PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Oliver Strohm

Publications and source records attributed to Oliver Strohm.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Detection of cardiac small vessel disease by adenosine-stress magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Patients testing positive for myocardial ischemia but without significant coronary artery (CA) stenosis in coronary angiography (CXA) are characterized as having "small vessel disease" (SVD). The aim of our study was to identify these patients by stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: 317 patients with suspected myocardial ischemia and clinical indication for CXA were scanned < 72 h before CXA in a whole-body 1.5T scanner. After 3 min of adenosine infusion (140 microg/kg/min), a myocardial first-pass perfusion sequence in 4-5 contiguous short-axis orientations using a Gadolinium-based contrast agent (0.1 mmol/kg) was performed. Images were analyzed qualitatively by two independent and blinded investigators. RESULTS: Perfusion deficits were detected in 93% of our patients. In 78% of patients with relevant perfusion delay, perfusion deficits extended to > 1/3 of the wall thickness in > or = 2 myocardial segments, persisted for > 5 heartbeats and were regarded as relevant coronary macroangiopathy. All of these patients had significant CA stenosis (60% had luminal narrowing > 70% and 18% had 50-70%). 22% of the patients had perfusion deficits affecting < or = 1/3 of wall thickness with persistence for < or = 5 heartbeats and were regarded as having SVD. None of these patients had a CA stenosis of > 50% or received CA revascularization. These patients more frequently had hypertension (p<0.0001), diabetes (p<0.05) and circumferential perfusion deficits (p<0.0001) than other patients. CONCLUSION: Stress perfusion CMR allows non-invasive differentiation between patients with significant CA stenosis and patients with SVD caused by hypertension and/or diabetes based on the temporal and spatial extent of perfusion deficits. Patients with SVD more often have diffuse perfusion deficits with shorter persistence than patients with significant CA disease.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2006

Safety of adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging using a mobile cardiac magnetic resonance system.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI) allows for the detection of ischemic heart disease. Aim of this prospective study was to show feasibility, practicability and safety of adenosine stress ceMRI in routine outpatients with a mobile scanner. METHODS: Consecutive patients were scanned in six different cardiac outpatient centers with a 1.5 T mobile ceMRI scanner. First-pass wash-in patterns of gadolinium chelate were evaluated after three minutes of adenosine infusion. After a second bolus of gadolinium chelate myocardial late enhancement (MLE) images of the left ventricle were acquired to visualize myocardial necrosis. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled to the study. No major complications during examination and adenosine infusion were observed. One hundred seventy-three minor complications as temporary atrio-ventriculare blockade, mild chest pain or dyspnea and nausea were noticed. None of the complications led to further special treatment CONCLUSION: This ceMRI protocol is suitable for application in outpatient settings. CeMRI stress testing using a mobile scanner in an outpatient setting is feasible and safe.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Prediction of necessity for coronary artery revascularization by adenosine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Assessing myocardial first-pass wash-in during pharmacological induced stress allows detection of perfusion deficits and indicates stenotic coronary arteries (CA). The aim of our study was to demonstrate clinical relevance of contrast-enhanced stress magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) by predicting necessity of CA intervention. METHODS: 738 patients with scheduled coronary angiography (CXA) were scanned in a 1.5 Tesla CMR scanner. After 3 min of adenosine infusion (140 microg/kg/min), first-pass kinetic of contrast agent was evaluated. Myocardial necrosis was visualized with "myocardial late enhancement (MLE)". Perfusion deficits were described as either "ischemia in viable myocardium", or "no relevant ischemia in viable myocardium" or as "ischemia in chronic myocardial infarction (CMI)" based on spatial and temporal extent of ischemia and of MLE. CXA was performed in all patients within 48 h after CMR and revascularization, if applicable, was performed. Angiograms were read by two independent and blinded investigators and matched with CMR findings. RESULTS: 539 patients (73%) showed "ischemia in viable myocardium" and revascularization was performed in 513 patients (95%). In 111 patients with "no relevant ischemia in viable myocardium", revascularization was performed in only 5 patients (5%). In 88 patients classified as "ischemia in CMI", revascularization was performed in 14 patients (16%). Positive predictive value of CMR for CA intervention was 0.95, negative predictive value was 0.89, sensitivity was 0.96, and specificity was 0.87. CONCLUSION: CMR allows clinical useful prediction of relevant CA disease with need for revascularization prior to CXA and may be used as non-invasive test for myocardial ischemia and viability to guide further therapy.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Cardiac magnetic resonance in outpatients in Germany--indications, complications and protocol suggestions from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has developed into a routine examination in many centers in cardiology. However, there is little knowledge about its applicability in outpatients as a diagnostic tool for cardiovascular diseases. We report about the experiences in a high-volume cardiac imaging center and in a "mobile setting" in Germany and provide routinely used examination protocols. METHODS: 8976 patients referred for CMR from cardiologists, internal medicine practices and from general practitioners and 2200 patients examined in a "mobile" system by outpatient cardiologists were included in the study. Indications were as follows: 7672 (69%) examinations for myocardial ischemia and viability, 1313 (12%) for cardiac and pericardial inflammatory disease and cardiac mass, 976 (9%) for detection and quantification of heart valve disease and 466 (4%) for congenital heart disease. 697 (6%) were referred for other indication. Two independent readers performed image analysis of the 8976 patients in our center. RESULTS: Image quality was rated "excellent" in 90.6%, "good" in 8%, "fair" in 1.2% and "poor" in 0.2%. 0.0002% of all examinations were not assessable due to low image quality. Minor complications (temporarily, asymptomatic AV-blockade; mild chest pain and/or dyspnea; nausea) could be observed in 12% and resolved within few minutes. One patient experienced a grand mal seizure due to hyperventilation. 0.9% examinations had to be terminated untimely due to claustrophobia. CONCLUSION: CMR in outpatients is a widely used imaging modality in cardiology in Germany. A large variety of clinical questions may be answered by CMR with excellent image quality and without major complication. With user-adapted protocols, a rapid diagnosis is achieved even in outpatients in a "mobile" setting. Hence, CMR will increase its applicability as a routine imaging tool.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed2004

[Applications in cardiovascular MRI and CT--clinical indications and training].

The recent technical advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) have led to a routine use of both methods in clinical cardiology. MRI is established for the diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease, aortic and pericardial disease as well as cardiac tumours. New indications include the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and inflammatory heart disease as well as myocardial perfusion measurements. CT is used for the diagnosis of coronary calcification for risk stratification. Moreover, stenoses of the coronary arteries and bypass grafts can be depicted using contrast enhanced multi-slice CT in selected patients. Training of cardiologists in the field of MRI has been defined by the Deutsche Arztetag in 2003 and demands 24 months of full-time training. At least 12 months must be spent in a department of radiology. Alternatively, the approach of the Landesärztekammer Baden-Württemberg is presented.

Aortic Diseases↗
PubMed1999

Behaviour of implantable coronary stents during magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) becomes more and more a routine diagnostic tool in clinical cardiology. In patients undergoing MRI, metallic implants may be harmful by motion or heating under certain circumstances. Many cardiac patients have implanted intracoronary stents. However, the safety of these metallic implants and especially their temperature behaviour during MRI has not been sufficiently tested. METHODS: This study investigated motion and temperature changes of 14 different stents for intracoronary application in two clinical scanners at field strengths of 1.0 and 1.5 T. At 1.5 T these studies were repeated after implantation of the stents into the coronary arteries of excised porcine hearts. Furthermore, the clinical status of 33 patients was assessed after a cardiac MR study and compared with a group of 33 patients matched for age, sex and risk factors for restenosis. RESULTS: No visible motion of the stents was observed. Furthermore, using a highly sensitive infrared camera any significant heating of the stents during MRI could be excluded. The rate of clinical events was not different in patients after MRI as compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that MRI is safe in patients with the currently available intracoronary stents.

Journal Article↗