A big fat wedding: association of adiponectin with coronary vascular lesions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Ori Ben-Yehuda.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The relation between measures of oxidation of lipid particles and cardiovascular disease has not been extensively investigated prospectively on a population basis. METHODS: A community cohort of 1192 men and 1427 women with measures of IgG antibodies to oxidized LDL were followed 8 years for the development of initial coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. RESULTS: Levels of IgG autoantibodies to a form of oxidized LDL were significantly associated with age in both sexes, positively with fibrinogen in men and negatively with HDL cholesterol in women. In sex-specific models that adjusted for age alone or those that adjusted for age, cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes mellitus, there was no relation between level of antibodies to oxidized LDL and the development of CHD or CVD. CONCLUSION: Autoantibodies to oxidized LDL were strongly related to age and were not related to incident CHD or CVD over 8 years of follow up.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a significant complication of venous thromboembolism and is caused by incomplete resolution of pulmonary emboli. The persistent chronic pulmonary hypertension leads to right-ventricle pressure overload. As a result, there is often significant functional and morphological alteration of both the right and the left ventricle. Transthoracic echocardiography, which allows for the estimation of pulmonary arterial pressures, not only plays an important role in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension but also provides insights in the pathophysiology of CTEPH. This article reviews the echocardiographic techniques and findings in CTEPH patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) on microvascular flow after coronary occlusion/reperfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (QMCE). BACKGROUND: Platelets may play a major role in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion, referred to as the "no-reflow phenomenon." Therefore, GPI might improve myocardial reperfusion, distinct from its effects on epicardial patency.T METHOD: hree-hour occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was followed by 3-h reperfusion in 16 open-chest dogs: 8 controls and 8 given a continuous infusion of the GPI tirofiban, starting 45 min before LAD reopening. Perfusion of the LAD bed was quantified by the rate of intensity rise (b) by QMCE; myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed by fluorescent microspheres. RESULTS: No differences in b or MBF were observed within the risk area between the control and GPI groups at baseline or occlusion. However, b and MBF were higher in GPI dogs than in controls during reperfusion, despite similar epicardial flow (p < 0.05 at 30, 60, and 90 min; p = NS at 180 min). Infarct area size was significantly reduced in GPI dogs compared with non-treated dogs (26.9 +/- 10.5% vs. 49.0 +/- 11.1% of at-risk area, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated by QMCE, GPI improves microvascular flow and reduces the infarct area after coronary occlusion/reperfusion, independent of epicardial flow. These data demonstrate the usefulness of QMCE in assessing microvascular flow, provide novel evidence for the role of platelets in the early phase of reperfusion injury, and show that GPI is of value in preserving microvascular perfusion after coronary reperfusion.
The Symmetry Bypass Connector (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota) is a nitinol, star-shaped device that was designed to facilitate placement of sutureless aorto-saphenous anastomoses during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Although the device is approved for clinical use in Europe and the U.S., its short- and long-term safety and efficacy are not established. We report on 5 of 121 patients undergoing CABG who presented with an acute coronary syndrome two to five months following placement of this device. In each patient, all saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) placed (n = 11) with the device were totally occluded (n = 6) or compromised by ostial stenoses (n = 5). Treatment consisted of repeat CABG in one patient and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in four patients with cutting balloon atherotomy and stenting. Following PCI, two of four patients presented again within two months with near-occlusive ostial restenosis in all stents placed. Intracoronary ultrasound showed severe neointimal hyperplasia, but only at the proximal interface of the device and stent. One patient was treated with brachytherapy in two SVGs but had a recurrence four months later and was treated with drug-eluting stents in both restenotic segments. Recalcitrant neointimal hyperplasia is postulated to be involved in the pathogenesis of anastomotic device stenosis, possibly similar to in-stent restenosis. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of this device. Pending such studies, consideration should be given in limiting its use to cases of unacceptably high risk of stroke during aortic cross-clamping. Dual antiplatelet agents, evaluation for ischemia, and close follow-up are warranted in patients that have already received the device.
During the past 2 decades, there has been a steady rise in the number of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) undergoing surgery and in the number of programs worldwide dedicated to the diagnosis and management of this patient population. This article discusses the natural history and clinical presentation of CTEPH, the evaluation of patients for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, and the outcomes following surgery, along with a brief review of the procedure as performed at the University of California, San Diego.
Once considered dangerous and potentially life threatening, cardiac catheterization of the patient with pulmonary hypertension can be performed safely and provides essential information in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension. This article summarizes the modern techniques used for right-heart catheterization, selective pulmonary angiography, and pulmonary angioscopy in the evaluation of the patient with pulmonary hypertension or suspected chronic thromboembolic disease.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the preferred treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but persistent pulmonary hypertension after PTE, as a result of either inaccessible distal thrombotic material or coexistent intrinsic small-vessel disease, remains a major determinant of poor outcome. Conventional preoperative evaluation is unreliable in identifying patients at risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension or predicting postoperative hemodynamic outcome. We postulated that pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure waveform analysis, a technique that has been used for partitioning pulmonary vascular resistance, might identify CTEPH patients with significant distal, small-vessel disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent preoperative right heart catheterization before PTE. Pulmonary artery occlusion waveform recordings were performed in triplicate. Postoperative hemodynamics after PTE were compared with preoperative partitioning of pulmonary vascular resistance derived from the occlusion data. Preoperative assessment of upstream resistance (Rup) correlated with both postoperative total pulmonary resistance index (R2=0.79, P<0.001) and postoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (R2=0.75, P<0.001). All 4 postoperative deaths occurred in patients with a preoperative Rup <60%. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure waveform analysis may identify CTEPH patients at risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension and poor outcome after PTE. Patients with CTEPH and Rup value <60% appear to be at highest risk.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: beta-Blockers have been shown to reduce both morbidity and mortality rates in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, because of potential side effects, their use is limited in patients who might benefit the most from such therapy. It was thought that the use of an ultra-short-acting intravenous beta-blocker might produce similar results with fewer complications in those patients with relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. METHODS: Accordingly, we evaluated the use of esmolol in patients with acute coronary syndromes and relative contraindication to beta-blocker therapy in a prospective randomized trial. One hundred eight patients at 21 sites received an infusion of intravenous esmolol or standard therapy on admission and were followed for 6 weeks from the day of admission. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite event consisting of any of the following that occurred during the index hospitalization: death, myocardial (re)infarction, recurrent ischemia, or arrhythmia as well as silent myocardial ischemia assessed by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Safety end points including hypotension, bradyarrhythmias, new or worsening congestive heart failure, and bronchospasm were also recorded. RESULTS: Event rates for primary end points were similar in the 2 groups: death (2% in the standard care group vs 4% in the group receiving esmolol), myocardial (re)infarction (4% standard vs 7% esmolol), ischemia (12% vs 13%), arrhythmias (4% vs 2%), and silent ischemia (13% vs 15%). There was a higher incidence of transient hypotension in the group receiving esmolol (2% vs 16%), but all such events were noted to resolve after discontinuation of the esmolol infusion. There were no additional differences in safety end points: bradycardia (2% for those receiving standard care vs 9% receiving esmolol), new congestive heart failure (10% vs 16%), bronchospasm (0% vs 7%), and heart block (2% vs 2%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker such as esmolol might offer an alternative to patients with contraindications to standard beta-blocker therapy. Although this trial had limited power to detect safety and efficacy differences between the 2 therapies, it was observed that safety end points, which occurred during esmolol administration, resolved readily when the infusions were decreased or discontinued. Additional testing is needed to substantiate these findings.