time of drug administration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A 12-month clinical study of LA-2585 (45.0 mg): a new 6-month subcutaneous delivery system for leuprolide acetate for the treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of LA-2585, a new 6-month subcutaneous depot of leuprolide acetate (Atrix Laboratories, Fort Collins, Colorado) were investigated in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12-month, open label, multicenter study 111 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were administered 45.0 mg LA-2585 subcutaneously once every 6 months. The primary efficacy parameter was serum testosterone 50 ng/dl or less. Leuprolide acetate pharmacokinetics were analyzed in a subset of 28 patients. RESULTS: Of the 111 enrolled patients 103 (93%) completed the 12-month study. Eight patients withdrew due to nonmedical reasons in 1, disease progression in 5 and cardiovascular disease in 2. By day 28, 108 of the 109 remaining patients (99%) achieved testosterone suppression, while 1 who never attained suppression was withdrawn at day 85. Mean time to castrate suppression was 21.2 days (median 21). At study completion 102 of 103 patients (99%) were below medical castrate testosterone levels of 50 ng/dl (mean +/- SE 12.3 +/- 2.1 ng/dl) with 91 of 103 (88%) at less than 20 ng/dl. Mean luteinizing hormone decreased from 6.98 +/- 0.48 mIU/ml at baseline to 0.23 +/- 0.14 mIU/ml at month 12. Luteinizing hormone was consistently below 1 mIU/ml. Mean prostate specific antigen decreased 97% from 39.8 +/- 21.5 ng/ml at baseline to 1.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml at 12 months. No clinically significant flare reactions were observed. The most common treatment related adverse event was mild to moderate hot flashes. CONCLUSIONS: LA-2585 (45.0 mg depot) consistently produced and maintained safe and effective serum testosterone suppression with total serum testosterone well below the medical castrate level of less than 50 ng/dl.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of prostate cancer: recommendations from an expert panel.

In this study, we provide consensus guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in men with prostate cancer. To this end, an expert panel composed of urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endocrinologists met to review current clinical evidence for the use of bisphosphonates in patients with different stages of prostate cancer to derive consensus recommendations. Physicians should be proactive in monitoring bone loss in patients receiving long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Further study is needed before recommending the routine use of bisphosphonates in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. However, if a patient has clinically significant bone loss, use of a bisphosphonate to prevent further compromise of bone integrity should be strongly considered, regardless of hormonal and metastatic status. Bone scans are the preferred method for the identification of bone metastases. In patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate indicated for the prevention of skeletal complications. In conclusion, patients with prostate cancer are at high risk for skeletal morbidity. Bisphosphonates have been shown to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy as well as skeletal complications in men with bone metastases. However, further study of the use of bisphosphonates across the clinical spectrum of prostate cancer is needed.

Bone Density Conservation Agents↗
PubMed2005

Caveat medicus: consequences of federal investigations of marketing activities of pharmaceutical suppliers of prostate cancer drugs.

In the course of recent health care fraud investigations against TAP Pharmaceuticals (Lake Forest, IL) and AstraZeneca International (London, United Kingdom), each pled guilty to one violation of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, settled claims related to alleged violations of the False Claims Act without admitting guilt, and paid fines, settlements for liabilities, and reimbursements of dollar 850 million and dollar 355 million, respectively. In a unique aspect of these cases, federal investigators brought criminal charges against 14 TAP employees and investigated the billing practices of several urologists. These investigations resulted in guilty pleas from both urologists and industry employees relative to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act or the False Claims Act and probationary sentences with payments of fines and restitution to the government for urologists who cooperated with federal investigations. One uncooperative urologist was found guilty of violating the Federal False Claims Act and sentenced to 6 months of home arrest, excluded from Medicare for 5 years, required to provide 600 hours of free medical care to indigent patients and patients covered by Medicare or Medicaid, and paid fines and restitution to the government. The cases against TAP and AstraZeneca have been followed by federal and state investigations of allegedly illegal marketing practices of other pharmaceutical firms and have resulted in negotiated settlements of dollar 3.8 billion and dollar 71.5 million, respectively. Believing that an Average Wholesale Price-based reimbursement system was an important driving factor for these marketing activities, Medicare has shifted to an Average Sales Price-based reimbursement system. This is expected to greatly impact the practice of outpatient oncology nationwide.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

The Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project.

CONTEXT: In 1998, a multidisciplinary team of investigators initiated RADAR (Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports), a clinically based postmarketing surveillance program that systematically investigates and disseminates information describing serious and previously unrecognized adverse drug and device reactions (ADRs). OBJECTIVE: To describe the structure, operations, and preliminary findings from the RADAR project and related dissemination efforts by pharmaceutical suppliers and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). DESIGN: After identifying a serious and unexpected clinical event suitable for further investigation, RADAR collaborators postulated clinical hypotheses and derived case series and incidence estimates from physician queries, published and unpublished clinical trials, published case reports, FDA databases, and manufacturer sales figures. RESULTS: RADAR investigators identified 16 types of serious ADRs among 1699 patients, of whom 169 (10%) died as a result of the reaction. Initial cases were identified by 7 RADAR investigators, 4 collaborating physicians, 2 attorneys, and by reviewing 3 published reports. Additional sources included queries of occupational health programs and medical directors of interventional cardiology laboratories (3 types of ADRs), published manuscripts and clinical trials (11 types of ADRs), review of medical records at a RADAR site (2 types of ADRs), unpublished clinical trial reports (3 types of ADRs), and reports from attorneys, family members, or patients (4 types of ADRs). Incidence estimates, ranging from 0.4% to 33%, were derived from 5 clinical trial reports, 2 physician queries, and 2 observational databases. Laboratory support for hypotheses included identification of 3 neutralizing antibodies and 3 histopathological findings. ADR reports were disseminated as 8 revised package inserts, 7 "dear doctor" letters, and 9 peer-reviewed articles. CONCLUSION: A new, clinically based, hypothesis-driven approach to postmarketing surveillance may supplement existing regulatory surveillance systems and improve patient safety.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2005

Society of Urologic Oncology position statement: redefining the management of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.

Because patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma are a very diverse group, management of these patients represents a unique challenge. Despite much research, to the authors' knowledge few studies published to date have provided definitive treatment answers. The Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) convened a multidisciplinary panel of urologists, oncologists, and radiation oncologists to develop a treatment algorithm for patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. The resulting treatment outline was based on a review of the literature review and on the expert opinions of the panelists. The current article provided a logical progression of treatment choices that included hormonal manipulations, chemotherapeutic options, and adjunctive therapies. Future clinical trials and therapies were also discussed by the authors. Management strategies should be targeted toward the individual patient. Although significant progress has been made in understanding and treating hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, earlier interventions would be ideal and better therapeutic approaches to prolong survival are necessary.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Amplification and overexpression of prosaposin in prostate cancer.

We identified prosaposin (PSAP) as a secreted protein expressed in androgen-independent (AI) prostate cancer cells by cloning/sequencing, after probing a PC-3 cDNA library expressed in the lambdaTriplEx phagemid expression vector with a polyclonal rabbit antibody generated against pooled human seminal plasma. PSAP is a neurotrophic molecule; its deficiency or inactivation has proved to be lethal in man and mice, and in mice, it leads to abnormal development and atrophy of the prostate gland, despite normal testosterone levels. We used Southern hybridization, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and/or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis, and we now report the genomic amplification of PSAP in the metastatic AI prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3, DU-145, MDA-PCa 2b, M-12, and NCI-H660. In addition, by using SNP arrays and a set of 25 punch biopsy samples of human prostate cancer xenografts (LAPC3, LuCaP 23.1, 35, 49, 58, 73, 77, 81, 86.2, 92.1, 93, 96, 105, and 115), lymph nodes, and visceral-organ metastases, we detected amplification of the PSAP locus (10q22.1) in LuCaP 58 and 96 xenografts and two lymph node metastases. In addition, AI metastatic prostate cancer cell lines C4-2B and IA8-ARCaP over-expressed PSAP mRNA without evidence of genomic amplification. Taken together with prior data that demonstrated the growth-, migration-, and invasion-promoting activities, the activation of multiple signal transduction pathways, and the antiapoptotic effect of PSAP (or one of its active domains, saposin C) in prostate cancer cells, our current observation of PSAP amplification or overexpression in prostate cancer suggests, for the first time, a role for this molecule in the process of carcinogenesis or cancer progression in the prostate.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2005

A prospective analysis of the time to normalization of serum androgens following 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy in patients on a randomized phase III clinical trial using limited hormonal therapy.

PURPOSE: Patients with prostate cancer are treated with neoadjuvant, adjuvant and intermittent therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-A). While these are largely successful in decreasing testosterone (T) and dihydroxytestosterone (DHT) to castrate levels, discontinuation of such therapy often results in continued suppression of androgens for variable periods of time. We present the largest published series of patients evaluating the timing of T and DHT increase after cessation of GnRH therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial T and DHT measurements were prospectively obtained every 3 months while on GnRH-A then monthly upon discontinuation of GnRH-A. Analysis of time from the second 3-month GnRH-A administration to T and DHT increase was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 80 evaluable patients had a median time to T 50 ng/dl or greater of 12.9 weeks and a median time to T normalization (212 ng/dl or greater) of 16.6 weeks. Low baseline T was associated with a prolonged time to T 212 ng/dl or greater (p = 0.0086) and a similar trend was seen in patients older than 66 years (p = 0.08). There were 62 evaluable patients with a median of 14.9 weeks to DHT 150 pg/ml or greater. There was no association with Gleason score at diagnosis, on study prostate specific antigen, type of prior definitive therapy, or any prior hormonal therapy and time to increase in circulating androgens. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 months of GnRH-A therapy in these patients, DHT and T levels did not return to normal for a median of 14.9 and 16.6 weeks, respectively.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy of nilutamide as secondary hormonal therapy in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of nilutamide as secondary hormonal therapy in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC), as treatment options are limited for these patients and secondary hormonal therapy with antiandrogens has advantages, including low toxicity, oral administration and high patient acceptance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 45 patients with AIPC who were treated with nilutamide as secondary hormonal therapy in two institutions. The decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, side-effects of treatment, and the relationship between baseline characteristics, type and duration of previous therapy and response to nilutamide were assessed. Most patients received oral nilutamide at 150 mg/day. RESULTS: Eighteen of 45 evaluable patients (40%) had a PSA level decrease of > or = 50%. Responders (PSA decline > or = 50%) had a median (range) time to progression of 4.4 (0.31-44.7) months. There were responses to nilutamide whether used as the second to fifth line of hormonal therapy. There were no differences in response to nilutamide based on clinical stage, type of local therapy, PSA level at diagnosis or initiation of nilutamide, or type of previous antiandrogen therapy. Responders were more likely to have received monotherapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues or orchidectomy as first-line hormonal treatment (P = 0.02). The most common reversible adverse effects were mild to moderate visual adaptation effects, reported in 20% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nilutamide appears to be an effective secondary hormonal therapy in patients with AIPC and is associated with a mild toxicity profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Saposin C stimulates growth and invasion, activates p42/44 and SAPK/JNK signaling pathways of MAPK and upregulates uPA/uPAR expression in prostate cancer and stromal cells.

AIM: To determine the effect of saposin C (a known trophic domain of prosaposin) on proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as its effect on the expression of urokinase plasmonogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and -9 in normal and malignant prostate cells. In addition, we tested whether saposin C can activate p42/44 and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) signal transduction pathways of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) superfamily. METHODS: We employed Western blot analysis, phospho-specific antibodies, cell proliferation assay, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, in vitro kinase assays and migration and invasion to determine the effect of saposin C on various biological behaviors of prostate stromal and cancer cells. RESULTS: Saposin C, in a cell type-specific manner, upregulates uPA/uPAR and immediate early gene c-Jun expression, stimulates cell proliferation, migration and invasion and activates p42/44 and SAPK/JNK MAPK pathways in prostate stromal and cancer cells. Normal prostate epithelial cells were not responsive to saposin C treatment in the above studies. CONCLUSION: Saposin C functions as a multipotential modulator of diverse biological activities in prostate cancer and stromal cells. These results strongly suggest that saposin C functions as a potent growth factor for prostatic cells and may contribute to prostate carcinogenesis and/or the development of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Cell Division↗
PubMed2004

Gleason score and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen in survival among patients with stage D2 prostate cancer.

Although multiple studies have addressed the prognostic importance of tumor differentiation in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, few data are available in patients with metastatic disease. We evaluated and compared survival data in two groups of men with Whitmore stage D2 metastatic prostate cancer initially treated with hormonal therapy. A series of 76 patients with D2 metastatic disease were evaluated and treated at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in conjunction with an additional cohort of 141 patients from the Louisiana State University School of Medicine (LSU). Pathological specimens were classified according to the Gleason score. Fifty-two (25%) of the combined NCI/LSU specimens had a Gleason score of 6 or less, 71 (34%) had a value of 7, and remaining 87 (41%) had scores between 8 and 10. The median PSA at the time of diagnosis for the NCI patients was 294.2 ng/ml. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time that a greater than 50% increase above nadir PSA was noted. In neither group was Gleason score correlated with overall survival. There was no association between the time to progression following hormone therapy and primary tumor Gleason score. The PSA concentration at the time of diagnosis was not correlated with the Gleason score for the NCI patients; however, there was an inverse correlation between pretreatment PSA level and time to progression following hormonal ablation. Gleason score does not appear to impact survival in metastatic prostate cancer. PSA as a marker of the biological behavior in metastatic disease may also be limited. These findings should be reevaluated in larger, better matched cohorts. Novel techniques such as serum proteomics, microarrays, and metastatic cell isolation methods may better predict outcome in advanced prostate cancer.

Aged↗